 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Alternative / March 2008Ping: stanw
Do NOT email me privately. Anything that is said can be posted right here, not behind the scenes, You are blocked. > Do NOT email me privately. Anything that is said can be posted right here, > not behind the scenes, > You are blocked. I wouldn't know. Do not what? Email you privately? When did you step in, anyway? Making rogue "demands" to have me cease conduct I haven't committed is your idea of making yourself relevant? I have nothing to say to you behind the scenes, and only the occasional dope slap when you try this nonsense in the public fora. And isn't it "plonk"? Tsk tsk. -stan This is so typical from these cult-members. I have tried to reason with the worst of them for years: Stan, Proby, Ann, but they are hell- bent in trying to ruin this group. But this will not happen, thanks to Patriots such as myself, Jan and Ilena. We will stand tall and dispense PROPER and accurate mental-health information. It MUST be done, it SHALL be done. No amount of nonsense from the Pro-Med Cult (PMC) will stop those Americans (and others) who want and need proper and verifiable information, the kind we give. Now Stan, this newsgroup got along swimmingly before you came back, and it will get along great when you leave again. Please follow to the letter everything that Jan Drew says and you WILL be a much better person. I have seen thousands of people improve their lives because of Jan Drew, you will too. Trust me on this, I have never been wrong. Sir ArtiO > > Do NOT email me privately. Anything that is said can be posted right here, > > not behind the scenes, [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > -stan This is so typical from these cult-members. I have tried to reason with the worst of them for years: Stan, Proby, Ann, but they are hell- bent in trying to ruin this group. But this will not happen, thanks to Patriots such as myself, Jan and Ilena. We will stand tall and dispense PROPER and accurate mental-health information. It MUST be done, it SHALL be done. No amount of nonsense from the Pro-Med Cult (PMC) will stop those Americans (and others) who want and need proper and verifiable information, the kind we give. Now Stan, this newsgroup got along swimmingly before you came back, and it will get along great when you leave again. Please follow to the letter everything that Jan Drew says and you WILL be a much better person. I have seen thousands of people improve their lives because of Jan Drew, you will too. Trust me on this, I have never been wrong. Sir ArtiO =============================================== If you are serious about the dribble u scribble then seek a therapist, and FAST. You may end up a bit more rational. Frank, we do not need a spychiatrist to know that you are not a well person and should not post here. This is my best personal opinion, by the way. We are in the process of ridding these newsgroups of the Cult of Useful Idiots: Proby, Stan, Marica, Ann and others. The subject of mental health and real alternatives should be not left up to those with an obvious conflict-of-interest. Our advice is always relaible and based on the most recent scientific research from national and University laboratories. Please refrain from barfing all over these groups, we have enough of that from the Stan/Ann/Proby Axis. > This is so typical from these cult-members. I have tried to reason > with the worst of them for years: Stan, Proby, Ann, but they are hell- [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > You may end up a bit more rational. Frank, we do not need a spychiatrist to know that you are not a well person and should not post here. This is my best personal opinion, by the way. We are in the process of ridding these newsgroups of the Cult of Useful Idiots: Proby, Stan, Marica, Ann and others. The subject of mental health and real alternatives should be not left up to those with an obvious conflict-of-interest. Our advice is always relaible and based on the most recent scientific research from national and University laboratories. Please refrain from barfing all over these groups, we have enough of that from the Stan/Ann/Proby Axis. ============================================= Oh really queer boy? So posting anon is part of your ploy, poor attempts at intimidation, lame, and I mean really lame responses and flames? LOL, you need to get a life. Learn to walk on your own two feet and not those of another. Get a spine you spineless wimp, a worm has more backbone that you. You project a lot, which means you need serious help. But, don't count on my to help you. Do avail yourself of some psychiatric help, you are in dire need of it. Frank, Obviously you are a vicitm of the medical-industrial-complex, as well as coming to terms with your own sexual orientation. That is okay. First off let me say that these newsgroups are doing you more harm than good, so leave for your own good. If not, the Cult will just use you. I have seen the Proby/Parsons/Palmer Axis, known as the 3-P Boyz, manipulate posters for their own aims. Do not let this happen to you, although it may be to late, you appear to have been sucked in. My expert opinion tells me that you, like Proby, needs an extended stay at a mental-health clinic. Please consider doing this. Now keep your abusive language away from here, these are support and information groups. Your kind of clap-trap have no place amongst civilized people. Sir ArtiO > Frank, we do not need a spychiatrist to know that you are not a well > person and should not post here. This is my best personal opinion, by [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > don't count on my to help you. Do avail yourself of some psychiatric > help, you are in dire need of it. Frank, Obviously you are a vicitm of the medical-industrial-complex, as well as coming to terms with your own sexual orientation. That is okay. First off let me say that these newsgroups are doing you more harm than good, so leave for your own good. If not, the Cult will just use you. I have seen the Proby/Parsons/Palmer Axis, known as the 3-P Boyz, manipulate posters for their own aims. Do not let this happen to you, although it may be to late, you appear to have been sucked in. My expert opinion tells me that you, like Proby, needs an extended stay at a mental-health clinic. Please consider doing this. Now keep your abusive language away from here, these are support and information groups. Your kind of clap-trap have no place amongst civilized people. Sir ArtiOqueer =========================================== Well florida queer, the sexual orientation problem is yours not mine, that is easy to see by your posts. Same with the foul language. You're projecting yourself yet hating every bit that you see about yourself. I am of the CABAL (tinc) your other projections are just as incorrect. The rest of your stuff is just yawner material, not worth of replying to, especially when the source is a queer boy from Florida. On Mar 4, 12:55 am, "Frank" <dawgf...@ten.hut> wrote: > "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <scie...@zzz.com> wrote in > messagenews:2810beb5-7738-476b-905e-f28da1879f02@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > don't count on my to help you. Do avail yourself of some psychiatric > help, you are in dire need of it. Frank, I feel your pain. I didn't mean to "out" you - but you can deal with it. But the subject matter here is ADD, or shall I say, the MYTH of ADD/ADHD. This always need to be brought to the attention of newbies as well as those who have been indoctrinated into the "System." As for as your "special problem" goes, learn to live with it, it is not a disease at all, it is now readily accepted in the society as normal. So don't sweat that. And don't turn into a self-hating gay person, that would do you much damage. You are already an emotional wreck, anybody can see that. Take care and consider checking yourself into a long-term stay at a qualified mental-health clinic. Proby spent a year there and he was better, at least for a little while. Good luck! Sir artio > Frank, Obviously you are a vicitm of the medical-industrial-complex, > as well as coming to terms with your own sexual orientation. That is [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > > - Show quoted text - > Do NOT email me privately. Anything that is said can be posted right here, > not behind the scenes, > You are blocked. Oh yeah, one more thing. Now the title makes you the center of attention - as you wish. -stan > > Do NOT email me privately. Anything that is said can be posted right here, > > not behind the scenes, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > -stan Ping, Ping, Ping Sing, Sing, Sing Ring, Ring, Ring Pop Goes the Weasel. I can understand her point. I've had people in here wanting to email me, and that's why everyone pretty much knows from my posts I don't want it. It just gets deleted. > > > Do NOT email me privately. Anything that is said can be posted right here, > > > not behind the scenes, [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > me, and that's why everyone pretty much knows from my posts I don't > want it. It just gets deleted. Drew has no point. I have not contacted her outside of this forum. She's just trying to cause trouble. Her "ping"ing me or whatever, and telling me in a thinly veiled attempt at staying at the forefront of everyone's attention, to not email her, borders on libelous. Period. Maybe Jan should heed her own crocodile warning - and not contact or reference *me*. Yeah - maybe she'd just better do that. -stan > Drew has no point. I have not contacted her outside of this > forum. She's just trying to cause trouble. Her "ping"ing me or [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > -stan Ok, if you didn't email her, then you shouldn't mind if she posts the email that it sounds like she got from someone posing as you, right? I've had "forged" emails coming to me from people that regularly post here, but I know were not them, based on doing some detective work. > > Drew has no point. I have not contacted her outside of this > > forum. She's just trying to cause trouble. Her "ping"ing me or [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > that regularly post here, but I know were not them, based on doing > some detective work. No, Bee - not "if" I didn't email her. I did not email her. There is no "if/then" statement to be had here. Whether I mind if she attempts to forge an email from me or not is irrelevant. My minding won't effect that behavior a bit. If and until she does produce such a thing. If that happens - then I will try like hell to respond outside of the internet as well. If anyone tries to misrepresent me, they WILL get a phone call or letter or visit by some authority figure and they will have to answer for their behavior. You sound biased toward believing her. Not know me - or obviously Drew, I don't exactly appreciate that ill-founded slant. I have a long history of being forthright and open in this newsgroup. Yes, my regularity has waned over the past several years, but my conduct has not. And I am not afraid to articulate myself publically. If I may say so, I'm rather good at it. I'm sorry if you've been stung by distasteful emails from anyone - but most especially if they were forgeries. But, I'm telling you, Drew can't produce what she didn't get. Got it? -stan > > Drew has no point. I have not contacted her outside of this > > forum. She's just trying to cause trouble. Her "ping"ing me or [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > that regularly post here, but I know were not them, based on doing > some detective work. No, Bee - not "if" I didn't email her. I did not email her. There is no "if/then" statement to be had here. Whether I mind if she attempts to forge an email from me or not is irrelevant. My minding won't effect that behavior a bit. If and until she does produce such a thing. If that happens - then I will try like hell to respond outside of the internet as well. If anyone tries to misrepresent me, they WILL get a phone call or letter or visit by some authority figure and they will have to answer for their behavior. You sound biased toward believing her. Not knowing me - and quite obviously not knowing Jan Drew, I don't exactly appreciate your ill-founded slant. I have a long history of being forthright and open in this newsgroup. Yes, my regularity has waned over the past several years, but my conduct has not. And I am not afraid to articulate myself publically. If I may say so, I'm rather good at it. I'm sorry if you've been stung by distasteful emails from anyone - but most especially if they were forgeries. But, I'm telling you, Drew can't produce what she didn't get. Got it? -stan > > Drew has no point. I have not contacted her outside of this > > forum. She's just trying to cause trouble. Her "ping"ing me or [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > that regularly post here, but I know were not them, based on doing > some detective work. No, Bee - not "if" I didn't email her. I did not email her. There is no "if/then" statement to be had here. Whether I mind if she attempts to forge an email from me or not is irrelevant. My minding won't effect that behavior a bit. If and until she does produce such a thing. If that happens - then I will try like hell to respond outside of the internet as well. If anyone tries to misrepresent me, they will be getting a phone call or letter or visit by some authority figure and they will have to answer for their behavior. You sound biased toward believing her. Not knowing me - and quite obviously not knowing Jan Drew, I don't exactly appreciate your ill-founded slant. I have a long history of being forthright and open in this newsgroup. Yes, my regularity has waned over the past several years, but my conduct has not. And I am not afraid to articulate myself publically. If I may say so, I'm rather good at it. I'm sorry if you've been stung by distasteful emails from anyone - but most especially if they were forgeries. But, I'm telling you, Drew can't produce what she didn't get. Got it? -stan > No, Bee - not "if" I didn't email her. I did not email her. There > is no "if/then" statement to be had here. Whether I mind if [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > I have no reason not to believe either one of you. So, Jan can use, ARIN.net to find out where that original email message came from, and then report it to the ISP that it came from, sending them a copy of the message that you just post here to me. That way they (the ISP) will know it was forged. Or she can send the email, and post a copy of it here, showing the forgery. I am not biased towards Jan, and would believe that you would want to get to the bottom of this as it concerns you, and your identity and goodness knows how many times it has happened previously. Jan has made you aware of that, and I think you should be thanking her for letting you know someone is using your good name. > > No, Bee - not "if" I didn't email her. I did not email her. There > > is no "if/then" statement to be had here. Whether I mind if [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > for letting you know someone > is using your good name. Okay, thanks, Bee. I apologize for my tone to you in my last post in this thread. But, *BELIEVE* me, there is nothing benevolent in any of Jan's actions. I am well acquainted with her tactics and was introduced to them over a decade ago. Have a good one. -stan > > No, Bee - not "if" I didn't email her. I did not email her. There > > is no "if/then" statement to be had here. Whether I mind if [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > for letting you know someone > is using your good name. Okay, Bee. Thanks for your concern, and I apologize for my tone toward you in my previous post in this tread. But, *BELIEVE* me, there is nothing benevolent in any of Jan's actions. I was first introduced to her tactics over a decade ago, and learned very quickly of her disengenousness. I see that it is still very well intact. Have a good one. -stan -stan > > No, Bee - not "if" I didn't email her. I did not email her. There > > is no "if/then" statement to be had here. Whether I mind if [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > for letting you know someone > is using your good name. Okay, Bee. Thanks for your concern, and I apologize for my tone toward you in my previous post in this tread. But, *BELIEVE* me, there is nothing benevolent in any of Jan's actions. I was first introduced to her tactics over a decade ago, and learned very quickly of her disengenousness. I see that it is still very well intact. Have a good one. -stan On Mar 4, 6:16 pm, Bee <Butterflies2...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 4, 2:17 pm, stanw <stanwsh...@yahoo.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > for letting you know someone > is using your good name. Okay, Bee. Thanks for your concern, and I apologize for my tone toward you in my previous post in this tread. But, *BELIEVE* me, there is nothing benevolent in any of Jan's actions. I was first introduced to her tactics over a decade ago, and learned very quickly of her disengenousness. I see that it is still very well intact. Have a good one. -stan Stanley W Shura That is impossible. I did not even have a computer in 1997. Bee <Butterflies2222@gmail.com> expounded: >I am not biased towards Jan, You should be. >and would believe that you would want to >get to the bottom of this as >it concerns you, and your identity and goodness knows how many times >it has happened previously. Stan shouldn't be concerned at all about his good name, Jan is a known troll and trolls can't do anything to anyone's reputation. \ >Jan has made you aware of that, and I think you should be thanking her >for letting you know someone >is using your good name. Jan is lying to do just as Stan said, to draw more attention to herself. to quote one of her oft-used phrases, sad, that.  SignatureProud member WWWSC #2 Formerly known as Ann > Stan shouldn't be concerned at all about his good name, Jan is a known > troll and trolls can't do anything to anyone's reputation. There are so many trolls and puppets that post--it is hard to tell who is who... These newsgroups are for entertainment purposes only! Bee <Butterflies2222@gmail.com> expounded: >> Stan shouldn't be concerned at all about his good name, Jan is a known >> troll and trolls can't do anything to anyone's reputation. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >These newsgroups are for entertainment purposes only! Sad but true. SignatureProud member WWWSC #2 Formerly known as Ann > > Stan shouldn't be concerned at all about his good name, Jan is a known > > troll and trolls can't do anything to anyone's reputation. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > These newsgroups are for entertainment purposes only! Well, they do have the potential to be informative and supportive.*Sometimes*, they even ARE! ;) Regarding the troll patrol, I understand what may have been some reticence on your part towards me. It has been awhile for me, and how could you know my history if in fact I've been, by and large, absent from a.s.a-d for most of the past several years. Anyway, if you're inclined to "check up" on me, or for due diligence or whatever, you can try entering "shuras" in the search box at the top of the page, right above "discussions". You'll see my old stuff. And, you'll see some of the histories of other more nefarious characters in this newsgroup. Take care. -stan > Well, they do have the potential to be informative and > supportive.*Sometimes*, they even ARE! ;) > Regarding the troll patrol, I understand what may have been some > reticence on your part towards me. It has been awhile for me, and how > could you know my history if in fact I've been, by and large, absent > from a.s.a-d for most of the past several years. It is the "cross posting," I thought I was posting to MHA- only. I'm sure the puppets know who they are--and the trolls know who they are--- I read an article about 5 years ago about usenet newsgroups (it was in a hard copy not internet form in one of the Psychology magazines), about people that steal the identities of people that used to post in newsgroups -- that hadn't been around for awhile, and activate them--so it would appear that it was the same person posting again. The article was called "Technology Puppetry" or something very close to that. As I said, this is for entertainment purposes only.....you can pretty much tell who is a puppet and who isn't....I had to pull an acquaintance out of one of those Russian women scams who got a letter out of no where---and almost fell for it! We share a good giggle every now and then--when I ask him how Tatiana is!! On Mar 5, 1:13 pm, stanw <stanwsh...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Well, they do have the potential to be informative and > supportive.*Sometimes*, they even ARE! ;) > Regarding the troll patrol, I understand what may have been some > reticence on your part towards me. It has been awhile for me, and how > could you know my history if in fact I've been, by and large, absent > from a.s.a-d for most of the past several years. It is the "cross posting," I thought I was posting to MHA- only. I'm sure the puppets know who they are--and the trolls know who they are--- I read an article about 5 years ago about usenet newsgroups (it was in a hard copy not internet form in one of the Psychology magazines), about people that steal the identities of people that used to post in newsgroups -- that hadn't been around for awhile, and activate them--so it would appear that it was the same person posting again. The article was called "Technology Puppetry" or something very close to that. As I said, this is for entertainment purposes only.....you can pretty much tell who is a puppet and who isn't....I had to pull an acquaintance out of one of those Russian women scams who got a letter out of no where---and almost fell for it! We share a good giggle every now and then--when I ask him how Tatiana is!! ==================================== Stan likes people to recognize his "impotence". He is so full of himself but I brought him and his friend down to their true levels and outed them both. That was basically the point of my being here. It took a little doing to stir them to the point of enragement and self degradation but it was done. The queer boys know who they are. :) It was fun, and now everyone knows them for what they are. > ==================================== > Stan likes people to recognize his "impotence". [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > It was fun, and now everyone knows them for what they are. Y'all have some history, I am not aware of. What exactly are you talking about? Bee, It really is a shame. Many years ago, this was a great spot to connect and share resources. : ( Terry www.addconsults.com www.myADDstore.com > > Stan shouldn't be concerned at all about his good name, Jan is a known > > troll and trolls can't do anything to anyone's reputation. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > These newsgroups are for entertainment purposes only! > Bee, > Many years ago, this was a great spot to connect > and share resources. : ( For whom? Pedophiles? Many years ago the disbarred attorney, and the polymorphous parade of perverted child molesters, child porn buffs, authors of pedo SMBD FAQ's, smut kings and phone sex proprietors and all their socially opportunistic cyberpathic sycophants were engaging in the same exact psychopathic zero sum games being engaged in against Jan against T Brown, S Freeman, Brad J. Art W, Ian, The big Kahuna, Andrew C. Sumone, Gotterbe, Jake, No spamme, the patient of Doktor Nightmare etc ad nauseum. Linda <Indomitable2@netzero.com> expounded: >> Bee, >> Many years ago, this was a great spot to connect [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >Sumone, Gotterbe, Jake, No spamme, the patient of Doktor Nightmare >etc ad nauseum. And here is one of the prime examples of posters who ruined the newsgroups. Thanx for offering such a glaring example, Linda! Good job! SignatureProud member WWWSC #2 Formerly known as Ann On Mar 5, 11:27 pm, Linda <Indomitab...@netzero.com> wrote: > And here is one of the prime examples of posters who ruined the > newsgroups. Thanx for offering such a glaring example, Linda! Good > job! > -- > Proud member WWWSC #2 > Formerly known as Ann So are you in Silicon Valley? On Mar 5, 8:59 pm, terrym2442 <terrym2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Bee, > Many years ago, this was a great spot to connect > and share resources. : ( For whom? Pedophiles? Many years ago the disbarred attorney, and the polymorphous parade of perverted child molesters, child porn buffs, authors of pedo SMBD FAQ's, smut kings and phone sex proprietors and all their socially opportunistic cyberpathic sycophants were engaging in the same exact psychopathic zero sum games being engaged in against Jan against T Brown, S Freeman, Brad J. Art W, Ian, The big Kahuna, Andrew C. Sumone, Gotterbe, Jake, No spamme, the patient of Doktor Nightmare etc ad nauseum. =========================================== Check Linda's history in SPP, it is documented there about her personal association with pedo's, seeking their support and or supporting them, probably more in other places. Also a bit about her history of posting and using child porn ng's and ng's associated with pedo's and abusers. There has also been questions raised about her SO's relationships with her "child(ren)" Drew has no point. I have not contacted her outside of this forum. -stan You most certainly did. You are a liar. > Drew has no point. I have not contacted her outside of this > forum. > > -stan > > You most certainly did. You are a liar. Jan, Linda, Frankie, et.al - pay attention. You are not worth my time. You have no credibility. And my writing energies are spent on far worthier minds than yours. Frankfurt - don't bother trying to "out" me. I did that oodles of years ago and it's old news. Get a f.cking life and find a real scoop you can pretend to wield. I'm gay. Whoopie! Don't worry - drooling, self-important, hayseeds whose family trees have no branches - are not my type. You're safe. Lin-*duh* - See Spot run. Run, Spot! Run! Dick and Jane see Spot run! Coprographic wasn't a word when you first spewed it out in the mid 90's. That hasn't changed. Sadly, neither have you. Drew - you want to call me a liar - knock yourself out. Go back and feel free to find anything that I wouldn't be proud to throw back down your already over-fatigued throat. Here - lemme help you out: stanwshura@yahoo.com, stan.shura@excite.com, stanw, shuras..... Search box 'em. Google 'em. Yahoo 'em. Print 'em out and magnet to your refrig. Perform some sg's on yourself to 'em. I don't give a sh.t. Just don't try to present yourselves and your cohorts (who know very well who they are) as anything but bored, impulsive, self- aggrandizing, sophomoric f.ck-ups who have long outlasted their relevance or welcome. >>>FLUSH!!!!!!!!<<< On Mar 5, 9:10 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > LIAR "stanw" <stanwsh...@yahoo.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > You most certainly did. You are a liar. Stanley W Shura Drew - you want to call me a liar - knock yourself out. Go back and feel free to find anything that I wouldn't be proud to throw back down your already over-fatigued throat. Here - lemme help you out: stanwshura@yahoo.com, stan.shura@excite.com, stanw, shuras..... Tell me something I didn't already know Stanley W Shura Search box 'em. Google 'em. Yahoo 'em. Print 'em out and magnet to your refrig. Perform some sg's on yourself to 'em. I don't give a sh.t. Just don't try to present yourselves and your cohorts (who know very well who they are) as anything but bored, impulsive, self- aggrandizing, sophomoric f.ck-ups who have long outlasted their relevance or welcome. >>>FLUSH!!!!!!!!<<< Yep, always happens when one is exposed. stan.sh...@excite.com This person has not created a profile. Name: Location: Title: Industry: Email address: stan.sh...@excite.com Website or Blog: Quote: About me: Average Rating: (21 ratings) Recent Activity: Activity in All 20 Groups -- 272 messages alt.support.attn-deficit (93) misc.health.alternative (44) misc.kids.health (33) talk.politics.medicine (26) sci.med (23) alt.support.ocd (11) alt.astronomy (7) rec.music.bluenote (7) sci.psychology.psychotherapy (4) misc.headlines (4) alt.support.depression.medication (4) news.newusers.questions (3) alt.support.tourette (3) alt.support.autism (3) alt.drugs.psychedelics (2) rec.org.mensa (1) alt.support.eating-disord (1) alt.support.anxiety-panic (1) alt.support.depression (1) alt.support.depression.manic (1) Reality and responsibility and our aversion to them misc.health.alternative Jul 23 2007 Fact that amphetemines "Potentiate psychiatric illness" to be <b>...</b> alt.support.attn-deficit Sep 26 2006 Fact that amphetemines "Potentiate psychiatric illness" to be <b>...</b> alt.support.attn-deficit Sep 24 2006 Ritalin Crushing alt.support.attn-deficit Aug 10 2006 Lollipop - lollipop - oh lolly-lolly-lolly, LOLLIPOP! / / / Doo <b>...</b> alt.support.attn-deficit Jul 31 2006 We love and adore you, Janjan! Oh!! She touched my shirt! I'm <b>...</b> alt.support.attn-deficit Jul 30 2006 this space intentionally left blan....er....well...... alt.support.attn-deficit Jul 30 2006 Can someone explain why inertia is connected to ED(no, not <b>...</b> alt.support.autism Jul 28 2006 Can someone explain to me why inertia is connect to ED (no, not <b>...</b> alt.support.autism Jul 28 2006 As of 5:50 pm EST, nobody else has spoken to Virginia. alt.astronomy Jul 26 2006 Show all » Post Activity Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2001 9 1 1 1 2002 21 11 1 2004 1 6 1 2006 15 185 2 12 2007 5 shu...@woods.uml.edu last post 1996. http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/76a38da87926ceb8 From: "stan" <stan.sh...@excite.com> Date: 21 Jul 2006 17:56:10 -0700 Local: Fri, Jul 21 2006 7:56 pm Subject: BU$TED? Jan Drew wrote: These chemistries > are generally self-stabilizing but when they are, or become, unstable > symptoms such as ADHD are the result. Thus, many drug companies have [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > very > high, 85% to 90%, efficacy. Did anyone else catch that? "....our company has found a nutritional supplement approach....." ....huh?....wh...what was th...... "...OUR company has found a nutritional supplement approach..." ...wait a minu......did I just see...... "...*OUR* company has found a nutrional supplemt approach..." .....no way......uh uh......that didn't say wha..... "... OUR ... COMPANY" ....you gotta be shi..... "--------------------------------------->OUR<-----------------------------------------------" Jan Drew, you are a spam spewing, truth bending, opportunistic a.s!!!! Who the hell am I kidding? YOU ARE A MONEY GRUBBING LIAR!! Go get 'er, Rich. -stan Ilena Rose wrote: > >YOU ARE A MONEY GRUBBING LIAR!! > Stan honey ... down boy. > I just read some of your stuff on the net. > Looks like you came to help Mark with the Ritalin Pushing ... I saw > your claim of getting a 4.0 after drugging yourself ... good tale but > sorry, I don't buy it. Wow - you had to go way back to find that post, didntcha? That was like, '95 or something. You had to do something special to retrieve posts that far back - I couldn't even figure out how to get past 2001. Um...get yourself a hobby. Regarding my own treatment and response to it - and the hard work that went along with it....you don't buy it? No - you don't *want* to buy it. There's a difference. Lovey - I'm not going to lose any sleep over your denial. I could drop a 5-spot in your cup walking along Mass. Ave. for all the cred you have with me. No, I take that back - at least that guy has enough humility to ask - and politely I might add. Scooted over obligingly and was rather well-spoken at that. You on the other hand - coming around like you know who's who and what's what with ADD. Who the hell are you that I should care? Your ilk and tho$e among you who choo$e which data you con$ider valid have hi$torically (heh - and hy$terically) never let the truth get in your way. Now don't get your panties in a bunch - I do not share your fellow conspiracy theorists' mind set that permits a belief in knowing what "The Absolute Truth" is. Cuz - as much as it makes me just well up with tears to admit it - I don't know what that is. But - I know my own life experiences and my own truth. And you are one arrogant little hussy to jump on here and tell me what I have and have not done. I could fax you a grade report, dx documentation, and pharmacy receipt - all with dates - and you'd still cup your hands over your ears, throw your head in the sand and yell "Noooooooooo!!!!!!!...la la la la la...I can't HEEEEAR YOU!!!" What a pity. For you, that is. -stan P.S. - Damn - that's 6 minutes I wasted on this one that I'll never see again! Grrr....... Hey, folks. Been awhile since I've posted (in fact, there are many names I don't recognize). Anyway - there's been something I've been itching to discuss for a long time - on here and with other ADD folks. It seems that whenever the topic of "multi-tasking" comes up, almost invariably, those folks on here and others who have been dx'd with ADD say it's something that they do naturally - indeed that it is something they can't HELP doing. I have long lamented that I cannot relate to that AT ALL. I have a HUGE amount of difficulty dealing with more than one thing at a time. In fact, if you wanna see me shoot venom, try and make me handle several simultaneous tasks. My problem is that I cannot prioritize or make decisions. And, I cannot screen out that which isn't immediately important. So, even if I am so lucky as to decide - 'okay, "A" needs my immediate attention', I cannot deal with it as long as B and C are poking at me (literally or figuratively). For example, I withdrew from college (temporarily) in part because I could never decide what I should be doing at any given time. Should I do the outline FIRST, or look for sources. Do I start big and narrow the topic, or choose a small one and build on it if I need to? How to I find out something if I don't know that I don't know? How do I prioritize when I don't even realize I need to. This sense of not knowing where or how to start was both in the small sense and the large. If I was working on a report for one class, I felt like I should be studying for the upcoming exam in another. If I was studying for that test, I couldn't concentrate because, among other things, I was worried about reading for another class, or doing that report, or God knows what else. This stuff has followed me everywhere - and of course to my current job (which I've had for the past fourteen months). I work at a child development center as a toddler teacher/caregiver. My partner and I are responsible for up to fourteen of them. Yep - fourteen children who go from screaming "NOOOOO!!!" and "MINE!" to writing on the walls with crayon, to jumping off of tables, to playing in the toilet, to deciding to find out what (non-toxic) paint tastes like! Now, I KNOW how to take care of toddlers, but sometimes (well, maybe a little more often than sometimes), I find myself so absorbed in reading a story to Johny or changing a *VERY* messy diaper (ewwwww! clothes pin anyone?), or seeing just how long I can make Susie giggle, that I don't always see Jimmy getting ready to whack another child with a push toy or practice sky-diving from the highest point he can get to. AND, sometimes I just get so overwhelmed I lose the ability to judge - to reason what is most important in the present. I don't mean to make it sound like their environment is constantly chaotic and dangerous. It isn't. But I just feel so often that I'm teetering on the edge of complete breakdown (of the room, and of my sanity). Usually, at the end of a given day, I reflect and maybe it wasn't quite as bad (or nearly as bad) as it felt at the moment. The children and I survived the crises, and there were enough warm fuzzies and hugs and "you're *FUNNY* 'tanley!" - to help drag me out of bed the next morning. I just don't know who I can turn to who can relate to EXACTLY the kind of incapacitating indecision and inability to "multi-task". I can't do it. Is there anyone here who feels similarly?? Thanks for letting me vent. Later. -stan -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own > WOW!!!! > Stanley W. Shura > I'm gay Gee, how'dja figure that one out, Sherlock? And more importantly what the f*ck does that have to do with anything in this newsgroup? You're a mess. -stan From: stan.sh...@excite.com (Stanley W. Shura) Date: 28 May 2001 10:53:01 -0700 Local: Mon, May 28 2001 12:53 pm Subject: Re: OCD is reason enough to kill From: "stan" <stan.sh...@excite.com> Date: 22 Jul 2006 19:52:02 -0700 Local: Sat, Jul 22 2006 9:52 pm Subject: Re: BU$TED? > > Is this fun for you? Did daddy cut up your credit cards > > or something? Why are you here? > > -stan > To expose YOU. > Friend of Mark Probert..... By golly, I think that's the first nice thing you've said to or about me, Jan! Thanks! -stan From: stan.sh...@excite.com (Stanley W. Shura) Date: 2 Sep 2001 23:20:43 -0700 Local: Mon, Sep 3 2001 1:20 am Subject: Re: ive had enough As far as why gays flaunt their gayness, this I don't know. I've only known > a few gay men in my life and most of them are, uh......flamboyant about > their sexuality. I've kind of always wondered why myself, since the few > lesbians I know don't seem to do this? I usually find gay men charming, > though- unless they're really militant about it- like those 'I'm here, I'm > queer, get used to it' types. I'd like to put in my two cents here. First - I think there is a whole huge variety of sexual orientation and preference and gender identity beyond being just strictly gay or strictly straight. I'm gay - and have been around many types of people. I LOVE diversity. Yes - I have also been around my share of other gay people and, from my point of view, there are just as many types and/or styles of gay folks as there are OCD'ers or athletes or musicians. I and a few gay friends happen to find the flaunters kind of annoying - and I personally think it's often downright fake. Motht gay folkth do not talk with affected little lithps. Funny though - I also see myself as somewhat effeminate - yet, you or he or she or the other person might not necessarily see me as such. Personally - I *despise* macho - and the 1950's/ultra-right ideation of gender roles. I am who I am. I am me. And as a matter of fact, having OCD has had a more significant effect on my self-identity than being gay. -stan androgeny From: "stan" <stan.sh...@excite.com> Date: 22 Jul 2006 19:52:02 -0700 Local: Sat, Jul 22 2006 9:52 pm Subject: Re: BU$TED? > Is this fun for you? Did daddy cut up your credit cards > > or something? Why are you here? > > -stan > To expose YOU. > Friend of Mark Probert..... By golly, I think that's the first nice thing you've said to or about me, Jan! Thanks! -stan ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Is this fun for you? Did daddy cut up your credit cards > > or something? Why are you here? > > -stan > To expose YOU. > Friend of Mark Probert..... By golly, I think that's the first nice thing you've said to or about me, Jan! Thanks! -stan Stanley W Shura > > > Do NOT email me privately. Anything that is said can be posted right here, > > > not behind the scenes, [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > me, and that's why everyone pretty much knows from my posts I don't > want it. It just gets deleted. I'm not so sure you do understand. Historically speaking, Stan Shura is ASAD's *coprographic* email harasser. If Stan Shura has toned down his harassing emails any, it's only because the antiharassment laws have been beefed up in the years since members of ASAD's criminal cyberstalking ring began sending targeted individuals harassing emails, whilst saying they didn't send the harrassing emails, to instigate yet another conflict as a false pretext for their perpetrating even worse crimes against the targeted individual, which in this case is Jan. On Mar 4, 6:57 am, Bee <Butterflies2...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 3, 11:09 pm, stanw <stanwsh...@yahoo.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > me, and that's why everyone pretty much knows from my posts I don't > want it. It just gets deleted. I'm not so sure you do understand. Historically speaking, Stan Shura is ASAD's *coprographic* email harasser. If Stan Shura has toned down his harassing emails any, it's only because the antiharassment laws have been beefed up in the years since members of ASAD's criminal cyberstalking ring began sending targeted individuals harassing emails, whilst saying they didn't send the harrassing emails, to instigate yet another conflict as a false pretext for their perpetrating even worse crimes against the targeted individual, which in this case is Jan. ================================= Still Kentucky? Stan is a needy fool. > Historically speaking, Stan Shura is ASAD's *coprographic* email > harasser. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Jan, Linda, Frankie, et.al - pay attention. You are not worth my time. You have no credibility. My history and reputation in this newsgroup is longstanding and verifiable. I have long earned the benefit of the doubt and the right to speak my mind. I dare say I have earned the respect of at least being spoken of, and spoken to, truthfully. Thus, my time, my thoughts, and my writing energies are spent on far worthier minds than those of trolls like the lot of you. Frankfurt - don't bother trying to "out" me. I did that oodles of years ago and it's old news. Get a f.cking life and find a real scoop you can pretend to wield. I'm gay. Whoopie! Don't worry - drooling, self-important, hayseeds whose family trees have no branches - are not my type. You're safe. Lin-*duh* - See Spot run. Run, Spot! Run! Dick and Jane see Spot run! Coprographic wasn't a word when you first spewed it out in the mid 90's. That hasn't changed. Sadly, neither have you. Drew - you want to call me a liar - knock yourself out. Go back and feel free to find anything that I wouldn't be proud to throw back down your already over-fatigued throat. Here - lemme help you out: stanwsh...@yahoo.com, stan.shura@excite.com, stanw, shuras..... Search box 'em. Google 'em. Yahoo 'em. Print 'em out and magnet to your refrig. Suck 'em. Choke on 'em. Perform some sg's on yourself to 'em. I don't give a sh.t. Just don't try to present yourselves as anything but bored, impulsive, self- aggrandizing, sophomoric f.ck-ups who have long outlasted their relevance or welcome. >>>FLUSH!!!!!!!!<<< |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.