Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / February 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Kids over diagnosed and over medicated for ADHD

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
bigvince - 23 Jan 2008 16:03 GMT
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/94801.php

Study Raises Questions About Diagnosis, Medical Treatment Of ADHD
A new UCLA study shows that only about half of children diagnosed with
attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, or ADHD, exhibit the
cognitive defects commonly associated with the condition.

The study also found that in populations where medication is rarely
prescribed to treat ADHD, the prevalence and symptoms of the disorder
are roughly equivalent to populations in which medication is widely
used.......

......Researchers also found surprising results regarding the
effectiveness of medicine in treating ADHD. In contrast to children in
United States, youth in northern Finland are rarely treated with
medicine for ADHD, yet the 'look' of the disorder its prevalence,
symptoms, psychiatric comorbidity and cognition is relatively the same
as in the U.S., where stimulant medication is widely used. The
researchers point out that this raises important issues about the
efficacy of the current treatments of ADHD in dealing with the
disorder's long-term problems.

"We know medication is very effective in the short-term," said
Smalley, who authored or co-authored each of the papers. "But the
study raises important questions concerning the long-term efficacy of
ADHD treatment. Here we have two different cultures and two different
approaches to treatment, yet at the time of adolescence, there are few
differences in the presentation and problems associated with
ADHD."....

Perhaps the model of treatment here is driven by the drug companies
who we all realise are almost charitable organizations.

Thanks Vince
Jeff - 23 Jan 2008 16:35 GMT
> http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/94801.php

<copyrighted material deleted>

>  Thanks Vince

You're welcome.

Where in the article did it say that kids were either overdiagnosed or
over medicated for ADHD?

Jeff
Jan Drew - 24 Jan 2008 03:01 GMT
>> http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/94801.php
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Jeff

It is not an article.  It is a study.
Jeff - 24 Jan 2008 03:48 GMT
>>> http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/94801.php
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> It is not an article.  It is a study.

No, it's an article on a website. It is describing the results of a study.

Nor was there any conclusion that kids are overdiagnosed or over
medicated for ADHD on the page.

Jeff
Peter Bowditch - 24 Jan 2008 04:44 GMT
>>> http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/94801.php
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>It is not an article.  It is a study.

A study is something you do. An article is something you write. An
article can be a report of a study but it can't be the study itself.

Make a note.

Signature

Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

Dave - 23 Jan 2008 19:28 GMT
> http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/94801.php
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
>  Thanks Vince

Vince,

In northern Finland, the locals are used to an herb providing the help
they need.

Most countries in the northern regions of the world use Rhodiola rosea
for ADHD. It is only in the USA that we deem it necessary to use
stimulants.

Dave
news.chi.sbcglobal.net - 23 Jan 2008 23:15 GMT
Leave the kids alone already.    The stimulants are what cause much of our
present day problems.   Whoever heard of ADHD before we were flooded with
anti-depressant   .As I  have said a thousand times, they have an ability to
transfer harm to an innocent person by the user.   Read website
DoctorBrains.org   comments on Crohns and Colitis by Kureforcrohns.
Strange to think what one person ingests can harm another, but that is so
with stimulants.    And distance does not stop the damage, the mind just
follows the victim and continues doing harm.    Stimulants have become a
plague by a a rollover effect.
Gail
> http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/94801.php
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> Thanks Vince
D. C. Sessions - 23 Jan 2008 23:22 GMT
> Leave the kids alone already.    The stimulants are what cause much of our
> present day problems.   Whoever heard of ADHD before we were flooded with
> anti-depressant

OK, history isn't your forte.

>                    .As I  have said a thousand times, they have an ability to  
> transfer harm to an innocent person by the user.   Read website
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> follows the victim and continues doing harm.    Stimulants have become a
> plague by a a rollover effect.

This particular belief has a lot to be said for it, since it's
pretty much untestable.

| Bogus as it might seem, people, this really is a deliverable       |
| e-mail address.  Of course, there isn't REALLY a lumber cartel.    |
| There isn't really a Santa Claus, but try www.santaclaus.com.      |
+--------------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> --------------+
news.chi.sbcglobal.net - 24 Jan 2008 03:56 GMT
OK History is not my forte.     What history are you speaking of.   Give a
short summary.     And the theory is testable.
If you know any child with Inflammatory Bowel Disease, they are the easiest
to return to normalcy.   Their contacts are limited, usually mother on
anti-depressants, father might be on anti-depressant or marijuana or other
relative or friend of family etc. be on a stimulant.   Remove the stimulant,
th child is fine.    I do not take this situation lightly.   It has become
an every day, every moment concern for my dearest people in nursing homes,
where some residents are on anti-depressants, leaving the rest in jeopardy
of health destruction and premature death.    Constantly telling the
administrator to ban the anti-depressants so everyone can feel normal.  She
refuses, says the doctor calls the shots.   To me her vocation is murder,
just like Hitler (She loves that, says everyone has to die sometime.   Yes,
I agree, everyone has to die sometime, but not by her hand or her doctor's
hand.    Nursing homes are killing fields with the anti-depressants.   The
home physician only treats what he sees, cannot distinguish what is the
progression of the illness they came for and the totally unrelated illness
many experience.    I have watched this over and over, and experienced it,
and why would I say this if I DID NOT KNOW IT TO BE TRUE.     An
antidepressant is what I desperately need, but will not take.    My  mind is
connected to these people and it would kill them quickly.   G-d forbid
another person with whom they are social or being observed, kills them.
Crazy,   no,  the world has become crazy with the overload of
anti-depressants who the pharmaceutical and physicians say we need.    What
happened to talk therapy.    They are deaf and dumb in that respect.    If
this one nursing home would ban the anti-depressants, that might be an
accomplishment that would shut me up for awhile.
Gail

>> Leave the kids alone already. The stimulants are what cause much of our
>> present day problems. Whoever heard of ADHD before we were flooded with
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> | There isn't really a Santa Claus, but try www.santaclaus.com.      |
> +--------------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> --------------+
news.chi.sbcglobal.net - 24 Jan 2008 04:06 GMT
Also, read my post on Alt.journalism on the subject.   There is a very short
excerpt written by Dr. Burrill Crohns that says some unidentifiable agent is
at work.   and I say that unidentifiable agent are stimulants.   The post is
"Looking for Descendents"  written on Jan 22.
Gail
> OK History is not my forte.     What history are you speaking of.   Give a
> short summary.     And the theory is testable.
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> home would ban the anti-depressants, that might be an accomplishment that
> would shut me up for awhile
Gail-----------+
Mark Probert - 05 Feb 2008 12:16 GMT
On Jan 23, 6:15 pm, "news.chi.sbcglobal.net"
<kureforcro...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Leave the kids alone already.    The stimulants are what cause much of our
> present day problems.   Whoever heard of ADHD before we were flooded with
> anti-depressant  

Lots of people. It was called other things, but it existed way back
when.

.As I  have said a thousand times, they have an ability to
> transfer harm to an innocent person by the user.

Say it a million times, but, it is still a wacko idea.

  Read website
> DoctorBrains.org   comments on Crohns and Colitis by Kureforcrohns.

Isn't that you? Are you citing yourself as a source?

> Strange to think what one person ingests can harm another, but that is so
> with stimulants.    And distance does not stop the damage, the mind just
> follows the victim and continues doing harm.    Stimulants have become a
> plague by a a rollover effect.

Why not check in for a check up from the neck up, and roll over when
they offer you a shot of something that may actuallyhelp you?

> >http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/94801.php
>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
news.chi.sbcglobal.net - 05 Feb 2008 23:52 GMT
Mark,
I hate to say that what I write is true.     If anyone wishes it were not
true, it is me.       Sorry you cannot see anything in what I write.   If
you lived here, I would beg you to take my friend out of the nursing home
and a different person would emerge.   She lived with me for 8 years, but
likes the nursing home and I cannot blame her.   It is very nice, care is
good, very amiable people.    BUT it all means borscht as the
anti-depressants in the home will kill prematurely.     The adminstrator
considers herself a good person, (orthodox), but to me she is simply a
killer and cares nothing about the residents.    I no longer have the means
to take my friend out.
It has changed my life to a life of worry, despair etc.
If I do not know anything else, I know about how crohns can devastate and
kill and not even the doctor can recognize the illness that killed as
crohns.    That is how confusing the issue is.   But not to a very observant
person or one who has had experience.   I  wish we could find a common
ground on which to  come to some understanding.    This is a problem that
confronts all of society.     So many are sick without knowing why.    What
is so important about the residents having anti-depressants.    If no one
has them, NO ONE feels the need for them.    Valium could ease their anxiety
with no harm to anyone.    But one nurse told me the home or psychiatrist
gets paid for dispensing anti-depressants.   The same nurse got ill with
crohns and couldn't walk.  Asked me why he was ill, and I told me exactly
who was observing him in the small lobby next to the desk he worked at.    A
week later, he said he was diagnosed with crohns.    So instead of saying
something to the administrator/owner he quit.     They have a fast turnover
at the desk, sooner or later anyone can be affected even among the workers.
I'll stop talking now as there is still a million words I can say.    It
affects my family also, so I am surely distraught.
Gail
Mark Probert - 27 Jan 2008 16:18 GMT
> http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/94801.php
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> are roughly equivalent to populations in which medication is widely
> used.......

Hey, Vince, toyou have a clue as towhat this paragraph means? I'll
help you, as you have yet to demonstrate the ability toread for
comprehension.

Simply put (just for you) it means that those morons who claim that
"Big Pharma" has crfeated the AD/HD "epidemic" had nothing to do with
it! IN fact it suggests that there is no true epidemic.

Thanks for the great article and your post. You continue to prove you
cannot read for compfrehension.
Sammybaby - 27 Jan 2008 20:36 GMT
> Simply put (just for you) it means that those morons who claim that
> "Big Pharma" has crfeated the AD/HD "epidemic" had nothing to do with
> it! IN fact it suggests that there is no true epidemic.

But it often, perhaps usually, is not a disease, but a reaction to the
environment.  (see article below)  And of course Big Pharma markets
diseases as well as medicines.  They are a business and that is what
marketing departments do.  The create needs.  Why? There is more money
in it.  That the patterns these children are exhibiting, those who
actually are, might have sources other than ones ususually tracked and
treated medically is something the BP has tried to downplay, and it
has hired noisy little know so littles like you as part of the PR
campaign to protect their profits.

Food Additives Trigger ADHD in Clinical Trial
Clinical trial links attention deficit/hyperactivity behaviors to
blend of artificial food preservative and colors
by Craig Weatherby

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) can take quite a toll
on kids, caregivers, and teachers.

And the widespread prescription of stimulant-type ADHD drugs like
Ritalin for children, whose brains are still forming, makes many
parents and resarchers nervous.

So parents' ears prick up at the hint of anything that might alleviate
ADHD without resort to controversial pharmaceuticals.

We've reported on research indicating that omega-3s may help some
children with ADHD.

A new study suggests that there may be substance to some parents'
claims that their kids' ADHD is triggered or

Key Points

   *
     Controlled clinical trial yields rare evidence that additives
may cause attention deficits and hyperactivity in kids.
   *
     Study could not pinpoint which additives were responsible,
because they were mixed together.
   *
     Chemicals tested included artificial food colors and a common
preservative.

exacerbated by food additives.

While it is widely held, the belief that food additives promote
attention-hyperactivity deficits in children is scientifically
controversial. As the authors of two recent evidence reviews said:

   * "... to date, there is little empirical evidence supporting the
effectiveness of dietary restrictions in treating ... attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)." (Cormier E, Elder JH 2007)
   * "... a critical review of the literature provides very limited
support for such a relationship [between food additives and
ADHD]." (Cruz NV, Bahna SL 2006)

But the results of a very credible new clinical trial lend weight to
parents' concerns about synthetic chemicals in foods.

New results find fault with common additives
Scientists at University of Southampton in England conducted a well-
designed clinical trial - randomized, double-blind, placebo-
controlled, crossover - intended to test whether intake of artificial
food color and additives (AFCA) would affect children's behavior.

They enrolled 153 three-year-olds and 144 children aged eight to nine
years of age, separated them into three groups, and gave each group a
different drink:

   * Test Drink A with sodium benzoate (preservative) and artificial
food color mix A.
   * Test Drink B with sodium benzoate (preservative) and artificial
food color mix B.
   * Placebo drink free of artificial additives and preservatives.

Each group consumed their beverage daily for six weeks. The
researchers estimated that the test drink groups ingested artificial
additives and preservatives in daily amounts roughly equal to those
found in two standard candy bars.

In addition to a computer test, the children were evaluated by parents
and/or teachers who were unaware of which drinks the children had
consumed.

The researchers found that children of all ages who consumed Test
Drink A were significantly more hyperactive and that they had shorter
attention spans, compared with the placebo drink groups.

No behavior differences were found between the placebo group and Test
Drink B group.

The authors came to this conclusion: "Artificial colors or a sodium
benzoate preservative (or both) in the diet result in increased
hyperactivity in 3-year-old and 8/9-year-old children ..."

Since all the children received a mix of additives, the authors could
not say which of the additives caused problems, but they plan to
conduct further trials to pinpoint the problematic compounds.

Sources

   * McCann D, Barrett A, Cooper A, Crumpler D, Dalen L, Grimshaw K,
Kitchin E, Lok K, Porteous L, Prince E, Sonuga-Barke E, Warner JO,
Stevenson J. Food additives and hyperactive behaviour in 3-year-old
and 8/9-year-old children in the community: a randomised, double-
blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2007 Sep 5; [Epub ahead of
print]
   * Cormier E, Elder JH. Diet and child behavior problems: fact or
fiction? Pediatr Nurs. 2007 Mar-Apr;33(2):138-43. Review.
   * Cruz NV, Bahna SL. Do food or additives cause behavior
disorders? Pediatr Ann. 2006 Oct;35(10):744-5, 748-54. Review.

[PRINTER FRIENDLY VERSION]
Mark Probert - 05 Feb 2008 12:20 GMT
> > Simply put (just for you) it means that those morons who claim that
> > "Big Pharma" has crfeated the AD/HD "epidemic" had nothing to do with
> > it! IN fact it suggests that there is no true epidemic.
>
> But it often, perhaps usually, is not a disease, but a reaction to the
> environment.  (see article below)

See hisatory of hundreds, if not thousands, of studies saying just the
opposite. In fact, if you knew how to properly diagnosed AD/HD, you
would know that it is NOT a reaction to anything.

 And of course Big Pharma markets
> diseases as well as medicines.  

When I see "BigPharma" I know I am talking to a moron. My doctor
suggested that I cut down the number of morons I sepak to, so,
bye....
Jan Drew - 06 Feb 2008 06:04 GMT
On Jan 27, 3:36 pm, Sammybaby <roastfreest...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 27 Jan, 17:18, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> But it often, perhaps usually, is not a disease, but a reaction to the
> environment. (see article below)

See hisatory [sic] of hundreds, if not thousands, of studies saying just the
opposite. In fact, if you knew how to properly diagnosed AD/HD, you
would know that it is NOT a reaction to anything.

 And of course Big Pharma markets
> diseases as well as medicines.

When I see "BigPharma" I know I am talking to a moron. My doctor
suggested that I cut down the number of morons I sepak [sic] to, so,
bye....
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.