Medical Forum / General / Alternative / March 2008
Dr K - I see you've met the Nitwit Brigade...
|
|
Thread rating:  |
jurimed2@yahoo.com - 04 Mar 2008 14:18 GMT Dr K:
I was very pleased to see someone of your professional stature raise such an important question about the injection of mercury, the mostly deadly of neurotoxins, into the defenseless bodies of America's children - for money.
It must have amazed you that not one of these people actually answered your inquiry. Instead they insulted you.
You've just met one of the internet's embarrassments - the proliferation of "fake identities" commenting on subjects.
It should have become clear to you that each and every of those "fake identity"commentators would indeed, if allowed to proceed without penalty, forcibly hold down a child, and inject the total scum of vaccaination into that child, by the gallon if they could, just to watch, like Mengele, the suffering, and the permanent damage they inflicted.
What I find also amazing is that some of this scum we find here, actually claim to be Jewish, with the obvious intent to defame Judaism - for, it is obvious that none of these subscribe, in even the tiniest way, to the Judeo/Christian Ethic. I've been tempted, from time to time, to notify the Israeli Mossad about this, and suggest some action. This pretense at Judaism is even more appaling, when they, out of the sides of their mouths, rail at those involved in health care issues like world hero Ilena Rosenthal, and her attorneys Mark Goldowitz, and David Shagam.
The world is sometimes a bad place - and it is hard to change it back to something good.
Working hard at it, though, in California...
Tim Bolen
drkulacz@optonline.net - 04 Mar 2008 16:33 GMT On Mar 4, 9:18 am, jurim...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Dr K: > [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > > Tim Bolen Some of these people use fake identities? Why won't they use their own name?
jurimed2@yahoo.com - 04 Mar 2008 18:43 GMT On Mar 4, 8:33 am, drkul...@optonline.net wrote:
> On Mar 4, 9:18 am, jurim...@yahoo.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Dr K:
Good question...
Yes, why won't they? I suspect, in the long and the short of it, that we're dealing with a "bully mentality." Bullies are always, in every case, cowards, who run when somebody like me bloodies their nose. Hence, these people don't want somebody like me on their doorstep, or even finding their doorstep. In essence, we're dealing with sissies.
Tim Bolen
drkulacz@optonline.net - 04 Mar 2008 18:59 GMT On Mar 4, 1:43 pm, jurim...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Mar 4, 8:33 am, drkul...@optonline.net wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Makes sense. One would think that a credible individual would make their identity known. I suppose that it is much easier to hide behind an alias when resorting to cowardly acts. Speaks volumes about the type of people that they are.
drkulacz@optonline.net - 05 Mar 2008 01:46 GMT On Mar 4, 1:59 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote:
> On Mar 4, 1:43 pm, jurim...@yahoo.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 67 lines] > > - Show quoted text - I am very curious about all of the secrescy and hidden identities on this forum. Please let us know who you are and why you are so secretive. Do you all belong to a cult or secret society???????
drkulacz@optonline.net - 05 Mar 2008 04:08 GMT On Mar 4, 8:46 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote:
> On Mar 4, 1:59 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 76 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Who is D.C. Sessions? Who is David Wright? Who is Kaiser Souse?
D. C. Sessions - 05 Mar 2008 14:00 GMT > Who is D.C. Sessions? Hire a PI if you don't know how to use Google.
| The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" | | The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?" | +---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+
Kevysmom - 07 Mar 2008 04:21 GMT > > Who is D.C. Sessions? Yeah, who are YOU, DC?? Are you a lumber jack? LOL
> In message <c53de9cd-b446-4e3b-b374-4c63d6178...@v3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>, drkul...@optonline.net wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > | The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?" | > +---------- D. C. Sessions <d...@lumbercartel.com> ----------+ Mark Probert - 05 Mar 2008 14:07 GMT On Mar 4, 11:08 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote:
> On Mar 4, 8:46 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 80 lines] > > Who is D.C. Sessions? A person who posts in newsgroups. If you had read his messages over the years, you would know a lot more. They are available in the archives. Do look them up.
> Who is David Wright? A person who posts in newsgroups. If you had read his messages over the years, you would know a lot more. They are available in the archives. Do look them up.
> Who is Kaiser Souse? Good question.
David Wright - 05 Mar 2008 05:39 GMT >On Mar 4, 1:59 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote: >> On Mar 4, 1:43 pm, jurim...@yahoo.com wrote: [quoted text clipped - 73 lines] >Please let us know who you are and why you are so secretive. >Do you all belong to a cult or secret society??????? Oh, gee, and I'm sure we should all publish our home addresses and phone numbers, too.
You haven't exactly been forthcoming with your full identity, now, have you bub?
But I'm betting you're the same Robert Kulacz, D.D.S. who agreed to a consent order in NY State to settle a charge of professional misconduct. Right?
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher
drkulacz@optonline.net - 05 Mar 2008 06:06 GMT > In article <6d12b469-434a-4025-af8d-620f08a52...@n75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, > [quoted text clipped - 93 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Bub???
Very professional David
Anyway, I am Robert Kulacz, DDS and I acknowledged that on a previous thread as well as the disciplinary action. I have nothing to hide "bub" That action is a very interesting story and not unlike other doctors that are targeted for speaking out about certain issues. The treatment of the patient in question was 100% correct as was finally admitted by the New York State Education Department. I did nothing wrong in my diagnosis or treatment but if you are familiar with board agenda, truth does not always matter. This was actually admited to me by the attorney for the New York State Education Department. The story is long and you would not believe it anyway, but suffice to say the state boards have an agenda just as you do.
I was more than happy to explain how the attorney for NYS admitted that I was targeted but Mr.Probert did not wish to know.
So what is your real name?
drkulacz@optonline.net - 05 Mar 2008 06:10 GMT On Mar 5, 1:06 am, drkul...@optonline.net wrote:
> > In article <6d12b469-434a-4025-af8d-620f08a52...@n75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, > [quoted text clipped - 121 lines] > > - Show quoted text -I Mr. Probert initially brought this up and I immediatley confirmed. Frankly, it would be a great topic to illustrate the corruption within the state boards.
Jan Drew - 07 Mar 2008 04:42 GMT On Mar 5, 1:06 am, drkul...@optonline.net wrote:
> On Mar 5, 12:39 am, wri...@l1000.prodigy.net (David Wright) wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 145 lines] > > - Show quoted text -I Mr. Probert initially brought this up and I immediatley confirmed. Frankly, it would be a great topic to illustrate the corruption within the state boards. ~~~~~~~~~~~~
Unlike..Mark S Probert who denies his being disbarred, and also using aol.com.
In the Matter of Mark Probert (Admitted as Mark S. Probert), a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.
92-02731
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT
183 A.D.2d 282; 590 N.Y.S.2d 747
November 9, 1992, Decided
PRIOR HISTORY: [***1]
Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District. Respondent was admitted to the Bar on February 15, 1978, at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, under the name Mark S. Probert.
DISPOSITION: Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline upon the respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is granted; and it is further,
HEADNOTES: Attorney and Client - Disciplinary Proceedings
Respondent attorney, who is charged with 22 counts of failing to cooperate with investigations of alleged misconduct by the Grievance Committee, and who has failed to answer or appear, is disbarred.
COUNSEL:
Frank A. Finnerty, Jr., Westbury (Muriel L. Gennosa of counsel), for petitioner.
JUDGES: Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline upon the respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is granted; and it is further,
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Mark Probert, is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondent shall continue to comply with this Court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary [***2] Law § 90, the respondent, Mark Probert, is commanded to continue to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.
OPINIONBY: Per Curiam.
OPINION: [*282]
[**747] By decision and order of this Court dated September 29, 1989, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law until the further order of this Court based upon his failure to cooperate with the Grievance Committee. By further order of this Court dated June 4, 1992, the Grievance Committee was authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding [*283] against the respondent and the Honorable Moses M. Weinstein was appointed as Special Referee.
[**748] A notice of petition and petition was personally served upon the respondent on July 2, 1992. No answer was forthcoming. The petitioner now moves to hold the [***3] respondent in default. The motion was personally served upon the respondent on August 14, 1992. The respondent has failed to submit any papers in response to the default motion.
The charges involve 22 counts of the respondent's failure to cooperate with the Grievance Committee in its investigations into complaints of professional misconduct.
The charges, if established, would require the imposition of a disciplinary sanction against the respondent. Since the respondent has chosen not to appear or answer in these proceedings, the charges must be deemed established. The petitioner's motion to hold the respondent in default and impose discipline is, therefore, granted. Accordingly, the respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately
Source:
NY UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, ATTORNEY REGIST. UNIT
Currency Status:
ARCHIVE RECORD
NAME & PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION
Name:
MARK PROBERT
Date Of Birth:
11/XX/1946
Gender:
MALE
Address:
1698 WEBSTER AVE
MERRICK, NY 11566
County:
NASSAU
Phone:
516-968-5572
EMPLOYER INFORMATION
Employer:
MARK S PROBERT ESQ
Organization:
PERSON
LICENSING INFORMATION
Licensing Agency:
NY STATE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION
License/Certification Type:
ATTORNEY
License Number:
1253889
Issue Date:
00/00/1978
License Status:
DISBARRED
License State:
NY
From: Mark Probert - view profile Date: Sun, Feb 11 2001 4:17 pm Email: Mark Probert <markpr...@my-deja.com> Groups: k12.chat.teacher
Noah has had one since 11/26/96 (my birthday). ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.attn-deficit/msg/19779a3cdb7c6546
May 13, 1996
Newsgroups: alt.support.attn-deficit From: msprob...@aol.com (MSProbert) Date: 1996/05/13 Subject: Invest in your kids
Mark S. Probert Merrick, New York
Frank - 07 Mar 2008 06:41 GMT > SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT So this is your christian like attitude?
Hypocrite and spammer. Snipped excess unrelated groups.
Do not be surprised to see your name in bright lights.
Jan Drew - 09 Mar 2008 07:41 GMT >> SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT > > So this is your christian like attitude? Bub, Mark S Probert's disbarrment has nothing to do with either Christian nor attitude.
Make a note of it.
> Hypocrite and spammer. Snipped excess unrelated groups. Restored, Frankie........................
> Do not be surprised to see your name in bright lights. You meant you haven't already? Comon down, Frankie!! Bring popcorn.
Frank - 09 Mar 2008 08:09 GMT >>> SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Make a note of it. But your reposting it shows a totally non-christ like attitude, one designed to cast aspersions, and like any ungodly woman, gossip. Meant for ill will. Do unto others as you would have then do unto you?
>> Hypocrite and spammer. Snipped excess unrelated groups. > > Restored, Frankie........................ Thank you for admitting you spammed and with a purpose.
>> Do not be surprised to see your name in bright lights. >> > You meant you haven't already? Comon down, Frankie!! Bring popcorn. Others will bring the popcorn, and eat it as they watch you twist and turn. You will turn to the usual denial mode knowing full well it is the truth and you will either be lying flat out or deceitful, what do they call it? One of the seven deadly sins?
No doubt your mind and soul are already calloused to a large extent due to your historical practices, but in this case you are forewarned that truth will out, and truth can be your friend. I suspect that your friends are deceit and lies neither of which come from above spiritually speaking.
No doubt your other friend Conceit has lead you into your hypocritical stance. It is common. Another term for it is "Pride cometh before a fall".
Mark Probert - 05 Mar 2008 14:12 GMT On Mar 5, 1:06 am, drkul...@optonline.net wrote:
> > In article <6d12b469-434a-4025-af8d-620f08a52...@n75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, > [quoted text clipped - 110 lines] > but if you are familiar > with board agenda, truth does not always matter. Considering what the NYS Board of Professional Medical Conduct did to a friend of mine, I would have to agree. Frankly, no matter what your tale is, his is incredible, since nothing occurred in NY.
> This was actually admited to me by the attorney for the New York State > Education Department. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > I was more than happy to explain how the attorney for NYS admitted > that I was targeted but Mr.Probert did not wish to know. I felt that your being forthright was sufficient and I moved on. I thought it was the proper thing to do.
> So what is your real name? David Wright's real name is,
David Wright.
Do not believe everything Timmie Tells Ya!
David Wright - 06 Mar 2008 02:06 GMT >> In article ><6d12b469-434a-4025-af8d-620f08a52...@n75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 94 lines] > >Very professional David This isn't a professional setting. If you think I'm going to tug my forelock and refer to you as "doctor," think again.
>Anyway, I am Robert Kulacz, DDS and I acknowledged that on a previous >thread as well as the disciplinary action. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >nothing wrong in my diagnosis or treatment but if you are familiar >with board agenda, truth does not always matter. I'm not familiar with their agenda. It's not a subject of major interest to me.
>This was actually admited to me by the attorney for the New York State >Education Department. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >So what is your real name? I always use my real name on these newsgroups.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher
drkulacz@optonline.net - 06 Mar 2008 02:39 GMT > In article <cf930c5a-9def-46bc-8e49-52ac90ca4...@u69g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, > [quoted text clipped - 132 lines] > > - Show quoted text - I never asked anybody to refer to me as doctor. That was started by somebody else. What's the big deal "Dave"
Bob
David Wright - 06 Mar 2008 03:24 GMT >> In article ><cf930c5a-9def-46bc-8e49-52ac90ca4...@u69g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 139 lines] > >Bob No big deal from me -- you're the one demanding to know everyone's name, when you don't even have the sense to include yours in most of your postings.
Not that I'm exactly in awe of your intelligence if you're willing to accept a guy like Tim Bolen at face value. A little more skepticism in your make up would do you a world of good.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher
drkulacz@optonline.net - 06 Mar 2008 03:37 GMT > In article <628e50aa-bbdd-4904-a89a-61ffc4053...@34g2000hsz.googlegroups.com>, > [quoted text clipped - 157 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Not demanding to know at all. Just wondering why some insist on staying anonymous. I have made my identity known so it does not need to be plastered on every post. Others, seem to hide behind the veil of annonymity, Why? Is this a secret society? People usually identify themselves unless they have something to hide.
Bee - 06 Mar 2008 04:03 GMT On Mar 5, 7:37 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote:
> People usually identify themselves unless they have something to hide. Dr. K, just think of everyone as a sock puppet that is in the anti alternative camp--and you'll be fine.
This is for entertainment purposes only---how can you possibly take anyone seriously?????
David Wright - 08 Mar 2008 02:27 GMT >> In article <628e50aa-bbdd-4904-a89a-61ffc4053...@34g2000hsz.googlegroups.com>, >> <drkul...@optonline.net> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 162 lines] >Not demanding to know at all. Just wondering why some insist on >staying anonymous. Probably because they don't want to get annoying phone calls from people who want to harass them.
>I have made my identity known so it does not need to be plastered on >every post. On the contrary, it's simple courtesy to include a few lines at the end of each post to identify yourself. You seem to be under the mistaken impression that if you identify yourself once, everyone in the world will know who you are forever after, including people who only started reading this newsgroup today.
>Others, seem to hide behind the veil of annonymity, >Why? >Is this a secret society? >People usually identify themselves unless they have something to hide. I can't agree with that at all. Sometimes people identify themselves and still have plenty to hide. Sometimes people like to be anonymous just to avoid additional email traffic.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher
jurimed2@yahoo.com - 09 Mar 2008 04:51 GMT David (Chris) Wright:
About your claim "Probably because they don't want to get annoying phone calls from people who want to harass them. "
Are you getting those kind of phone calls? Do you know someone who is? Tell us about that please.
Curious in California...
Tim Bolen
David Wright - 10 Mar 2008 04:45 GMT >David (Chris) Wright: > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >Are you getting those kind of phone calls? Do you know someone who >is? Tell us about that please. Happily, I am not getting such calls, and by keeping little verminous types like you from knowing who I am, I figure I'll help keep it that way.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher
Bee - 10 Mar 2008 06:23 GMT > Happily, I am not getting such calls, and by keeping little verminous > types like you from knowing who I am, I figure I'll help keep it that > way. Someone must think I'm someone involved in something that I am not, because one of my friends discovered something today that does not belong aimed at my yard - I will be figuring out some gawd awful white noise for it to listen to, something like Tiny Tim-----or Jesus Loves Me, or Ray Steven's music. Whatever I come up with, it will be bad-- whomever is behind this "will pay" and it will hurt their ears! I kind of suspected it was there - based on a few things I have read---and with the problems I am having with my computer, You know when your email gives you a blow by blow of telephone conversations that take place in your own home---somethings not right in Denmark!
Bee - 06 Mar 2008 04:01 GMT > Not that I'm exactly in awe of your intelligence if you're willing to > accept a guy like Tim Bolen at face value. A little more skepticism > in your make up would do you a world of good. David, you absolutely right about skepticism---I am very skeptical of those individuals that post in an alternative health newsgroup that are skeptical of Tim Bolen.
David Wright - 06 Mar 2008 05:23 GMT >> Not that I'm exactly in awe of your intelligence if you're willing to >> accept a guy like Tim Bolen at face value. A little more skepticism [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >of those individuals that post in an alternative health newsgroup >that are skeptical of Tim Bolen. And that speaks volumes about you.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher
Mark Probert - 06 Mar 2008 12:30 GMT > In article <ac5b4315-b64f-47f2-a4ad-ddedf4e5b...@e60g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > And that speaks volumes about you. Volumes? Pfui. Library of Congress.
Bee - 06 Mar 2008 13:00 GMT > >David, you absolutely right about skepticism---I am very skeptical > >of those individuals that post in an alternative health newsgroup > >that are skeptical of Tim Bolen. > > And that speaks volumes about you. Your statement means absolutely ZERO to me. Coming from a Loser like yourself, I almost think it is a compliment!!
This newsgroup is for entertainment purposes only----you are entertaining...NOT.
David Wright - 07 Mar 2008 02:58 GMT >> >David, you absolutely right about skepticism---I am very skeptical >> >of those individuals that post in an alternative health newsgroup [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >This newsgroup is for entertainment purposes only----you are >entertaining...NOT. Aw, I'm so hurt. You are free to stop reading my postings at your earliest convenience.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher
Bee - 07 Mar 2008 03:23 GMT > Aw, I'm so hurt. You are free to stop reading my postings at your > earliest convenience. > > No thanks---I'm going to continue---in case you haven't heard there is a new Sheriff in town---Mr. IT Guy---and I think your postings as well as mine are just as valuable as mine.....
Bee - 07 Mar 2008 04:01 GMT > Aw, I'm so hurt. You are free to stop reading my postings at your > earliest convenience. Are you trying to "stifle my reading habits, now?"
I keep meaning to ask you--sometimes your postings are 8 hours ahead of me, and sometimes they are only two hours---was just curious if England swings like a pendulum do---if there were Bobbies on Bicycles two by two---you must travel A LOT---but glad to see that you post every night on the good old MHA!!
David Wright - 08 Mar 2008 00:35 GMT >> Aw, I'm so hurt. You are free to stop reading my postings at your >> earliest convenience. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >two by two---you must travel A LOT---but glad to see that you post >every night on the good old MHA!! What's England got to do with any of this? I have no idea why my postings would show varying times, I use the same news server in all cases.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher
Bee - 08 Mar 2008 03:20 GMT > What's England got to do with any of this? I have no idea why my > postings would show varying times, I use the same news server in all > cases. It is really strange-David--that was the only reason I brought it up-- several of your posting show you being 8 hours a head of me--which throws you into England time...I know sometimes you post with Prodigy, and sometimes with Comcast. I don't think Comcast or Prodigy are that far off in the time zone.
-- I have a couple of friends that work at Google in the Valley, and I sent some samples snail mail. They had never heard of it before---but it could be because I am aware that my computer has been compromised---
Anyways, hopefully it will give them something to do at work or show their boss.
David Wright - 08 Mar 2008 04:41 GMT >> What's England got to do with any of this? I have no idea why my >> postings would show varying times, I use the same news server in all [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >Anyways, hopefully it will give them something to do at work or show >their boss. I don't post via prodigy any more.
All I can think of is that perhaps the postings are reaching google via different routes at times. Not sure why that'd happen, but it's entirely possible.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher
Bee - 08 Mar 2008 07:19 GMT > I don't post via prodigy any more. > > All I can think of is that perhaps the postings are reaching google > via different routes at times. Not sure why that'd happen, but it's > entirely possible. Really--that's really strange - hopefully no one is in your account, like they are into mine---law enforcement did tell me to pull the plug, from the computer every time I am not using it....something about hijacking--using someone else's computer to access the internet.
D. C. Sessions - 08 Mar 2008 14:45 GMT > Really--that's really strange - hopefully no one is in your account, > like they are into mine---law enforcement did tell me to pull the > plug, > from the computer every time I am not using it....something about > hijacking--using someone else's computer to access the internet. If your box has been zombied, you being logged in won't stop it.
| The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" | | The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?" | +---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+
Bee - 08 Mar 2008 15:45 GMT > If your box has been zombied, you being logged in won't stop it. > > -- How does it happen? Tell me about zombied?
D. C. Sessions - 08 Mar 2008 16:01 GMT >> If your box has been zombied, you being logged in won't stop it. >> >> -- > How does it happen? Tell me about zombied? Where to start? A "zombie" PC is one which has been taken over by "malware" -- you would probably say "virus," but there are other kinds. The thing about a zombie is that it takes orders from some other source. They're usually connected in what are called "botnets" (robot networks) and have distributed ways of relaying commands from the controller, who often uses them for distributing spam, for attacking target systems, etc.
Your choices are pretty much to either become reasonably savvy in terms of keeping a Microsoft system from getting infected (or "owned") or else using something else. A clueless Macintosh user isn't _safe_, but is likely to be safe_er_ -- Me, I use Linux. Haven't touched an MS system in about ten years and the only time I light up anything from Microsoft is when I run a virtual machine at tax time; that sucker is behind armor.
Bottom line: get clued or get 0wn3d.
| The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" | | The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?" | +---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+
David Wright - 10 Mar 2008 04:36 GMT >> I don't post via prodigy any more. >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >from the computer every time I am not using it....something about >hijacking--using someone else's computer to access the internet. Luckily, I don't use Windows and thus am in relatively little danger of being hijacked. In any case, I doubt that someone else is posting under my name using my style.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher
Bee - 10 Mar 2008 06:17 GMT > Luckily, I don't use Windows and thus am in relatively little danger > of being hijacked. In any case, I doubt that someone else is posting > under my name using my style. You don't do Windows anymore? But do you do floors???? How about coffee?
D. C. Sessions - 06 Mar 2008 13:14 GMT > David, you absolutely right about skepticism---I am very skeptical > of those individuals that post in an alternative health newsgroup > that are skeptical of Tim Bolen. So it is reasonable to infer that you either are skeptical of yourself or place complete trust in Bolen.
| The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" | | The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?" | +---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+
Bee - 06 Mar 2008 15:18 GMT > So it is reasonable to infer that you either are skeptical > of yourself or place complete trust in Bolen. > > -- Neither-dipshit!
Where is your sense of humor---this newsgroup is a joke--if anyone takes it for anything but at the entertainment value that it presents -- they need help!
jurimed2@yahoo.com - 06 Mar 2008 17:22 GMT > > So it is reasonable to infer that you either are skeptical > > of yourself or place complete trust in Bolen. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > it for anything but at the entertainment value that it presents -- > they need help! Bee:
I agree and disagee. First, this attack by these "fake identity" people is not a joke on their part. It's organized. Each person identified can be traced back to a common source. Each of them have some sort of reward built into their activities, whether its a paycheck, or something else. And, each of them are VERY MUCH AFRAID I'll discover who they are - for good reason.
My guess is that, even now, each of them look out the window each morning and night, looking to see if there is a strange van parked up the street, and wondering too, who put it there. They probably watch, constantly, to see who it is that's talking to their employer.
This is not a game.
Tim Bolen
Peter Bowditch - 06 Mar 2008 23:35 GMT >> > So it is reasonable to infer that you either are skeptical >> > of yourself or place complete trust in Bolen. [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >paycheck, or something else. And, each of them are VERY MUCH AFRAID >I'll discover who they are - for good reason. Who am I, Tim? And why weren't you in your "office" when I dropped by to introduce myself (and pick up the subpoenas, of course)?
>My guess is that, even now, each of them look out the window each >morning and night, looking to see if there is a strange van parked up >the street, and wondering too, who put it there. They probably watch, >constantly, to see who it is that's talking to their employer. My employer sends this message: "f.ck off, Tim".
>This is not a game. > >Tim Bolen
 Signature Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
jurimed2@yahoo.com - 07 Mar 2008 03:33 GMT > jurim...@yahoo.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > > - Show quoted text - poor peter:
Oh, I was there, peter, waiting for you so I could kick the living sh.t out of you while making a citizen's arrest for "stalking" - but you showed up, pansie that you are, just after dawn when there was no one to tell me you were on site.
Same story with Mexico, and Hulda Clark's clinic - you showed up long after the clinic was closed for the day, so you didn't get all that Mexican cock up your a.s, you would have gotten in that comfy little Mexican jail, the Federales, and the Rurales were going put you in when they grabbed you. You were just a phone call away...
Amused in California...
Tim Bolen
Peter Bowditch - 07 Mar 2008 09:07 GMT >poor peter: > >Oh, I was there, peter, waiting for you so I could kick the living >sh.t out of you while making a citizen's arrest for "stalking" - but >you showed up, pansie that you are, just after dawn when there was no >one to tell me you were on site. I know you live in some other world to the rest of us, Tim. That must be why a photograph of me outside your office shows the shadow on the east side of me and you say that happens at dawn. Everywhere else the sun in the west means afternoon.
But why should I expect you to not tell lies? After all, that is what you do for a living.
>Same story with Mexico, and Hulda Clark's clinic - you showed up long >after the clinic was closed for the day, so you didn't get all that >Mexican cock up your a.s, Does Hulda sell "Mexican cock up the a.s" at her pink palace?
Interestingly, the photos at http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/comment/clark08.htm have shadows showing that the sun was in the south east. In the world of real people, that would make it morning.
But why should I expect you to not tell lies? After all, that is what you do for a living.
> you would have gotten in that comfy little >Mexican jail, the Federales, and the Rurales were going put you in >when they grabbed you. You were just a phone call away... But you forgot to call them. How sad.
But why should I expect you to not tell lies? After all, that is what you do for a living.
>Amused in California... I doubt that you could be as amused as I was when I saw your "office".
 Signature Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
David Wright - 08 Mar 2008 02:38 GMT >> jurim...@yahoo.com wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] >you showed up, pansie that you are, just after dawn when there was no >one to tell me you were on site. How comical. I've seen video of you, Timmy, and I've seen still photos of Peter, and from what I can tell, he's no older than you are (possibly younger) and larger. I very much doubt that he'd be in any physical danger from you unless you had a gun.
He's already debunked the rest of your story, about the times of day etc. And last I knew, making a citizen's arrest for the not-really- committed crime of stalking did not give you license to beat the arrestee up.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher
Bee - 08 Mar 2008 03:24 GMT > He's already debunked the rest of your story, about the times of day > etc. And last I knew, making a citizen's arrest for the not-really- > committed crime of stalking did not give you license to beat the > arrestee up. You know David, I've seen both photos -- I think they are are around the same age.
I'm not sure about "the stories." I won't bet on either one of them because they are way too different. Nor, does it matter. You know what they say about two people that come on an accident scene at the same time from two angles - you get two different answers...
Peter Bowditch - 08 Mar 2008 05:48 GMT >> He's already debunked the rest of your story, about the times of day >> etc. And last I knew, making a citizen's arrest for the not-really- [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >angles - you >get two different answers... But I offered the evidence of photographs showing the position of the sun. In the south east when Bolen says it is late in the day, in the west when Bolen says it is dawn. I know water goes down the plughole a different way in the Northern Hemisphere, but I didn't know the sun went the other way as well.
 Signature Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
Bee - 08 Mar 2008 07:27 GMT > But I offered the evidence of photographs showing the position of the > sun. In the south east when Bolen says it is late in the day, in the [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > -- Where are the photos? And if there are computerized, and not a hard copy, there are wonderful programs that can do amazing things----I downsized my chest---and send out cards to my friends---and told them that I had had bust reduction surgery. Everyone bought it----at first---as I was out on vacation when I did it. My S.O. was at home, and I had him going ----he was worried I really was a 32AAA!!!
Bee - 08 Mar 2008 07:28 GMT > But I offered the evidence of photographs showing the position of the > sun. In the south east when Bolen says it is late in the day, in the [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > -- Why did you fly all the way from Australia to go to Bolen's neck of the woods? Were you invited to a party?
Peter Bowditch - 08 Mar 2008 11:33 GMT >> But I offered the evidence of photographs showing the position of the >> sun. In the south east when Bolen says it is late in the day, in the [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >the woods? >Were you invited to a party? Perhaps you might remember asking me recently about a conference I attended.
In other words - asked and answered.
 Signature Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
Bee - 08 Mar 2008 15:44 GMT > Perhaps you might remember asking me recently about a conference I > attended. > > In other words - asked and answered. I thought there had been a MHA party---and not everyone got to go!! Or was even invited!
Hey, I have a question for you---what is your definition of quackery? I mean, there seems to be the "definite" answer but what is your own definition of it?
I believe quackery exists, but I do not believe that it exists for example in the definition used by Quackwatch.
Mark Probert - 10 Mar 2008 03:16 GMT > > But I offered the evidence of photographs showing the position of the > > sun. In the south east when Bolen says it is late in the day, in the [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > the woods? > Were you invited to a party? Peter was an invited speaker at an event.
Bee - 10 Mar 2008 06:15 GMT > Peter was an invited speaker at an event. At Timmie's house? Or at the post office box?
Mark Probert - 10 Mar 2008 12:19 GMT > > Peter was an invited speaker at an event. > > At Timmie's house? Or at the post office box? Nope.
Mark Probert - 10 Mar 2008 03:14 GMT > In article <9f51b3bc-b399-46d1-b447-711ef2604...@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, > [quoted text clipped - 56 lines] > (possibly younger) and larger. I very much doubt that he'd be in any > physical danger from you unless you had a gun. Timmie would be in the most danger if Timmie had a gun.
> He's already debunked the rest of your story, about the times of day > etc. And last I knew, making a citizen's arrest for the not-really- > committed crime of stalking did not give you license to beat the > arrestee up. Jan Drew - 07 Mar 2008 05:10 GMT David Wright - 08 Mar 2008 02:33 GMT >> > So it is reasonable to infer that you either are skeptical >> > of yourself or place complete trust in Bolen. [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >paycheck, or something else. And, each of them are VERY MUCH AFRAID >I'll discover who they are - for good reason. Why would anyone be afraid of you discovering who they are? I'm not afraid of it, nor do I care if you decide to park outside my place. If you showed up on my doorstep and refused to go away, I'd call the police, of course. But I think most people would do that.
>My guess is that, even now, each of them look out the window each >morning and night, looking to see if there is a strange van parked up >the street, and wondering too, who put it there. They probably watch, >constantly, to see who it is that's talking to their employer. > >This is not a game. Sure it is. It's a very strange game where you lurch around making vaguely ominous-sounding statements, as if you're about to descend like an avenging angel on some nefarious group.
But, of course, you aren't. You really don't have any grounds for doing anything at all. Business for you must be really slow right now if you have all this free time to be making your not-quite-threats.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher
Jan Drew - 07 Mar 2008 05:07 GMT > In message > <ac5b4315-b64f-47f2-a4ad-ddedf4e5be4a@e60g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, Bee [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > So it is reasonable to infer that you either are skeptical > of yourself or place complete trust in Bolen. LOL! The *gang's* usual *reasonable to infer*.
Douglas does not question Mark S Probert.
"M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-July 10, 2004" <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t 07-10...@lymbercartel.com>
|
> D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> Jan Drew - 07 Mar 2008 05:00 GMT > In article > <628e50aa-bbdd-4904-a89a-61ffc4053669@34g2000hsz.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 160 lines] > name, when you don't even have the sense to include yours in most of > your postings. ZZzz. Where did David read any *demanding*??
> Not that I'm exactly in awe of your intelligence if you're willing to > accept a guy like Tim Bolen at face value. A little more skepticism [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > on?" > -- Bill Maher Mark Probert - 06 Mar 2008 03:47 GMT > In article <cf930c5a-9def-46bc-8e49-52ac90ca4...@u69g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, > [quoted text clipped - 125 lines] > > I always use my real name on these newsgroups. Dr. K has been cautioned about believing Bolen. I hope he takes a word to the wise.
Bee - 06 Mar 2008 04:08 GMT > Dr. K has been cautioned about believing Bolen. I hope he takes a word > to the wise. Is that a threat? It sure sounds like it. Please explain what you mean.
David Wright - 06 Mar 2008 05:24 GMT >> Dr. K has been cautioned about believing Bolen. I hope he takes a word >> to the wise. > >Is that a threat? It sure sounds like it. Please explain what you >mean. It is quite obviously not a threat. Get a grip.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher
Mark Probert - 06 Mar 2008 12:32 GMT > In article <451b9771-cca3-470e-b495-4e6de841c...@p73g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>, > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > It is quite obviously not a threat. Get a grip. Of course it is not a threat. It is a word to the wise. I bet Bolen's former client, Stuie Suster just loved being extradited from Connecticut. Even if the case was later tossed, the humility he had to undergo for his actions which mirror Bolen's empty threats about legal process.
Jan Drew - 07 Mar 2008 05:23 GMT On Mar 6, 12:24 am, wri...@l1000.prodigy.net (David Wright) wrote:
> In article > <451b9771-cca3-470e-b495-4e6de841c...@p73g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > It is quite obviously not a threat. Get a grip. Of course it is not a threat. It is a word to the wise. I bet Bolen's former client, Stuie Suster just loved being extradited from Connecticut. Even if the case was later tossed, the humility he had to undergo for his actions which mirror Bolen's empty threats about legal process. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Speaking of legal.
In the Matter of Mark Probert (Admitted as Mark S. Probert), a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.
92-02731
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT
183 A.D.2d 282; 590 N.Y.S.2d 747
November 9, 1992, Decided
PRIOR HISTORY: [***1]
Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District. Respondent was admitted to the Bar on February 15, 1978, at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, under the name Mark S. Probert.
DISPOSITION: Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline upon the respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is granted; and it is further,
HEADNOTES: Attorney and Client - Disciplinary Proceedings
Respondent attorney, who is charged with 22 counts of failing to cooperate with investigations of alleged misconduct by the Grievance Committee, and who has failed to answer or appear, is disbarred.
COUNSEL:
Frank A. Finnerty, Jr., Westbury (Muriel L. Gennosa of counsel), for petitioner.
JUDGES: Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline upon the respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is granted; and it is further,
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Mark Probert, is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondent shall continue to comply with this Court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary [***2] Law § 90, the respondent, Mark Probert, is commanded to continue to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.
OPINIONBY: Per Curiam.
OPINION: [*282]
[**747] By decision and order of this Court dated September 29, 1989, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law until the further order of this Court based upon his failure to cooperate with the Grievance Committee. By further order of this Court dated June 4, 1992, the Grievance Committee was authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding [*283] against the respondent and the Honorable Moses M. Weinstein was appointed as Special Referee.
[**748] A notice of petition and petition was personally served upon the respondent on July 2, 1992. No answer was forthcoming. The petitioner now moves to hold the [***3] respondent in default. The motion was personally served upon the respondent on August 14, 1992. The respondent has failed to submit any papers in response to the default motion.
The charges involve 22 counts of the respondent's failure to cooperate with the Grievance Committee in its investigations into complaints of professional misconduct.
The charges, if established, would require the imposition of a disciplinary sanction against the respondent. Since the respondent has chosen not to appear or answer in these proceedings, the charges must be deemed established. The petitioner's motion to hold the respondent in default and impose discipline is, therefore, granted. Accordingly, the respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately
Source:
NY UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, ATTORNEY REGIST. UNIT
Currency Status:
ARCHIVE RECORD
NAME & PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION
Name:
MARK PROBERT
Date Of Birth:
11/XX/1946
Gender:
MALE
Address:
1698 WEBSTER AVE
MERRICK, NY 11566
County:
NASSAU
Phone:
516-968-5572
EMPLOYER INFORMATION
Employer:
MARK S PROBERT ESQ
Organization:
PERSON
LICENSING INFORMATION
Licensing Agency:
NY STATE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION
License/Certification Type:
ATTORNEY
License Number:
1253889
Issue Date:
00/00/1978
License Status:
DISBARRED
License State:
NY
From: Mark Probert - view profile Date: Sun, Feb 11 2001 4:17 pm Email: Mark Probert <markpr...@my-deja.com> Groups: k12.chat.teacher
Noah has had one since 11/26/96 (my birthday).
Bee - 06 Mar 2008 13:03 GMT > >>Probert: Dr. K has been cautioned about believing Bolen. I hope he takes a word > >> to the wise. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > I know this is USENET--but considering you did not make that post in the first place-- I'm wondering why you are answering it.....
It's never a dull moment, around "AS MY STOMACH TURNS."
Jan Drew - 07 Mar 2008 05:21 GMT > In article > <451b9771-cca3-470e-b495-4e6de841c2af@p73g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >>Is that a threat? It sure sounds like it. Please explain what you >>mean. Note how the *gang members* answer for each other.
I guess Douglas Sessions can reasonably infer...........................
> It is quite obviously not a threat. Get a grip. > > -- David Wright@comcast.com Bee - 07 Mar 2008 05:34 GMT > Note how the *gang members* answer for each other. Jan,,,don't you know what happens when you do the "sock hop" trot too often???---"any PORT" in any storm!!! You know it must get harder every day to remember what name you said you would "puppet" for the day!! And they always get their ISP screwed up----you gotta laugh....the Puppeteer must be on drugs to keep up with it all!!!
Jan Drew - 07 Mar 2008 05:17 GMT On Mar 5, 9:06 pm, wri...@l1000.prodigy.net (David Wright) wrote:
> In article > <cf930c5a-9def-46bc-8e49-52ac90ca4...@u69g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 147 lines] > > I always use my real name on these newsgroups. Dr. K has been cautioned about believing Bolen. I hope he takes a word to the wise. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ One cannot believe Mark S Probert. A word to the wise.
Jan Drew - 07 Mar 2008 04:55 GMT > In article > <cf930c5a-9def-46bc-8e49-52ac90ca431b@u69g2000hse.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 144 lines] > > -- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net OrgName: Comcast Cable Communications, Inc. OrgID: CMCS Address: 1800 Bishops Gate Blvd City: Mt Laurel StateProv: NJ PostalCode: 08054 Country: US
Mark Probert - 05 Mar 2008 14:09 GMT > In article <6d12b469-434a-4025-af8d-620f08a52...@n75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, > [quoted text clipped - 86 lines] > consent order in NY State to settle a charge of professional > misconduct. Right? Dr. K acknowledged that without hesitation. He is far more forthright than Bolen. While that sounds like a left handed compliment, it is true.
Jan Drew - 07 Mar 2008 05:25 GMT On Mar 5, 12:39 am, wri...@l1000.prodigy.net (David Wright) wrote:
> In article > <6d12b469-434a-4025-af8d-620f08a52...@n75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 100 lines] > consent order in NY State to settle a charge of professional > misconduct. Right? Dr. K acknowledged that without hesitation. He is far more forthright than Bolen. While that sounds like a left handed compliment, it is true. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Speaking of forthright.
In the Matter of Mark Probert (Admitted as Mark S. Probert), a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.
92-02731
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT
183 A.D.2d 282; 590 N.Y.S.2d 747
November 9, 1992, Decided
PRIOR HISTORY: [***1]
Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District. Respondent was admitted to the Bar on February 15, 1978, at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, under the name Mark S. Probert.
DISPOSITION: Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline upon the respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is granted; and it is further,
HEADNOTES: Attorney and Client - Disciplinary Proceedings
Respondent attorney, who is charged with 22 counts of failing to cooperate with investigations of alleged misconduct by the Grievance Committee, and who has failed to answer or appear, is disbarred.
COUNSEL:
Frank A. Finnerty, Jr., Westbury (Muriel L. Gennosa of counsel), for petitioner.
JUDGES: Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline upon the respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is granted; and it is further,
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Mark Probert, is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondent shall continue to comply with this Court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary [***2] Law § 90, the respondent, Mark Probert, is commanded to continue to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.
OPINIONBY: Per Curiam.
OPINION: [*282]
[**747] By decision and order of this Court dated September 29, 1989, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law until the further order of this Court based upon his failure to cooperate with the Grievance Committee. By further order of this Court dated June 4, 1992, the Grievance Committee was authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding [*283] against the respondent and the Honorable Moses M. Weinstein was appointed as Special Referee.
[**748] A notice of petition and petition was personally served upon the respondent on July 2, 1992. No answer was forthcoming. The petitioner now moves to hold the [***3] respondent in default. The motion was personally served upon the respondent on August 14, 1992. The respondent has failed to submit any papers in response to the default motion.
The charges involve 22 counts of the respondent's failure to cooperate with the Grievance Committee in its investigations into complaints of professional misconduct.
The charges, if established, would require the imposition of a disciplinary sanction against the respondent. Since the respondent has chosen not to appear or answer in these proceedings, the charges must be deemed established. The petitioner's motion to hold the respondent in default and impose discipline is, therefore, granted. Accordingly, the respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately
Source:
NY UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, ATTORNEY REGIST. UNIT
Currency Status:
ARCHIVE RECORD
NAME & PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION
Name:
MARK PROBERT
Date Of Birth:
11/XX/1946
Gender:
MALE
Address:
1698 WEBSTER AVE
MERRICK, NY 11566
County:
NASSAU
Phone:
516-968-5572
EMPLOYER INFORMATION
Employer:
MARK S PROBERT ESQ
Organization:
PERSON
LICENSING INFORMATION
Licensing Agency:
NY STATE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION
License/Certification Type:
ATTORNEY
License Number:
1253889
Issue Date:
00/00/1978
License Status:
DISBARRED
License State:
NY
From: Mark Probert - view profile Date: Sun, Feb 11 2001 4:17 pm Email: Mark Probert <markpr...@my-deja.com> Groups: k12.chat.teacher
Noah has had one since 11/26/96 (my birthday).
Citizen Jimserac - 06 Mar 2008 18:17 GMT On Mar 4, 8:46 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote:
> On Mar 4, 1:59 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 74 lines] > Please let us know who you are and why you are so secretive. > Do you all belong to a cult or secret society??????? I don't know about the others, but I'm James Pannozzi, former software developer. I've been using Jimserac and Citizen Jimserac for quite some years.
Citizen Jimserac
jurimed2@yahoo.com - 06 Mar 2008 20:29 GMT > On Mar 4, 8:46 pm, drkul...@optonline.net wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 85 lines] > > - Show quoted text - CJ:
Nice to meet you. I don't classify you, or your intelligent comments, in the "Nitwit Brigade."
Still, and always, in California... (except when I'm traveling)
Tim Bolen
Mark Probert - 05 Mar 2008 14:05 GMT On Mar 4, 1:43 pm, jurim...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Mar 4, 8:33 am, drkul...@optonline.net wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 48 lines] > Yes, why won't they? I suspect, in the long and the short of it, that > we're dealing with a "bully mentality." Yes, Timmie, that is what you have. You constantly threaten legal suit. You post personal information about people.
Yes, Timmie, you are a bully (but, like everything else you do, not an effective one.)
Bullies are always, in every
> case, cowards, And live in the forest.
> who run when somebody like me bloodies their nose. Chest thumping!
> Hence, these people don't want somebody like me on their doorstep, or > even finding their doorstep. In essence, we're dealing with sissies. Why would you want to find their doorsteps when newsgroups are about discussion? You want to stifle their free speech?
> Tim Bolen Bee - 06 Mar 2008 05:37 GMT On Mar 4, 10:43 am, jurim...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Yes, why won't they? I suspect, in the long and the short of it, that > we're dealing with a "bully mentality." Bullies are always, in every [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Tim Bolen Hey Timmie. I have a question for you---is it true that your Daddy or your Uncle got you a job because you were such a loser and couldn't get one on your own?
jurimed2@yahoo.com - 06 Mar 2008 17:01 GMT > On Mar 4, 10:43 am, jurim...@yahoo.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > your Uncle got you a job > because you were such a loser and couldn't get one on your own? Bee:
Yup, that's almost true. My Daddy made me mow the lawn in the summer, shovel the front walk in the winter, and paid me an allowance for it. Then my "Uncle) (Sam) made me learn about weapons, combat, blowing sh.t up, stuff like that. Is that what you mean?
Is there a reference I should be aware of? Is one of those sissies sticking their head up again?
Amused in California...
Tim Bolen
Martin - 06 Mar 2008 20:27 GMT >> On Mar 4, 10:43 am, jurim...@yahoo.com wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >Yup, that's almost true. My Daddy made me mow the lawn in the summer, >shovel the front walk in the winter, and paid me an allowance for it. Well, you sure learned to shovel something from that experience.
>Then my "Uncle) (Sam) made me learn about weapons, combat, blowing >sh.t up, stuff like that. Is that what you mean? Is that the same uncle that taught you how to survive in the woods with your family? And Timmie, is that one of your infamous veiled threats again?
>Is there a reference I should be aware of? Is one of those sissies >sticking their head up again? Hear who is calling people sissies. You didn't even have the guts to tell a court where you live, or what your education is. Either that, or you really have some sort of brain damage.
>Amused in California... > >Tim Bolen Bee - 06 Mar 2008 21:49 GMT > Hear who is calling people sissies. You didn't even have the guts to > tell a court where you live, or what your educatio |
|