Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / January 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

GAZETTE:  Government wrong to push human papillomavirus vaccine

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ilena Rose - 23 Jan 2008 17:35 GMT
On the internet, the true Snake oil Sellers (plus a few new ones)
pushing this unproven vaccine, have been fillilng blogs, Wiki, the
Health Fraud list, and Usenet with their industry propaganda about
this snake oil.

www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/snake-oil.htm

http://www.gazette.uwo.ca/article.cfm?section=Opinions&articleID=1529&month=01&d
ay=23&year=2008


To the editor:
The hasty decision by our federal Health Minister to vaccinate young
Canadian girls in Grades 6-9 against the human papillomavirus (HPV) is
a monstrous mistake.

First, the vaccine isn’t necessary. According to the Centre of Disease
Control and Prevention, only a very small percentage of women infected
with the virus have “high risk” strains that could lead to cervical
cancer.

Otherwise, HPV generally clears on its own like the common cold, or
could leave you with a few genital warts. There is no dangerous
epidemic of HPV and there is no epidemic of cervical cancer.

Cervical cancer kills approximately 400 women in Canada each year as
compared to breast cancer, which kills approximately 5,000 women. We
already have a good method of early detection and therefore
management, of cervical cancer, with almost 100 per cent survival rate
when found early — namely the Pap test.

The $300 million used for the Gardasil vaccination program could be
better spent on ThinPrep cervical cancer screening, which is even more
accurate than the Pap smear test and on increased sex education in
schools, which has been proven in numerous studies to decrease
risk-taking behaviour and incidence of sexually transmitted
infections.

Second, we don’t even know the vaccine is effective, let alone safe.
Merck, the makers of Gardasil, still cannot give us answers to such
questions as: How safe is this vaccine? What are the side effects? How
many girls were used in clinical trials? And because cervical cancer
develops over many years, was this vaccine even tested long enough to
know that it works?

Another alarming fact: since May 2007, there have been 2,000 adverse
affects from this vaccine reported in the United States along with
seven deaths, which are currently under investigation.

Third, the medical support for this initiative is suspect. As a nurse
who has been taught to think critically and use evidence-based
practice, I started to research information about the Gardasil vaccine
only to be alarmed on every front.

I looked to experts at the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
of Canada for help to see why they are so enthusiastic about this
vaccine and saw, to my surprise, that they were given a $1.5 million
grant from Merck: did this money have an impact on their behaviour?

This vaccine and public in-school vaccination program is screaming
“scam.” With all the unanswered questions and adverse side effects,
why are we supporting this campaign?

I urge everyone to be critical thinkers and leaders. Do some research
and support the initiatives you believe in, and speak out against the
ones you don’t. Our healthcare system is in critical danger of being
taken over and controlled by big pharmaceutical companies like Merck,
that do research fueled by how to make money, not by how to make
humans healthy.
—Celina Carter
Bachelor of Science in Nursing
Jeff - 23 Jan 2008 17:59 GMT
> On the internet, the true Snake oil Sellers (plus a few new ones)
> pushing this unproven vaccine, have been fillilng blogs, Wiki, the
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> with the virus have “high risk” strains that could lead to cervical
> cancer.

Where is the Centre of Disease Control and Prevention? Who are they?

Please tell us how to identify who will get the high-risk strains.

> Otherwise, HPV generally clears on its own like the common cold, or
> could leave you with a few genital warts. There is no dangerous
> epidemic of HPV and there is no epidemic of cervical cancer.

Yet, 400 women are killed each year, often in the primes of their lives.
Others have to go through heart- and gut-wrenching treatment.

> Cervical cancer kills approximately 400 women in Canada each year as
> compared to breast cancer, which kills approximately 5,000 women. We
> already have a good method of early detection and therefore
> management, of cervical cancer, with almost 100 per cent survival rate
> when found early — namely the Pap test.

That doesn't always work. Ask the families of the 400 women who die each
year.

> The $300 million used for the Gardasil vaccination program could be
> better spent on ThinPrep cervical cancer screening, which is even more
> accurate than the Pap smear test and on increased sex education in
> schools, which has been proven in numerous studies to decrease
> risk-taking behaviour and incidence of sexually transmitted
> infections.

Can you please show us the risk-benefit analysis that lead you to this
conclusion?

> Second, we don’t even know the vaccine is effective, let alone safe.
> Merck, the makers of Gardasil, still cannot give us answers to such
> questions as: How safe is this vaccine? What are the side effects? How
> many girls were used in clinical trials? And because cervical cancer
> develops over many years, was this vaccine even tested long enough to
> know that it works?

We know that it prevents the infection that leads to cancer. And the
information is available at www.cdc.gov, the US Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention in Atlanta.

> Another alarming fact: since May 2007, there have been 2,000 adverse
> affects from this vaccine reported in the United States along with
> seven deaths, which are currently under investigation.

That's the right word: "event." In none of these deaths, has the vaccine
been shown to be at fault.

> Third, the medical support for this initiative is suspect. As a nurse
> who has been taught to think critically and use evidence-based
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> “scam.” With all the unanswered questions and adverse side effects,
> why are we supporting this campaign?

Because it is expected to save the lives of hundreds of Canadians each year.

> I urge everyone to be critical thinkers and leaders. Do some research
> and support the initiatives you believe in, and speak out against the
> ones you don’t. Our healthcare system is in critical danger of being
> taken over and controlled by big pharmaceutical companies like Merck,
> that do research fueled by how to make money, not by how to make
> humans healthy.

I did my research. I find that the vaccine will likely save hundreds of
lives in Canada and even more in the US.

I have also come to the conlusion that the anti-vaccine folks are trying
to use fear and ignorance to turn people away from vaccines.

Jeff

> —Celina Carter
> Bachelor of Science in Nursing
Jan Drew - 24 Jan 2008 02:52 GMT
>> On the internet, the true Snake oil Sellers (plus a few new ones)
>> pushing this unproven vaccine, have been fillilng blogs, Wiki, the
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Where is the Centre of Disease Control and Prevention? Who are they?

Priceless!  Do note how, Jeffrey Peter Joseph Utz, M.D.
jeff...@juno.com
[2007] "Robert Watson" kidsdoc2...@hotmail.com
Jeff Utz  jtest-u...@juno.com
Jeff Utz, M.D. jeff...@juno.com
Jeffrey P. Utz, M.D. jeff...@softhome.net   Hence "Putz"
http://www.msu.edu/~utz/  u...@pilot.msu.edu
Jeffrey Peter, M.D. kidsdoc2...@hotmail.com
Wyle E. Coyote wyle_e_coyot...@hotmail.com
Jeff Utz  kidsdoc2...@hotmail.com (Jan 2003)
Jeff jef...@pacbell.net
Jeff j...@hotmail.com (2007)
and again (2008)

never criticizes his buddy Mark Probert's typos.

> Please tell us how to identify who will get the high-risk strains.

lol.  Ask your beloved CDC.

>> Otherwise, HPV generally clears on its own like the common cold, or
>> could leave you with a few genital warts. There is no dangerous
>> epidemic of HPV and there is no epidemic of cervical cancer.
>
> Yet, 400 women are killed each year, often in the primes of their lives.
> Others have to go through heart- and gut-wrenching treatment.

Yet, you don't seem to be concerned about the *needless deaths and mistakes*
from
convention medicine.

>> Cervical cancer kills approximately 400 women in Canada each year as
>> compared to breast cancer, which kills approximately 5,000 women. We
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> That doesn't always work. Ask the families of the 400 women who die each
> year.

You forgot the families who are killed each year from breast cancer.

>>The $300 million used for the Gardasil vaccination program could be
>> better spent on ThinPrep cervical cancer screening, which is even more
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Can you please show us the risk-benefit analysis that lead you to this
> conclusion?

Read, notdoc, read.

http://www.gazette.uwo.ca/article.cfm?section=Opinions&articleID=1529&month=01&d
ay=23&year=2008


>> Second, we don’t even know the vaccine is effective, let alone safe.
>> Merck, the makers of Gardasil, still cannot give us answers to such
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> information is available at www.cdc.gov, the US Centers for Disease
> Control and Prevention in Atlanta.

Ahh, yes.  Believe the CDC and govenment.

http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/publications/news/news-now/clinical-care-rese
arch/20070925hpv4gbs.html


http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/84804.php

http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/0517hpvvaccine0517.html

http://www.judicialwatch.org/judicial-watch-announces-list-washington-s-ten-most
-wanted-corrupt-politicians-2007


>> Another alarming fact: since May 2007, there have been 2,000 adverse
>> affects from this vaccine reported in the United States along with
>> seven deaths, which are currently under investigation.
>
> That's the right word: "event."

Where?

In none of these deaths, has the vaccine
> been shown to be at fault.

Tell that to the families of those who have died.

My. my I am so surprised you would tell a blatant lie.
http://ahrp.blogspot.com/2007/05/gardasil-vaccine-so-far-3-deaths-and.html

>> Third, the medical support for this initiative is suspect. As a nurse
>> who has been taught to think critically and use evidence-based
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Jeff

You did your research.  You could not tell the deaths were caused by the
vaccination...

When one dies died of a blood clot three hours after getting the Gardasil
vaccine. .

>> —Celina Carter
>> Bachelor of Science in Nursing
Jeff - 24 Jan 2008 03:46 GMT
>>> On the internet, the true Snake oil Sellers (plus a few new ones)
>>> pushing this unproven vaccine, have been fillilng blogs, Wiki, the
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> never criticizes his buddy Mark Probert's typos.

I didn't criticize anyone's typo. Ask what agency that is.

>> Please tell us how to identify who will get the high-risk strains.
>
> lol.  Ask your beloved CDC.

The point is that there is no way to tell which girls will later get the
high-risk infection and which ones won't.

>>> Otherwise, HPV generally clears on its own like the common cold, or
>>> could leave you with a few genital warts. There is no dangerous
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> mistakes* from
> convention medicine.

That's not the subject of this thread. However, I am very concerned
about these, particularly, with proper software and procedures, many are
easy to prevent.

>>> Cervical cancer kills approximately 400 women in Canada each year as
>>> compared to breast cancer, which kills approximately 5,000 women. We
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>
> You forgot the families who are killed each year from breast cancer.

That's not the subject of this thread.

>>> The $300 million used for the Gardasil vaccination program could be
>>> better spent on ThinPrep cervical cancer screening, which is even more
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> http://www.gazette.uwo.ca/article.cfm?section=Opinions&articleID=1529&month=01&d
ay=23&year=2008
 

I meant a real analysis by someone who knows what he is doing.

>>> Second, we don’t even know the vaccine is effective, let alone safe.
>>> Merck, the makers of Gardasil, still cannot give us answers to such
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> http://www.aafp.org/online/en/home/publications/news/news-now/clinical-care-rese
arch/20070925hpv4gbs.html
 

That was over 6 months ago. What was the outcome of the investigation?

> http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/84804.php

So what? Which of those deaths have been shown to be caused by the vaccine?

> http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/0517hpvvaccine0517.html 

Old news.

> http://www.judicialwatch.org/judicial-watch-announces-list-washington-s-ten-most
-wanted-corrupt-politicians-2007
 
>
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
> When one dies died of a blood clot three hours after getting the
> Gardasil vaccine. .

See, the patient died of a blood clot, not a vaccine.

You have yet to prove that the vaccine was anything other than coincidence.

Jeff

>>> —Celina Carter
>>> Bachelor of Science in Nursing
Ilena Rose - 23 Jan 2008 18:12 GMT
Snake oil Salesman, Jefffrey P Utz ...

www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Snake-oil.htm#Jeffrey-Utz

There is no certainty about this new expensive drug you are pushing
here ...

"may" prevent cervical cancer is a big IF.

"may" save lives even bigger.

You are deaf, dumb and blind to the facts regarding this unproven drug
... and use your typical "ministry of truth' disinformation tactics.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.