Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Mercury Declared a Major Health Concern

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bee - 09 Mar 2008 05:16 GMT
Looks like the scientists are learning more about mercury----

http://www.southasianpost.com/portal2/c1ee8c441886655f01188ae383aa00e4_Mercury_d
eclared_a_major_health_concern.do.html

Kulacz - 09 Mar 2008 05:40 GMT
> Looks like the scientists are learning more about mercury----
>
> http://www.southasianpost.com/portal2/c1ee8c441886655f01188ae383aa00e...

Bee:
For those that do not want to click on it, here it is. For citation
and references please click on the link for the complete presentation
and article credit.
This continues to support the toxicity of mercury at very low levels.
This issue apprently is not understood by people like Peter moran,
David Wright, D.C. Sessions Mark Probert etc. who continually
vigorously debunk these statements and those that support them

Mercury declared a major health concern
Friday, March 7, 2008

A University of Northern British Columbia (UNBC) professor has
contributed to an international declaration aimed at drawing attention
to the effects of mercury pollution. It was released last week by the
world's leading mercury scientists.

UNBC Health Sciences professor Laurie Chan has been involved with
mercury research for more than a dozen years and has worked with
aboriginal communities throughout Canada's North to document the human
health effects of mercury contamination, as well as the effects of
other environmental pollutants. Chan was one of 40 scientists
worldwide - and one of only eight Canadians - to contribute to the
international declaration, which presents 33 main findings based on
mercury's atmospheric sources, its effects on wildlife and fisheries,
and health effects.

"The most challenging part of the research is identifying the subtle
effects of even very low levels of mercury in people," says Dr. Chan
who is a BC Leadership Chair in Aboriginal Environmental Health. "Some
of my research has documented that the presence of even small amounts
of mercury can affect the biochemistry of the brain and possibly slow
down the communication between brain cells. The research we're doing
now is quantifying the levels of mercury in people and what are the
subtle effects."

Mercury is produced primarily from the burning of fossil fuels. It is
one of the pollutants that generally appear at high levels in the
North because of predominant wind currents and the fact that mercury
becomes more stable in cold temperatures. The International
Declaration on Mercury Pollution states that three times more mercury
now falls from the sky than before the Industrial Revolution. The
human fetus is particularly at risk, with low levels of mercury
exposure in utero linked to lower intelligence. The increased
concentration of mercury in fish and wildlife also puts aboriginal
people at high risk for mercury exposure. "It is important to
emphasize that not all fish is bad," says Dr. Chan. "Salmon, for
example, have little mercury and eating more fish generally benefits
heart health and brain development."

"This is a global issue and a local issue," says Dr. Chan, who is
currently working with three aboriginal communities in northern BC to
document mercury exposure and its health effects. "The Mercury
Declaration came out of an international conference that attracted
more than
1000 scientists. It gives us a platform to hopefully influence public
policy.
Kulacz - 09 Mar 2008 05:46 GMT
> > Looks like the scientists are learning more about mercury----
>
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
> 1000 scientists. It gives us a platform to hopefully influence public
> policy.

Peter Moran:
Please tell us more about your proclaimed safe levels of mercury.
D. C. Sessions - 09 Mar 2008 15:31 GMT
> This continues to support the toxicity of mercury at very low levels.
> This issue apprently is not understood by people like Peter moran,
> David Wright, D.C. Sessions Mark Probert etc. who continually
> vigorously debunk these statements and those that support them

No, I'm not insisting that extremely low levels of mercury
may have effects (which would be silly, given chaos).  I
maintain that *everything* has effects at even very low
levels -- and that we can't hide under the bed.

Once again, quantify the risk from a given source of mercury
(or arsenic, or polonium, ...) and we can have an intelligent
discussion of whether it's acceptable.  Propose a specific
mitigation plan and we can have a meaningful discussion on
whether the benefits of that course justify its liabilities.

The article cited discussed mercury from coal burning, in
quantities that are going to be very difficult to scrub from
the plant emissions.  Using that as an example, the present
options are (a) live with the pollution, and (b) shut down
coal-burning power plants.

The consequences of the latter course *will* cause a vast
amount of death and suffering.  Before you argue that we
should shut down those plants, a rational person should at
the very least have *some* idea of whether the damage done
by mercury emissions is anywhere near as great.

| The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" |
|    The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?"    |
+---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+
Peter Bowditch - 09 Mar 2008 22:19 GMT
>Mercury is produced primarily from the burning of fossil fuels.

Now you've done it. Everyone knows that the major source of
environmental mercury is dental amalgam, so you can't quote a
scientist saying something else unless you want to be considered part
of the *gang* (TING).

Welcome to the *gang* (TING).

Signature

Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

Jan Drew - 10 Mar 2008 00:49 GMT
http://www.wholisticresearch.com/info/artshow.php3?artid=20
Bee - 10 Mar 2008 01:06 GMT
> Now you've done it. Everyone knows that the major source of
> environmental mercury is dental amalgam, so you can't quote a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> --

Peter---you aren't such a BOB ( bad old boy) after all--you do get it
- this
newsletter is Comedy Central----

:::::::have some popcorn and talk dirty to me:::::::::::::::::::
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.