Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

State's Nursing Homes Might Be Overusing Antipsychotics

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Roman Bystrianyk - 05 Mar 2008 01:21 GMT
LISA CHEDEKEL | Courant Staff Writer, "State's Nursing Homes Might Be
Overusing Antipsychotics", Hartford Courant, March 3, 2008,
Link: http://www.courant.com/news/health/hc-druggedresidents0302.artmar02,0,2380275.story

Connecticut's nursing homes dole out antipsychotic drugs to residents
who do not have psychotic disorders at one of the highest rates in the
country, raising questions about whether the medications are being
used to subdue agitated patients because of a lack of staffing and
attention to alternate treatments.

Federal data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services show
that since 2005, Connecticut has consistently ranked in the top four
states in the prevalence of antipsychotic drugs dispensed to nursing
home residents who have no psychotic or related conditions. In the
most recent quarterly report, through September 2007, only Louisiana
had a higher prevalence rate than Connecticut, where more than 26
percent of residents who lacked an appropriate psychiatric diagnosis
were prescribed antipsychotics.

Nationally, the prevalence rate is 19.8 percent, with several states,
such as Florida, Pennsylvania and New Jersey, well below that average.

"This is not a good indicator" for Connecticut, said Charlene
Harrington, an expert on nursing home quality and professor of
sociology and nursing at the University of California-San Francisco.
"One of the main factors [for a high medication rate] is not having
enough staff. If patients are having behavioral problems, it's easier
to give them a pill to keep them quiet" than to hire more staff. "It's
cheaper. They'll sleep a lot."

Nursing-home staffing is now a focus of state lawmakers, who are
weighing proposals that would update the state's minimum staffing
standards to nationally recommended levels. The existing standards are
more than 25 years old and rank among the least stringent in the
country. The staffing proposals were prompted by a series in The
Courant that detailed the troubled patient-care and financial history
of one of the state's largest chains, Haven Healthcare, which filed
for bankruptcy after the stories appeared.

Federal data from the past three years show that Connecticut has
ranked highest or second-highest among states in the prevalence of
antipsychotic use among "low-risk" nursing home residents, defined as
those who do not exhibit cognitive impairment and behavioral problems.
In the most recent reporting period, 23.3 percent of low-risk
residents were receiving antipsychotics, compared with the national
average of 16.5 percent.

Among "high-risk" residents who do exhibit those problems, Connecticut
prescribes antipsychotics at the highest rate in the country -- 55.2
percent, compared with the national average of 42.5 percent, according
to data from the most recent reporting period.

The Nursing Home Reform Act of 1987 mandates that residents be free
from "chemical restraints" imposed for the purposes of discipline or
convenience. Federal guidelines allow nursing homes to administer
antipsychotic drugs to residents with dementia-related behavioral
symptoms, but they require that residents meet specific clinical
criteria and receive gradual dose reductions and behavioral
interventions in an attempt to wean them off the medications.

Although the newer antipsychotics, called atypicals, are approved only
for bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, doctors routinely prescribe
them "off-label" to quiet behavioral problems associated with dementia
or Alzheimer's disease. The use of such drugs in nursing homes has
grown in recent years, despite studies questioning their benefits and
highlighting their risks.

The most commonly prescribed antipsychotics carry Food and Drug
Administration "black box" warnings that elderly dementia patients
using them face an increased risk of death. In addition, studies have
shown that the drugs most commonly prescribed off-label for
Alzheimer's patients are no more effective than placebos for most
people, and carry side effects that include confusion, sleepiness and
rigidity, which can increase the risk of falls.

State public health officials say they are not sure why Connecticut
nursing homes have a high rate of dispensing antipsychotics to
residents who lack an appropriate diagnosis. They say that their
prevalence data might be better reported than other states, and they
note that the health department has been aggressive about citing homes
for medicating residents unnecessarily.

Some health officials suggest that the prevalence rate is high because
Connecticut has a relatively large proportion of residents who are
over age 80 and who have dementia-related problems.

"One of the reasons could be we have a large number of seniors in our
[nursing home] population. Our population is getting older. Our
dementia numbers are probably increasing," said Barbara Cass, the
state health department's program manager for the Medicare survey
program.

But Connecticut nursing homes do not have especially high numbers of
residents diagnosed with dementia or other psychiatric conditions in
comparison with other states, according to federal data. In 2006, 46
percent of Connecticut's nursing home residents had a dementia
diagnosis -- slightly higher than the national average of 45 percent,
but lower than 22 other states. About 15 percent of Connecticut's
nursing home residents had other psychiatric diagnoses, lower than the
national average of 20.5 percent.

Those figures account for residents with specific diagnoses, but they
do not include all residents who exhibit dementia-related behavioral
problems.

Dr. Harry Morgan, a geriatric psychiatrist in Glastonbury, said he was
disturbed to learn that Connecticut ranks high in its rate of
dispensing antipsychotics to residents without diagnoses. He said that
the protocol he advocates as a consultant to nursing homes calls for
clinicians to try behavioral interventions and examine possible
physical causes for agitation before considering antipsychotics.

"There are times in which patients with dementing illnesses are in
such distress, to do nothing would be inhumane," Morgan said. "But in
some nursing homes, what you see is a knee-jerk reaction -- they'll put
someone on a neuroleptic [or antipsychotic] ... in hopes of a quick fix
tonight."

"The use of these medicines can be appropriate, but it is not
appropriate to use them as an alternative to adequate staffing,"
Morgan said. "People shouldn't approach them as a first-line
treatment. ...We have to work to drive down the usage of antipsychotic
drugs."

Toby Edelman, an attorney with the Center for Medicare Advocacy Inc.
in Washington said that in the 20 years since the nursing-home reform
law was passed, the industry has focused more on reducing the
prevalence of physical restraints than on limiting chemical
restraints.

Medication "is not as visible as physical restraints, so it's used as
a substitute," Edelman said. "That's hardly what the [reform act] was
intended to do."

Edelman and Harrington said that a high prevalence of antipsychotic
use in a nursing home can be an indicator of inadequate staffing. Non-
pharmacological interventions for residents with dementia, such as
recreational activities, exercise and one-on-one attention, require
extra staff.

"You have to have the time to spend with people," Harrington said.

On average, nursing homes in Connecticut provide about 3.7 hours of
care per resident a day -- 1.4 hours by licensed or registered nurses,
and 2.3 hours by certified nursing assistants.

Other states have taken steps to boost staffing to levels recommended
in a study commissioned by the federal government: 4.1 hours of care
per resident a day.

Connecticut homes have had little incentive to boost staffing, in part
because state law requires only 1.9 hours of nursing care a day. The
state health department has rarely ordered individual homes to
increase their staffing levels.

But federal data do suggest that Connecticut is more aggressive than
other states in citing nursing homes for administering unnecessary
antipsychotic drugs and other medications.

In the latest surveys, state health inspectors cited 21.7 percent of
Connecticut's 244 licensed homes for administering "unnecessary drugs"
to residents, a rate higher than the regional average of 14.7 percent
and the national average of 18 percent. Although unnecessary drugs can
include all kinds of medication, the citation frequently is issued for
improper use of psychoactive drugs.

Cass, the health department program manager, said that Connecticut has
been "very astute" in identifying unnecessary drug violations, in part
because the state uses a more in-depth inspection process than many
other states. In each nursing home, inspectors closely review the
medication records of a sampling of residents to ensure that there are
appropriate diagnoses, she said. In addition, the health department
flags homes with high rates of prescribing antipsychotics and conducts
"more focused reviews" of those facilities.

Inspection data show that the state has issued more than 110 citations
to nursing homes since October 2005 for administering unnecessary
drugs. Eleven homes have been cited twice for that violation, with the
second citation coming within a year of the first. Among the homes
cited twice was Wethersfield Health Care Center, which was included on
a recent federal list of 54 of the most poorly performing nursing
homes nationwide.

Eight homes owned by Haven Healthcare have been cited for unnecessary
drugs in the past two years, federal records show. Haven's chain of 15
Connecticut homes filed for bankruptcy in November after The Courant's
stories detailed the chain's repeated patient-care deficiencies, lower-
than-average staffing and serious financial problems.

The improper use of psychotropic drugs at one Haven home in Torrington
led the health department to issue a consent order against the home in
December 2006 that mandated closer monitoring of residents receiving
antipsychotics. State health inspectors had cited the home for seven
cases in which it failed to justify the use of antipsychotic,
antidepressant or sedative medications, or to monitor residents for
side effects.

In one of those cases, a resident receiving five such medications,
without an appropriate diagnosis, was found to be in such declining
health that hospice was called -- until a physician was alerted and
ordered a reduction in the drugs. The resident's mental state then
rebounded: "The agitation and anxiety are gone, the resident is much
more alert [and] vital signs are stable," the state health inspection
report says.

More recently, in November 2007, state health inspectors imposed a
consent order and two years' probation on Haven's home in New Haven
for myriad violations, among them failing to justify and monitor the
use of antipsychotic medications prescribed to two residents. The New
Haven home also was cited for low staffing levels.

Nationally, the rate of prescribing psychoactive drugs in nursing
homes has been rising in recent years, with a 2005 study showing that
antipsychotic use in 2000-01 had reached the highest level in more
than a decade. That study, headed by a University of Massachusetts
Medical School researcher, found that about one-third of nursing home
residents receiving antipsychotics had "inappropriate indications" for
the drugs.

In 2005, the taxpayer-funded Medicaid program -- the main payer for
drugs prescribed in nursing homes -- spent more than $5 billion on
antipsychotics such as Risperdal and Seroquel, which retail for
several dollars per pill.

Since the FDA warnings, some doctors increasingly have turned to
antidepressants to treat the agitation and psychotic symptoms
associated with dementia. Morgan said that depression can be an
underlying cause of agitation, and he noted that antidepressants don't
carry the adverse side effects -- or expense -- of antipsychotics.

Morgan said that although most Connecticut nursing homes have a large
proportion of residents with dementia-related symptoms -- 50 percent to
70 percent, in his estimation -- many homes "don't think of themselves
as dementia-care facilities, in terms of having special expertise" or
extensive training for staff. That needs to change, he said.

"We have to begin to shift the model of dementia care away from
skilled-nursing facilities, so that we also focus on behavioral
interventions [and] recreational and interpersonal activities," Morgan
said. "Staffing certainly has to be looked at, but so does the
training of that staff."
Bee - 05 Mar 2008 21:57 GMT
> "This is not a good indicator" for Connecticut, said Charlene
> Harrington, an expert on nursing home quality and professor of
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> to give them a pill to keep them quiet" than to hire more staff. "It's
> cheaper. They'll sleep a lot."

I've been gathering research for a paper on elder abuse.  It never
ceases
to amaze me about employees and owners involved in Adult Family Care
Homes, boarding homes,
and SNF's, etc., etc., --how they managed to get through the screening
process---I've heard some
down right horror stories of neglect of our elders.   Like the
statement made above--they medicate
to keep them quiet rather than hire sufficient staff.  That's sick.
Roman Bystrianyk - 10 Mar 2008 02:51 GMT
> > "This is not a good indicator" for Connecticut, said Charlene
> > Harrington, an expert on nursing home quality and professor of
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> statement made above--they medicate
> to keep them quiet rather than hire sufficient staff.  That's sick.

Here are 2 more stories that might be of interest.

The Drugging of Seniors in Nursing Homes
http://www.healthsentinel.com/org_news.php?id=047&title=The+Drugging+of+Seniors+
in+Nursing+Homes&event=org_news_print_list_item


Seniors Often Malnourished - The Hidden Epidemic
http://www.healthsentinel.com/org_news.php?id=038&title=Seniors+Often+Malnourish
ed+%96+The+Hidden+Epidemic&event=org_news_print_list_item


Have a good day.
Roman
Mark Probert - 10 Mar 2008 04:01 GMT
> > "This is not a good indicator" for Connecticut, said Charlene
> > Harrington, an expert on nursing home quality and professor of
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> statement made above--they medicate
> to keep them quiet rather than hire sufficient staff.  That's sick.

In areas where there is a shortage of health care professionals, the
"screeing process" is putting a mirror under their nose, and if it
fogs up, they are hired on the spot. The prblem may stem fron the low
Medicaid reimbursement rates causing low salaries that do not attract
the best and the brightest.
Bee - 10 Mar 2008 06:27 GMT
> In areas where there is a shortage of health care professionals, the
> "screeing process" is putting a mirror under their nose, and if it
> fogs up, they are hired on the spot. The prblem may stem fron the low
> Medicaid reimbursement rates causing low salaries that do not attract
> the best and the brightest.

It is really sad when individuals take advantage of seniors, and the
disabled.
You have to wonder why different states don't inspect these places as
often
as they should, and shut down the homes that the owners are running
that
are not up to code.
Roman Bystrianyk - 11 Mar 2008 12:00 GMT
> > In areas where there is a shortage of health care professionals, the
> > "screeing process" is putting a mirror under their nose, and if it
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> that
> are not up to code.

We really don't have the level of care of individuals that we really
should have although there are efforts that are made by some to change
things.   One more story in that area.

Nurses work to reduce the over 100,000 deaths from bedsores

http://www.healthsentinel.com/org_news.php?id=120&title=Nurses+work+to+reduce+th
e+over+100%2C000+deaths+from+bedsores&event=org_news_print_list_item


Roman Bystrianyk, "Nurses work to reduce the over 100,000 deaths from
bedsores", Health Sentinel, April 19, 2007,

A bedsore, more properly known as pressure ulcer, is an area of skin
and tissue that has become damaged. Pressure ulcers usually happen
when a person is in a sitting or lying position for an extended period
of time without shifting his or her weight. The continuous pressure
against the skin causes a decreased blood supply to that part of the
body. Without a normal blood supply, that part of the body cannot
survive and the affected tissue dies.

In spite of progress in technology the occurrence of pressure ulcers
remains unacceptably high. Using supporting surfaces, repositioning
patients, moisturizing a patient's skin, and optimizing a patient's
nutritional status are considered appropriate strategies to prevent
pressure ulcers. According to the European Pressure Advisory Panel,
"protein and calorie supplementation, along with the use of arginine,
vitamins and trace elements with antioxidant effects appear to have a
positive effect on healing."

Unfortunately, according to the Nutrition Screening Initiative an
estimated 40% to 60% of hospitalized older adults, 40% to 85% of
nursing home residents, and 20% to 60% of home care patients are
malnourished or at risk of malnutrition.

A study in the April 2007 issue of American Journal of Nursing
examines the incidence and high cost of pressure ulcers and presents
the results of an implemented protocol to reduce the occurrence of
this widespread problem.

The study notes that "of more than 27 million deaths reported in the
United States, pressure ulcers were listed as a cause of in 114,380,
or 0.4%, of those deaths; in 21,365 (18.7%) of these, they were the
primary (or underlying) cause of death." That is equivalent over 300
deaths occurring each day in the United States where a bedsore is
considered one of the causes.

The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) determined that the
incidence of pressure ulcers in acute care settings ranged from 0.4%
to 38%. In 1998, "the mean hospital cost per patient for treating a
pressure ulcer was $15,760."

Despite the seriousness of this problem hospitals and other healthcare
settings are still plagued with high rates of pressure ulcers.
Although guidelines and protocols for pressure ulcer prevention have
been developed, "many physicians and nurses report feeling that they
lack education regarding pressure ulcer management, suggesting that
guidelines are not reaching their intended audience."

Clinical nurse specialists (CNS) instituted a Pressure Ulcer
Prevention Protocol Interventions, or PUPPI, at the Ohio State
University Medical Center in Columbus Ohio. The protocol is a nursing
initiative that involves assessing risk and nutritional status,
providing skin care, documenting, and giving referrals as needed.

Pressure ulcer treatment protocols have shown a decrease in incidence
"by almost 90% in nursing homes and almost 25% in critically ill
patients." Implementation of pressure ulcer management at one large
teaching hospital showed a 55% decrease in pressure ulcer incidence
after 2 years.

The PUPPI was instituted starting in September of 2004. The staff was
provided with information and a number of tools to implement the
protocol. As this was a new venture that required change and involved
extra work, there was an additional effort to provide education,
mentoring, and support.

The first quarter after implementation the pressure ulcer prevalence
decreased from a benchmark of 12.65% to 4.11% for all ulcers and from
6.84% to 2.05% for hospital acquired pressure ulcers.

According to the study's lead author, Kimberly Catania, rates continue
to be lower at 5.59% for all pressure ulcers and 2.10% for hospital
acquired pressure ulcers in November of 2006, and 8.53% for all
pressure ulcers and 3.10% for hospital acquired pressure ulcers in
February of 2007.

The study concludes, "While the unit CNSs have championed this process
and continue to monitor the program, it has been the nursing staff who
have embraced evidence-based nursing practice and brought it to the
bedside by adopting the initiative into daily practice. They have
become proactive rather than reactive regarding skin care issues.
Their improved communication and critical thinking have had a
significant impact on patient care and quality and outcomes."

If you wish to find out more about the PUPPI program please contact
Kimberly Catania at Kimberly.Catania@osumc.edu.

SOURCE: American Journal of Nursing, April 2007
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.