Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Two year old Baby dies 3 days after MMR jab .....

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ilena Rose - 14 Mar 2008 23:47 GMT
http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?LOWAGE=&HIGHAGE=&VAX=MMR&SEX=&VAX
CNT=&STATE=&VAXMAN=&VAX_DATE_LOW=&VAX_DATE_HIGH=&VAXLOT=&ONSET_DATE_LOW=&ONSET_D
ATE_HIGH=&VAXDOSE=&SUB_DATE_LOW=&SUB_DATE_HIGH=&VAXROUTE=&REPORT_DATE_LOW=&REPOR
T_DATE_HIGH=&VAXSITE=&L_THREAT=&PRIOR_VAX=&ER_VISIT=&CUR_ILL=&HOSPITAL=&HISTORY=
&X_STAY=&SYMPTOMS=&RECOVD=&LAB_DATA=&DISABLE=&OTHER_MEDS=&DIED=Yes&V_ADMINBY=&DE
ATH_DATE_LOW=&DEATH_DATE_HIGH=&V_FUNDBY=&PAGENO=1&action=Find&PERPAGE=1000&SORTI
NG=ID


VAERS ID    297178      Vaccination Date:    2007-11-07
Age    2.0      Onset Date:    2007-11-10   Days later: 3
Sex    F      Submitted:    2007-11-16
State    TX      Entered:    2007-11-19
   
Life Threatening Illness? No
Died? Yes (date died: 2007-11-12)
Disability? No
Recovered? No
ER or Doctor Visit? No
Hospitalized? No
Current Illness: NONE
Diagnostic Lab Data: Electrolytes with mild dehydrate. Histology shows
acute gastroenteritis and broncho-pneumonia
Previous Vaccinations:
Other Medications: NONE
Preexisting Conditions: PRE-MATURE BIRTH....NO COMPLICATIONS
Vaccination
   
Manufacturer
   
Lot
   
Dose
   
Route
   
Site
DTAP    SANOFI PASTEUR    U2156AA    3    IM    LL
HIBV    SANOFI PASTEUR    UF205AA    3    IM    LL
IPV    SANOFI PASTEUR    Z0873    3    IM    RL
MMR    MERCK & CO. INC.    0706F    0    IM    RL
PNC    WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC    B08702H    3    IM    RL
VARCEL    MERCK & CO. INC.    06084    0    IM    RL
Administered by: UNK     Purchased by: UNK
Symptoms: Blood culture negative Bronchopneumonia Bronchopneumonia
Death Electrolyte imbalance Gastroenteritis Histology Pyrexia
Child started with high fever, 48 C, post vaccination and died on
11/12/2007
Hawki63@sbcglobal.net - 15 Mar 2008 01:38 GMT
> http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?LOWAGE=&HIGHAGE=&VAX=MMR&SEX=&VAX
CNT=&STATE=&VAXMAN=&VAX_DATE_LOW=&VAX_DATE_HIGH=&VAXLOT=&ONSET_DATE_LOW=&ONSET_D
ATE_HIGH=&VAXDOSE=&SUB_DATE_LOW=&SUB_DATE_HIGH=&VAXROUTE=&REPORT_DATE_LOW=&REPOR
T_DATE_HIGH=&VAXSITE=&L_THREAT=&PRIOR_VAX=&ER_VISIT=&CUR_ILL=&HOSPITAL=&HISTORY=
&X_STAY=&SYMPTOMS=&RECOVD=&LAB_DATA=&DISABLE=&OTHER_MEDS=&DIED=Yes&V_ADMINBY=&DE
ATH_DATE_LOW=&DEATH_DATE_HIGH=&V_FUNDBY=&PAGENO=1&action=Find&PERPAGE=1000&SORTI
NG=ID

>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Diagnostic Lab Data: Electrolytes with mild dehydrate. Histology shows
> acute gastroenteritis and broncho-pneumonia

both diagnoses are known to be fatal in young children...regardless to what
"shots"

not to mention the prematurity

> Previous Vaccinations:
> Other Medications: NONE
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Child started with high fever, 48 C, post vaccination and died on
> 11/12/2007
drceephd@insightbb.com - 17 Mar 2008 00:06 GMT
On Mar 14, 8:38 pm, <Hawk...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> >http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?LOWAGE=&HIGHAGE=&VAX=M...
>
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

This kind of logic is typical of big pharma thinking.

Say you have a pre-existing heart condition.  I walk up and shoot
you.  You die 3 days later.  Prove to me that my bullet killed you and
not the pre-existing heart condition.

Secondly, considering the chicken and the egg, which comes first, the
disease or the vaccine which can cause and/or aggrevagte your disease
until you are dead?

When will we learn and admit that vaccines are not safe nor effective?
When will we learn that you should not inject poisons into sick
children?

DrCee
You cannot secure nor restore health with pus or poisons.
D. C. Sessions - 17 Mar 2008 00:39 GMT
> This kind of logic is typical of big pharma thinking.
>
> Say you have a pre-existing heart condition.  I walk up and shoot
> you.  You die 3 days later.  Prove to me that my bullet killed you and
> not the pre-existing heart condition.

That's going to be a tough assignment if you're into magic
and don't believe that biology operates by specific processes.

On the other hand, it's not too tough if the bullet nicked
the bullet nicked the earlobe but the proximate cause of
death was myocardial inschemia consequent to arterial plaque
that had been building up for years.

It's also easy if the bullet penetrated the skull and pureed
the brain.  Either way there's actual *mechanism* involved.

Of course, the more religiously inclined would simply blame
evil spirits.  The more avant-garde religious might name
those evil spirits things like "toxins" but it's still the
same old-time religion.

> Secondly, considering the chicken and the egg, which comes first, the
> disease or the vaccine which can cause and/or aggrevagte your disease
> until you are dead?

Ummm, gee -- if the vaccine *aggravates* the pre-existing condition
then a quick consideration of the usual chronology suggests that
the pre-existing condition was ... pre-existing.  Wow.  It's a good
thing that you have us to work out problems like this that are
too tough for you to do on your own.

Of course, if the pre-existing condition (e.g. mitochondrial
disorder) were a congenital one that can be triggered by any
fever, avoiding vaccines wouldn't really make much long-term
difference.

> When will we learn and admit that vaccines are not safe nor effective?

Maybe when you have a better argument than, "Doctors make too much
money and I hate them for it?"

> When will we learn that you should not inject poisons into sick
> children?

When you can show that it does more harm than *not*.
(NB: Baby Poling's father doesn't seem to agree with you.
That's a bit of a clue, there.)

I won't hold my breath.

| The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" |
|    The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?"    |
+---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+
Skeptic - 17 Mar 2008 00:54 GMT
> In message
> <465e7e21-073d-4fd1-8678-5c596de4f303@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> those evil spirits things like "toxins" but it's still the
> same old-time religion.

Ah, religion.  Here's the great thing for the religious zealots... if you're
shot through the brain with a bullet and you live it is a miracle of god.
If you're shot through the head and you die, god has chosen you to join him.
If you're shot through the head and you're a permanent vegetable then god
has special plans for you.  It never ceases to amaze me how religious
zealots - who should be eternally happy since everything that over goes
right or goes wrong is a good thing and in the master plan - somehow are the
root cause of all the world's major problems and wars.
drceephd@insightbb.com - 17 Mar 2008 18:08 GMT
> In message <465e7e21-073d-4fd1-8678-
> I won't hold my breath.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> |    The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?"    |
> +---------- D. C. Sessions <d...@lumbercartel.com> ----------+

If you held your breath until you turned black would be a help.

Dr. Archie Kalernicos (sp) work with the aboriginal population in
Australia proves the fatality of vacinating the ill.

Yet, the docs do not care.  As an example, he relayed this.  Archie
went on leave.  The doc who replaced him was told not to vaccinate any
sick child.  The doc new better, He vaccinated two ill kids and killed
them both.

I think it is high time we rethink giving the docs a license to kill
like agent 007.  Perhaps they would clean up their murderous ways.

DrCee
You cannot secure nor restore health with pus or poisons.
Skeptic - 17 Mar 2008 00:49 GMT
On Mar 14, 8:38 pm, <Hawk...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> "Ilena Rose" <B...@mundo.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

> This kind of logic is typical of big pharma thinking.
>
> Say you have a pre-existing heart condition.  I walk up and shoot
> you.  You die 3 days later.  Prove to me that my bullet killed you and
> not the pre-existing heart condition.

If you shot me in my toe, I had it bandaged up at my local ER, and by the
next day I was back at work doing fine... then a few days later dropped dead
... I'd say it wsa probably from that pre-existing heart condition.

What we are talking about here is when we can and can't just assume that a
temporal relationship is also a causative one.

About 7,000 people will die today in the USA.  Many of them will have
sniffed cocaine 3 days ago.  Did that cause their demise?  Many will have
had food poisoning within the last week.  Surely that must have killed them.
Many ate steak dinners last night.  Steak now kills people too!

The point is this - pick your "event" - whether it be doing drugs, eating
certain foods, engaging in racy activities, or ... or getting a vaccination.
Statistically deaths will occur - based on random chance - shortly after any
such event.  The event juxtaposed to a death is not proof of causation.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.