 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Alternative / March 2008Would it be possible to get out of Grade School?
Everyone has their opinion---but would it be possible to get out of grade school, and stop the name calling? If you do not agree with the post, would it be possible not to make fun of the person that posted it, and just give your opinion without putting anyone down with their name for their opinion? > Everyone has their opinion---but would it be possible to get out of > grade school, and stop the name calling? Try stopping your crap, and it can happen. So long as you accuse me, and others, of things we are not doing, you will get responses that you do not like. If you do not agree with the > post, would it be possible not to make fun of the person that posted > it, and just give your opinion without putting anyone down with their > name for their opinion? On Mar 27, 7:36 pm, Bee <Butterflies2...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Everyone has their opinion---but would it be possible to get out of >> grade school, and stop the name calling? >Try stopping your crap, and it can happen. So long as you accuse me, >and others, of things we are not doing, you will get responses that >you do not like. YOU and YOU alone are responsible for your words. Stop trying to blame others. Proven fact, you call names and use filthy language. Groups View all web results » Results 1 - 10 of about 2,400 for Mark Probert idiot Groups View all web results » Results 1 - 10 of about 1,130 for Mark Probert a.shole Groups View all web results » Results 1 - 10 of 135 for Mark Probert f.ck off and die bitch If you do not agree with the > post, would it be possible not to make fun of the person that posted > it, and just give your opinion without putting anyone down with their > name for their opinion? > >Bee Everyone has their opinion---but would it be possible to get out of > > grade school, and stop the name calling? > > Try stopping your crap, and it can happen. So long as you accuse me, > and others, of things we are not doing, you will get responses that > you do not like. The point of the post was this--and those that posted missed the point. Spirited debate is one thing, name-calling, and defamation of character is another. My question was "Would it be possible to get out of Grade School?" When children are in Grade School they can almost get away with name calling (although if I had ever done as a child, I still wouldn't be able to sit down) but once you leave grammar school, and grow up--it really should come to an end. We are all adults here. And we should be able to agree to disagree without name calling. Do not accuse me of the same thing you are doing yourself, everyone here is just as guilty as the next person, myself included, no one here is an angel. Everyone has participated. The point being the 12 years of history or whatever it is needs to stop. It serves no purpose at all. Respect is earned. People that have different viewpoints than others should accept that, we all view life differently, and all have our own ideas and notions about how things work. 'Nuff said. > Everyone has their opinion---but would it be possible to get out of > grade school, and stop the name calling? If you do not agree with the > post, would it be possible not to make fun of the person that posted > it, and just give your opinion without putting anyone down with their > name for their opinion? This one's a keeper. | The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" | | The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?" | +---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+ > In message <df9403f3-ce59-4bc9-aeec-0d72e5770...@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Bee wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > This one's a keeper. Yep! - Especially when you consider, the author has a knack for calling employers, while trying to silence opinions of those she doesn't agree with! > Yep! - Especially when you consider, the author has a knack for > calling employers, while trying to silence opinions of those she > doesn't agree with! Calling employers, now that is hilarious. I've never called an employer on anyone in here in my life. Care to apologize? > > In message <df9403f3-ce59-4bc9-aeec-0d72e5770...@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Bee wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > calling employers, while trying to silence opinions of those she > doesn't agree with! Sorry - I shouldn't have used the term, "calling." The actual term was "contacted" employers. There was actually a paper trail! > Sorry - I shouldn't have used the term, "calling." The actual term > was "contacted" employers. There was actually a paper trail! Real Estate agents are self-employed. According to the DRE, real estate agents do not work for "employers." Would you care to apologize to the parties you have offended? > > > In message <df9403f3-ce59-4bc9-aeec-0d72e5770...@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, Bee wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Sorry - I shouldn't have used the term, "calling." The actual term > was "contacted" employers. There was actually a paper trail! Those that claim Real Estate agents are considered "self-employed" is only correct in that assumption when it applies to tax purposes, as real estate licensees with the DRE, they must work for an employing broker. It's why those seeking to curtail the free speech rights of those with opposing views have not only contacted employers in the past, but employing brokers and corporations associated with individuals as well. Isn't it interesting that those associated with "free speech" rights are so active in attempting to deny the rights to those with views differing from their's. There are interesting threads in that regard in the archives. > There are interesting threads in that regard in the archives. That is just that--archives--OLD news, OLD way of thinking. Today is the first step to a NEWER way of thinking for those willing to accept the challenge. >> There are interesting threads in that regard in the archives. > >That is just that--archives--OLD news, OLD way of thinking. >Today is the first step to a NEWER way of thinking for those >willing to accept the challenge. But do not fall into the trap of newness for newness' sake. I remember once reading "There are two kinds of fools. One says 'This is old, and therefore good.' The other says 'This is new, and therefore better.'" Sometimes new is better. But sometimes it isn't. -- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "There are two kinds of Republicans: millionaires and suckers." -- John Dolan > Sometimes new is better. But sometimes it isn't. Sometimes a break from the old could be thought of being very bold It is a risk worth taking For some they see it is faking But the motive is clear What does one have to fear? The experience could change the way you think Bringing happiness to you in a wink! Have a healthy weekend, David! |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.