 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Alternative / April 2008Mark Thorson the REPEATED LIAR CANNOT SHUT up!
The following is a retraction statement that Mark Thorson has posted to various newsgroups: Subject: Retraction of Anatoxin-a Primer During the last several years, I have from time to time posted to this and other newsgroups a file of information called "An Anatoxin-a Primer." I now retract the statements made in the Anatoxin-a Primer. The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from Klamath Lake, produced by Cell Tech, contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I characterized as addictive), and that Cell Tech deliberately avoids testing for this toxin because anatoxin-a is responsible for the effects reported by SBGA users. I have since been advised that Cell Tech conducts regular tests that would disclose anatoxin-a, and that this toxin has never been found in Super Blue Green Algae. I had no basis for the suggestions I made in the Anatoxin-a Primer, and I hereby retract it in full. Mis-state to state incorrectly : give a false account of False intentionally untrue lie untrue with intent to deceive =========== Having no basis is L Y I N G! As for Mark Probert, he ia a DISBARRED ATTORNEY. Your further lies are also noted. LIAR. YOU REPEATEDLY LIED OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER. >I merely posted the URL >to a database that had your PUBLIC information in it, the >same information anyone could have found in a phone book. Wrong. >The URL to a database is: >http://www.switchboard.com >At the top of that page is says: >Telephone Directory. In that posting, you posted a link that says at the top Switchboard *People Results* >I did not, otherwise a Google search on my name and this >newsgroup for "Bryant" would turn up such a posting. Can it Mark. Anyone can clearly see this Byrant things is just another dirty trick of yours. You are a liar and you know it. > At the time >I posted it, three J. Drew's showed up in Bloomington, Well now. That was a people's results page and NOT the URLto a database that had your PUBLIC information. You went to the datebase, then you posted the results AFTER you did the searching. Now to prove the total liar, you are. You see Mark liars are sooner or later exposed. Today is your day, and most likely you won't learn, that your bringing it up over and over, is a problem with you. My asterisks added. From: Mark Thorson (nos...@sonic.net) Subject: Re: Admitting when one is wrong View this article only Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative Date: 2002-05-26 21:30:10 PST Karuna wrote: > Is this what happened? > Mark (Thorson): In July 2001, someone suggested to you, here on mha, > that > another poster was most likely female and also might be apprehensive > about > being harrassed by others on the 'net. You responded by posting a linked > access to several names and phone numbers, one of which might be that > person, thereby *inviting* such harrassment. > Is that true? **"Inviting" is your characterization, but I did post the link to switchboard.com, which was a simple search that yielded several names, any or none of which could have been Jan, which came from a public database.*** **And if Jan had said it that way, I would not have disputed the accuracy of what she said, except in the area of intent. *** It was more of an impulse*** decision, triggered by the previous posting in the thread ***It was as though a finger-shaped holes suddenly appeared in front of me.** ****I couldn't resist sticking my finger in it.**** At the time, it didn'tseem like a big deal, because it was just like calling up information on the phone. But I see now that it doesn't look any different than encouraging harassment, so I agree that I shouldn't have done it. On this one point, Jan, I apologize. I do not wish any third party to harass you. === Mark Thorson Sep 12 2004, 8:35 pm You said I posted your address. Not true. You said I posted search results. Not true. For me to be a liar, there must have been a LIE. YEARS LATER, YOU ARE STILL LYING! What statement did I ever make about Cell Tech or their products is a lie? The retraction does not say any of my statements were false, much less a lie. I've asked you before, and you have never been able to show me even one statement I made about Cell Tech which is untrue, much less a lie. When you accuse me of lying, that is a false accusation. If you dispute that, kindly quote one of these lies you claim I told. You won't do that. And I know why you won't do that. It is because you can't. > The following is a retraction statement that Mark Thorson has posted to > various [quoted text clipped - 155 lines] > > YEARS LATER, YOU ARE STILL LYING! What statement did I ever make about Cell Tech or their products is a lie? The retraction does not say any of my statements were false, much less a lie. I've asked you before, and you have never been able to show me even one statement I made about Cell Tech which is untrue, much less a lie. When you accuse me of lying, that is a false accusation. If you dispute that, kindly quote one of these lies you claim I told. You won't do that. And I know why you won't do that. It is because you can't. > I've asked you before, and you have never been > able to show me even one statement I made about > Cell Tech which is untrue, much less a lie. Has anyone shown that Jan Drew and Ilena Rosenthal are not the same person? > > I've asked you before, and you have never been > > able to show me even one statement I made about > > Cell Tech which is untrue, much less a lie. > > Has anyone shown that Jan Drew and Ilena Rosenthal are not the same > person? When they made Ilena, they broke the mold. On Apr 11, 1:09 pm, Frank <fmerri...@nycny.net> wrote: > On Apr 5, 7:55 pm, Mark Thorson <nos...@sonic.net> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Has anyone shown that Jan Drew and Ilena Rosenthal are not the same > person? When they made Ilena, they broke the mold. == http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/msg/966a985371a2cc4b Mar 15 2006 I will no longer engage in negative behavior toward her for the reasons I previously posted. This is O V E R. == *A snide remark deserves scorn.* Mark S Probert Merrick, NY *I read Torah everday* Mark S Probert Merrick, NY Here's another example of Jan Drew lying: Quoting from this ORIGINAL POSTING from Jan Drew: http://www.google.com/groups?&selm=20040924222415.01015.00001086%40mb-m15.aol.com I have stated nothing about the Catholic faith. ----- statements about Catholics from Jan's earlier postings ----- Quoting from this ORIGINAL POSTING from Jan Drew: http://www.google.com/groups?&selm=20040922214509.08241.00000819%40mb-m10.aol.com Absolutley no bigotry, no act, nor any of the desperate accusations. Eric, do show us where we are instructed to pray to saints. Where did this belief come from? It is a man made rule and the work of Satan, placing saints before Jesus Christ. Quoting from this ORIGINAL POSTING from Jan Drew: http://www.google.com/groups?&selm=20040922212212.08241.00000817%40mb-m10.aol.com The truth that praying to saints doesn't come from God, is in not way a bigot, nor prejudice. It is simply the truth. Jan Quoting from this ORIGINAL POSTING from Jan Drew: http://www.google.com/groups?&selm=20040602133702.13763.00000187%40mb-m27.aol.com Praying to saints comes from man, not God, and indeed comes from Satan. Jan Quoting from this ORIGINAL POSTING from Jan Drew: http://www.google.com/groups?&selm=20040525010815.13455.00001025%40mb-m06.aol.com I personally think the Catholics have done many things wrong. Quoting from this ORIGINAL POSTING from Jan Drew: http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20031128180805.08361.00001014%40mb-m24.aol.com There's a huge mistake. NOWHERE is man instructed to pray to ANYONE OTHER THAN GOD THROUGH JESUS HIS SON. Sadly praying to saints comes from Satan. Jan Quoting from this ORIGINAL POSTING from Jan Drew: http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20040524015357.02666.00001366%40mb-m24.aol.com All prayers to Saints bounce off the ceiling. No where did God instruct man to pray to anyone except him THROUGH his son Jesus Christ. Praying to Saints is a man made up rule, led by the help of Satan. Quoting from this ORIGINAL POSTING from Jan Drew: http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20040602133702.13763.00000187%40mb-m27.aol.com I have never mention Catholics. Praying to saints comes from man, not God, and indeed comes from Satan. Jan To see Jan's ORIGINAL POSTING, go here: http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20040310000815.25804.00001173%40mb-m01.aol.com Jan wrote: > >From: Mark Thorson nos...@sonic.net > > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > You can't YOU JUST LIED AGAIN!!!!!!! ----- example quotes of Jan accusing people of being paid shills ----- Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew: http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030415173745.18794.00000646%40mb-fn.aol.com Any time alt. health is mentioned the personal trashing starts. Mostly comes from paid shill Mark Probert. Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew: http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030412210802.08778.00000680%40mb-fw.aol.com Internet bully Mark Probert who is a paid shill and lives off his wife. Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew: http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030410170838.14245.00000347%40mb-ct.aol.com As for Mark, he is a paid shill and lives off his wife. Quoting from this ORIGINAL posting from Jan Drew: http://www.google.com/groups?selm=20030325123827.25124.00000246%40mb-mn.aol.com As long as Mark is here, the paid shill will call names when in fact he is the one who is a bigot. Speaking of his own people. "Mark Thorson" Nothing about IIena. Now--another proven lie. > What statement did I ever make about Cell Tech or > their products is a lie? The retraction does not [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > You won't do that. And I know why you won't > do that. It is because you can't. According to your retraction you said Cell Tech DELIBERATELY avoided testing for the toxin. That would indicate you had some knowledge. But it turns out you did NOT have any knowledge regarding your FALSE claim. That is a lie, through and through. > > What statement did I ever make about Cell Tech or > > their products is a lie? The retraction does not [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > That is a lie, through and through. No, I did not lie, nor did I make a false statementt. THe retraction does not state that any statemen t I made was false. Certainly, a statement would have to be false to be a lie, right? And yet _nobody_ has been able to point to even one statement I made about Cell Tech or their algae which is false, much less a lie. Feel free to try, but I'm sure you won't. > The following is a retraction statement that Mark Thorson has posted to > various [quoted text clipped - 155 lines] > > YEARS LATER, YOU ARE STILL LYING! What statement did I ever make about Cell Tech or their products is a lie? The retraction does not say any of my statements were false, much less a lie. I've asked you before, and you have never been able to show me even one statement I made about Cell Tech which is untrue, much less a lie. When you accuse me of lying, that is a false accusation. If you dispute that, kindly quote one of these lies you claim I told. You won't do that. And I know why you won't do that. It is because you can't. > What statement did I ever make about Cell Tech or > their products is a lie? The retraction does not [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > You won't do that. And I know why you won't > do that. It is because you can't. According to your retraction you said Cell Tech DELIBERATELY avoided testing for the toxin. That would indicate you had some knowledge. But it turns out you did NOT have any knowledge regarding your FALSE claim. That is a lie, through and through. > > What statement did I ever make about Cell Tech or > > their products is a lie? The retraction does not [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > > That is a lie, through and through. No, I did not lie, nor did I make a false statementt. THe retraction does not state that any statemen t I made was false. Certainly, a statement would have to be false to be a lie, right? And yet _nobody_ has been able to point to even one statement I made about Cell Tech or their algae which is false, much less a lie. Feel free to try, but I'm sure you won't. >> > What statement did I ever make about Cell Tech or >> > their products is a lie? The retraction does not [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > > Feel free to try, but I'm sure you won't. There you have it continually lying. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.