Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

A Woman lives 20 years after uterine cancer ... no chemo, radiation nor surgery ... used Laetrile instead ... died pain free

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ilena Rose - 24 Mar 2008 23:29 GMT
What I am further "implying" Myrl Jeffcoat, is that when the med
device industry /  Quackwatch SLAPP team 'educated' you ... they were
getting these 'benefits" with your one big mouth:

1 ... Down came the Silicone Webring linking dozens of sites. (There
was not one penny of cost to you ... it was already up and on many
women's sites, and it took more work for you to yank it down than keep
it up.) Who benefitted?  The breast implant industry. The losers? The
women in the breast implant support system.

2 ... Down came this very good expose on Steve Milloy ... linked
throughout the internet with your buddy, Quackwatch head Barrett.

http://web.archive.org/web/20010211082334/http://www.webstarmagic.com/wisletter.htm
(Readers, if Myrl nukes this too, I have copies of it, just ask for
them.)

Who benefitted? Silicone manufacturers, tobacco manufacturers, Pharma
sellers, med device makers, etc. The losers? People who wanted to know
who bought Steve Milloy and Junkscience.com.

                  More to come.
Ilena Rose - 24 Mar 2008 23:32 GMT
I further "imply" Myrl Jeffcoat, that in buying or renting your mouth

(yes I know you claim you have never been compensated one penny nor
received any other benefit than the love & admiration of disbarred
attorney, Mark S Probert, and my 3 losing plaintiffs and Patrick
O'leary) ...

Not one more bad word would be said by you about plaintiffs attorneys
or the TCC (even though you had blasted them for years) ... and your
job was to appear to "support the women" but without ever more
revealing the lies of the impant manufacturers, nor discussing how
their science is junk.
Myrl - 24 Mar 2008 23:56 GMT
> I further "imply" Myrl Jeffcoat, that in buying or renting your mouth
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> revealing the lies of the impant manufacturers, nor discussing how
> their science is junk.

Ilena - Please get help!

We have all watched you turn everything in newsgroups about you and
your numerous lawsuits, while allowing real facts to starve in the
process!
D. C. Sessions - 25 Mar 2008 00:18 GMT
> Ilena - Please get help!
>
> We have all watched you turn everything in newsgroups about you and
> your numerous lawsuits, while allowing real facts to starve in the
> process!

And it has worked splendidly.

| The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" |
|    The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?"    |
+---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+
Mark Probert - 25 Mar 2008 00:54 GMT
> I further "imply" Myrl Jeffcoat, that in buying or renting your mouth
>
>  (yes I know you claim you have never been compensated one penny nor
> received any other benefit than the love & admiration of disbarred
> attorney, Mark S Probert,

Ilena, calm down! Relax!

I have nothing to do with it.

And, please do remember that my position on breast implants is quite
similar to yours, except that I base mine on their high failure rate.

BTW, now that you mentioned me three times in this thread, could you
take a moment to explain your motives in contacting my wife? Like I
have said, the only rational I can come up with is that you were
trying to intimidate me into silence, thus denying my right of Free
Speech, something that you claim for yourself.

I have asked you this several times, and am sure that an explanation
is forthcoming, since you are so busy these days.
Jan Drew - 25 Mar 2008 04:21 GMT
On Mar 24, 6:32 pm, Ilena Rose <B...@mundo.com> wrote:
> I further "imply" Myrl Jeffcoat, that in buying or renting your mouth
>
> (yes I know you claim you have never been compensated one penny nor
> received any other benefit than the love & admiration of disbarred
> attorney, Mark S Probert,

Ilena, calm down! Relax!

I have nothing to do with it.

And, please do remember that my position on breast implants is quite
similar to yours, except that I base mine on their high failure rate.
===

UDP on.

BTW, now that you mentioned me three times in this thread, could you
take a moment to explain your motives in contacting my wife? Like I
have said, the only rational I can come up with is that you were
trying to intimidate me into silence, thus denying my right of Free
Speech, something that you claim for yourself.

I have asked you this several times, and am sure that an explanation
is forthcoming, since you are so busy these days.
============

*where no one, under any circumstances, respond to any of their messages,
for any reason. If they post something that needs to be refuted,
commencing a new thread without reference to them, would be proper.*

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med/msg/eac0698e78a0163c
March 21: 9:16 am 2006

. *If you, and Jan, want to dredge up  ancient
history, feel free. I do not play that game anymore.

If you continue to post with the same attitude, I will correctly
assume  that you, too, in addition to Jan, want the war to continue.
I do not.*
Myrl - 24 Mar 2008 23:53 GMT
> What I am further "implying" Myrl Jeffcoat, is that when the med
> device industry /  Quackwatch SLAPP team 'educated' you ... they were
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
>                    More to come.

Sorry to disappoint you Ilena.  But I've never had a conversation with
Barrett, I've not spoken with Polevoy!  I can understand your paranoia
may wish you to lump everyone together with opinions differing from
your's - to become part of your "boogey man cartel."

I don't see Barrett and Polevoy posting here on this newsgroup!  So
most folks only have your version of things about them.  As for my
siding with anyone who would assist the public in debunking quack
treatments - I'm for that!  I don't agree with all of Polevoy and
Barrett's targets - but agree with many of them!

As for your ad nauseum claims about the Milloy material and the
removal of my website - those are bogus claims by you.

My website continues to exist to this day at: http://www.webstarmagic.com/wisletter.htm

An explanation of the Milloy material that you rant continually about
can be found here:

http://www.ilena-rosenthal.com/myrl.html
D. C. Sessions - 25 Mar 2008 00:17 GMT
> Sorry to disappoint you Ilena.  But I've never had a conversation with
> Barrett, I've not spoken with Polevoy!  I can understand your paranoia
> may wish you to lump everyone together with opinions differing from
> your's - to become part of your "boogey man cartel."

Didn't you know that there's really only one skeptical poster
here, using a long list of sock puppets?

| The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" |
|    The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?"    |
+---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+
Myrl - 25 Mar 2008 00:27 GMT
> Didn't you know that there's really only one skeptical poster
> here, using a long list of sock puppets?

I have learned there can be "alternate realities". . .;-)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.