Medical Forum / General / Alternative / January 2008
High Mercury Levels & Chemicals & Polluants in Breast Milk and other Bodily Tissues
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Ilena Rose - 25 Jan 2008 14:41 GMT http://ilenarose.blogspot.com Health Lover
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jan2008/2008-01-21-01.asp
Chemical Exposures Cost California $2.6 Billion in 2004 LOS ANGELES, California, January 21, 2008 (ENS) - High mercury levels and more than 100 synthetic chemicals and pollutants have been found in breast milk, umbilical-cord blood, and other bodily tissues of California residents, yet state laws regulating hazardous chemicals have serious gaps and fail to protect public health and the environment, finds a new report by researchers at the University of California.
As a result, diseases among Californians who are exposed to chemicals and pollution cost the state's insurers, businesses and families an estimated $2.6 billion in direct and indirect costs during 2004, says the report, released Thursday together with a set of recommended policy reforms for the state.
The California Environmental Protection Agency commissioned the Centers for Occupational and Environmental Health, COEH, at UC Berkeley and UCLA to prepare the report. Dr. John Balmes (Photo courtesy UC Berkeley)
"This report, for the first time, puts cost estimates on the consequences for Californians of current chemical and product management policies," said COEH director Dr. John Balmes, a professor of environmental health sciences at UC Berkeley and a professor of medicine at UC San Francisco.
"California has shown that creating new jobs and investment opportunities can go hand in hand with protecting human health and the environment," said Dr. Balmes. "We have been doing this with vehicle emissions and energy use, and this new report makes it obvious that we will need to do the same with chemicals and products."
In 2004, more than 200,000 California workers were diagnosed with deadly, chronic diseases, such as cancer and emphysema, attributable to chemical exposures in the workplace, according to the report. Another 4,400 died as a result of those diseases. Equipment for chrome plating to produce bright, shiny surfaces on consumer products (Photo courtesy California Air Resources Board)
The new findings, based on well-established methodology for analyzing economic impact, indicate that those diseases resulted in $1.4 billion in both direct medical costs and indirect costs that include lost wages and benefits.
An additional $1.2 billion in direct and indirect costs is attributed to 240,000 cases of preventable childhood diseases related to environmental exposure to chemical substances, the report says.
The existing problems and recommended policy changes are detailed in the report, "Green Chemistry: Cornerstone to a Sustainable California," which has been endorsed by 127 faculty members from seven UC campuses, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
The report presents data from the California's Department of Toxic Substances Control showing that 61 of the state's 85 largest hazardous waste sites are leaking toxics directly into groundwater.
An estimated one million California women of reproductive age have blood mercury levels that exceed what the federal government considers safe for fetal development.
California leads the nation in the number of pounds of pesticide applied, and each year pesticides poison hundreds of workers.
Although chemical exposures are relevant to the general population, two groups - children and workers - are particularly vulnerable, the report states. Immigrants, minorities, and lower-income groups in California are more likely to experience the highest levels of exposure, both as residents and as workers. Lettuce pickers in a California field (Photo courtesy California Department of Public Health)
The standard regulatory mechanism for protecting workers from chemical exposures is the Permissible Exposure Limit, PEL, which establishes an exposure level considered safe for most workers, based on a 40 hour workweek. While California has established 688 PELs - compared to 453 federal PELs - this represents only a small fraction of the hazardous chemicals and mixtures to which workers are potentially exposed.
PELs have not been established in California for 44 workplace carcinogens, the report states.
With global chemical production predicted to increase 330 percent by 2050, health problems related to environmental contamination are likely to grow unless comprehensive steps are taken now, the report's authors say.
"Green chemistry," the use of renewable and safer raw materials, manufacturing processes and products, offers a sustainable solution, according to the report.
"Research conducted in the past decade has provided ample evidence of significant health impacts from exposure to toxic chemicals," said John Froines, COEH director at UCLA and a professor of environmental health sciences.
"It is timely for California to reduce the use of toxic agents through innovative technological approaches available through green chemistry. New policies that prevent hazards rather than cleaning up problems after the fact will foster innovation and help green chemistry emerge as a central part of our economy," said Froines.
The report calls on California to lead the nation in implementing a comprehensive approach to the management of chemicals and products by:
* Passing new laws to remedy the insufficient data available on the toxicity of chemicals so that California businesses, regulators and consumers can make informed choices about the products they use.
* Providing California agencies with a new legal framework to enable them to act when there are reasonable concerns about a product's safety, even when complete hazard or tracking data are unavailable.
* Investing in the design of chemicals, materials and manufacturing processes that are inherently safer for humans.
Some of these recommendations echo a 2006 UC report to the California Legislature on green chemistry policy, which contributed to the introduction of new state legislation in 2007 to require improved reporting on the sale of high-quantity chemicals and reductions in some uses of the most toxic chemicals.
That legislation did not pass and is expected to be reintroduced in 2008.
The report is online at the UCLA Center for Occupational and Environmental Health at www.coeh.ucla.edu/greenchemistry.pdf
Kevysmom - 25 Jan 2008 20:21 GMT > An estimated one million California women of reproductive age have > blood mercury levels that exceed what the federal government considers > safe for fetal development. Do the Pharma Shills understand what this means??? Don't they advocate safety for babies and children, Those hypocrites!
> http://ilenarose.blogspot.com > Health Lover [quoted text clipped - 130 lines] > The report is online at the UCLA Center for Occupational and > Environmental Health atwww.coeh.ucla.edu/greenchemistry.pdf D. C. Sessions - 25 Jan 2008 22:11 GMT >> An estimated one million California women of reproductive age have >> blood mercury levels that exceed what the federal government considers >> safe for fetal development. > > Do the Pharma Shills understand what this means??? Don't they advocate > safety for babies and children, Those hypocrites! Yeah, it means that sushi should be banned: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/health/2004142034_tuna24.html
California should also ban coal-fired power plants, since they're by far the #1 source of environmental mercury.
| Bogus as it might seem, people, this really is a deliverable | | e-mail address. Of course, there isn't REALLY a lumber cartel. | | There isn't really a Santa Claus, but try www.santaclaus.com. | +--------------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> --------------+
Kevysmom - 25 Jan 2008 23:11 GMT > California should also ban coal-fired power plants, since they're > by far the #1 source of environmental mercury. What a great day, We agree on something!
So what would we do for power if we placed a ban on coal power plants?
> In message <3932f3bb-1df8-4188-979f-3b29d813b...@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>, Kevysmom wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > | There isn't really a Santa Claus, but trywww.santaclaus.com. | > +--------------- D. C. Sessions <d...@lumbercartel.com> --------------+ D. C. Sessions - 26 Jan 2008 01:11 GMT > So what would we do for power if we placed a ban on coal power plants? Treadmills. Do you know how many joggers there are in California at any given moment?
However, there is a problem in that the environmental lawsuits would keep the program locked up for years.
| Bogus as it might seem, people, this really is a deliverable | | e-mail address. Of course, there isn't REALLY a lumber cartel. | | There isn't really a Santa Claus, but try www.santaclaus.com. | +--------------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> --------------+
rpautrey2 - 26 Jan 2008 01:34 GMT Good Post! Paul
Excerpt:
The existing problems and recommended policy changes are detailed in the report, "Green Chemistry: Cornerstone to a Sustainable California," which has been endorsed by 127 faculty members from seven UC campuses, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
The report presents data from the California's Department of Toxic Substances Control showing that 61 of the state's 85 largest hazardous waste sites are leaking toxics directly into groundwater.
An estimated one million California women of reproductive age have blood mercury levels that exceed what the federal government considers safe for fetal development.
California leads the nation in the number of pounds of pesticide applied, and each year pesticides poison hundreds of workers.
Although chemical exposures are relevant to the general population, two groups - children and workers - are particularly vulnerable, the report states. Immigrants, minorities, and lower-income groups in California are more likely to experience the highest levels of exposure, both as residents and as workers. Lettuce pickers in a California field (Photo courtesy California Department of Public Health)
The standard regulatory mechanism for protecting workers from chemical exposures is the Permissible Exposure Limit, PEL, which establishes an exposure level considered safe for most workers, based on a 40 hour workweek. While California has established 688 PELs - compared to 453 federal PELs - this represents only a small fraction of the hazardous chemicals and mixtures to which workers are potentially exposed.
PELs have not been established in California for 44 workplace carcinogens, the report states.
With global chemical production predicted to increase 330 percent by 2050, health problems related to environmental contamination are likely to grow unless comprehensive steps are taken now, the report's authors say.
"Green chemistry," the use of renewable and safer raw materials, manufacturing processes and products, offers a sustainable solution, according to the report.
"Research conducted in the past decade has provided ample evidence of significant health impacts from exposure to toxic chemicals," said John Froines, COEH director at UCLA and a professor of environmental health sciences.
"It is timely for California to reduce the use of toxic agents through innovative technological approaches available through green chemistry. New policies that prevent hazards rather than cleaning up problems after the fact will foster innovation and help green chemistry emerge as a central part of our economy," said Froines.
The One True Zhen Jue - 26 Jan 2008 14:47 GMT > > California should also ban coal-fired power plants, since they're > > by far the #1 source of environmental mercury. > > What a great day, We agree on something! > > So what would we do for power if we placed a ban on coal power plants? To paraphrase "W", we need to go New-Que-Lur!
> > In message <3932f3bb-1df8-4188-979f-3b29d813b...@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>, Kevysmom wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > - Show quoted text - vernon O - 27 Jan 2008 00:12 GMT The future is nuclear power. Yes there is much to be done.
The future of auto power is hydrometer. It's already developed except for tank and distribution factors.
What's stopping it? Thee traillawryers. No American manufafacturere will step out. Is there a danger? No, but then there was no danger with front wheel drive dive either.
> California should also ban coal-fired power plants, since they're > by far the #1 source of environmental mercury. What a great day, We agree on something!
So what would we do for power if we placed a ban on coal power plants?
On Jan 25, 5:11 pm, "D. C. Sessions" <d...@lumbercartel.com> wrote:
> In message > <3932f3bb-1df8-4188-979f-3b29d813b...@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > | There isn't really a Santa Claus, but trywww.santaclaus.com. | > +--------------- D. C. Sessions <d...@lumbercartel.com> --------------+ D. C. Sessions - 27 Jan 2008 00:24 GMT > The future is nuclear power. Yes there is much to be done. We're going in circles. This thread started out with the question of how to keep California in its current lifestyle after the horrible nuclear plants are all shut down.
| Bogus as it might seem, people, this really is a deliverable | | e-mail address. Of course, there isn't REALLY a lumber cartel. | | There isn't really a Santa Claus, but try www.santaclaus.com. | +--------------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> --------------+
Jan Drew - 27 Jan 2008 02:54 GMT >> The future is nuclear power. Yes there is much to be done. > > We're going in circles. You best lay off the pain pills.
This thread started out with the
> question of how to keep California in its current lifestyle > after the horrible nuclear plants are all shut down. No this thread started out:
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jan2008/2008-01-21-01.asp
Chemical Exposures Cost California $2.6 Billion in 2004 LOS ANGELES, California, January 21, 2008 (ENS) - High mercury levels and more than 100 synthetic chemicals and pollutants have been found in breast milk, umbilical-cord blood, and other bodily tissues of California residents, yet state laws regulating hazardous chemicals have serious gaps and fail to protect public health and the environment, finds a new report by researchers at the University of California.
As a result, diseases among Californians who are exposed to chemicals and pollution cost the state's insurers, businesses and families an estimated $2.6 billion in direct and indirect costs during 2004, says the report, released Thursday together with a set of recommended policy reforms for the state.
The California Environmental Protection Agency commissioned the Centers for Occupational and Environmental Health, COEH, at UC Berkeley and UCLA to prepare the report. Dr. John Balmes (Photo courtesy UC Berkeley)
"This report, for the first time, puts cost estimates on the consequences for Californians of current chemical and product management policies," said COEH director Dr. John Balmes, a professor of environmental health sciences at UC Berkeley and a professor of medicine at UC San Francisco.
"California has shown that creating new jobs and investment opportunities can go hand in hand with protecting human health and the environment," said Dr. Balmes. "We have been doing this with vehicle emissions and energy use, and this new report makes it obvious that we will need to do the same with chemicals and products."
In 2004, more than 200,000 California workers were diagnosed with deadly, chronic diseases, such as cancer and emphysema, attributable to chemical exposures in the workplace, according to the report. Another 4,400 died as a result of those diseases. Equipment for chrome plating to produce bright, shiny surfaces on consumer products (Photo courtesy California Air Resources Board)
The new findings, based on well-established methodology for analyzing economic impact, indicate that those diseases resulted in $1.4 billion in both direct medical costs and indirect costs that include lost wages and benefits.
An additional $1.2 billion in direct and indirect costs is attributed to 240,000 cases of preventable childhood diseases related to environmental exposure to chemical substances, the report says.
The existing problems and recommended policy changes are detailed in the report, "Green Chemistry: Cornerstone to a Sustainable California," which has been endorsed by 127 faculty members from seven UC campuses, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
The report presents data from the California's Department of Toxic Substances Control showing that 61 of the state's 85 largest hazardous waste sites are leaking toxics directly into groundwater.
An estimated one million California women of reproductive age have blood mercury levels that exceed what the federal government considers safe for fetal development.
California leads the nation in the number of pounds of pesticide applied, and each year pesticides poison hundreds of workers.
Although chemical exposures are relevant to the general population, two groups - children and workers - are particularly vulnerable, the report states. Immigrants, minorities, and lower-income groups in California are more likely to experience the highest levels of exposure, both as residents and as workers. Lettuce pickers in a California field (Photo courtesy California Department of Public Health)
The standard regulatory mechanism for protecting workers from chemical exposures is the Permissible Exposure Limit, PEL, which establishes an exposure level considered safe for most workers, based on a 40 hour workweek. While California has established 688 PELs - compared to 453 federal PELs - this represents only a small fraction of the hazardous chemicals and mixtures to which workers are potentially exposed.
PELs have not been established in California for 44 workplace carcinogens, the report states.
With global chemical production predicted to increase 330 percent by 2050, health problems related to environmental contamination are likely to grow unless comprehensive steps are taken now, the report's authors say.
"Green chemistry," the use of renewable and safer raw materials, manufacturing processes and products, offers a sustainable solution, according to the report.
"Research conducted in the past decade has provided ample evidence of significant health impacts from exposure to toxic chemicals," said John Froines, COEH director at UCLA and a professor of environmental health sciences.
"It is timely for California to reduce the use of toxic agents through innovative technological approaches available through green chemistry. New policies that prevent hazards rather than cleaning up problems after the fact will foster innovation and help green chemistry emerge as a central part of our economy," said Froines.
The report calls on California to lead the nation in implementing a comprehensive approach to the management of chemicals and products by:
* Passing new laws to remedy the insufficient data available on the toxicity of chemicals so that California businesses, regulators and consumers can make informed choices about the products they use.
* Providing California agencies with a new legal framework to enable them to act when there are reasonable concerns about a product's safety, even when complete hazard or tracking data are unavailable.
* Investing in the design of chemicals, materials and manufacturing processes that are inherently safer for humans.
Some of these recommendations echo a 2006 UC report to the California Legislature on green chemistry policy, which contributed to the introduction of new state legislation in 2007 to require improved reporting on the sale of high-quantity chemicals and reductions in some uses of the most toxic chemicals.
That legislation did not pass and is expected to be reintroduced in 2008.
The report is online at the UCLA Center for Occupational and Environmental Health at www.coeh.ucla.edu/greenchemistry.pdf
Jan Drew - 26 Jan 2008 01:45 GMT > In message > <3932f3bb-1df8-4188-979f-3b29d813b267@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>,
>>> An estimated one million California women of reproductive age have >>> blood mercury levels that exceed what the federal government considers [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > California should also ban coal-fired power plants, since they're > by far the #1 source of environmental mercury. And mercury amalgams are OH so safe....
IN the mouth.
Dangerous BEFORE placed in the mouth. Dangerous the instant they come OUT. Somewhere in MID AIR, they suddenly become dangerous again.
Mercury from mercury amalgams are the number ONE source of mercury in people.
Blattus Slafaly £ ¥ 0/00 :) - 25 Jan 2008 23:19 GMT > http://ilenarose.blogspot.com > Health Lover > > http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jan2008/2008-01-21-01.asp > > Chemical Exposures Cost California $2.6 Billion in 2004 Metals are good for you. They put some in vitamin pills.
 Signature Blattus Slafaly ? 3 :) 7/8
Jan Drew - 26 Jan 2008 01:57 GMT >> http://ilenarose.blogspot.com >> Health Lover [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Metals are good for you. They put some in vitamin pills. http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/lifestyle/html/20070324T230000-0500_120798_OBS_HE AVY_METAL_POISONING__PART_II____HEALTH_EFFECTS_OF_MERCURY_.asp
Peter Bowditch - 26 Jan 2008 08:03 GMT >>> http://ilenarose.blogspot.com >>> Health Lover [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/lifestyle/html/20070324T230000-0500_120798_OBS_HE AVY_METAL_POISONING__PART_II____HEALTH_EFFECTS_OF_MERCURY_.asp What are you drinking this weekend, Jan? It seems to be making you more incoherent than usual. The next time someone advises you to stay away from the brown acid you should listen.
 Signature Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
Jan Drew - 27 Jan 2008 02:48 GMT ""Blattus Slafaly £ ¥ 0/00 :)"" <boobooililililil@roadrunner.com> wrote in
>message news:479a6ea7$0$30043$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... >> Ilena Rose wrote: >> http://ilenarose.blogspot.com >> Health Lover > >> http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jan2008/2008-01-21-01.asp
>> Chemical Exposures Cost California $2.6 Billion in 2004
> Metals are good for you. They put some in vitamin pills. http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/lifestyle/html/20070324T230000-0500_120798_OBS_HE AVY_METAL_POISONING__PART_II____HEALTH_EFFECTS_OF_MERCURY_.asp
Heavy metal poisoning (Part II) - Health effects of mercury
Sunday, March 25, 2007
MERCURY is the most toxic non-radioactive element on earth. The term "mad as a hatter" is linked to the madcap milliner in Lewis Carroll's book, Alice in Wonderland. The origin of the saying relates to a disease peculiar to the hat-making industry in the 1800s.
A mercury solution commonly used during the process of turning fur into felt caused the hatters to breathe in the fumes of this highly toxic heavy metal. This situation was exacerbated by the poor ventilation in most of the workshops.
This, in turn, led to an accumulation of mercury in the workers' bodies, resulting in symptoms such as trembling ("hatters' shakes"), slurred speech, loosening of teeth, loss of coordination, memory loss, depression, irritability and anxiety. Hence the term "The Mad Hatter Syndrome".
Mercury is receiving considerable attention today because of its ubiquity as an environmental pollutant. The metal is generated naturally in the environment from the degassing of the earth's crust, from volcanic emissions, forest fires and the evaporation of seawater. Mining operations, paper industries and chloralkali plants are significant producers of mercury.
Up until 1990, mercury compounds were added to paint as a fungicide; these compounds are now banned. However, surfaces painted with these old supplies still exist. The substance continues to be used in thermometers, thermostats, and dental amalgam. It is also found in many commonly available products including pesticides, fertilisers, auto exhaust, bleached flour, processed foods, drinking water, adhesives, food preservatives and batteries. Medicines, such as mercurochrome and merthiolate contain mercury.
Mercury contained in medical, household, and industrial products is able to enter the atmosphere when the products, are discarded, especially when they are incinerated. Mercury is constantly cycling through the environment, evaporating into the atmosphere and returning to the ground as the result of gravity or precipitation and being deposited into lakes and rivers. An estimated two-thirds of mercury in the environment is the result of human activities.
Effects of mercury Pure elemental mercury is a cumulative heavy-metal poison that is moderately absorbed through the skin, poorly absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract, and readily absorbed as vapour through the lungs. The element is strongly toxic when absorbed as vapour from the respiratory tract, but it is considerably less so when exposure occurs via other routes.
Elemental mercury often passes through the GI tract without being absorbed; in the past mercury was used for mechanical relief of intestinal obstructions. Compounds of mercury tend to be much more toxic than the element itself, and organic compounds of mercury are often extremely toxic.
Mercury damages the central nervous system, endocrine system, kidneys, and other organs, and adversely affects the mouth, gums, and teeth. Exposure over long periods of time or heavy exposure to mercury vapour can result in brain damage and ultimately death. Mercury and its compounds are particularly toxic to foetuses and infants. Women who have been exposed to mercury in pregnancy have given birth to children with serious birth defects.
Some of the toxic effects of mercury are reversible. However, heavy or prolonged exposure can do irreversible damage, particularly in foetuses, infants, and young children. Mercury exposure in very young children can have severe neurological consequences, preventing nerve sheaths from forming properly. Mercury poisoning in the young is suspected as a possible cause of autistic behaviour.
Methylmercury & fish One of the other forms of mercury is an extremely toxic substance - methylmercury. It dissolves easily in water and bioaccumulates in the food chain. ( Bioaccumulation is the increase in concentration of a substance along the food-chain ). Methylmercury is ingested by fish when it gets in the water then it bioaccumulates in fish. This fish is in turn eaten and can cause many health problems when people eat the mercury contaminated fish. One of the main sources of mercury poisoning is eating methylmercury-contaminated fish. For these reasons, pregnant women and small children should be especially aware of fish advisories in their area.
Thimerosal Thimerosal, a preservative that contains mercury, had been added in very minute amounts to vaccines to prevent their deterioration. It has been hypothesised that there could be a potential relationship between thimerosal use in vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders of autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and speech or language delay.
This hypothesis was based on a comprehensive review of the scientific literature on mercury toxicity. At present, all routinely recommended vaccines for Jamaican and American infants are available only as thimerosal-free formulations, with the exception of inactivated influenza vaccine.
Dental amalgam Mercury fillings, also known as "amalgam" or "silver fillings," are the most common fillings in the world. They are called silver because of their colour and contain 45 to 52 per cent mercury. The remaining volume is made up with copper, tin, silver and zinc.Exposure to mercury fillings results in a chronic toxicity, not acute poisoning.
It has been theorized that amalgam fillings could be part of the explanation for the explosion of learning problems and autism in children since World War II, a time period corresponding with the introduction and widespread use of mercury amalgam. Charles Williamson, MD, co-director of the Toxic Studies Institute in Boca Raton, Florida, states:
"Once mothers realise the fillings in their teeth damage the development of their babies' brains while they're in the womb, and once these women understand this damage can result in low IQ, learning and behavioural problems after birth, then we'll see a public outcry against the use of mercury amalgam." Studies in both animals and humans have confirmed the presence of mercury from amalgam fillings in tissue specimens, blood, amniotic fluid, or urine.
The American Dental Association ( ADA ) acknowledges that amalgam contains mercury and reacts with other substances. However, to date the ADA maintains that amalgam continues to be a safe material. Of interest, the metallic mercury used by dentists to manufacture dental amalgam is shipped as a hazardous material to dental offices.
Treatment To treat patients for mercury overload, doctors recommend a variety of nutrients and drugs to chelate the mercury out of the body. In the process the cells are protected from the effects of the large amounts of free mercury being released into the bloodstream for urinary excretion.
Chelation was first used in the 1940s by the United States Navy to treat lead poisoning and was subsequently approved by the Food and Drug Administration as a safe method of treating heavy metal toxicity. Chelation therapy is a medical treatment that improves metabolic and circulatory function by removing toxic metals and abnormally located nutritional metallic ions from the body. It is accomplished by the administration of chelating agents.
Dr Jacqueline E Campbell is a family physician in private practice. E mail drjcampbell14@yahoo.com
Peter Bowditch - 27 Jan 2008 03:05 GMT >""Blattus Slafaly £ ¥ 0/00 :)"" <boobooililililil@roadrunner.com> wrote in >>message news:479a6ea7$0$30043$4c368faf@roadrunner.com... [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > >MERCURY is the most toxic non-radioactive element on earth. No need to read any further, as ignorance of the subject has been demonstrated. Either that or mendacity.
<snip rant based on ignorance and/or lying>
 Signature Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
Jan Drew - 28 Jan 2008 07:05 GMT http://www.mercuryexposure.org/
http://www.hairanalysisprogram.com/mercury-poisoning.php
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MthUo8k0l0
http://www.acupuncturetoday.com/mpacms/at/article.php?id=28087
http://www.vaccinationnews.com/DailyNews/July2001/AutismUniqueMercPoison.htm
|
|
|