Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / June 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Chocolate DEBUNKED !!!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mark Thorson - 25 Apr 2008 22:16 GMT
Bad news for chocolate.  Raises heart rate,
otherwise nothing.    :-(

Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Apr;87(4):872-80.
A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized
trial of the effects of dark chocolate and cocoa
on variables associated with neuropsychological
functioning and cardiovascular health: clinical
findings from a sample of healthy, cognitively
intact older adults.
Crews WD Jr, Harrison DW, Wright JW.
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University, Blacksburg, VA 24506, USA.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been
increased interest in the potential health-
related benefits of antioxidant- and
phytochemical-rich dark chocolate and cocoa.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to
examine the short-term (6 wk) effects of dark
chocolate and cocoa on variables associated
with neuropsychological functioning and
cardiovascular health in healthy older adults.

DESIGN: A double-blind, placebo-controlled,
fixed-dose, parallel-group clinical trial was
used. Participants (n = 101) were randomly
assigned to receive a 37-g dark chocolate bar
and 8 ounces (237 mL) of an artificially
sweetened cocoa beverage or similar placebo
products each day for 6 wk.

RESULTS: No significant group (dark chocolate
and cocoa or placebo)-by-trial (baseline,
midpoint, and end-of-treatment assessments)
interactions were found for the
neuropsychological, hematological, or blood
pressure variables examined. In contrast, the
midpoint and end-of-treatment mean pulse rate
assessments in the dark chocolate and cocoa
group were significantly higher than those
at baseline and significantly higher than
the midpoint and end-of-treatment rates in
the control group. Results of a follow-up
questionnaire item on the treatment products
that participants believed they had consumed
during the trial showed that more than half
of the participants in both groups correctly
identified the products that they had
ingested during the experiment.

CONCLUSIONS: This investigation failed to
support the predicted beneficial effects
of short-term dark chocolate and cocoa
consumption on any of the neuropsychological
or cardiovascular health-related variables
included in this research. Consumption of
dark chocolate and cocoa was, however,
associated with significantly higher pulse
rates at 3- and 6-wk treatment assessments.
RuF - 26 Apr 2008 00:58 GMT
> Bad news for chocolate.  Raises heart rate,
> otherwise nothing.    :-(
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
> associated with significantly higher pulse
> rates at 3- and 6-wk treatment assessments.

SUPER news for me Mark. I have low blood pressure,
so I need a boost.

Now where did I put that bucket of 72% chocs?

Yum! Yum!
trigonometry1972@gmail.com | - 26 Apr 2008 04:24 GMT
> Bad news for chocolate.  Raises heart rate,
> otherwise nothing.    :-(
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
> associated with significantly higher pulse
> rates at 3- and 6-wk treatment assessments.
trigonometry1972@gmail.com | - 26 Apr 2008 04:50 GMT
On Apr 25, 8:24 pm, "trigonometry1...@gmail.com |"
<trigonometry1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Bad news for chocolate.  Raises heart rate,
> > otherwise nothing.    :-(
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
> > associated with significantly higher pulse
> > rates at 3- and 6-wk treatment assessments.

If only poor ate chocolate, it would either be taxed
like tobacco or it would banned and its users
put away for 20 years at least in the great
State of Texas. Chocolate is a soft drug.
Just say No to chocolate.

It speeds the pulse.
It has weak aphordisiac.
It gives a sense of well being.
It contains those dangerous Advanced Gylcation Endproducts.
It alkaloids speed the death of the bone building cells.
It contains white sugar and often milk.
It is even known to contain the deadly peanut at times.

It is a foodstuff only suitable to college aged Democrats and the
Dutch.
Obama and McCain distributed chocolates when they
were younger in order to influence young women.
Were these youthful indiscretions on there parts?
Or where they benefiting from exploited workers of
the third world. TV network news reporters want to know.
During the next election related debate, they will
ask this vital question.

Perhaps in the future Mark Thorson will ask
that chocolate, be made a prescription item.
Perhaps he will hope the research will prove it is suitable for
use in terminal cancer patients only.
And then only after a double blinded cross over study
following the patients unto the end life and provided no
deaths occur during the study should chocolate
products be permitted in the hands of the public by
the all knowing US-FDA..
Kevysmom - 26 Apr 2008 05:05 GMT
> Obama and McCain distributed chocolates when they
> were younger in order to influence young women.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> During the next election related debate, they will
> ask this vital question.

Laughing out loud! Thats was truly funny! BTW, Texas is not great,
Bush is from texas!

On Apr 25, 11:50 pm, "trigonometry1...@gmail.com |"
<trigonometry1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 25, 8:24 pm, "trigonometry1...@gmail.com |"
>
[quoted text clipped - 95 lines]
> products be permitted in the hands of the public by
> the all knowing US-FDA..
trigonometry1972@gmail.com | - 26 Apr 2008 14:24 GMT
> > Obama and McCain distributed chocolates when they
> > were younger in order to influence young women.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Laughing out loud! Thats was truly funny! BTW, Texas is not great,
> Bush is from texas!

I certainly committed enough typos in the riff.
My list of chocolate related effects wasn't a parody but
of course much of the content was parody and a
bit gentle mocking with a number of serious points
to be made. Including what I see as the "logic" of
of Mark's reasonings.

> On Apr 25, 11:50 pm, "trigonometry1...@gmail.com |"
>
[quoted text clipped - 98 lines]
> > products be permitted in the hands of the public by
> > the all knowing US-FDA..
Marshall Price - 04 May 2008 01:08 GMT
> It contains those dangerous Advanced Gylcation Endproducts.

  I'm afraid you're getting close to a plonking, Trig.  How could AGEs
get into chocolate?

Signature

Marshall Price of Miami
Known to Yahoo as d021317c

trigonometry1972@gmail.com | - 04 May 2008 02:49 GMT
> trigonometry1...@gmail.com | wrote:
> > It contains those dangerous Advanced Gylcation Endproducts.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Marshall Price of Miami
> Known to Yahoo as d021317c

Sorry, it is a roasted food. This heating pushes sugar into the act
of glycation with other food components and
products are known Advanced Glycation Endproducts,
if memory serves me.

I get lazy and use acronyms. I'll happily expand on a topic if a
question ask. Provided it doesn't involve too much work.
Marshall Price - 07 May 2008 17:49 GMT
>> trigonometry1...@gmail.com | wrote:
>>> It contains those dangerous Advanced Gylcation Endproducts.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I get lazy and use acronyms. I'll happily expand on a topic if a
> question ask. Provided it doesn't involve too much work.

  Sorry about the way I reacted.

  I think that's the Maillard reaction you're talking about, isn't it?

Signature

Marshall Price of Miami
Known to Yahoo as d021317c

bobbie sellers - 11 Jun 2008 20:16 GMT
>>> trigonometry1...@gmail.com | wrote:
>>>> It contains those dangerous Advanced Gylcation Endproducts.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>   I think that's the Maillard reaction you're talking about, isn't it?

   But who cares if chocolate is good or bad for one's long term
health as long as it is tasty.  Death is inevitable in this very temporary
life so relax and have a nice truffle or other chocolate treat.

   Have all the regulars gone off on a world chocolate tour or something
of like nature?

   On PBS yesterday there was a great show on chocolate and how the
local chocolatiers are helping the growers all over the world to improve
their crops by teaching them about making chocolate and giving them
equipment so that they can make chocolate and taste what they grow.

    later
    bliss -- C  O C O A  Powered... (at california dot com)

Signature

bobbie sellers - a retired nurse in San Francisco

"It is by will alone I set my mind in motion.
It is by the beans of cocoa that the thoughts acquire speed,
the thighs acquire girth, the girth become a warning.
It is by theobromine alone I set my mind in motion."
    --from Someone else's Dune spoof ripped to my taste.

Mark Thorson - 11 Jun 2008 20:37 GMT
> On PBS yesterday there was a great show on chocolate and how the
> local chocolatiers are helping the growers all over the world to improve
> their crops by teaching them about making chocolate and giving them
> equipment so that they can make chocolate and taste what they grow.

That was the show with Dave Guittard on it?
I think that may have been a local KQED-FM show,
not a national PRI show.
bobbie sellers - 12 Jun 2008 01:54 GMT
>  
>> On PBS yesterday there was a great show on chocolate and how the
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> not a national PRI show.
>  
   It may have been local, certes the Guittard family is quite
local.  I had to leave on other business before the show was over.

               later
               bliss -- C O C O A Powered... (at california dot com)

Signature

bobbie sellers - a retired nurse in San Francisco

"It is by will alone I set my mind in motion.
It is by the beans of cocoa that the thoughts acquire speed,
the thighs acquire girth, the girth become a warning.
It is by theobromine alone I set my mind in motion."
    --from Someone else's Dune spoof ripped to my taste.

Marshall Price - 12 Jun 2008 05:00 GMT
>>>> trigonometry1...@gmail.com | wrote:
>>>>> It contains those dangerous Advanced Gylcation Endproducts.
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>     later
>     bliss -- C  O C O A  Powered... (at california dot com)

  I'm posting in sci.med.nutrition.  We discuss nutrition here, and
we're all very interested in what's "good or bad for one's long term
health."  There's more to life than "treats," IMHO.

Signature

Marshall Price of Miami
Known to Yahoo as d021317c

bobbie sellers - 12 Jun 2008 15:54 GMT
>>>>> trigonometry1...@gmail.com | wrote:
>>>>>> It contains those dangerous Advanced Gylcation Endproducts.
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> we're all very interested in what's "good or bad for one's long term
> health."  There's more to life than "treats," IMHO.

   Certainly there is more to life than treats but broccoli is very
nice when prepared
properly.  Besides the treats and the food that is simply good for you
or necessary there
are lots of pain and eventually death.  And when you get old enough you
realize that
none of these are bad.
   Lots of people in the world are living on a diet so bad it is
no wonder they cannot think straight about the issues affecting their
lives and
strike out at others who are so well off that they can think about the
illusory issue
of long term health.
    I say illusory because all you can do if you are lucky with a
good genetic heritage and careful in your activities is stay healthy for
one human
life time.  There is no evidence that this will help the real problems
people face
every day.  It might do better to think about spreading the food to the
people
who are not getting enough nutrition and about production of food that
is sustainable in terms of the life of the earth.

   Thank whatever for the cocao bean and chocolate.

     later
    bliss - cocao powered

Signature

bobbie sellers - a retired nurse in San Francisco

   Ningen banji          Human beings do
   Samazama no           Every single kind
   Baka a suru           Of stupid thing
       --- 117th edition of Haifu Yanagidaru published in 1832

Kevysmom - 26 Apr 2008 04:29 GMT
Its good for you, thens its NOT good for you!  Heck, a little bit wont
do anyone harm!

> Bad news for chocolate.  Raises heart rate,
> otherwise nothing.    :-(
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
> associated with significantly higher pulse
> rates at 3- and 6-wk treatment assessments.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.