 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Alternative / January 2008A MCS question for Mark Thorson
Mark Thorson: Are you the world's leading expert on Multiple Chemical Sensitivities? Please state the reason you have this need to post and repost the same stuff over and over and over.... You are boring.....the titles are misleading, and you are hardly the authority on anything, are you? > Mark Thorson: > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > You are boring.....the titles are misleading, and you are hardly the > authority on anything, are you? Debbee, do you have any specific criticism of the study? Is there something wrong with the design or controls? If not, why do you dispute the conclusion? On Jan 27, 8:21 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Debbee, do you have any specific criticism of the study? Is there > something wrong with the design or controls? > If not, why do you dispute the conclusion? Andrew, I want to hear from Mark Thorson, the poster of all of the posts and reposts on the same subjects over and over and over. You know, how I have asked Ilena in the past to stop with the same old same old posts? I do not want her to accuse me of being a hypocrite... Let Mark Thorson answer the question for himself..... Thank you > On Jan 27, 8:21 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > same old same old posts? I do not want her to accuse me of being a > hypocrite... Well, I must have missed that, but thank you for having told her that. Ilena starts a thread and repeatedly posts the same message to that thread as replies. Mark doesn't do that, but he does repost many of the same studies when the topic of MCS comes up. At any rate, its all well and good that you want Mark to respond, after all, he did start the thread and posted the study. Is it wrong ask what your specific objection to this study is? Do you have any specific criticisms or do you simply prefer to dismiss the conclusion? > Let Mark Thorson answer the question for himself..... > > Thank you On Jan 27, 4:02 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote: > At any rate, its all well and good that you want Mark to respond, > after all, he did start the thread and posted the study. > Is it wrong ask what your specific objection to this study is? Do you > have any specific criticisms or do you simply prefer to dismiss the > conclusion? As an alternative health care professional, since most of the treatments for MCS are of an alternative nature, I was thinking Andrew that you would also be interested in the answer to this question. Most alternative practitioners that I have met generally stick pretty much together and support the entire alternative health care spectrum. I know you probably forgot this, but I know you are a man of great respect for all alternative health care professionals, and I thank you for allowing me to remind you. Thank you. > On Jan 27, 4:02 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > thank you for > allowing me to remind you. I hope you were wearing hip-waders when you wrote that. If you are asking _ME_ why Mark reposts those articles, its probably because you didn't understand them the previous time(s). Otherwise, you would have made specific criticisms or embraced them. As it is, you don't seem to interested in scientific studies. You seem to prefer nebulosity to replicability. > Thank you. You're Welcome! On Jan 29, 5:01 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I hope you were wearing hip-waders when you wrote that. No, I was not. I am being sincere. You might want to pick up (I think you can get them through your local library by request) all of the volumes of Dr. William Rea's Chemical Sensitivity books--there are a lot case studies in there that go against the information that was in these studies. It will keep you busy for awhile as you read all of the documentation, but I really do think you will find those volumes a "good read." After all, he recommended to me acupuncture to me in the first place. > If you are asking _ME_ why Mark reposts those articles, its probably > because you didn't understand them the previous time(s). Otherwise, > you would have made specific criticisms or embraced them. Yes, I was talking with you Andrew. I understood them the first time, but I do not agree with them. See above--you will see the conflicting information by a professional that has had years of experience treating MCS patients successfully, and it will be different than the information you get in those studies. He has had YEARS of experience, as opposed to those that do those studies. I bet in a contest he would win hands down for number of years in the field over any of those that did those studies. > As it is, you don't seem to interested in scientific studies. You > seem to prefer nebulosity to replicability. I am interested in scientific studies. Read all of the volumes in Dr. Rea's books on Chemical Sensitivity. You will get a different prespective on "scientific studies," but it will be worth your time.. > >Deb Thank you. > >Andrew You're Welcome! And again, I saw, "Thank you." |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.