Medical Forum / General / Alternative / April 2008
Breast Cancer and Green Tea
|
|
Thread rating:  |
ironjustice - 07 Apr 2008 14:20 GMT Ingredient Found in Green Tea Significantly Inhibits Breast Cancer Growth in Female Mice
Newswise -- Green tea is high in the antioxidant EGCG (epigallocatechin-3- gallate) which helps prevent the body's cells from becoming damaged and prematurely aged. Studies have suggested that the combination of green tea and EGCG may also be beneficial by providing protection against certain types of cancers, including breast cancer. A new study conducted by researchers at the University of Mississippi finds that consuming EGCG significantly inhibits breast tumor growth in female mice. These results bring us one step closer to better understanding the disease and potentially new and naturally occurring therapies.
The study was conducted by Jian-Wei Gu, Emily Young, Jordan Covington, James Wes Johnson, and Wei Tan, all of the Department of Physiology & Biophysics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS. Dr. Gu will present his team's findings, entitled, Oral Administration of EGCG, an Antioxidant Found in Green Tea, Inhibits Tumor Angiogenesis and Growth of Breast Cancer in Female Mice, at the 121st Annual Meeting of the American Physiological Society (APS; http://www.the-APS.org/press), part of the Experimental Biology 2008 scientific conference.
The Study Epidemiological studies suggest that green tea and its major constituent, EGCG, can provide some protection against cancer. Because these studies were very limited, the anti-cancer mechanism of green tea and EGCG was not clear. As a result, the researchers examined whether drinking EGCG (just the antioxidant infused in water) inhibited the following: expression of VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor, which is found in a variety of breast cancer types); tumor angiogenesis (thought to help tumors expand by supplying them with nutrients); and the growth of breast cancer in female mice.
Seven week old female mice were given EGCG (25 mg/50 ml) in drinking water for five weeks (approximately 50-100 mg/kg/day.) The control mice received regular drinking water. In the second week of the study mouse breast cancer cells were injected in the left fourth mammary glands of the mice. Tumor size was monitored by measuring the tumor cross section area (TCSA). Tumors were eventually isolated and measured for tumor weight, intratumoral microvessel (IM) density (using staining), and VEGF protein levels (using ELISA).
At the end of the five week period the researchers found that oral consumption of EGCG caused significant decreases in TCSA (66%), tumor weight (68%), IM density 155±6 vs.111±20 IM#mm^2) and VEGF protein levels (59.0±3.7 vs. 45.7±1.4 pg/mg) in the breast tumors vs. the control mice, respectively (N=8; P<0.01). Further, VEGF plasma levels were lower in EGCG mice than in control mice (40.8±3.5 vs. 26.5±3.8 pg/ ml P< 0.01).
Dr. Gu, the senior researcher for the study, hypothesized that the reason for the link between EGCG and the reductions in the cancer data was because EGCG directly targets both tumor blood vessels and tumor cells of breast cancer for suppressing the new blood vessels formation in breast tumor, the proliferation and migration of breast cancer cells.
Gu concluded by saying, "In this study we have demonstrated that the frequent ingestion of EGCG significantly inhibits breast tumor growth, VEGF expression and tumor angiogenesis in mice. We believe our findings will help lead to new therapies for the prevention and treatment of breast cancer in women."
Physiology is the study of how molecules, cells, tissues and organs function to create health or disease. The American Physiological Society (APS; http://www.The-APS.org/press) has been an integral part of this discovery process since it was established in 1887.
(c) 2008 Newswise. All Rights Reserved.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Could be natural iron chelators"
Epigallocatechin-3-gallate and Epicatechin-3-gallate from Green Tea Decrease Plasma Non-Transferrin Bound Iron and Erythrocyte Oxidative Stress Authors: Thephinlap, C.1; Ounjaijean, S.1; Khansuwan, U.1; Fucharoen, S.1; Porter, J. B.1; Srichairatanakool, S.1
Source: Medicinal Chemistry, Volume 3, Number 3, May 2007, pp. 289-296(8)
Publisher: Bentham Science Publishers Abstract:
β-Thalassemia patients suffer from secondary iron overload caused by increased iron absorption and multiple blood transfusions. Excessive iron catalyzes free-radical formation, causing oxidative tissue damage. Non-transferrin bound iron (NTBI) detected in thalassemic plasma is highly toxic and chelatable. Desferrioxamine and deferiprone are used to treat the iron overload, but many side effects are found. Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and epicatechin gallate (ECG) in green tea (GT) show strong antioxidant properties. We separated the EGCG and ECG from GT extract using an HPLC, and examined their iron-binding and free-radical scavenging activities. They bound Fe3+ rapidly to form a complex with a predominant absorption at 560 nm. EGCG and ECG bound chemical Fe3+ and chelated the NTBI in a time- and dose dependent manner. They also decreased oxidative stress in iron-treated erythrocytes. In conclusion, EGCG and ECG could be natural iron chelators that efficiently decrease the levels of NTBI and free radicals in iron overload.
Keywords: Epigallocatechin-3-gallate; epicatechin-3-gallate; green tea; iron overload; non-transferrin bound iron; oxidative stress
Document Type: Research article
DOI: 10.2174/157340607780620608
Affiliations: 1: Department of Biochemistry,Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Who loves ya. Tom
Jesus Was A Vegetarian! http://tinyurl.com/2r2nkh
Man Is A Herbivore! http://tinyurl.com/a3cc3
DEAD PEOPLE WALKING http://tinyurl.com/zk9fk
Bolaleman - 07 Apr 2008 18:49 GMT There are already quite a lot of studies confirming this type of effect in green tee, for instance the following one that was published already in 2002:
"Cancer prevention with green tea: reality and wishful thinking" by Bertram B. and Bartsch H. from the Cancer Research Center in Heidelberg, Germany (Abteilung für Toxikologie und Krebsrisikofaktoren, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Deutschland. b.bertram@dkfz.de), published at Wien Med Wochenschr. 2002; 152(5-6):153-8.
In the abstract you find the following: Different processing of the leaves of the tea plant Camellia sinensis yields green or black tea, the subject of numerous investigations on the preventive effects on chronic degenerative diseases. The tea polyphenols, in particular (-)- epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) were found to account for most of the protective effects. Since the concentration of EGCG is 5 times higher in green than in black tea, it is assumed that green tea possesses a greater preventive potential. Protection against cancer and cardiovascular diseases are the most important biomedical effects. In experimental models the preventive activity of tea is well documented for tumors at many organ sites. In humans, tea was reported to be protective against tumors of the lung, the gastrointestinal tract and the liver. Tea polyphenols, especially EGCG, were shown to exert cancer-protective activity by the following mechanisms: they inhibit the metabolic activation of carcinogens and induce at the same time detoxifying enzymes. They inhibit signaling pathways controlling cell proliferation and tumor growth such as protein kinase C and the release of tumor necrose factor-alpha from cells. Tea polyphenols reactivate processes which are impaired in tumor cells, such as the programmed cell death and the tumorsuppressor gene p53. Finally, tea polyphenols can also block angiogenesis leading to a starvation of the tumor. By inactivation of proteolytic enzymes they inhibit the development of metastases. This short review summarizes relevant recent findings on the protective effects of green tea constituents.
There is probably no discussion any more if certain constituents in green tea have cancer prevention properties (including breast cancer) but the one million question is what quantity of gree tee do you need to consume in order to reduce the cancer probability. If you read the toxicological studies performed on green tea you will find that usually very high doses were used of the extracts in order to confirm the described effects. I remember a study where it was mentioned that you will need to drink about one and a half liter of green tea extract over a long time in order to get a statistically relevant effect. In fact, the frequency and quantity of green tea consumed was inversely associated with (breast) cancer risk. Searching the web I found a study claiming for instance that a consumption more than 3 cups of green tee can reduce the lung cancer risk (http:// www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1810371). Unfortunately, I did not find the study indicating the minimal dose for reducing the breast cancer risk. Somebody can help?? I am sure that I read it somewhere and I am also sure that it is not sufficient to drink a cup of green tea from time to time. It should be a routine in our daily life to substitute coffee and soft drinks by green tea. And the taste is not bad at all - isn´t it?
OE
-------------------- By the way: Found a cool nursing job database with over 250,000 jobs in nursing? Check this out: http://2ajobguide.com/jobs_for_nursing.aspx
Guybrush Threepwood - 07 Apr 2008 21:27 GMT > There are already quite a lot of studies confirming this type of > effect in green tee, for instance the following one that was published [quoted text clipped - 59 lines] > in nursing? Check this out: > http://2ajobguide.com/jobs_for_nursing.aspx I drank a lot of green tea just before I got testicular cancer for the first time and before they found a metastasis in my spinal colon in 2006.....So, I am back on coffee now... Anyhow...the taste is not bad.
 Signature Gruß Guybrush
Tom - 08 Apr 2008 00:02 GMT > I drank a lot of green tea just before I got testicular cancer for the > first time and before they found a metastasis in my spinal colon in > 2006.....So, I am back on coffee now... > Anyhow...the taste is not bad. Which Green Tea did you drink, that one contaminated with bunch of heavy metals, pesticides, etc. which comes from China ?
Over his lifetime, a man's risk of testicular cancer is roughly 1 in 250, so it had to come from some junk you eat you in you case.
So, do not eat, drink any junk from China anymore !
Bolaleman - 09 Apr 2008 00:49 GMT Hi Guybrush,
hope you are better and I don't know if you heard it: Testicular cancer is treated successfully in more than 95% of cases (according to information I found in the Internet: http://www.oncologychannel.com/testicularcancer/index.shtml). This of course does not consider your metastasis in the spinal colon that hopefully was removed in the meantime. The fact that you developed this cancer despite drinking a lot of green tea does not tell anything about the cancer prevention potential of this herb. In the toxicological studies thousands of people were investigated in order to find statistical relevant effects. In the page I mention above you also can read that: "incidence of testicular cancer is rising. According to the American Cancer Society, approximately 7600 cases are diagnosed and about 400 men die of the disease each year in the United States. The disease is most prevalent in men between the ages of 18 and 32 and is approximately 5 times more common in Caucasians than African Americans. Germany, Scandinavia, and New Zealand have the highest incidence of testicular cancer and Asia and Africa have the lowest." The question is: how many testicular cancer cases would be diagnosed if every single american man would drink at least one liter of (non contaminated) gree tea per day for a period of not less than 12 months? Maybe in two years the number would drop to 6000 or to 5000 but for sure not to cero! And if you are lucky you are amongst the 1600 or 2600 or .....you suffer a heart attack like 1.5 million americans each year with 500,000 deaths. Everything a question of statistics.
Gruß zurueck und gute Besserung, Bolaleman
adambond3@gmail.com - 09 Apr 2008 12:02 GMT > Hi Guybrush, > [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > Gruß zurueck und gute Besserung, > Bolaleman So basically what you're saying is, if the cancer won't kill us, something else will.
Great.
And I actually liked getting out of bed this morning.
Oh well.
There's lots of cancer agencies out there to donate to. My preferred one is the Global Cancer Research Institute: http://gcri.blogspot.com/
Anyway, you won't see me downing a whole bunch of green tea anytime soon. ;)
Adam
Bolaleman - 09 Apr 2008 23:16 GMT On 9 abr, 07:02, adambo...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hi Guybrush, > [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] > > - Mostrar texto de la cita - Adam, didn't want to discourage you with my posting!!!
--------------------
Bolaleman - 12 Apr 2008 05:00 GMT On 9 abr, 07:02, adambo...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hi Guybrush, > [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > > Adam Dear Adam, it was not my intention to demotivate you drinking whole bunches of green tea any more :-) Let's try to motivate you again....:
I think the following point is important to consider: even if natural "drugs" like green tea do not protect us for 100%, they can reduce the probability that we suffer certain diseases and their application can make a big difference. If you live an unhealthy life (let's assume you are a strong fumer, drinker, fast food fetishist, etc.) you might be lucky and be healthy till you are 80, but the probability that this is not the case if quite high. If you know that applying certain natural herbs can reduce the risk of getting sick by - let's say 20% - and you also know that your unhealthy lifestyle might increase the risk by about 20%, the difference between both "extremes" already are 40%. I know that all this is theory but what I want to say is that even if routinely consumption of green tea (and of other related herbs containing antioxidants, etc.) statistically might not be very relevant on a first view, it might make a great difference in certain cases. I at least drink green tea almost each day because I know that it MIGHT protect me but basically because I enjoy the taste of this stuff. Convinced?
Marshall Price - 12 Apr 2008 19:36 GMT >> I drank a lot of green tea just before I got testicular cancer for the >> first time and before they found a metastasis in my spinal colon in [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Over his lifetime, a man's risk of testicular cancer is roughly 1 in 250, so > it had to come from some junk you eat you in you case. When you put the word "so" in there, you're implying that there's a connection!
Does the moon go around the earth because of "some junk you eat you in you case"?
 Signature Marshall Price of Miami Known to Yahoo as d021317c
Bolaleman - 14 Apr 2008 22:46 GMT > >>Bolalemanwrote: > [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > > - Mostrar texto de la cita - I don't understand your point. Can you please explain which "connection" you are thinking about?
Marshall Price - 16 Apr 2008 21:21 GMT >>>> Bolalemanwrote: >>>> I drank a lot of green tea just before I got testicular cancer for the [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > I don't understand your point. Can you please explain which > "connection" you are thinking about? You gave the incidence of a disease, which is perfectly okay with me, but then you said "so" (as if to say "therefore") somebody got it because of what he ate.
It's like saying half the people in Tahiti are female, so it must come from chewing gum.
There's no connection at all!
 Signature Marshall Price of Miami Known to Yahoo as d021317c
|
|
|