Medical Forum / General / Alternative / March 2008
Imus In The Morning with David Kirby Discussing the True 'Snake-oil' ... Vaccinations!
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Ilena Rose - 04 Mar 2008 18:44 GMT Note from Ilena Rosenthal, Health Lover.
The Snake-oil Team really are getting to use all their education... we have seen their Probert insult and tear down every one of us speaking out on vaccine dangers ... from his haughty role as Disbarred Attorney, a member of the Snake-oil Vigilantes.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-kirby/imus-in-the-morning-this_b_89775.html
Imus In The Morning, This Morning
Posted March 4, 2008 | 10:26 AM (EST)
IMUS: Good morning Mr. Kirby. How are you?
DAVID: I'm good. It's been exactly 3 years ago when you and Deidre really started bringing this to the people's attention. Boy, talk about "Ground Hog Day". It just seems like we're beating the same issues all over again, without getting anywhere.
IMUS. I thought it was kind of amusing to me, after Senator McCain said what he said in Texas, which I'll ask you about in a second....to see my name in a couple of columns blaming me for influencing him. When I've never said anything of the kind. I've got my own suspicions, but, any way, what exactly did Sen. McCain say now?
DAVID: Sen. McCain said, after being asked a question in Texas by a woman referring to the big court case, which was just conceded, in which the government said that a girl's vaccine injury led to and resulted in an ultimate diagnosis of autism. She asked him about it and he, to just about everyone's surprise, said he believed there was strong evidence to implicate the vaccine ingredient called thimerosal, in the rise in the numbers of cases.
He said the rise of cases is indisputable, meaning it's not just better diagnosis, we have more autism in America today than we had 10 or 15 years ago. He's trying to figure out what is going on. He recognizes there is a national emergency. It may not be the mercury in the vaccines, it may not be the vaccines at all, but, until we get to the bottom of this it's refreshing, to say the least, to hear a politician out there talking about what a lot of other people are talking about.
At some point, if you want to get into some of the studies that are coming out, McCain -- who's been blasted in the last 24 hours, taking more "incoming" that I've received in 5 years in just 24 hours -- he is referring to actual studies that have been published by very top flight scientists. And he has a very good medical and science staff. He would not have made this statement flippantly, and, it didn't come out of nowhere.
IMUS: The next question: There is scientific evidence out there suggesting that there is a definitive link?
DAVID: There's lots of science evidence, when taken together might suggest a link. Or might suggest a mechanism. My position has always been that this has not been proven one way or the other. Yes, there is evidence to refute, there is more evidence everyday to support this theory. People who oppose it, think this is over, and, I think it would serve them well to take a minute or two, go back to Pubmed, look at the studies that did not appear in the NY Times or on ABC news. We get filtered information in this country, and, I frankly don't blame people for thinking that this is bunk, baloney, proven, over and done with, anyone who brings it up is crazy. Because they have not been given access to the studies. The American people have not been given all the information they need.
They need to go out and find it. It's there, look at the brain studies being done by people from Harvard and Johns Hopkins. Their (subjects) are presenting with oxidative stress, heavy metals and mercury in the brain. Look at the study in Child Neurology that went back and looked at a previous study...lo and behold...they found that children with autism do have higher levels of mercury in their blood. A mistake was made in the original calculations.
And some mitochondrial studies have just come out....continue to come out....which are very germane to this court case. It all starts to fall into place, and it is hard science. It is peer reviewed. People are willfully ignoring it, some of them, they know it's out there and they won't look at it. Most of the people online who are saying that John McCain is crazy, Don Imus is crazy, David Kirby is crazy....have not bothered to read these studies. It's frustrating, because you want to have a scientific discussion, but you are talking to people who only have half the picture.
IMUS: Talking with David Kirby here on the Imus program, in an effort to get the audience to kill themselves.
DAVID: C'mon, it's too early for that, Don!
IMUS: The vaccine manufacturers claim they took thimerosal out of the vaccines when? Not the flu vaccines but most vaccines.
DAVID: The media reports that all mercury came out of all shots in 2001. Nothing could be further from the truth.
IMUS: What is the truth?
DAVID: Well, we don't know and the government won't tell us.
IMUS: Well, why don't the vaccine manufacturers tell us?
DAVID: They don't have to.
DAVID: They stopped making mercury containing vaccines right around the end of 2001 Now, this stuff goes and gets shipped into warehouses. Then it gets into the pipeline, that's when the expiration date is placed on it, the day it leaves the warehouse. They stocked up on mercury containing vaccines as they were transitioning into the mercury free formula. For those years, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and I'm quite certain into 2004, a lot of this stuff was still sitting on shelves.
In the meantime, we started giving the flu shot to pregnant women and infant children, which still contains the full amount of mercury. We never hit zero, and now we're back up. If a woman who gets the flu shot is pregnant, the fetus will be exposed to that. Then the child gets another flu shot at 6 months, 7 months and 18 months. With all the residual mercury in some of the other shots, the child is getting about 85 micrograms of mercury, total exposure. Which is, yes, much less than it used to be. But, we're not at zero. And again, the mitochondrial disease, at least for a subset of these kids, given that they have that disease, they might be sensitive to any amount of mercury, or any toxin that could set them over the edge.
IMUS: Then, in these vaccines, whether the mercury is used as a preservative or not, a trace amount of mercury is used in all vaccines.
DAVID: That's correct. (NOTE: Some childhood vaccines do not and never did contain mercury, DK) About 1/2 micrograms in most of the shots these kids are getting. That's very, very little, in and of itself. The point is, if you do have some type of allergic problem with this, or you do have an inability to secrete it, it will accumulate in your body. I think the evidence is pointing now, beyond just mercury, beyond just thimerosal. I believe there are several things in our environment that can trigger several different types of conditions and predisposition's that ultimately manifest in symptoms we diagnose as autism. Whether it truly is classic autism or not, if it's your kid, you don't really care.
IMS: What are they?
DAVID: It may be genetics, (or) because of mitochondrial health, in other words, cellular energy, (or) because of a pre-existing autoimmune condition, or an allergic condition. Given any set of those conditions, and then getting any set of triggers -- mercury in vaccines, the number and type of vaccines we're giving now, pollution in the air, pesticides, flame retardants or even just viruses, perhaps. But if a kid is set up for regression... whatever gets there first, I'm talking hypothetically, but, whatever gets there first may set off the regression. In most cases in this country, that insult came in the form of a vaccine.
IMUS: You know what I never understood? They warn people, particularly pregnant women, not to eat fish because of the extraordinary high levels of mercury they found in fish. In fact, the New York Times did a study, went around to sushi joints and they found an insane level of mercury in these various fish. It's my understanding the form of mercury in fish is not as lethal as the form of mercury in vaccines. So, what has never made sense to me, if they don't want you to eat a less lethal form of mercury in fish, they think it's okay or fine to inject any amount of mercury into the bloodstream of an infant. Just on a common sense level, sounds to me INSANE!
DAVID: Some people think it is. It's certainly contradictory, that the same day the NewYork Times reported the ultra high levels of mercury in Tuna -- which means environmental levels in general are going up - they also reported New Jersey is trying to implement mandatory flu vaccines for kids going to school.
Everyone should go online right now and look up the flu vaccine. Look up the product insert. It will say, and don't quote me exactly, something like "this product has not been studied in pregnant women. The reproductive effects are unknown. The impact on the fetus is unknown. This product is not indicated for pregnant women unless medically necessary".
IMUS: Now you are not saying, I know I'm not saying, that there is a definitive, drop-dead link between autism and thimerosal in vaccines. What you're saying and what I'm saying is, at some point, we need to all reach a definitive scientific determination if, in fact that is the case. Is that what you're saying?
DAVID. Absolutely.
IMUS: Okay, so why do people characterize you and others, and me, though I'm less to the story than anyone else, my wife is a big part of the story and so are you....why are you all characterized as being crazy, when you are not saying what they say you are saying?
DAVID: If you sat down and read only the studies that people seem to be reading, and you ignore the studies that people like me and Deidre read, you would come to the same conclusion....David Kirby is crazy, what is he talking about? People need to do their own homework. Listen, I think the biggest problem here is we're all operating in a vacuum. This court case that was just conceded is a confidential document. The government does not think we should be able to see it.
IMUS: Now, you're talking about the vaccine court?
DAVID: I'm talking about the vaccine court. Now, the family that just won this settlement has to go back into court and ask permission of the government to talk about what happened to their child.
IMUS; What did the vaccine court determine?
DAVID: They determined this child had an underlying mitochondrial disorder, which produces low cellular energy, and was aggravated by her vaccines. (NOTE: This was not determined by the court, but by medical personnel at HHS, live radio is a bit tricky - DK)
She got 9 vaccines in 1 day. 5 shots....9 vaccines. Within months she regressed into autism. In fact, she was diagnosed with full-blown autism.
IMUS: Why haven't we read about that in the NY Times or seen it on NBC nightly news?
DAVID: Well, the NY Times is not particularly interested in this story. There are reporters out there this week trying to cover it, but, until the family gets permission from the government to speak, I'm not sure how much coverage it actually is going to get. You know, I love being on your show, but, I wish instead of me being here this morning, you had somebody from HHS. Because what we basically have over there is a wall of silence.
Why is it not okay to talk about this? Why is this confidential? Exactly whose interests are being protected, if the family says it's perfectly okay to talk about this....and. the family wants to talk about it? Why is the government saying we can't talk about it? Those rules are in place to protect the privacy of the family, which has already been waived.
IMUS: We're out of time .....thank you Mr. Kirby.
drkulacz@optonline.net - 04 Mar 2008 19:29 GMT > Note from Ilena Rosenthal, Health Lover. > [quoted text clipped - 195 lines] > > read more » A wonderful interview. It is interesting to note that the New York Times reported the story about John McCain's concern about the possible link between vaccines and autism.
One statement by the NY times may lead to inaccurate conclusions. They stated that the mercury in vaccines is not found in the bloodstream for an extended period of time after receiving the vaccine.
The same holds true for mercury vapor released from dental amalgams of from a mercury spill.
The mercury vapor from amalgams is released in an uncharged state which allows it to readily pass through body tissue. It is then converted to Hg (mercury) +1 and Hg+2. This means that the mercury is in a charged state. (we will exclude all of the chemistry terms for the sake of understanding). This charged mercury atom readily binds to tissues in the body and is therefore NO LONGER DETECTED IN THE BLOOD. That is why a blood test for mercury is inaccurate since the mercury is already tightly bound to body tissues. If it is in the blood then it may be easier to excrete.
The charged Hg has a high affinity for sulfhydryl groups. One particulary important brain protein is called Beta-Tubulin. It is abundant in the brain and instrumental in forming important structures called microtubules. Beta-Tubulin contains sulfhydryl groups necessary for microtuble formation and stability. Mercury readily crosses the blood brain barrier. it has been shown that very very small amounts of mercury willdisrupt Beta-Tubulin. In addition other metals that are present make mercury more toxic.
There are various protective mechanisms such as people who geneticaly produce a protein called APO E2. Apo E2 has two binding sites for mercury which may bind heavy metals such as mercury before they bind to body tissues. APO E4 has ho binding sites for heavy metals and APO E3 has a single binding site.So if you produce APO2 instead of APO E4 you may be able to tolerate an assult by mercury. The type of APO E a person produces has been shown to be an indicator of the age of Azheimer disease onset.
So as you see, and as Mr. Kirby pointed out, this issue is complex. But what is not complex is the decision to inject a potent neurotoxin such as mercury into children. To do so is insane.
I suspect that a similar mechanism occurs with the thimerosol in vaccines but I would have to do further research before making a definitive statement on that.
drkulacz@optonline.net - 04 Mar 2008 19:37 GMT On Mar 4, 2:29 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote:
> > Note from Ilena Rosenthal, Health Lover. > [quoted text clipped - 222 lines] > to body tissues. > If it is in the blood then it may be easier to excrete. I suspect that a similar mechanism may occur with mercury in thimerosol but I would have to do further research before making a definive statement on that.
> The charged Hg has a high affinity for sulfhydryl groups. One > particulary important brain protein is called Beta-Tubulin. It is [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > such as mercury into children. > To do so is insane. drkulacz@optonline.net - 04 Mar 2008 22:00 GMT On Mar 4, 2:37 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2:29 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote:> On Mar 4, 1:44 pm, Ilena Rose <B...@mundo.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 250 lines] > > such as mercury into children. > > To do so is insane. It is interesting that many people read select abstracts and conclusions instead of entire articles and related backround information in medicine and chemistry when drawing conclusions on topics such as this. Then they resort to name calling the people that have actually done so.
Bob Badour - 04 Mar 2008 22:39 GMT > On Mar 4, 2:37 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 258 lines] > information in medicine and chemistry when drawing conclusions on > topics such as this. I research topics with all information readily available to me. Sometimes that's abstracts, sometimes that's entire papers. When I find an interesting abstract in pubmed, I try to google for the full text because often the researchers themselves publish the full text on their personal web pages.
I was rather indescriminate in my readings about vaccines, mercury and thimerosal, and I approached them with an open mind before I drew the conclusions I drew. I keep an open mind to new information. At this point, I am very skeptical that any new information will change the verdict as far as thimerosal and autism goes.
> Then they resort to name calling the people that have actually done so. Are you suggesting that idiot Imus has read a full text article on any medical subject? Where the hell is your evidence?
I read the recent court case Kirby wrote about, and I read Kirby's conclusions from the same document. The empirical evidence leaves no doubt that Kirby is an idiot. Or worse, but I gave the man the benefit of the doubt.
drkulacz@optonline.net - 04 Mar 2008 23:51 GMT On Mar 4, 2:37 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2:29 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote:> On Mar 4, 1:44 pm, Ilena Rose <B...@mundo.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 250 lines] > > such as mercury into children. > > To do so is insane. Somehow the forum will not allow me to post to any post other than my own. It has also deleted one of my posts. Anyway, you can call both Imus and David Kirby idiots if you like. Enjoy your own opinion.
drkulacz@optonline.net - 04 Mar 2008 23:53 GMT On Mar 4, 6:51 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2:37 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 257 lines] > Anyway, you can call both Imus and David Kirby idiots if you like. > Enjoy your own opinion. And I enjoy the wonderful "star" rating system. You cannot help but laugh!!
Bob Badour - 05 Mar 2008 00:17 GMT > On Mar 4, 6:51 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >> >>>>>The Snake-oil Team really are getting to use all their education... we [snip]
>>Somehow the forum will not allow me to post to any post other than my >>own. It has also deleted one of my posts. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > And I enjoy the wonderful "star" rating system. You cannot help but > laugh!! I presume this "star" rating system is something in google groups. Since I don't use google groups, I don't really care about it.
I wonder, though, whether you are enamoured with yet another sophist fallacy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum
drkulacz@optonline.net - 05 Mar 2008 01:43 GMT On Mar 4, 6:53 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote:
> On Mar 4, 6:51 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 262 lines] > And I enjoy the wonderful "star" rating system. You cannot help but > laugh!! I have to reply to my own post again since a reply to Bob Badour's post will not register. I believe a public, well covered discussion by top scientists is needed checking the agenda and ego at the door.
Bee - 05 Mar 2008 02:51 GMT On Mar 4, 5:43 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote:
> I have to reply to my own post again since a reply to Bob Badour's > post will not register. > I believe a public, well covered discussion by top scientists is > needed > checking the agenda and ego at the door. And I cannot get the star rating system to allow me to give a rating to anyone. I've seen question marks appearing on posts, when I've hit the reply button, the strangest things happen here--and posts mysteriously disappear. Now you see them, now you don't. It has happened before to numerous people that support alternative and complementary medicine. Talk about a violation of free expression!! Goggle suggested last week it was probably someone that hacked into my system, because they were puzzled because they said it couldn't be happening to their system, but did say if it kept happening to give them a call, to let them know, and they would check into it.
The star system -- is a joke. I'm honored when I have a low rating - on my posts, I always figured I rocked someone's world, and there is information there that they don't want to call attention to, so instead of ignoring it (which wouldn't add up in the star power), they give me a low score, and just makes me smile.
Bob Badour - 05 Mar 2008 03:40 GMT > On Mar 4, 6:53 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >> >>>>>>The Snake-oil Team really are getting to use all their education... we [snip]
>>>Somehow the forum will not allow me to post to any post other than my >>>own. It has also deleted one of my posts. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > I have to reply to my own post again since a reply to Bob Badour's > post will not register. It seems you object to my use of the Followup-To header. I find cross-posts to largely unrelated newsgroups only useful for trolls, cranks, and perseverating day counters. For this reason, I generally set the Followup-To header in responses to cross-posts to indicate where others can continue the discussion with me.
> I believe a public, well covered discussion by top scientists is > needed > checking the agenda and ego at the door. With all due respect, the only thing lacking is coverage, and anyone who really wants to be informed can easily find where to look. The CDC, for instance, gives an excellent bibliography that covers both sides of the thimerosal issue, and one can augment that through google and pubmed searches.
Most of the coverage sensationalizes popular hysteria over largely discredited hypotheses through blatant sophistry while ignoring the best empirical evidence available.
Actions speak louder than words. When I see a disconnect between what someone says and what someone does, I believe what they do and not what they say.
You say you want a public, well covered discussion by top scientists checking the agenda and ego at the door, but you act by posting positive support for ludicrously biased, axe-grinding agenda by a egotistical clown and an advertising hack who writes the flimsiest of sophistry.
I conclude you have an agenda and/or an ego in the ring.
drkulacz@optonline.net - 05 Mar 2008 03:55 GMT > drkul...@optonline.net wrote: > > On Mar 4, 6:53 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote: [quoted text clipped - 52 lines] > > I conclude you have an agenda and/or an ego in the ring. I respectfully disagree with you but you certainly are entitled to your opinion. Thank you for your thoughts.
Bob Badour - 05 Mar 2008 15:35 GMT >>drkul...@optonline.net wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 57 lines] > your opinion. > Thank you for your thoughts. Once again, it's neither entitlement nor opinion. It's observation. I observed what you said and what you did. Have I mischaracterised any of the facts in any important way?
You demanded to know what qualified me to interpret scientific data, and I responded with my credentials. You have yet to answer my question: What credentials qualify Kirby or Imus to interpret scientific data?
While I am not particularly swayed by credentialism, I think it is only fair for you to answer. After all, you introduced the issue.
drkulacz@optonline.net - 05 Mar 2008 15:50 GMT > drkul...@optonline.net wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 72 lines] > > - Show quoted text - I prefer not to have further conversation with a person such as you who insults others and makes statements such as calling people idiots. There seems to be a lot of that going on around here. D.C. Sessions is resorting to that and it is not something that I do not wish to engage in.
Bob Badour - 05 Mar 2008 22:07 GMT >>drkul...@optonline.net wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 74 lines] > who insults others and makes > statements such as calling people idiots. Let's see: You can insult me by challenging my right to interpret scientific papers for myself. You can insult me by calling me biased. You can attack my character by calling me angry. You can insult me by insinuating that I may not have dug deeply enough into said scientific studies. You can denigrate my thoughtful, informed conclusions as mere opinion.
You can laud dangerous uninformed sophistry like Kirby's. An interview that insults anyone who disagrees with Kirby as uninformed and having been duped by unseen and un-named forces working behind the scenes, according to you, is a wonderful interview.
What you cannot do and will not do is provide a substantive answer to any question.
You claimed that the ignorant sophistry in the Imus-Kirby interview was wonderful. What makes it wonderful? Is it only wonderful because it supports some agenda you have?
You demanded to know what qualified me to interpret scientific literature, and I spelled it out with a substantive reply. What qualifies Kirby? Or Imus? Do you simply lack the intellectual honesty to admit that neither has any qualification?
[snip]
> I do not wish to engage in. What you do not wish to engage in is a substantive discussion with anyone who disagrees with you.
astri - 06 Mar 2008 01:18 GMT >> I prefer not to have further conversation with a person such as you >> who insults others and makes statements such as calling people [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > was wonderful. What makes it wonderful? Is it only wonderful because > it supports some agenda you have? he lauds *imus* and then prefers not to interact with people who insult others and call names???????????????????????????????
-- astri
====================== to email send to astri ====================== at volcano dot org ======================
Bob Badour - 06 Mar 2008 01:40 GMT >>> I prefer not to have further conversation with a person such as you >>> who insults others and makes statements such as calling people [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > he lauds *imus* and then prefers not to interact with people who insult > others and call names??????????????????????????????? I have to say I am underwhelmed by his replies to me. His replies reek of evasion.
Muddle - 06 Mar 2008 02:57 GMT >>>> I prefer not to have further conversation with a person such as you >>>> who insults others and makes statements such as calling people [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > I have to say I am underwhelmed by his replies to me. His replies reek of > evasion. Well I for one am glad you'all shortened how far down I had to scroll to read the latest posting.
Terry Jones - 06 Mar 2008 00:40 GMT >> You demanded to know what qualified me to interpret scientific data, and >> I responded with my credentials. You have yet to answer my question: [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >D.C. Sessions is resorting to that and it is not something that >I do not wish to engage in. You are evading a fair question with all the facility of a politician. If you find that "insulting" then stop doing it.
Or are you claiming that while it's fair for you to ask a poster for *their* qualifications to assess information, that it is in some way "unfair" to expect *you* to do that self-same thing for your sources of interpretation (or indeed for yourself)?
 Signature Terry
drkulacz@optonline.net - 05 Mar 2008 04:13 GMT > drkul...@optonline.net wrote: > > On Mar 4, 6:53 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote: [quoted text clipped - 52 lines] > > I conclude you have an agenda and/or an ego in the ring. I am curious to know where you believe that I have a disconnect from what I say and what I do. Just what are you referrring to? Thank you
Bob Badour - 05 Mar 2008 15:47 GMT >>drkul...@optonline.net wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 58 lines] > Just what are you referrring to? > Thank you Says he wants: top scientists, no agenda, no ego Acts to support: uninformed media personalities, agenda, ego
Says: A, B, C. Acts: not A, not B, not C. I call that disconnect.
(The last time I looked, I think the dictionary had a picture of Imus under the entry for ego.)
Anyone who carefully and objectively reads the recent court case and the histrionic sophistry Kirby concluded from the document will recognize unmistakable agenda and ego. I would call Kirby's sophistry brazen in that he is so confident nobody will actually read and understand the court case that he publishes it right beside the sophistry.
Arak - 06 Mar 2008 16:35 GMT On Mar 4, 6:43 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote:
> I have to reply to my own post again since a reply to Bob Badour's > post will not register. > I believe a public, well covered discussion by top scientists is > needed > checking the agenda and ego at the door. Looking at all the BS which has done nothing but harm autistic people, I think you have something with this idea of having a well covered, public discussion with scientists. (David Kirby is a business manager - not what I call scientific and most of the lit out there about vaccines come from equally questionable sources)
So...yes. Let's see some real science, some real discussion and less emotionally based garbage!
Arak /|\
Bob Badour - 05 Mar 2008 00:13 GMT > On Mar 4, 2:37 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 258 lines] > Anyway, you can call both Imus and David Kirby idiots if you like. > Enjoy your own opinion. I don't enjoy that opinion. I have it in spite of my lack of enjoyment because it is an informed opinion.
Bob Badour - 04 Mar 2008 21:15 GMT >>Note from Ilena Rosenthal, Health Lover. >> [quoted text clipped - 197 lines] > > A wonderful interview. What's good about it? It's just a bunch of meaningless sophistry. For example, it almost comes right out and says anyone who disagrees with these idiots cannot have done the homework. I have looked into the issue. I have read the pubmed abstracts. The balance of evidence suggests no autism link with mercury, thimerosal or vaccines.
The higher quality studies show no link or actively refute the studies that purport to show a link. At the same time, study is ongoing so it's not like these idiots have to campaign for further study as they claim in the interview.
What's more, I have read about the court case mentioned and it in no way shape or form suggests anything Kirby claims it does. He's a sophist idiot.
Imus is a clown who entertains. Anyone who thinks they get informed by his show needs to rethink their sources.
[snip]
|
|
|