Carole - if you are in Sydney I invite you to invest $40 and come to
the Skeptics' Dinner at Chatswood on March 8. While there you will
hear about how easy it is to fool people. The speaker has even
suggested the question: "What can we learn from the mistakes of others
and ourselves?".

https://secure5.ozhosting.com/skeptics/shop/sydneydinner0803.htm

No, neither do you.

Join it yourself, you're the one living in dreamland.

Carole
www.cellsalts.net

Quite a few are human parasites, but interestingly enough
they're so specialized that head lice (for instance) can't
colonize body hair, pubic lice can't colonize underarm
hair, etc.

And you'll note that Carole still hasn't told us which
cell salts will keep away various flying parasites such
as mosquitos, biting gnats, etc.  Pity that, since she
is passing up such a golden opportunity to prove (with
videos!) how well her remedies work.

+---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+

Sorry, it just doesn't sound right.
Not only must things be right, but they must sound right.
There is no way I would call a starfish, or a seahorse, or a mullosc, or
even a snail an animal. So just drop it.

Many types of worms are parasites to humans.

Have you got some hidden medical condition that you are searching for an
answer for?
It seems that way to me.

www.einsteinconspiracy.co.uk
"We have been greatly deceived. We have been led to believe that modern
theory is supported by experiments, but we have not been told that the
experiments that can disprove modern theory have been denied from being
conducted.

"This now requires a complete change in our mind-sets. What we have been led
to believe about science has been a delusion. We are denied the experiments
to prove modern theory wrong. It requires a complete break with the myths
that we have been led to believe in the 20th century as regards Einstein and
the development of modern physics theory. Bear in mind that having been
denied experimental evidence in my theorising, by what has turned out to be
a conspiracy, I have had to abandon theorising, and instead play the role of
a detective in piecing together the clues left from history as to the real
events at a scene of a crime. The relevant events start from 1925 which
resulted in the physics community rejecting the physics that Einstein was
advocating, in favour of another theory. "

No -- I haven't got the time.

If it was made by the US government, what does it say about the system that
controls our lives?
That you are living under a delusion, that on the one hand they are supposed
to be looking after the people, but on the other hand they are working out
how to kill them?

Carole
www.cellsalts.net
www.soiltheory.com   -- the new domain name

And I asked him to apply his "unified theory of everything"
to the post-Columbian depopulation of the Western Hemisphere,
in particular to the Huron, and his only response was "lead
poisoning."  After that, silence.

Little matters like the classical college lab experiment of
dividing a homogenous population of experimental animals
and introducing a pathogenic microorganism into one but not
the control gets the same treatment: fingers in ears.

Or, for that matter, the routine use of bacillus thuringiensis
by gardeners. Or the now-common-in-west-nile-country use of
"bacteria bombing" standing water to deal with mosquitos.

Face it: Chuckles has a very well-developed ability to
ignore (and insult) anything that might cause a thinking
person to do reality checks.

+---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+

PM: 50%! You can do better than that. PA

Excerpt:

How can you attribute infectious illnesses to a manifestation of
"toxemia"
when many will can get better without any treatment directed at
"toxaemia"
and there is then often immunity to further infection with that
organism?

PM

Well, Moron, you certainly seem ignorant and confused.  I have given
you clear and concise information that contagion and transmissibility
are  lies,  deceits, a tool of the medical monopoly to continue its
pillaging of the sheeple.

Once again, read the peer reviewed, published research of Bechamp,
Enderlein,  and E.C Rosenow.  Your concept and flawed view of
bacteriology, disease, contagion, and the overall concept of the germ
theory of disease will be found to be false.  I have done that
consistently.  You, have consistently refused to get out of the mental
box you are in and view the forest as a forest and not just a field of
individual trees which you do not comprehend.

Toxemia is not an "infectious illness" that requires a "cure".  You
cannot poison the sick into becoming well.  The best example of
"toxemia" and its modern scientific proof, are the "amyloids."  What
are the amyloids?  Why are they a part of diseases tissue?  Why are
they a part of Alzheimer's, etc, etc.  You do not know.  The latest
effort by big pharma to develop a poison for the condition failed.
The effort failed because you cannot view the amyloids as a
manifestation of toxemia.  Toxemia cannot be reduced or eliminated by
adding more toxemia to the system with toxic drugs called medicines.
You, and big pharma, are so damn misguided that it would be funny if
it were not so very serious.
You continually believe that you must do "something" in order to prove
your worthyness as a physician and collect your fee.  Why not accept
that "doing nothing" may be more valuable than "doing something?"
especially when that something makes the patient sicker or even kills
them?
The acute diseases are not caused by bacteria or viruses invading a
human.  This is a scientifically valid conclusion.  If a bacteria or
virus can be found in a state of disease within a living organism,
that bacteria arose from within the organism.  The bacteria is then a
"symptom" and not a causative agent.  Refer to the work of Bechamp,
Enderlein, and Rosenow for further conformation.
The act of vaccination is then to vaccinate against a symptom and not
against any specific cause.  The failure of that action should be
readily seen.  This is one reason why vaccinations are not effective.
How can vaccinations prevent symptoms when they cannot prevent the
bacteria?
It is true enough, that if you inject foreign protein into an
organism, the organism will recognize the protein as foreign, and act
to reject it by producing "anti-bodies."  Of what value is this when
the bacteria of dis-ease are normal to the organism and protective for
the organism?  Your vaccines will not and cannot be protective.  Yet,
you cannot see the difference and try to poison the ill with anti-
biotics to effect a cure.
Germs and anti-bodies are real things??  Yet I would defy you to
observe an anti-body under the microscope, or grow one in culture.
Bacteria exist, germs do not.  You resort to a tired old euphemism
that is out of date.
You continue to rely on propaganda for your argument.  Show us some
peer reviewed, published articles, where some group of volunteers were
exposed to some "germ" in the air, in their water, or  in their food
that made any of the volunteers ill.  The only experiments of this
type that I am aware of always prove that bacteria cannot make a
healthy human sick since none, nada, nil, of the volunteers will
develop any illness associated with the so called "disease organism."

Bacteriology since Pasteur and Koch has continued to promote  the
lie.  Thousands of papers by hundreds of researchers have proven that
the germ theory of disease is false. Even a recent review of Pasteur's
research proves this.   The concept of the germ theory of disease and
contagion is one of the best medical lies going.  The only one better,
but based upon that lie, is AIDS.

If modern man removes the scalpel, the hypodermic syringe, and the
prescription pad from the allopath, of what value is that individual
in any state of ill health?

DrCee
Not an allopath, not licensed to miam or kill, and no need to lie.

Please do not think that I am picking on you; you are not the only offender,
but you happen to be one whose posts I would read otherwise.  For something
like 25 years, there has been a standard etiquette on usenet for the
style of posts, particularly, the way in which quotations of previous
posts are made.  This etiquette was developed so that it would be easy for
the reader to know which lines in a post were quoted material, and which
post in the thread was the source of the quoted material.  By ignoring that
etiquette, you basically make your posts impossible to read.  *Please*
cite quoted material properly, with one of the standard characters (> and :
are the most popular) in the leftmost column of all quoted material,
and the number of such characters indicating from how far back in the thread
the quoted material is taken.

-----
Richard Schultz                              schultr@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
"an optimist is a guy/ that has never had/ much experience"

Be fair -- he never claimed that his education came from Uranus.  He claimed
that *he* came from Uranus.

-----
Richard Schultz                              schultr@mail.biu.ac.il
Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University
-----
There's something I must tell you, there's something I must say:
The only really perfect love is one that gets away.

Yes, the microbes exist in both theories - germ and soil theory.
What we're saying though is that the microbes only thrive in a toxic body,
hence the condition of the internal milieu is the first cause of disease.
The microbes are only the effect.
Killing the microbes is like killing the flies rather than cleaning up the
rubbish.

Carole
www.cellsalts.net
www.soiltheory.com