Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / May 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Obama Climbs On The Vaccine Bandwagon

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ilena Rose - 22 Apr 2008 18:16 GMT
Obama Climbs On The Vaccine
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-kirby/obama-climbs-on-the-vacci_b_97969.html
Posted April 22, 2008 | 11:29 AM (EST)
Breaking Home News

Note from Ilena Rosenthal: First McCain ... now Obama ... thank you to
the brave vaccination awareness advocates who have refused to be
silenced ... www.ilenarose.blogspot.com

Barring some big Clinton blowout in Pennsylvania today, the next
President of the United States will unequivocally support research
into the growing evidence of some link between vaccines and autism.

Republican John McCain has already expressed his belief that vaccines
and the mercury containing preservative thimerosal could be implicated
in what he has rightly termed an "autism epidemic."

Yesterday, at a rally in Pennsylvania, Barack Obama had this rather
surprising thing to say:

   "We've seen just a skyrocketing autism rate. Some people are
suspicious that it's connected to the vaccines. This person included.
The science right now is inconclusive, but we have to research it."

So there you have it, our next President will share the views of such
radical fringe crazies as, well, me, Democrat Robert Kennedy, Jr.,
Republican Joe Scarborough, former NIH and Red Cross chief Bernadine
Healy, and several researchers at Harvard, Johns Hopkins, the
Universities of California and Washington and elsewhere.

All of us agree: Current evidence suggests that vaccines could be a
contributing factor in some cases of autism, and more research is
immediately required.

And yes, now the comments to this piece will come flying in, repeating
the tired mantra that "this case is closed," that vaccines and
thimerosal have been "completely vindicated," and that people like me
are just trying to scare the public and drive them away from vaccines,
leaving their children vulnerable and sick.

Of course, none of the above is true. So stay tuned.

To begin with, government researchers are currently looking into a
number of factors that may trigger autism, including vaccines, their
ingredients and the crowded vaccine schedule itself.

Secondly, on April 11th, I attended a top-level meeting in Washington
where vaccine safety officials discussed all of the above issues, and
more. Included on the Federal Draft Research Agenda for vaccine safety
are now questions such as:

   Can vaccines cause neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism?

   Can vaccines in children with mitochondrial dysfunction cause
significant "neurological deterioration?"

   Can the combination live-virus measles, mumps and rubella vaccine
cause seizures and long term damage in children?

   Can vaccines cause autoimmune disease?

   Can thimerosal cause tics or Tourette syndrome?

   Can attenuated viruses in vaccines cause asthma in children?

So, no matter who is President next year, top government researchers
will be examining the role of vaccines in autism and other childhood
illnesses. Thus, the declarations of both McCain and, now, Obama, make
good scientific sense.

But there is more.

Dozens of autism cases (and perhaps more) currently filed in so-called
Vaccine Court will almost certainly be compensated this year. Why?
Because a little girl named Hannah Poling with a supposedly rare
mitochondrial condition was recently compensated for her own vaccine
injuries, including autism and epilepsy.

But I have personally identified at least a dozen (and there are
reports of many more) children with cases in the court who meet the
exact same medical criteria as Hannah, and whose cases will almost
surely be compensated as well -- each time with the attendant media
fanfare.

My prediction is that, by Election Day, few Americans will still
believe there is absolutely no evidence to link vaccines to at least
some cases of regressive autism.

So the remarks by McCain and Obama not only reflect good science, they
reflect good politics as well.
PeterB - 23 Apr 2008 00:38 GMT
Vaccine is certainly implicated in autism even if it's not likely to
be the sole trigger.  What's tragic is that vaccine is so completely
unncessary and without scientific basis.
drceephd@insightbb.com - 23 Apr 2008 00:51 GMT
> Vaccine is certainly implicated in autism even if it's not likely to
> be the sole trigger.  What's tragic is that vaccine is so completely
> unncessary and without scientific basis.

While I agree with the uselessness and unscientific basis for vaccines
and the practice of ritual immunization, provide us with another
causative agent or agents that have the capacity to do the harm to a
developing infant that mercury, aluminum, and the other toxoids in
vaccines have been shown to be able to do.

I suggest that the injected ethylmercury from thimerosal has the
capacity to do much more harm than the methylmercury from ingested
fish, particularly since the level of mercury intoxication is nearly
1000 times greater in concentration.

I further suggest that aluminum can and does do similar harm.  The
synergism of aluminum and mercury is again at least 100 times more
toxic that either alone.

The toxoids in the DPT shot are the same toxoids used to study
encephalopathy in lab animals.  The high pitched screaming of the kids
is due to the huge migrane headache caused by the brain swelling from
the toxoids.

The MMR toxoids have been shown to be involved in the terrible gut
problems of the autistic.

Would a 2x4 upside your head convince you that being hit with a piece
of wood swung with force hurts or would you need some more convincing?

DrCee
You cannot secure nor restore health with pus or poisons.
Jeff - 23 Apr 2008 01:09 GMT
> Vaccine is certainly implicated in autism even if it's not likely to
> be the sole trigger.  What's tragic is that vaccine is so completely
> unncessary and without scientific basis.

Really? Ever notice all those kids coming down with polio? Staying home
from school from measles? Having birth defects from rubella? Not anymore.

Vaccines completely eliminated polio in the Western hemisphrere, nearly
completely stopped measles (with all cases from sources outside the US),
decreased invasive Hib disease, nearly eliminated rubella-related birth
defects, decrease the incidence and severity of chicken pox, decreased
the rates of diptheria, tetanus and purtussis.

If you want to decrease the chances of your kid from getting sick or
dying, then vaccines are necessary.

Jeff
Myrl - 23 Apr 2008 02:54 GMT
> > Vaccine is certainly implicated in autism even if it's not likely to
> > be the sole trigger.  What's tragic is that vaccine is so completely
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Jeff

Most intelligent folks have figured out the enormous benefit seen from
vaccines, have far outweighed any small risk vaccinations present.

People who would promote an anti vaccination agenda in this day and
age, are either too young to remember the world with Polio, Rubella,
Whooping Cough, Mumps, etc.; OR they are too old and senile to
remember it!
news - 23 Apr 2008 14:18 GMT
On Apr 22, 5:09 pm, Jeff <kidsdoc2...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> PeterB wrote:
> > Vaccine is certainly implicated in autism even if it's not likely to
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Jeff

Most intelligent folks have figured out the enormous benefit seen from
vaccines, have far outweighed any small risk vaccinations present.

People who would promote an anti vaccination agenda in this day and
age, are either too young to remember the world with Polio, Rubella,
Whooping Cough, Mumps, etc.; OR they are too old and senile to
remember it!
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
 So Myrl, how's that bridge buying thing working out for you?
Kevysmom - 23 Apr 2008 21:57 GMT
vaccines, have far outweighed any small risk vaccinations present.

Tell that to a mother who watched her child go into a seizure and
died.

> On Apr 22, 5:09 pm, Jeff <kidsdoc2...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Jeff - 23 Apr 2008 23:32 GMT
> vaccines, have far outweighed any small risk vaccinations present.
>
> Tell that to a mother who watched her child go into a seizure and
> died.

How about you telling a mother of a child who died from Hib meningitis
that the Hib vaccine is dangerous?

The fact is that there is risk in everything we do. Vaccines and
refusing to get vaccines is no different.

The risk from vaccines is far less than the risk of the diseases they
prevent.

Unfortunately, your emotional argument will convince some parents not to
vaccinate their kids. Sadly, those kids are more likely to get very
serious illnesses.

>> On Apr 22, 5:09 pm, Jeff <kidsdoc2...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
Kevysmom - 24 Apr 2008 00:11 GMT
Pure Pharma Propaganda Bullsh*t!

We were also told the Iraq had WMD and we are in imminent danger.  By
the same people I might add.

> > vaccines, have far outweighed any small risk vaccinations present.
>
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Jeff - 24 Apr 2008 00:16 GMT
> Pure Pharma Propaganda Bullsh*t!

Actually, that is my opinion. What the pharma companies say is not my
concern.

> We were also told the Iraq had WMD and we are in imminent danger.  By
> the same people I might add.

Really? And what people are these?

>>> vaccines, have far outweighed any small risk vaccinations present.
>>> Tell that to a mother who watched her child go into a seizure and
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>> - Show quoted text -
Kevysmom - 24 Apr 2008 00:35 GMT
> > We were also told the Iraq had WMD and we are in imminent danger.  By
> > the same people I might add.
>
> Really? And what people are these?

Well, lets see we are in Iraq for oil, so who is behind oil? Corporate
America. How do they get that oil, They use our government.

> > Pure Pharma Propaganda Bullsh*t!
>
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Jeff - 24 Apr 2008 00:54 GMT
>>> We were also told the Iraq had WMD and we are in imminent danger.  By
>>> the same people I might add.
>> Really? And what people are these?
>
> Well, lets see we are in Iraq for oil, so who is behind oil? Corporate
> America. How do they get that oil, They use our government.

Corporate America!

ROTFL!

>>> Pure Pharma Propaganda Bullsh*t!
>> Actually, that is my opinion. What the pharma companies say is not my
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>> - Show quoted text -
Kevysmom - 24 Apr 2008 01:00 GMT
> >>> We were also told the Iraq had WMD and we are in imminent danger.  By
> >>> the same people I might add.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> ROTFL!

And what do you find so humorous, Jeff?

You dont think Corporate America had anything to do with Iraq?

You do realize its Corporate America that decides what vaccines to
inject into our babies.

Corporate America= GREED!

> >>> We were also told the Iraq had WMD and we are in imminent danger.  By
> >>> the same people I might add.
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Jeff - 24 Apr 2008 01:05 GMT
>>>>> We were also told the Iraq had WMD and we are in imminent danger.  By
>>>>> the same people I might add.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> And what do you find so humorous, Jeff?

Your paranoia about corporate America. And your poor ability to think.

> You dont think Corporate America had anything to do with Iraq?
>
[quoted text clipped - 56 lines]
>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>> - Show quoted text -
Kevysmom - 24 Apr 2008 01:21 GMT
> > And what do you find so humorous, Jeff?
>
> Your paranoia about corporate America. And your poor ability to think.

Fine, Now its my turn......ROTFL @ Jeffy! :o)

> >>>>> We were also told the Iraq had WMD and we are in imminent danger.  By
> >>>>> the same people I might add.
[quoted text clipped - 71 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Jan Drew - 25 Apr 2008 03:29 GMT
>>>>>> We were also told the Iraq had WMD and we are in imminent danger.  By
>>>>>> the same people I might add.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Your paranoia about corporate America. And your poor ability to think.

Nice personal attack.

>> You dont think Corporate America had anything to do with Iraq?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 72 lines]
>>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>> - Show quoted text -
Myrl - 24 Apr 2008 00:51 GMT
> > Pure Pharma Propaganda Bullsh*t!
>
[quoted text clipped - 48 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Yep, Iraqi expatriot, Chalabi, who sold the whole WMD scheme to the
current administration, has controlling interest in the companies that
make vaccines. . .LOL!

However, I'll give Kevysmom this. . .It is true that some in this
administration, had a considerable amount of investment in the Anthrax
vaccine.  I think Rumsfeld especially did.

Remember the Anthrax scare we had immediately following 9-11???  It
turns out it was likely a domestic terrorist threat/attacks.  And the
strain of Anthrax used in those attacks, apparently came from a
military base right here in the USA.  What ever happened to that
"person of interest" (Stephen Hatfill) anyway???
Kevysmom - 24 Apr 2008 01:24 GMT
> However, I'll give Kevysmom this. . .It is true that some in this
> administration, had a considerable amount of investment in the Anthrax
> vaccine.  I think Rumsfeld especially did.

See, I didnt know Rummy had his greedy hands in the Anthrax vaccine!

> Remember the Anthrax scare we had immediately following 9-11???  It
> turns out it was likely a domestic terrorist threat/attacks.  And the
> strain of Anthrax used in those attacks, apparently came from a
> military base right here in the USA.  What ever happened to that
> "person of interest" (Stephen Hatfill) anyway???-

I sure hope everyone is smart enough to be voting for Obama.

> > > Pure Pharma Propaganda Bullsh*t!
>
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Myrl - 24 Apr 2008 01:52 GMT
> > However, I'll give Kevysmom this. . .It is true that some in this
> > administration, had a considerable amount of investment in the Anthrax
[quoted text clipped - 80 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

I think most anyone would be better running the White House than what
we have!  At one point I had more hope for McCain, but he doesn't seem
to have a plan for the ailing economy.  His stance is leave it alone!
I think 8 years of the existing policies would all but ruin us. . .and
that's what I see McCain as perpetuating.

Like Obama, I was totally against going into Iraq from the very
beginning.  The archives of this newsgroup will prove that.  But, I
disagree with him now.  We have totally broke it over there, and we
should not just get up and leave.  I think we have a moral obligation
to stabilize the situation that we created by unilaterally impossing
pre-emptive action on a country, which had absolutely nothing to do
with 9-11.  The terrorists flying the planes that day were from Saudi
Arabia and Pakistan - Not Iraq, or Iran!

I like what Hillary says about Health care, I also agree, that there
should be benchmarks for leaving Iraq - and those benchmarks should
not be publicized!
Kevysmom - 24 Apr 2008 15:11 GMT
Myrl,

I think this is your best post, Ever!

Obama doesnt plan on just leaving Iraqis to deal with the situation
that we caused. He is planning on leaving troops to help keep peace in
the region.

Hillary has always been for the Iraqi war, she changed her stance on
the war when she decided to run for the nomination. I also worry about
her stance regarding Iran.

I actually like McCain's wife.  I think McCain is a real war hero and
has some good qualities in him, that I admire. But he would be another
puppet for the GOP. And thats the last thing our country needs.

> > > However, I'll give Kevysmom this. . .It is true that some in this
> > > administration, had a considerable amount of investment in the Anthrax
[quoted text clipped - 101 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Myrl - 24 Apr 2008 15:39 GMT
> Myrl,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> has some good qualities in him, that I admire. But he would be another
> puppet for the GOP. And thats the last thing our country needs.

There is an interesting documentary on the ramp up to the Iraq War.
It goes into depth about the politics and the business interests which
caused this administration to display so much exhuberance and glee at
the possibility of invading Iraq. And to find such a welcome friend in
Iraqi ex-patriout, Chalabi, who was whispering sweet nothings into
administration ears.

One of the men involved in writing the intelligence report ultimately
presented to Congress to extract their approval for the invasion was
continually met with interference from the Administration (mainly in
Cheney's realm), to black out or rewrite entire segments of the report
to provide a more agressive reasoning for our going to war.  Afterall,
they were writing a marketing piece to sell this war to congress,
rather than providing real facts!

Once completed, it was enormous with many hundreds of pages.  The
report was put on a conference room table in a Congressional meeting
room, shortly before Congress was to break for a long Thanksgiving
holiday.

So the question remains - How many Congressional members actually sat
at that table and read that report with any considered thought, or
depth???

In order for Obama to "keep the peace" in Iraq, we will first need to
first stabilize the country.  Stabilizing the country will not allow
Obama to do what he has said - which is to immediately bring the
military home!  What we may wish that he be able to do, morally isn't
an option!  And that is not his fault!

I watch many documentaries.  These were some of the more interesting
ones regarding the Iraq War.  I'm certain there were others, but their
titles escape me right now.

If you belong to Netflix (like I do), you can obtain them that way.
But, I suspect Blockbuster may have some of them.  Several were
produced by the History Channel, PBS, etc.

(1) WMD: Weapons of Mass Deception
(2) Uncovered: The War on Iraq
(3) The Whole Truth About the Iraq War
(4) The Iraq War: The War Profitteers
Kevysmom - 26 Apr 2008 04:18 GMT
Hi Mryl,

Another GREAT post of yours, thanks!

> (1) WMD: Weapons of Mass Deception
> (2) Uncovered: The War on Iraq
> (3) The Whole Truth About the Iraq War
> (4) The Iraq War: The War Profitteers

Im not sure if I watched those...But on PBS they have a documentary
still up on its web sire(No wonder the Bush Administration wants to
cut funds!)

These documentaries should be seen by everyone.. I hope that when we
get a new president they will investigate all of this, But Im sure
every bit of evidence will be shredded, and all new computers in place
before Bush leaves office.

In "The Dark Side," FRONTLINE tells the story of the vice president's
role as the chief architect of the war on terror, and his battle with
Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet for control of the "dark
side." Drawing on more than 40 interviews and thousands of documents,
the film provides a step-by-step examination of what happened inside
the councils of war.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/darkside/view/

> > Myrl,
>
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> (3) The Whole Truth About the Iraq War
> (4) The Iraq War: The War Profitteers
Myrl - 26 Apr 2008 04:46 GMT
> Hi Mryl,
>
[quoted text clipped - 83 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Yes, I saw that one too.  Tenet was skeptical, but was heavily
presured by the Vice President's Office, and staff.  At the end of the
day, Tenet's "slam dunk" comment, helped cock the trigger on Iraq.
Kevysmom - 26 Apr 2008 04:49 GMT
I just opened a link that a person on another group I belong to
posted.

This is NOT good. This makes me so upset. Havent we done enough damage
in the ME?

Joint Chiefs Chairman Says U.S. Preparing Military Options Against
Iran

25/04/08 "Washington Post" -- - The nation's top military officer said
today that the Pentagon is planning for "potential military courses of
action" against Iran, criticizing what he called the Tehran
government's "increasingly lethal and malign influence" in Iraq.

Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said a
conflict with Iran would be "extremely stressing" but not impossible
for U.S. forces, pointing specifically to reserve capabilities in the
Navy and Air Force.

> > Hi Mryl,
>
[quoted text clipped - 87 lines]
> presured by the Vice President's Office, and staff.  At the end of the
> day, Tenet's "slam dunk" comment, helped cock the trigger on Iraq.
Mark Probert - 26 Apr 2008 15:22 GMT
> I just opened a link that a person on another group I belong to
> posted.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> for U.S. forces, pointing specifically to reserve capabilities in the
> Navy and Air Force.

Dingbat, listen, military preparedness is for those people who can
think. You are obviously not one of them. However, being the ever
helpful person I am, I wil lpoint out that the military prepares
multiple scenarios all the time, and this is merely routine. It is a
real bitch if you have to wait for the last minute.
Jeff - 26 Apr 2008 16:19 GMT
>> I just opened a link that a person on another group I belong to
>> posted.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Dingbat, listen, military preparedness is for those people who can
> think.

Mark, while I disagree with Kevy's mom about vaccines, and I believe she
is acting with emotions and not logic or facts when it comes to
vaccines, your dismissal of her comments on another matter is also
without basis. At least she was able to quote someone who should know
what he is talking about.

And even if you were correct, that is not reason to attack Kevy's mom.

Jeff

> You are obviously not one of them. However, being the ever
> helpful person I am, I wil lpoint out that the military prepares
> multiple scenarios all the time, and this is merely routine. It is a
> real bitch if you have to wait for the last minute.
Mark Probert - 26 Apr 2008 16:31 GMT
> >> I just opened a link that a person on another group I belong to
> >> posted.
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> And even if you were correct, that is not reason to attack Kevy's mom.

I am sorry---not. She gratuitously attacks me, and I give her back
what she dishes out.

When she stops, I stop. Not before.

> Jeff
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Jeff - 26 Apr 2008 16:44 GMT
<...>

>> And even if you were correct, that is not reason to attack Kevy's mom.
>
> I am sorry---not. She gratuitously attacks me, and I give her back
> what she dishes out.
>
> When she stops, I stop. Not before.

The Golden Rule: Treat others as you want to be treated.

Lt. Gen. Kuribayashi: Do what it right because it is right.

Jeff
D. C. Sessions - 26 Apr 2008 17:00 GMT
>>> And even if you were correct, that is not reason to attack Kevy's mom.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> The Golden Rule: Treat others as you want to be treated.

Mark is Jewish, and Hillel's formulation is a better fit
anyway:

"What is hateful to you, do not do to others.  That is
the entire Torah, everything else is commentary.  Go,
and learn."

| sh.t happens.  Sometimes it happens to you. |
+--- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---+
Kevysmom - 26 Apr 2008 17:40 GMT
> "What is hateful to you, do not do to others.

Hello! Isnt that the same thing as "The Golden Rule"?

> >>> And even if you were correct, that is not reason to attack Kevy's mom.
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> | sh.t happens.  Sometimes it happens to you. |
> +--- D. C. Sessions <d...@lumbercartel.com> ---+
D. C. Sessions - 26 Apr 2008 18:27 GMT
>> "What is hateful to you, do not do to others.
>
> Hello! Isnt that the same thing as "The Golden Rule"?

No.  One is positive, the other negative.

The difference comes up when you consider the things that
you *would* like done to you despite the possibility that
others wouldn't.  In present context, "colon cleansing."

>> >>> And even if you were correct, that is not reason to attack Kevy's mom.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>> | sh.t happens.  Sometimes it happens to you. |
>> +--- D. C. Sessions <d...@lumbercartel.com> ---+

| sh.t happens.  Sometimes it happens to you. |
+--- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---+
news - 27 Apr 2008 03:48 GMT
The clean up crew was here.
Mark Probert - 26 Apr 2008 17:12 GMT
> <...>
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Lt. Gen. Kuribayashi: Do what it right because it is right.

I tried that. It resulted in slanderous webapges, and a dimwit delving
into my twoenty year old personal history.

I do not walk into a minefield twice.
Kevysmom - 26 Apr 2008 16:46 GMT
When did *I* attack you?

> > >> I just opened a link that a person on another group I belong to
> > >> posted.
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Mark Probert - 26 Apr 2008 17:13 GMT
> When did *I* attack you?

The hand in the cookie jar routine is old.

You have attacked me, and negatively referred to me.

"Marky" is condescending. You lie with the war mongers and junk yard
dog.

'nuf said.
Kevysmom - 26 Apr 2008 17:38 GMT
> "Marky" is condescending. You lie with the war mongers and junk yard
> dog.

"Marky" wasn't meant to be taken as offensive, sorry.

And I do not lie with war mongers, just the opposite!

> > When did *I* attack you?
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> 'nuf said.
news - 27 Apr 2008 03:38 GMT
On Apr 26, 11:19 am, Jeff <kidsdoc2...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Mark Probert wrote:
> > On Apr 25, 11:49 pm, Kevysmom <bluebun...@gmail.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> And even if you were correct, that is not reason to attack Kevy's mom.

I am sorry---not. She gratuitously attacks me, and I give her back
what she dishes out.

When she stops, I stop. Not before.

So, tell us, when will you advance beyond 15 years old?
Mark Probert - 27 Apr 2008 21:03 GMT
> On Apr 26, 11:19 am, Jeff <kidsdoc2...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> So, tell us, when will you advance beyond 15 years old?

I know counting is hard for you. Live with your limitations.
news - 28 Apr 2008 03:09 GMT
>> On Apr 26, 11:19 am, Jeff <kidsdoc2...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> I know counting is hard for you. Live with your limitations.
> Also, tell us, did you mommy make you an a.s or was it you daddy?
Mark Probert - 26 Apr 2008 16:32 GMT
> >> I just opened a link that a person on another group I belong to
> >> posted.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> vaccines, your dismissal of her comments on another matter is also
> without basis.

Sure it is. I have a basis. Called reality. She has no clue as to what
she is whining about.

At least she was able to quote someone who should know
> what he is talking about.
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
news - 27 Apr 2008 03:40 GMT
On Apr 26, 11:19 am, Jeff <kidsdoc2...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Mark Probert wrote:
> > On Apr 25, 11:49 pm, Kevysmom <bluebun...@gmail.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> vaccines, your dismissal of her comments on another matter is also
> without basis.

Sure it is. I have a basis. Called reality. She has no clue as to what
she is whining about.

At least she was able to quote someone who should know
> what he is talking about.

And you do? Bwahahahaha, oh crap! you caused me to spill my coffee.
Hehehehehehe, Damn, you are one funny dude.
Kevysmom - 26 Apr 2008 16:46 GMT
Thanks, Jeff.

> >> I just opened a link that a person on another group I belong to
> >> posted.
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Myrl - 24 Apr 2008 00:41 GMT
> Pure Pharma Propaganda Bullsh*t!
>
> We were also told the Iraq had WMD and we are in imminent danger.  By
> the same people I might add.

No Dear - It wasn't the "same" people who told us there were WMDs in
Iraq, and presenting scientific proof that vaccines work!  I know you
may wish to see conspiracies everywhere!

As an aside, on Monday in Phoenix, UFO(s) were sited.  Pictures were
taken and they hit the media.  Then the next day, a guy comes forward
and states that he strung a bunch of balloons together, with flares
attached to them, which provided the "UFO" effect.

However, there are those that now say it's the "official" explanation
- and extrateresterials are out there!

The people seeing that report will fall into 3 categories:  (1) People
who will believe the guy's story. (2) People who will believe his
story is an official coverup story. (3) But, the third group of
people, will say maybe it is, maybe it's not - and either continue
exploring for the truth, or go on to other things in their lives.
Kevysmom - 24 Apr 2008 01:29 GMT
> No Dear - It wasn't the "same" people who told us there were WMDs in
> Iraq, and presenting scientific proof that vaccines work!  I know you
> may wish to see conspiracies everywhere!

Corporate America is just that Corporate America. It doesnt matter if
its Oil or Pharma, they are all the same.  The "Proof" that vaccines
work is bought and paid for by Pharma.

> > Pure Pharma Propaganda Bullsh*t!
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> people, will say maybe it is, maybe it's not - and either continue
> exploring for the truth, or go on to other things in their lives.
D. C. Sessions - 24 Apr 2008 04:46 GMT
> Tell that to a mother who watched her child go into a seizure and
> died.

Seizures from haemophilus influenzae are terrifying, and
indeed the neurological damage is crippling even when
the patient survives.  The same, of course, is true of
meningococcal disease.  Fortunately, neither is remotely
as common today as they were 15 years ago.

| sh.t happens.  Sometimes it happens to you. |
+--- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---+
Kevysmom - 23 Apr 2008 05:15 GMT
>Really? Ever notice all those kids coming down with polio? Staying home
from school from measles? Having birth defects from rubella? Not
anymore.

No, we just traded those diseases for cancer, asthma, autism,
diabetes, epilepsy, etc...ALL of
these diseases are now epidemic in our country.

1 out of 6 children have some form of developmental disorder. How did
this happen?

> > Vaccine is certainly implicated in autism even if it's not likely to
> > be the sole trigger.  What's tragic is that vaccine is so completely
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Jeff
Myrl - 23 Apr 2008 05:54 GMT
> No, we just traded those diseases for cancer, asthma, autism,
> diabetes, epilepsy, etc...ALL of
> these diseases are now epidemic in our country.
>
> 1 out of 6 children have some form of developmental disorder. How did
> this happen?

Have you considered, fast food restauraunts, additives in food,
chemicals in the environment, the drug usage of the parents, etc.?

I can understand you may wish the vaccine industry is to blame,
because you can more readily target their deep pockets for litigation
dollars.

But the fact remains that autism continues to increase at alarming
rates, inspite of the fact that thimerosol has been removed from
childhood vaccines since 2001, with the exception of the flu vaccine.
Most children don't get the flu shot.

Also keep this in mind.  About a week ago, settlement for all those
Ford Explorer roll-overs came to an end.  Guess the outcome - $25
MILLION dollars went to the attorneys.  But, the Explorer owners get
only a $500. coupon to use when buying a new Ford car - with the
caveat that they redeem the coupon within 30 days!

Folks need to rethink the logic of spending years in litigation that
only makes attorneys rich!
Jeff - 23 Apr 2008 12:14 GMT
>> Really? Ever notice all those kids coming down with polio? Staying home
> from school from measles? Having birth defects from rubella? Not
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> diabetes, epilepsy, etc...ALL of
> these diseases are now epidemic in our country.

Yet vaccines have nothing to do with any of the diseases you mention. If
I am incorrect, please cite your scientific evidence.

> 1 out of 6 children have some form of developmental disorder. How did
> this happen?

You tell me. And if you want to implicate vaccines, please provide the
scientific evidence.

Coincidence is not causation.

Jeff

>>> Vaccine is certainly implicated in autism even if it's not likely to
>>> be the sole trigger.  What's tragic is that vaccine is so completely
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>>
>> Jeff
Kevysmom - 23 Apr 2008 22:07 GMT
> > 1 out of 6 children have some form of developmental disorder. How did
> > this happen?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Coincidence is not causation.

Why dont YOU prove it isnt. How many vaccines are we injecting into
babies now from the time they are one day old?

22 vaccines is it? How many vaccines did you get when you was an
infant? Dr Jeff, you do know that a baby doesnt have a full blood
brain barrier until 6 months old, right?

How many babies will suffer and die from vaccines? How many more will
cry and have heart ache knowing their baby was injected with these
toxins that have taken their child's life. Have you ever seen a baby
suffer from life threatening seizures, Dr Jeff?  Do you know any
parents that have lost a child due to these seizures? You do realize
that vaccines cause seizures in babies. You do realize that the number
one cause for lawsuits against the vaccine courts is because of
seizures and death. I know these parents. I know the stories on a
personal note, Not just from reading it.

Donna

> >> Really? Ever notice all those kids coming down with polio? Staying home
> > from school from measles? Having birth defects from rubella? Not
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
PeterB - 23 Apr 2008 21:31 GMT
> > Vaccine is certainly implicated in autism even if it's not
> > likely to be the sole trigger.  What's tragic is that vaccine is
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> home from school from measles? Having birth defects from rubella?
> Not anymore.

Timeline data for all of these proves conclusively that vaccine had
nothing to do with them.  Look it up.  When a child contracts a case
of measles these days, it's almost certain that it won't be reported
due to vaccine bias based on a child's vaccine status, but the best
vaccine does is to limit or reduce the severity of a viral infection
(and sometimes it produces symptoms not unlike the disease itself.)
Since parents nowadays don't suspect a communicable disease, a child
is rarely presented to a doctor for evaluation.   He or she stays out
of school for a day or two with a "flu bug."  Even if the child is
presented for evaluation, a doctor rarely orders blood work.  Again,
that is based on vaccine bias.  You probably don't know that measles
mortality had already declined by 95% before the vaccine was even
introduced, and for that to happen, severe morbidity had to be
declining, as well.

> Vaccines completely eliminated polio in the Western hemisphrere,
> nearly completely stopped measles (with all cases from sources
> outside the US), decreased invasive Hib disease, nearly eliminated
> rubella-related birth defects, decrease the incidence and severity
> of chicken pox, decreased the rates of diptheria, tetanus and
> purtussis.

One of my cousins died at age 3 within an hour of receiving her
pertussis vaccine.  This was before I was born and people rarely
sought legal remedy against medical providers in those days. Both her
mother and my mother (who had not yet had children of her own)were
devastated by this loss.  It's true that such diseases today are not
the problem they once were, but vaccine was far too late in the game
to explain those declines.  Nowadays, we chalk most of our "mystery"
bugs up to that "weird flu" going around, but you don't really know.

> If you want to decrease the chances of your kid from getting sick
> or dying, then vaccines are necessary.

Care to back that up with risk-adjusted scientific evidence from a
published source?
Jeff - 23 Apr 2008 23:28 GMT
>>> Vaccine is certainly implicated in autism even if it's not
>>> likely to be the sole trigger.  What's tragic is that vaccine is
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Timeline data for all of these proves conclusively that vaccine had
> nothing to do with them.   Look it up.

Really? Until the measles vaccine came out, most children got measles.
Now, in the US and other countries where the vast majority of kids do,
almost no kids get measles. Polio was wiped out of the western
hemisphere by vaccines.

Get a clue, man.

> When a child contracts a case
> of measles these days, it's almost certain that it won't be reported
> due to vaccine bias based on a child's vaccine status, but the best
> vaccine does is to limit or reduce the severity of a viral infection
> (and sometimes it produces symptoms not unlike the disease itself.)

Bull. Already this year, cases of measles have been reported in
California and the New York City Area. These cases were from people
outside the country.

Measles is reported.

> Since parents nowadays don't suspect a communicable disease, a child
> is rarely presented to a doctor for evaluation.   He or she stays out
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> introduced, and for that to happen, severe morbidity had to be
> declining, as well.

Will you please provide evidence to back your claims?

You seem to be totally ignorant.

>> Vaccines completely eliminated polio in the Western hemisphrere,
>> nearly completely stopped measles (with all cases from sources
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> to explain those declines.  Nowadays, we chalk most of our "mystery"
> bugs up to that "weird flu" going around, but you don't really know.

Get a clue man. The vaccines wiped out the diseases.

>> If you want to decrease the chances of your kid from getting sick
>> or dying, then vaccines are necessary.
>
> Care to back that up with risk-adjusted scientific evidence from a
> published source?

I suggest you look at the evidence at www.cdc.gov.
PeterB - 24 Apr 2008 01:21 GMT
> >>> Vaccine is certainly implicated in autism even if it's not
> >>> likely to be the sole trigger.  What's tragic is that vaccine
> >>> is so completely unncessary and without scientific basis.

> >> Really? Ever notice all those kids coming down with polio?
> >> Staying home from school from measles? Having birth defects
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> majority of kids do, almost no kids get measles. Polio was wiped
> out of the western hemisphere by vaccines.

And I colonized Pluto once with a brew of ferrets.  You can't see them
from here, but I promise, it's true.  Here's the kicker.  Despite
ferrets now living on Pluto, I can't prove that I put them there
myself.  Remind you of anything?

> Get a clue, man.

We don't need "clues," dude, we need facts.  Got any?

> > When a child contracts a case
> > of measles these days, it's almost certain that it won't be
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> California and the New York City Area. These cases were from people
> outside the country.

You aren't paying attention. I said children *already* vaccinated
would be unlikely to receive virus-specific IgM evaluation because of
their vaccination status.  No one said measles no longer exists, and
no one said it can't be detected.

> Measles is reported.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Will you please provide evidence to back your claims?

Refer to the chart in Myrl's post about measles earlier.  You can also
find scientific reviews of these data in many published books on the
subject.  If you need some relevant titles, I'll be happy to supply
them.

> You seem to be totally ignorant.

I will ignore your ad hominems for now.

> >> Vaccines completely eliminated polio in the Western hemisphrere,
> >> nearly completely stopped measles (with all cases from sources
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Get a clue man. The vaccines wiped out the diseases.

Have you seen one of my Plutonian ferrets by chance?

> >> If you want to decrease the chances of your kid from getting
> >> sick or dying, then vaccines are necessary.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> I suggest you look at the evidence at www.cdc.gov.

Gee, that's a problem.  CDC's governance is largely comprised of
former pharmaceutical executives, and for my money, that's not an
unbiased source or information.  Got anybody remotely independent?
D. C. Sessions - 24 Apr 2008 04:41 GMT
> Have you seen one of my Plutonian ferrets by chance?

No, at last word they'd caught a ride with Chuckles to
Uranus.

| sh.t happens.  Sometimes it happens to you. |
+--- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---+
PeterB - 29 Apr 2008 03:17 GMT
> In message <1a873489-5abf-435e-8568-57b70dd5c...@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, PeterB wrote:
>
> > Have you seen one of my Plutonian ferrets by chance?
>
> No, at last word they'd caught a ride with Chuckles to
> Uranus.

If that's anything like a black hole, we can talk about the evidence
for vaccine effectiveness or safety, both of which appear to have been
sucked into another universe.
David Wright - 29 Apr 2008 04:10 GMT
>> In message
><1a873489-5abf-435e-8568-57b70dd5c...@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>for vaccine effectiveness or safety, both of which appear to have been
>sucked into another universe.

The mere fact that you are impervious to evidence does not mean that
evidence is lacking.

You've never come up with a plausible explanation for the near-
disappearance of polio, measles, mumps, etc from the US.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "There are two kinds of Republicans:  millionaires and suckers."
                                                     -- John Dolan
D. C. Sessions - 29 Apr 2008 04:21 GMT
> You've never come up with a plausible explanation for the near-
> disappearance of polio, measles, mumps, etc from the US.

Sure he has.  They didn't.  No explanation needed.

| sh.t happens.  Sometimes it happens to you. |
+--- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---+
news - 29 Apr 2008 13:40 GMT
Troll cleaning.
news - 29 Apr 2008 13:38 GMT
Butterflies1111@gmail.com - 30 Apr 2008 16:53 GMT
.

> You've never come up with a plausible explanation for the near-
> disappearance of polio, measles, mumps, etc from the US.

  Ok, they all just got tired of living here and moved on to another
country?
  They saw your photo, and ran out of the U.S.?
   They were treated with Accutane by a health professional in N.C.,
and
vanished into thin air?

   Anyone got any other ideas?    Maybe we could go on a measles,
mumps and
polio hunt to see if we can find them.  Where in the world is Carmen
ala MeaslesMumpsPolio?
D. C. Sessions - 29 Apr 2008 04:23 GMT
>> In message <1a873489-5abf-435e-8568-57b70dd5c...@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, PeterB wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> for vaccine effectiveness or safety, both of which appear to have been
> sucked into another universe.

Oh, the Francis study is a good start.

| sh.t happens.  Sometimes it happens to you. |
+--- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---+
news - 29 Apr 2008 13:40 GMT
Troll removal
David Wright - 30 Apr 2008 03:46 GMT
>Troll removal

Not that I mind seeing you make a fool of yourself (it seems to be
your primary reason for being on m.h.a), but there are two things you
should know:

1) empty postings (a reflection of your empty skull) give no context
  about what it is you're objecting to, and are thus vacuous

2) empty postings do not cause whatever it is you're replying to to
  disappear

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "There are two kinds of Republicans:  millionaires and suckers."
                                                     -- John Dolan
Kevysmom - 30 Apr 2008 03:59 GMT
I find him to be kinda cute and funny. Better than your post that are
always insulting.

> In article <ye-dnUIZUdfSiorVnZ2dnUVZ_q6mn...@giganews.com>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>      "There are two kinds of Republicans:  millionaires and suckers."
>                                                       -- John Dolan
David Wright - 30 Apr 2008 05:09 GMT
>I find him to be kinda cute and funny. Better than your post that are
>always insulting.

Versus yours, which are merely usually insulting?

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "There are two kinds of Republicans:  millionaires and suckers."
                                                     -- John Dolan

>> In article <ye-dnUIZUdfSiorVnZ2dnUVZ_q6mn...@giganews.com>,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>> 2) empty postings do not cause whatever it is you're replying to to
>>    disappear
news - 30 Apr 2008 13:28 GMT
Awwwww, now I'm blushing.
>I find him to be kinda cute and funny. Better than your post that are
> always insulting.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>>      "There are two kinds of Republicans:  millionaires and suckers."
>>                                                       -- John Dolan
Kevysmom - 30 Apr 2008 22:45 GMT
> Awwwww, now I'm blushing."

"Mission Accomplished!"  :o)

Im on a mission accomplished kick today....

> >I find him to be kinda cute and funny. Better than your post that are
> > always insulting.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Mark Probert - 30 Apr 2008 21:21 GMT
> I find him to be kinda cute and funny. Better than your post that are
> always insulting.

Support
Kevysmom - 30 Apr 2008 22:46 GMT
> Support

LOL, You weren't joking!!! You are so funny.

> > I find him to be kinda cute and funny. Better than your post that are
> > always insulting.
>
> Support
news - 30 Apr 2008 13:27 GMT
>>Troll removal
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>     "There are two kinds of Republicans:  millionaires and suckers."
>                                                      -- John Dolan

And the best part is that it bothered you enough that you just had to
"comment" about it. AHHHH sweet success!
David Wright - 01 May 2008 03:21 GMT
>>>Troll removal
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>And the best part is that it bothered you enough that you just had to
>"comment" about it. AHHHH sweet success!

Tools, I could tell everyone you're a troll, but it's so much easier
to have you just come out and admit it, as you just did.  Thanks.
You're a peach.

(Figures, really.  He accuses others of what he does.  Classic projection.)

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "There are two kinds of Republicans:  millionaires and suckers."
                                                     -- John Dolan
news - 01 May 2008 15:16 GMT
>>>>Troll removal
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> to have you just come out and admit it, as you just did.  Thanks.
> You're a peach.

OK, perhaps you cannot get as high as being a troll. How does azzole fit?
D. C. Sessions - 24 Apr 2008 04:40 GMT
> Really? Until the measles vaccine came out, most children got measles.
> Now, in the US and other countries where the vast majority of kids do,
> almost no kids get measles. Polio was wiped out of the western
> hemisphere by vaccines.

He denies it -- everyone still gets measles, and since
it was never a serious disease nobody thinks twice about it.

Or so he says.

| sh.t happens.  Sometimes it happens to you. |
+--- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---+
D. C. Sessions - 24 Apr 2008 04:39 GMT
>> Really? Ever notice all those kids coming down with polio? Staying
>> home from school from measles? Having birth defects from rubella?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> vaccine does is to limit or reduce the severity of a viral infection
> (and sometimes it produces symptoms not unlike the disease itself.)

And as for the patients with polio-induced respiratory paralysis,
well, we just pretend that they don't exist and call it a car
wreck or something.  The Neuralizer does wonders for the family
and friends who don't remember them getting sick.

Measles?  Indeed -- the memory of parents and doctors in the
1960s was amazingly short.  Within three years they completely
forgot what that rash reminded them of.  Without all the
anxiety, kids didn't go blind, deaf, or have other neurological
impairment either.  All that, and it was just their imaginations.

The rubella birth defects, of course, never happened.  Pay no
attention to the cripples behind the curtain.

> Since parents nowadays don't suspect a communicable disease, a child
> is rarely presented to a doctor for evaluation.   He or she stays out
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> introduced, and for that to happen, severe morbidity had to be
> declining, as well.

Since this was all just a coincidence, you won't have any
trouble at all finding just ONE example from hundreds of
combinations where mass vaccination didn't immediately
precede a three-sigma drop in the disease it targeted
for one of:

* polio
* diphtheria
* pertussis
* tetanus
* measles
* mumps
* rubella
* Hib
* HepB
* Meningococcal disease

In a country where they've kept reasonably complete records
for at least the ten years before and afterward.

| sh.t happens.  Sometimes it happens to you. |
+--- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---+
PeterB - 23 Apr 2008 21:54 GMT
> > Vaccine is certainly implicated in autism even if it's not
> > likely to be the sole trigger.  What's tragic is that vaccine is
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> home from school from measles? Having birth defects from rubella?
> Not anymore.

Not any more?  Did you know that timeline data for all of these proves
conclusively that vaccine had nothing to do with those declines?  Look
it up.  When a child contracts a case of measles these days, it's
almost certain that it won't be reported due to vaccine bias based on
a child's vaccine status, yet the best vaccine can do is to limit or
reduce the severity of a viral infection (and sometimes it produces
symptoms not unlike the disease itself.)  Since parents nowadays don't
really suspect a communicable disease, a child is rarely presented to
a doctor for evaluation.   He or she stays out of school for a day or
two with a "flu bug."  Even if the child is presented for evaluation,
a doctor rarely orders blood work.  Again, that is based on vaccine
bias.  You probably don't know that measles mortality had already
declined by 95% before the vaccine was even introduced, and for that
to happen, severe morbidity had to be declining, as well.

> Vaccines completely eliminated polio in the Western hemisphrere,
> nearly completely stopped measles (with all cases from sources
> outside the US), decreased invasive Hib disease, nearly eliminated
> rubella-related birth defects, decrease the incidence and severity
> of chicken pox, decreased the rates of diptheria, tetanus and
> purtussis.

One of my cousins died at age 3 within an hour of receiving her
pertussis vaccine.  This was before I was born and people rarely
sought legal remedy against medical providers in those days. Both her
mother and my mother (who had not yet had children of her own)were
devastated by this loss.  It's true that such diseases today are not
the problem they once were, but vaccine was far too late in the game
to explain those declines.  Nowadays, we chalk most of our "mystery"
bugs up to that "weird flu" going around, but you don't really know.

> If you want to decrease the chances of your kid from getting sick
> or dying, then vaccines are necessary.

Care to back that up with risk-adjusted scientific evidence from a
published source?
D. C. Sessions - 24 Apr 2008 04:44 GMT
> Did you know that timeline data for all of these proves
> conclusively that vaccine had nothing to do with those declines?

No, and you're going to avoid presenting anything resembling
real data to support your claim too.  Instead, it will all be
insults directed at distracting from your total lack of facts.

(Measles, United States)
Year   Cases     Deaths
1950   319,124
1951   530,118
1952   683,077
1953   449,146
1954   682,720
1955   555,156
1956   611,936
1957   486,799
1958   763,094
1959   406,162

1960   441,703   380
1961   423,919   434
1962   481,530   408
1963   385,156   364
1964   458,083   421
1965   261,904   276
1966   204,136   261
1967    62,705    81
1968    22,231    24
1969    25,826    41
1970    47,351    89
1971    75,290    90
1972    32,275    24
1973    26,690    23
1974    22,094    20
1975    24,374    20
1976    41,126    12
1977    57,345    15
1978    26,871    11
1979    13,597     6

| sh.t happens.  Sometimes it happens to you. |
+--- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---+
PeterB - 24 Apr 2008 05:35 GMT
> In message <e5187787-2f0b-4919-aa68-912a82ae2...@b64g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, PeterB wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> real data to support your claim too.  Instead, it will all be
> insults directed at distracting from your total lack of facts.

Is that supposed to be an argument?  The table of data you yourself
provided to your buddy Myrl was incomplete and fails to show measles
progression prior to introduction of vaccine.  I'm sure it was an
"honest" mistake, right Dougie?

> (Measles, United States)
> Year   Cases     Deaths
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> | sh.t happens.  Sometimes it happens to you. |
> +--- D. C. Sessions <d...@lumbercartel.com> ---+
David Wright - 23 Apr 2008 05:09 GMT
>Vaccine is certainly implicated in autism even if it's not likely to
>be the sole trigger.

Accused is not the same as implicated.

>What's tragic is that vaccine is so completely
>unncessary and without scientific basis.

So you keep claiming.  Since you're immune to evidence, so you'll go
on claiming.

In your spare time, please explain whatever happened to measles in the
US.  Without resorting to self-invented concepts like "subclinical
measles," I mean.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "There are two kinds of Republicans:  millionaires and suckers."
                                                     -- John Dolan
news - 23 Apr 2008 14:22 GMT
> In article
> <abc261d3-5935-4d19-b9f0-661da814d6f4@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> US.  Without resorting to self-invented concepts like "subclinical
> measles," I mean.
David, how bout YOU take as many vacs as you please and leave the other
people alone? Don't start with that BS about it only works if everyone takes
it. Such a plan worked out well for Jim Jones now didn't it?
David Wright - 25 Apr 2008 05:03 GMT
>> In article
>> <abc261d3-5935-4d19-b9f0-661da814d6f4@59g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>David, how bout YOU take as many vacs as you please and leave the other
>people alone?

You're free to not read my posts.  I invite you to start immediately
if they bother you so much.

> Don't start with that BS about it only works if everyone takes
>it. Such a plan worked out well for Jim Jones now didn't it?

You must have spent your time away from m.h.a taking a course in how
not to make any sense.  You apparently finished at the top of your
class.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "There are two kinds of Republicans:  millionaires and suckers."
                                                     -- John Dolan
news - 25 Apr 2008 13:41 GMT
>> Don't start with that BS about it only works if everyone takes
>>it. Such a plan worked out well for Jim Jones now didn't it?
>
> You must have spent your time away from m.h.a taking a course in how
> not to make any sense.  You apparently finished at the top of your
> class.

David, you should not take more than one stupid pill a day.
David Wright - 26 Apr 2008 01:13 GMT
>>> Don't start with that BS about it only works if everyone takes
>>>it. Such a plan worked out well for Jim Jones now didn't it?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>
>David, you should not take more than one stupid pill a day.

I'll follow your advice, since I see you're speaking from direct
personal experience (when you wrote your previous posting).

The Jonestown massacre has nothing to do with vaccination, and your
silly attempt to generate the analogy doesn't change that.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "There are two kinds of Republicans:  millionaires and suckers."
                                                     -- John Dolan
news - 26 Apr 2008 01:54 GMT
>>>> Don't start with that BS about it only works if everyone takes
>>>>it. Such a plan worked out well for Jim Jones now didn't it?
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>     "There are two kinds of Republicans:  millionaires and suckers."
>                                                      -- John Dolan

So how bout this. You take all the vaccines that my family has not taken.
That way you can be really safe!
David Wright - 26 Apr 2008 21:31 GMT
>>>>> Don't start with that BS about it only works if everyone takes
>>>>>it. Such a plan worked out well for Jim Jones now didn't it?
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>So how bout this. You take all the vaccines that my family has not taken.
>That way you can be really safe!

I know that even you are not dumb enough to mean that seriously, so I
assume you're trying to be funny.

You're not succeeding.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "There are two kinds of Republicans:  millionaires and suckers."
                                                     -- John Dolan
Mark Probert - 26 Apr 2008 15:20 GMT
> >> Don't start with that BS about it only works if everyone takes
> >>it. Such a plan worked out well for Jim Jones now didn't it?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> David, you should not take more than one stupid pill a day.

Speaking from personal experience, I see.
news - 27 Apr 2008 03:36 GMT
On Apr 25, 8:41 am, "news" <tool...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Don't start with that BS about it only works if everyone takes
> >>it. Such a plan worked out well for Jim Jones now didn't it?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> David, you should not take more than one stupid pill a day.

>Speaking from personal experience, I see.
>In your dreams Boo Boo.
Mark Probert - 27 Apr 2008 21:03 GMT
> On Apr 25, 8:41 am, "news" <tool...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> > David, you should not take more than one stupid pill a day.
> >Speaking from personal experience, I see.

> In your dreams Boo Boo.

(Attributions corrected).

No, I do not dream of you. Reading your illogic is a "daymare."

And, do not take any more stupid pills. You have more than a lifetime
supply in you. And, short of cephalectomy, cleansing will not work.
news - 28 Apr 2008 03:07 GMT
>> On Apr 25, 8:41 am, "news" <tool...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> And, do not take any more stupid pills. You have more than a lifetime
> supply in you. And, short of cephalectomy, cleansing will not work.
So, Mark, have you been talking to the mirror for a long time? Or is it
something you only do while on the internet?