: The way it would work - the spammer would send out their obnoxious
: messages, the virus would target, and trace backwards to the spammer,
: and blow up their computer.
And what happens if the spam "originates" in a computer whose owner has
accidentally downloaded a Trojan Horse?
-----
Richard Schultz schultr@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
The gardener plants an evergreen whilst trampling on a flower. . .
Myrl - 21 Apr 2008 15:21 GMT
> In article <fbbb064f-3bfb-4c60-b915-a0dc230a4...@x19g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, Myrl <wisgroup_lea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> -----
> The gardener plants an evergreen whilst trampling on a flower. . .
Well hopefully the "Return to Sender" virus would be "smart" enough to
look beyond the belly of the Trojan Horse, and shoot those pesky
Romans instead. . .;-)
Citizen Jimserac - 22 Apr 2008 12:55 GMT
> In article <fbbb064f-3bfb-4c60-b915-a0dc230a4...@x19g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, Myrl <wisgroup_lea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> -----
> The gardener plants an evergreen whilst trampling on a flower. . .
A little window appears and says "You've got a trojan
or are the originator of spam or else are Richard Schultz, famed
chemist who knows nothing about Acupuncture.
Citizen Jimserac
> On Apr 21, 4:44 am, CitizenJimserac<Jimse...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> messages, the virus would target, and trace backwards to the spammer,
> and blow up their computer.
Don't tempt me. I spent 32 years programming
and finally got out of it. I'm not going back.
Citizen Jimserac