> In message <cbf36c7b-501a-4f29-ba38-4c2633103...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com>, drcee...@insightbb.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> | sh.t happens. Sometimes it happens to you. |
> +--- D. C. Sessions <d...@lumbercartel.com> ---+
>> In message <cbf36c7b-501a-4f29-ba38-4c2633103...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com>, drcee...@insightbb.com wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>
>> It's called "choice" instead of "force."
> Nice idea, but unless the employer is "self insured" and directs its
> oversight insurance company to allow the claim, then there is no
> choice. It is allopathy or nothing. That is the use of financial
> force, isn't it?
You mistake me. Upon enrollment last month, I had the choice
of "conventional," "alternative," both, or neither. No
requirement for me to pay for "alternative," no requirement
for you to pay for "conventional." In fact, by waiving
"conventional," you would get more back than the cost of
the "alternative" coverage.
> I really am for an interest bearing, non-taxable account that will be
> funded similar to the current disease insurance cost program.
Health Savings Accounts. Already law in the USA.
> Here,
> the employee and the employer funds the program as usual. If the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> 5% interest per year, the employees would be millionaires come
> retirement time.
Health Savings Accounts don't distinguish, and there are
qualifying high-deductable "alternative" insurance plans
that you can use.
| sh.t happens. Sometimes it happens to you. |
+--- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ---+