Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Big Pharma, Studies, etc.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
D. C. Sessions - 28 Feb 2008 16:27 GMT
Suppression, publication bias, sock-puppet websites, and
all the other red meat for the MHA faithful:

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=60

I'm not expecting much comment on this, though, thanks to
the "path of least resistance" principle.

| The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" |
|    The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?"    |
+---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+
drceephd@insightbb.com - 28 Feb 2008 20:32 GMT
> Suppression, publication bias, sock-puppet websites, and
> all the other red meat for the MHA faithful:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> |    The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?"    |
> +---------- D. C. Sessions <d...@lumbercartel.com> ----------+

I might be more inclined to participate if the site were titled
"psuedo-sciencebasedmedicine.con"

DrCee
You cannot secure nor restore health with pus or poisons.
Mark Probert - 28 Feb 2008 20:54 GMT
On Feb 28, 3:32 pm, drcee...@insightbb.com wrote:

> > Suppression, publication bias, sock-puppet websites, and
> > all the other red meat for the MHA faithful:
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> I might be more inclined to participate if the site were titled
> "psuedo-sciencebasedmedicine.con"

Schmuckie, did you bother to read the article "A Foolish
Consistency"?

Of course you didn't, since it proves you are an idiot.

You see, a RealDoctor, not a fake one like you, is discussing the
relationship between medical practice and the pharmaceutical
industry.
The One True Zhen Jue - 28 Feb 2008 22:41 GMT
> On Feb 28, 3:32 pm, drcee...@insightbb.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Schmuckie,

Good one!  I wish I had thought of that.

did you bother to read the article "A Foolish
> Consistency"?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> relationship between medical practice and the pharmaceutical
> industry.

I've always thought that female pharmaceutical sales reps were
suspiciously hot!

- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -
Mark Probert - 29 Feb 2008 03:25 GMT
On Feb 28, 5:41 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> > On Feb 28, 3:32 pm, drcee...@insightbb.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> I've always thought that female pharmaceutical sales reps were
> suspiciously hot!

A neighbor's wife is a rep. You are right.

A friend, who is a neurologist, married one. She is incadescent.
Hawki63@sbcglobal.net - 29 Feb 2008 18:49 GMT
On Feb 28, 5:41 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Feb 28, 3:54 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> I've always thought that female pharmaceutical sales reps were
> suspiciously hot!

I have to agree that looks are part of the qualifications

tho......the male reps are also usually gorgeous...I have a nephew...6'8 who
is a rep...his wardrobe is Hollywoodish..etc

A neighbor's wife is a rep. You are right.

A friend, who is a neurologist, married one. She is incadescent.
Jan Drew - 02 Mar 2008 07:07 GMT
On Feb 28, 5:41 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Feb 28, 3:54 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> I've always thought that female pharmaceutical sales reps were
> suspiciously hot!

A neighbor's wife is a rep. You are right.

*A friend, who is a neurologist, married one. She is incadescent.*

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.attn-deficit/msg/b47238df12888f43

Anecdotes are not facts. They are, at best interesting stories. At
worst, outright lies.

M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t 07-10...@lymbercartel.com>
Jan Drew - 02 Mar 2008 07:04 GMT
<Andrew_Kingoff@yahoo.com>blathered:

 <snip off topic>

http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/c1efd889a7678735

That _IS_ topical and worthy of discussion.  Stick with the topic,
that works for you & us.
D. C. Sessions - 28 Feb 2008 22:56 GMT
>> Suppression, publication bias, sock-puppet websites, and
>> all the other red meat for the MHA faithful:
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I might be more inclined to participate if the site were titled
> "psuedo-sciencebasedmedicine.con"

SCORE!!!!!!

| The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" |
|    The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?"    |
+---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+
drceephd@insightbb.com - 29 Feb 2008 00:58 GMT
> In message <0340d72a-3977-43bd-aefa-07f6aa638...@d62g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, drcee...@insightbb.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> |    The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?"    |
> +---------- D. C. Sessions <d...@lumbercartel.com> ----------+

I stand by what I wrote:
I might be more inclined to participate if the site were titled
"psuedo-sciencebasedmedicine.CON."

So called science based medicine is an excuse for the modern medical
con.

The author merely points to some truths while being expected to be
ignored by his peers...other pompus, egotistical, irrational, money
hungry MDs.

DrCee
You cannot secure nor restore health with pus and poisons.
Jan Drew - 02 Mar 2008 07:00 GMT
> Suppression, publication bias, sock-puppet websites, and
> all the other red meat for the MHA faithful:

Translation: Lying *GANG POSTERS*
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.