Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Bee - in answer to the "Suster" questions...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jurimed2@yahoo.com - 07 Mar 2008 14:32 GMT
Bee:

You asked, in another thread, about the famous Stuart Suster case.  As
you note, Mark Probert keeps bringing it up.  Why does he do that?

Good question.  I think that he, and his employers, were very much
dismayed at my entry into that Suster case - even though I got there
near the end.  Read my series of articles on the subject by starting
with the URL below, and you'll see why.  Since, you, like I, have
probably deduced what Probert, and some of the others here, do, read
the first article, with that in mind - and re-read my article called
"The Six Components of the 2008 Quackbuster Operation" on the front
page of the www.Bolenreport.net site.  Pay particular atention to
component number five.

http://www.quackpotwatch.org/opinionpieces/SusterPharma.htm

Probert's paymasters are, right about now, in sh.t-their-pants mode -
for everything is coming together quite nicely.  Example - as
announced yesterday by the Associated Press,  New York Attorney
General Cuomo is conducting an in depth investigation of the health
insurance industry.  Put that together with the Suster case, which put
light on insurance industry practices, the Cavitat case, which
brightened the light, then and now the AAPS v Texas Medical Board,
which has authorized the deposition of twenty-five people so far, and
Probert's paymasters are afraid to make a noise lest the avalanche
begins.

Probert, I'm guessing, right about now, has his drapes closed, peering
around the edge, looking for strange vehicles on his street, or
somebody in a suit, or a uniform, carrying official looking papers,
coming up his front walk.

But, the light is brighter, nationwide - and Cuomo is just ONE of the
bad things that's going to happen to Probert's paymasters.

It should become obvious to you, when you sit back and look at the
whole picture, about what the function of certain, if not all, of the
"Nitwit Brigade" personnas are here, and in other discuusion groups
for.  There is an easy pattern they've developed, and it has purpose.
It is component number four in my "Six Components" article.

Of course these people don't want me to personally identify them.  Can
you read their fear between the lines?  It's so palpable you could
almost make muffins out of it.

Amused in California...

Tim Bolen
Bee - 07 Mar 2008 15:48 GMT
On Mar 7, 6:32 am, jurim...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Bee:
>
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>
> Tim Bolen
Bee - 07 Mar 2008 16:16 GMT
On Mar 7, 6:32 am, jurim...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Bee:
>
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
>
> Tim Bolen

A post just posted itself----can not sign on, cannot sign off, posts
disappear, and posts get posted--all too many strange things happening
here----That old Buffalo Springfield song pops into
mind...."Something's happening....what it is, ain't exactly clear...."

I don't think *you got it* when I said I wanted YOUR version of the
Suster case.  I want to know -- was the dude exposing himself or
molesting his patients?  Or was this a bunch of hogwash---I'd read
your website but I stepped in something the other day that caused my
computer to go completely black---and I hate to say it -- but do you
know that there are tracing cookies and spyware on some sites?  How do
I know that your site is completely spyware, and cookie free?
jurimed2@yahoo.com - 07 Mar 2008 18:08 GMT
> On Mar 7, 6:32 am, jurim...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Bee:

No, Stuart Suster never did anything that could be construed as sexual
misbehavior.  It was all made up. He was never lone with patients.  No
police agency would touch Thexton's allegations.

I think many websites have built in cookies.  I don't think mine do,
but maybe.

Tim Bolen
Bee - 08 Mar 2008 03:30 GMT
On Mar 7, 10:08 am, jurim...@yahoo.com wrote:

> No, Stuart Suster never did anything that could be construed as sexual
> misbehavior.  It was all made up. He was never lone with patients.  No
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Tim Bolen

That's a relief to know.  Why would someone deliberately lie about
someone like that?
That makes no sense.

I think I'll just leave you to do your own parts I, II, III, etc with
whatever you are doing....
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.