 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Alternative / April 2008Interesting Read about Blogs and Getting Paid to Post
Interesting read: http://pandagon.blogsome.com/2006/06/13/one-more-reason-to-be-wary-of-feeding-trolls/ And comments that follow. Now, the question is, if one is getting paid to post--think of all of the advantages it would be to create sock puppets!! > Interesting read: > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Now, the question is, if one is getting paid to post--think of all of > the advantages it would be to create sock puppets!! It has been my contention there may be a couple who are paid to blog, while fighting IMAGINARY sock puppets. . .I wonder how much they are getting paid??? > > Interesting read: > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > while fighting IMAGINARY sock puppets. . .I wonder how much they are > getting paid??? Considering that blogging has nothing to do with Usenet, I wonder how much Pee-Turb is being paid to conflate the two. On Apr 7, 5:35 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Interesting read: > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Considering that blogging has nothing to do with Usenet, I wonder how > much Pee-Turb is being paid to conflate the two. My time is my own, Andy. Don't you wish you could say that? > On Apr 7, 5:35 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > My time is my own, Andy. Don't you wish you could say that?- Hide quoted text - In other words, you're claiming to be stupid as opposed to being paid to act stupid. Stupid is as stupid is paid to be, Pee-Turb. > - Show quoted text - On Apr 8, 8:19 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> > > > My time is my own, Andy. Don't you wish you could say that? > > In other words, you're claiming to be stupid as opposed to being > paid to act stupid. > Stupid is as stupid is paid to be, Pee-Turb. Does that explain why you stalk me here on mha? Perhaps you "think" that by bringing this up even when I do not that it reduces the chances I will. Not very clever, but I can understand the fear. Please say hello to your sponsors for me. > On Apr 8, 8:19 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> > > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > chances I will. Not very clever, but I can understand the fear. > Please say hello to your sponsors for me. Yes Andy, please give your sponsors my regards also. They must be pleased with your thoughtful and very insightful posts. Did they waive the education requirement? I wonder how you landed a sponsor role?????? http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/c1efd889a7678735 That _IS_ topical and worthy of discussion. Stick with the topic, that works for you & us. On Apr 7, 5:35 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Interesting read: > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Considering that blogging has nothing to do with Usenet, I wonder how > much Pee-Turb is being paid to conflate the two. What is the defference by being hit at 60 MPH heazd on with a Volkswagen of a Toyota? Chances are you will be dead. Common sense 101. The obvious point is using the internet groups, (whatever form they may be) to disseminate information and being paid to do such is taking place. According to the NY Times people are getting paid something like $10.00/post. Not bad income. > What is the defference by being hit at 60 MPH heazd on with a > Volkswagen of a Toyota? [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > $10.00/post. > Not bad income. Except that the posts in question are actual (if brief) articles that take on the order of an hour to write. They are hosted on websites which carry advertising and otherwise have a funding source based on the number of readers, which is where the money comes from. The reason this is newsworthy is that "blogging" is replacing more traditional news and commentary online and thus there is a great demand for readable content. There just isn't much *pay* anywhere near what reporters and columnists formerly received. The sites in question run to tens of thousands of page views per article. MHA? It is to laugh. There is a second class of "pay to post" where the rates for shilling traffic to the site run two to three cents per 200-word post. A third-world speed typist might get by on those rates, but the total volume of MHA's most prolific posters wouldn't amount to a single latte a day. | The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" | | The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?" | +---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+ > In message <8e01be74-4e08-4ba0-a222-df42d28ac...@v32g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, Kulacz wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > | The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?" | > +---------- D. C. Sessions <d...@lumbercartel.com> ----------+ You seem to know a lot about at least this one subject. Is it lucrative for you? >> In message <8e01be74-4e08-4ba0-a222-df42d28ac...@v32g2000prd.googlegroups.com>, Kulacz wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > You seem to know a lot about at least this one subject. > Is it lucrative for you? Easy way for you to find out, but it seems that you're afraid to step up to the table. One might wonder why. | The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" | | The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?" | +---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+ > In message <d6f4f64d-05dd-49cd-9118-6f3e3ebfe...@b5g2000pri.googlegroups.com>, Kulacz wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Making things complex whern a simple soution is readily availableis absurd. You want to make it complex. You are not stepping upto the plate. You are making a simple action more complex. > > In message <d6f4f64d-05dd-49cd-9118-6f3e3ebfe...@b5g2000pri.googlegroups.com>, Kulacz wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > > - Show quoted text - In addition, it does not matter since your methods are indicative oi the fact that you most likely are a paid poster with an agenda for a special interest group. You will not offer a simple accepted disclosure that is the norm in the scientific community. Nothing more needs to be said as the answere is given in your failure to disclose and your absurd suggestions. The topic is answered and closed in my book. > In addition, it does not matter since your methods > are indicative oi the fact that you most likely are a paid poster with > an agenda for a special interest group. So since it's "most likely" that I am paid to do this, you can pick up an easy $2000 just by calling. That *WAS* the whole point of the exercise -- and spin as you will, you're just driving home the point that you don't believe what you post. Oh, yeah -- you're trying to use the fact that I'm willing to put up *my* money to prove that you're a lier as "proof" that you're right. Weren't you telling people to go take a class in logic? | The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" | | The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?" | +---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+ 2 > > > In message <d6f4f64d-05dd-49cd-9118-6f3e3ebfe...@b5g2000pri.googlegroups.com>, Kulacz wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 66 lines] > > - Show quoted text - 1-A >> > You seem to know a lot about at least this one subject. >> > Is it lucrative for you? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Making things complex whern a simple soution is readily availableis > absurd. But it *is* simple -- I make an honest offer that nobody in their right mind would refuse. You refuse. That's really _very_ simple. > You want to make it complex. The only thing complex going on here is your attempts to spin this as anything other than you being caught out in a lie. > You are not stepping upto the plate. Wow -- that is the most amazing PKB. Name the CPA, fish. We'll see who steps up to the plate. > You are making a simple action more complex. Nope. Simple as can be: I make an offer, you refuse. Nothing complex about it. I tell the truth, you accuse me of lying, I put money on the table to see who believes what they're posting. You start making excuses. Keep it up, fish, it's fun to watch. | The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" | | The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?" | +---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+ > Keep it up, fish, it's fun to watch. Oh, really? The fish is the one hiding behind an email address that is hosted out of Apple Valley, CA---I thought you lived in the McCain State? >> Keep it up, fish, it's fun to watch. > > Oh, really? The fish is the one hiding behind an email address that > is > hosted out of Apple Valley, CA---I thought you lived in the McCain > State? Lessons in network architecture cost. Do you want to sign up? | The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" | | The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?" | +---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+ > Lessons in network architecture cost. > Do you want to sign up? No thank you; I do not want to end up with the same negative attitude that you would appear to have. > It has been my contention there may be a couple who are paid to blog, > while fighting IMAGINARY sock puppets. . .I wonder how much they are > getting paid??? How would one feel to realize that they had been talking to sock puppets for years on usenet??? <smile> |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.