These clowns wouldn't know evidence if it bit they in the arse.
A review based of poorly run trials results in poor conclusions.

The best thing one can do is to boycott items or services
that purchase adverts in the so-called "Independent."

Maybe they say they do not work, but when I take them, I have more energy.

They excluded 405 studies because there was no mortality.  In the USA,
the CDC has almost no reports of supplement caused mortality.

Unfortunately people have been brainwashed into believing good
nutrition is just about eating vitamins.  Those that benefit from this
belief are the makers of junk food etc who fortify their junk with
vitamins to pass them off as healthy.  If eating healthy means eating
real foods that occur in nature than makers of junk food will never be
able to make an argument on why their food is healthy.

Vitamin deficiencies are rare unless you are eating a unhealthy
unbalanced diet.  Why anyone would put synthetic man made vitamins
whose origins and the quantity of said vitamins in each pill are
suspect is beyond me.  People think if a little is good a lot must be
better but this is not the case.  8 glasses of water a day maybe
healthy but 80 is certainly not.  Your body is simply not going to
utilize more than what is required and too much often interferes with
other processes.  Vitamins are not money where more yields higher
returns, far from it.

Here read this.

http://www.nutraingredients.com/news/printNewsBis.asp?id=84681

These are not the supplements I take!

What you call vitamin E is in fact in most
instances in these studies either racemic alpha tocopherol
or a best d-alpha tocopherol only or mostly.
Do realize you realize why these poor supplemental
choices?

I take a mixture of of high gamma mixed tocopherols
and a capsule of alpha tocopherol succinate.
Plus I have a high level of sesamin in my diet so
my gamma levels are higher than yours.
More over I take vitamin K so my vitamin K level aren't
suppressed like the subject in these poorly designed
studies.

The so-called beta-carotene they are using is
all trans beta carotene. Whereas the natural form
is a mixture of trans and cis forms.

I rarely take this form. Only when I need a multiple which
is relatively rare. The evidence is that is it is a risk
in smokers.

And the vitamin A the studies is given in a wildly
wrong ratio to vitamin D. There is antagonistic
relationship between these two vitamins.
Further prefomed vitamin A is not an antioxidant.

They do plenty of good when correctly used in higher and
better balance doses and it better forms. This hand
wringing is amazing bit of willful ignorance on the part of
who ever made the comment.