Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Dr. William Rea in the News and on Nightline Tonight

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bee - 21 Mar 2008 00:26 GMT
Interesting Read:

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=4489265&page=1
Kulacz - 21 Mar 2008 14:18 GMT
> Interesting Read:
>
> http://www.abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=4489265&page=1

I saw this report last night.
It was very interesting.
The attorney for the state of Texas feels that Dr. Rea may be
dangerous. For helping people?
She uses the tried and true excuse of no double blind placebo
controlled studies as one of her main arguments.
We all know the problems with double blind placebo controlled studies
especially in the multifactoral nature of disease.
In addition, we also know saw the same data can be manipulated to
often support the agenda of the presenter of a particular study ar
groups of  data. (HRT comes to mind)

I found the comments made by the allergist immunologist stating that
Dr. Rea's patients are actually suffering from a psychiatric disorder
and not MCS quite disturbing. Is this the current state of medical
thinking (or "non" thinking?)

The comments on mercury were also absurd even going so far as to state
that mercury is no linger used in any vaccines.

This media piece illustrates the bias of the media and the medical
establishment against Doctor's like Dr. Rea.
edgger - 21 Mar 2008 23:47 GMT
There's more information in the ABC comments than their one-sided
story.
Bee - 23 Mar 2008 13:18 GMT
> There's more information in the ABC comments than their one-sided
> story.

Agreed, that there is.  Say, would you happen to know if there is an
truth to the rumor that there is to be a big rally
in Austin, TX starting on November 29th and continuing through
December 1st when the fate of Dr. Rea is to be decided
at the Texas Medical Board.   A friend of mine got a telephone call
about the rally and then called to  ask me if I knew if it was true or
not.    I hadn't heard anything but I don't do the clinic anymore but
I know a number of people that do.
David Wright - 22 Mar 2008 03:03 GMT
>> Interesting Read:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>The comments on mercury were also absurd even going so far as to state
>that mercury is no linger used in any vaccines.

It said "although, in fact, most vaccines today don't contain any
mercury."

Which is true.  Nice to see that your reading skills are up to snuff.

>This media piece illustrates the bias of the media and the medical
>establishment against Doctor's like Dr. Rea.

So tell me, is there anything that we *should* be biased against, or
should we welcome absolutely everything with open arms?

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?"
                                                       -- Bill Maher
Bee - 24 Mar 2008 06:12 GMT
> So tell me, is there anything that we *should* be biased against, or
> should we welcome absolutely everything with open arms?

You, David Wright, and well as the rest of the people in the USA
should
have the right to choose what kinds of health care treatments that
want
to engage in without BIG Brother watching over everyone---claiming to
be the King Kong Sized Condom for the health care community.

YOU can be biased against anything YOU want to be biased about, but
my healthcare, and everyone else besides YOU should  be allowed to
make
their own choices.  Would you like me making the healthcare choices
for you?
You would come unglued during your first colonic.
David Wright - 24 Mar 2008 14:33 GMT
>> So tell me, is there anything that we *should* be biased against, or
>> should we welcome absolutely everything with open arms?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>for you?
>You would come unglued during your first colonic.

But only because I'd realize I'd gone mad for having the thing in the
first place.  That'd be unsettling.

Meanwhile, it's fun watching YOU come unglued with your increasingly
vituperative and irrational diatribes against me.  Hey, Deb, remember,
this is just entertainment, as you are so fond of pointing out.  So
how come you're getting so emotional about it?

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?"
                                                       -- Bill Maher
Bee - 25 Mar 2008 08:35 GMT
> Meanwhile, it's fun watching YOU come unglued with your increasingly
> vituperative and irrational diatribes against me.  Hey, Deb, remember,
> this is just entertainment, as you are so fond of pointing out.  So
> how come you're getting so emotional about it?

It is entertainment---I'm not at all mad in the slightest nor even
angry.
The only part of being emotional that I have is laughing at you.

Be biased, David, I could give two sh.ts about what you really think
in the
first place.  Irrational?  Oh please....I'm just giving you a taste of
your own
medicine, and the medicine that you spew at everyone else--apparently
you
don't like it....

I'm far from unglued---LOL.......if you cannot take the heat, David,
stop dishing it out....
David Wright - 26 Mar 2008 01:06 GMT
>> Meanwhile, it's fun watching YOU come unglued with your increasingly
>> vituperative and irrational diatribes against me.  Hey, Deb, remember,
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>I'm far from unglued---LOL.......if you cannot take the heat, David,
>stop dishing it out....

Nice try at recovery, Debster, but you'll backslide soon enough.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "There are two kinds of Republicans:  millionaires and suckers."
                                                     -- John Dolan
Bee - 26 Mar 2008 02:03 GMT
> Nice try at recovery, Debster, but you'll backslide soon enough.

Are you an Aries per chance?
Peter Moran - 21 Mar 2008 22:07 GMT
> Interesting Read:
>
> http://www.abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=4489265&page=1

Go to Lisa Nagy's  web site, which asks "do you have any of these symptoms?"
and ask yourself whether you want to be a party to the encouragement of
environmental hypochondriasis.   You will find  "Do tyre shops smell of
rubber?"   " Do you have to cut the labels out of your clothing?"  and other
nonsense.  This woman, the one used to promote Rea's quackery,  is far more
likely to be mentally ill than to have any  problems with the environment.
Rea must diagnose environmental illness in every patient he sees if he is
treating this kind of patient.

http://www.environmentalmedicineinfo.com/

PM
Jan Drew - 22 Mar 2008 05:13 GMT
"Peter Moran" <pmoran@internode.on.net>

Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
From: "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 22:46:05 GMT
Local: Tues, Apr 4 2006 6:46 pm
Subject: Re: More about me
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original |
Report this message | Find messages by this author

"Rich" <jos...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message

news:kdzYf.41298$%d.37503@tornado.socal.rr.com...

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

>> "Rich" <jos...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote and LIED--again:

>>>> AND

>>>> The reason the DIVERSION of plagiarizing  became the
>>>> subject..................

>>>>>From: "Peter Moran" mori...@gil.com.au
>>>>>>>We deserve to have the truth the matter.

>>>>>>>Peter Moran

>>>>>> Here is an example of the truth of the matter, which Peter Moran flat
>>>>>> out denies

>>> [snip diversion]

>> Liar.

>> The title of this thread is More about me....

>> Restored: More about Peter Moran:

> No, what you posted is diversion.

Wrong.

It's not about Dr. Moran,

It IS about Peter Moran.

it's about Jesse

> Gelsinger and Dr. Wilson, and Dr. Moran had NOTHING to do with that
> tragedy. NOTHING.

NEVER said he did.

It IS what he had to SAY.

Your repeated posting of this nonsense demonstrates your very weird

> accusatory nature. It proves nothing at all about anybody but YOU.

I understand you don't like my pointing out the TRUTH.....

His WORDS and LIES are clear.

Restored:

>> http://www.msnbc.com/news/809196.asp [article no longer available, as
>> EVERY single person knows who was here at the time, what's more most of
>> it is posted below, so that's shoots another one of Richie's excuses]

All medical advances have entailed risk, ever since the first caveman said"I
wonder what this berry does?".

Using retroviruses to try and correct lethal and potentially lethal gene
defects is a very legitimate and logic alavenue of medical research. So this
is
nothing to do with "conspiracies", "coverups" .

It is a matter of the quality of informed consent that was applied.    It
would
be unusual these days for such issues to not be addressed carefully by the
researchers and the ethics committees to which all clinical trials are
submitted thesedays.   We cannot know how culpable the doctors are from this
rather emotive news item.

>Peter Moran

*Years earlier, a scientist just a few miles away from the Gelsinger's home
in
Tucson had raised serious questions about whether the experiment was safe.*

 Documents

 .  Feb. 8, 2002: FDA letter, attempt to ban Dr. Wilson from other
experiments.
.  March 3, 2000: FDA Warning Letter, original findings about the gene
therapy experiment.

(No coverups there,,,,,,,,,,,,,)

The trouble is, Paul Gelsinger says, Dr. Wilson's team had never told him
that anyone had ever raised questions about safety

(That's fine and dandy according to organized medicine member, Peter Moran.)

ADVERSE REACTIONS WERE NOT REPORTED
      And that was just the beginning. Federal investigators, pouring
through
Penn's records, announced at the conference that they had made a series of
startling discoveries, raising questions about whether the doctors had
covered
up problems and broken basic test rules.

In fact, just a few months before Jesse had signed up for the experiment,
several monkeys given viruses similar to Jesse's got sick. And two of them
died.

(No coverup there)

The rules for the experiment said: Even if volunteers didn't get visibly
ill,
if tests showed that any of them had a significant reaction called "grade
3," the experiment was supposed to be "halted" immediately.
      Records show there were "grade 3" reactions in more than one
patient. The first time, doctors stopped, called the government and got
permission to continue, saying an unusual condition with the patient might
have
been the cause.
      The second time, they stopped, called and got permission again,
citing
another unusual condition.
      But when it happened a third time, they didn't stop, didn't call.
      Then, a fourth time. They didn't stop or call then either

(No coverups there).

      For their own safety, volunteers weren't supposed to have a blood
ammonia level higher than 50. But people were coming in with higher levels
and
without proper approval. The limit was raised to 70.
      When Jesse signed up over the summer, he was within the limits, but
records show that when Penn doctors tested him, just days before the
experiment, his reading was 114 - more than double the original safety
limit.

(That's way cool huh Peter???)

HIGH FINANCIAL STAKES
      With so many red flags from the monkey deaths to the reactions in
other
volunteers, even to Jesse's own ammonia levels, Why had Dr. Wilson's team
allowed the experiment to continue?

(Wonder if Peter can answer this question?)

      At the University of Pennsylvania, the conflict committee approved
Dr.
Wilson's arrangement with Genovo.
      In fact, the university itself owned a piece of his company and stood
to
profit, too.

(Hmmmmmmmmm).

      In a statement, the university acknowledged that some information
"should have been shared with the FDA sooner."

(Just a minor little slip,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,)

There was no information given to Jesse or his family about the monkey
deaths.
There was no information given to Jesse or his family about toxic results in
prior patients. There was no information that would allow Jesse and his
family
to make any kind of informed decision."

(Peter STILL can't see any coverup!!!! NO dishonesty!)

CONFIDENTIAL REPORTS

      He told congress that other private companies in the race for cures
had
also been doing gene therapy experiments and had also gotten adverse
reactions.
But instead of sharing the information, government rules allowed them to
stamp
those reactions "confidential," classifying them as trade secrets to
protect their research investments.
      So, while the government knew about them, other researchers like Dr.
Wilson and volunteers like Jesse Gelsinger were never allowed to see them.

(TRust the government!!!)

"I was outraged," says Paul. "I had a right to know. Jesse had a right to
know.

(Oh my,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,emotions).

***In February, the Food and Drug Administration said that because Dr.
Wilson
filed "false and misleading" reports and "repeatedly and deliberately
violated regulations ****

REPEAT FOR THE HARD HEADED!!!

***Dr. Wilson filed "false and misleading" reports and "repeatedly and
deliberately violated regulations ***

(No coverups,,,,,,,,,,no fraud,,,,,,,,,,no deliberate
violations,,,,,,,,,,,,)

      This week marks the third anniversary of Jesse Gelsinger's death. At
the University of Pennsylvania, Dr. Wilson

****is still on the faculty****

(Soooooooooo in organized medicine,,,,,,,,,,,)

****Filing *false and misleading reports* is A OK,,,,,,,,,,,,****

****REPEATED and DELIBERATE  violations,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,is A OK.***

but no longer in charge of its gene therapy program. And, in Congress,
lawmakers are still debating legislation to provide more protection for
medical
volunteers.

******in the end, whether Jesse was betrayed by the doctors he and his
family
thought they could trust.*********

Jan

Even more about Peter Moran...

Thanks, Jan.  One of my better posts.

Peter Moran

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Jan Drew - 22 Mar 2008 04:40 GMT
> Interesting Read:
>
> http://www.abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=4489265&page=1

Another witch hunt from evil organized medicine.
Bee - 24 Mar 2008 06:35 GMT
> Another witch hunt from evil organized medicine.

Does ABC have phamaceutical companies as advertisers?  How about
insurance companies?
With the lawsuit going on, you have to wonder why the story was as
slanted as it appeared to be.
That reporter would be a wonderful witness for the plaintiffs in any
case.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.