 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Alternative / March 2008STOP Posting Garbage from PubMed!
It is pretty pathetic when an advocate of Natural Health knows more about the scientific method, researching PubMed, and the art of communication than the current crop of science Geeks currently posting on these so-called science ngs do. Postings straight from PubMed are only interesting when they are being used to support a point being made by a poster. The wholesale dumping of abstracts from PubMed without preceding each posting with a clearly articulated statement being presented by a poster is a total waste of bandwidth, is an irritation, is nothing but SPAM, Garbage, Crap, or any other totally negative connotation that anybody might want to call it. It positively ain't science. It is just pure laziness on your part, with a good amount of mushy thinking skills thrown in. I am not you Mommy, children. I know how to research PubMed. I am glad that you know, too. But unless you explicitly point out the conclusions that you are trying to make, I really do not to care to see your crap floating in the science ng toilet bowl. Please Science Geeks, learn to flush the toilet after each use. Ironjusice, Jesus and Science used in the same sentence is an oxymoron. Just thought that you Dumb-a.ses might want to know, that I know more about the scientific method than you do. > It is pretty pathetic when an advocate of Natural Health..... Pathetic is a word that frequently comes to mind when thinking about sci.med these days. > Just thought that you Dumb-a.ses might want to know, that I know more > about the scientific method than you do. Like saying a one-eyed man with cataracts can see better than a totally blind man. HMc On Mar 29, 12:41 pm, Mr-Natural-Health <john-h- go...@naturalhealthperspective.com> wrote: "Troll, troll, trolly trolly troll, etc etc etc" .....talk about a total waste of bandwidth. On Mar 29, 12:41 pm, Mr-Natural-Health <john-h- go...@naturalhealthperspective.com> wrote: > It is pretty pathetic when an advocate of Natural Health knows more > about the scientific method, researching PubMed, and the art of > communication than the current crop of science Geeks currently posting > on these so-called science ngs do. They may know more, but that's not really the point. PR grunts working here for industry (astroturfing thugs) are often drawn from backgrounds in science and several of them are very bright. Don't be fooled -- they know exactly what they're doing. Their objective isn't to inform but rather to shape public opinion, and the use of citations (when they bother) is a clever device. They know the odds are poor that anyone with a scientific background will see a poorly-chosen citation and contradict them, so it serves their purpose well. It also suggests an aura of academic inpenetrability. Why do they *use* a poorly-chosen citation in the first place? Because the facts were NOT on their side to begin with and they simply use the one they think will conceal this fact the best. > Postings straight from PubMed are only interesting when they are being > used to support a point being made by a poster. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > SPAM, Garbage, Crap, or any other totally negative connotation that > anybody might want to call it. Again, implied but unstated "viewpoints" is a PR tactic designed to remove the possibility of inconvenient questions. The best way to avoid being a target is never to present one. And you can't shame them into becoming legitimate posters because they've been doing this on behalf of their sponsors for many years. > It positively ain't science. It is just pure laziness on your part, > with a good amount of mushy thinking skills thrown in. Not laziness. These people work VERY hard to do what they do. > I am not you Mommy, children. I know how to research PubMed. I am > glad that you know, too. But unless you explicitly point out the [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Ironjusice, Jesus and Science used in the same sentence is an > oxymoron. Awwww, don't mess with Tom. Jesus broke a few laws of physics, remember. > Just thought that you Dumb-a.ses might want to know, that I know more > about the scientific method than you do. >On Mar 29, 12:41 pm, Mr-Natural-Health <john-h- >go...@naturalhealthperspective.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >backgrounds in science and several of them are very bright. Don't be >fooled -- they know exactly what they're doing. Which begs the question why Big Supplement has hired you to work for them. You're obviously not very bright. and don't have a clue what you're doing. I guess they rather spend their money on buying politicians. > Their objective isn't to inform but rather to shape public opinion, and the use of citations >(when they bother) is a clever device. They know the odds are poor [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] >> Just thought that you Dumb-a.ses might want to know, that I know more >> about the scientific method than you do. No one hired John Boy for anything on this topic; get a grip. > >On Mar 29, 12:41 pm, Mr-Natural-Health <john-h- > >go...@naturalhealthperspective.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > you're doing. I guess they rather spend their money on buying > politicians. You ran away when asked to prove your false assertion after claiming to have read it in the archives, remember? Also, when referring to another person's intelligence you might want to check your grammar before hitting the "submit" button. Oden Mar 29, 8:41 am, Mr-Natural-Health <john-h- go...@naturalhealthperspective.com> wrote: > It is pretty pathetic when an advocate of Natural Health knows more > > Please Science Geeks, learn to flush the toilet after each use. > > Ironjusice, Jesus and Science used in the same sentence is an > oxymoron. To call Ironinjustice a science geek is praise he doesn't deserve. That said his semi random posting are more interesting than the bulk of your BS, John Boy. You've repeated made this same complaint over the years. You are just small boy trying to stir the ants, it seems and the ants aren't much interested in you. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.