www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/krista.htm
http://breastimplantawareness.blogspot.com
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/94475.php
The New York Times on Thursday examined whether breast implants are
the kind of "annuity medicine" that will require routine surgical
"tune-ups" and whether they expose patients to increased medical risk
and unreasonable out-of-pocket expenses. Doctors in the U.S. performed
about 329,000 breast augmentation surgeries in 2006, up from about
291,000 augmentations in 2005, a survey by the American Society of
Plastic Surgeons found. According to the Times, the "renaissance" of
breast enhancement surgery, the country's most popular cosmetic
operation, has been fueled in part by FDA's decision in 2006 to
approve a new line of silicone implants, lifting a 14-year moratorium.
There is "no established medical consensus" on how long breast
implants last because available clinical studies follow patients for
just a few years, the Times reports. Saline implants and silicone
implants can develop small tears in their shells, causing ruptures.
Implants also can cause scar tissue, which sometimes hardens and
squeezes the implant, causing pain and deforming the breasts. In the
case of defects, manufactures Allergan and Mentor offer warranty on
the implants. Allergan provides a lifetime implant replacement
warranty and up to $1,200 for fees for the first 10 years. One-third
of patients in an Allergan study had a second operation within four
years.
"The short answer is, we don't know specifically how long implants
last," Stephen Li -- the president of a medical device testing
company, who served on three of FDA's panels that reviewed implant
safety and voted to approve silicone implants -- said. He said
manufacturers' data indicate the implants should last at least 10
years. Carol Ciancutti-Leyva, the director of a 2007 anti-implant
documentary called "Absolutely Safe," said that "implants may last
less than 10 years or more than 10 years but when you start having
problems with them, your health insurance is unlikely to cover the MRI
tests or the reoperations."
In addition, "explantation" surgery, which involves complete removal
of implants and scar tissue, can be complicated, particularly for
older silicone implants, the Times reports. "If the envelope has
broken down and the silicone has leaked out, you are trying to get out
all of that goo," Susan Kolb, a plastic surgeon in Atlanta who
performs three to five explantation surgeries weekly, said. Scar
tissue can adhere to muscles and to the fibrous tissue covering the
ribs, and some doctors mistakenly remove too much muscle or breast
tissue during the surgery, which can cause chest deformities, she said
(Singer, New York Times, 1/17).
Reprinted with kind permission from
http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily
Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for
email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free
service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by
The Advisory Board Company.
Kevysmom - 22 Jan 2008 12:46 GMT
> www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/krista.htmhttp://breastimplantawareness.blogspot.com
>
[quoted text clipped - 50 lines]
> service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by
> The Advisory Board Company.
Could this be the reason breast cancer is epidemic in the USA?
Mark Probert - 22 Jan 2008 12:50 GMT
>> www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/krista.htmhttp://breastimplantawareness.blogspot.com
>>
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
>
> Could this be the reason breast cancer is epidemic in the USA?
No. Do some research.
Implants cause other problems. I do not think that they should be
marketed simply because of their high failure rate.
Kevysmom - 22 Jan 2008 12:59 GMT
> >>www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/krista.htmhttp://breastimplantawarenes...
>
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Kevysmom - 22 Jan 2008 12:59 GMT
> No. Do some research.
>
> Implants cause other problems. I do not think that they should be
> marketed simply because of their high failure rate.-
How do you know it doesnt cause cancer? It could explain the epidemic
of
breast cancer!
> >>www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/krista.htmhttp://breastimplantawarenes...
>
[quoted text clipped - 59 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Mark Probert - 22 Jan 2008 13:28 GMT
>> No. Do some research.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> of
> breast cancer!
Implants are used for breast reconstruction AFTER mastectomy for breast
cancer.
There have been studies showing that there is no higher incidence of
breast cancer in implanted women. If there were clear and convincing
proof that implants cause breast cancer, Ilena would have posted it.
Since she has not posted it, I take it as absolutely proven that there
is no proof.
Now, do your own research instead of idle speculation.
>>>> www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/krista.htmhttp://breastimplantawarenes...
>>>> http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/94475.php
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
Kevysmom - 22 Jan 2008 13:39 GMT
I was asking Ilena if breast implants could be the reason behind the
epidemic of breast cancer. I havent read everything on this board
regarding breast implants and I could have missed this information,
Markey.
You are in a real ill mood this morning, Bad weather outside?
> >> No. Do some research.
>
[quoted text clipped - 73 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Mark Probert - 23 Jan 2008 12:19 GMT
> I was asking Ilena if breast implants could be the reason behind the
> epidemic of breast cancer. I havent read everything on this board
> regarding breast implants and I could have missed this information,
> Markey.
>
> You are in a real ill mood this morning, Bad weather outside?
Nope. Stupid posts, like yours.
D. C. Sessions - 23 Jan 2008 14:00 GMT
>> You are in a real ill mood this morning, Bad weather outside?
>
> Nope. Stupid posts, like yours.
Admit it, Mark -- those are the ones you live for.
| Bogus as it might seem, people, this really is a deliverable |
| e-mail address. Of course, there isn't REALLY a lumber cartel. |
| There isn't really a Santa Claus, but try www.santaclaus.com. |
+--------------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> --------------+
Jan Drew - 24 Jan 2008 06:50 GMT
>>> www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/krista.htmhttp://breastimplantawareness.blogspot.com
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
>
> No.
You posted this claim...You prove it.....
> Implants cause other problems. I do not think that they should be marketed
> simply because of their high failure rate.
And cancer.
D. C. Sessions - 22 Jan 2008 14:22 GMT
> Could this be the reason breast cancer is epidemic in the USA?
Only if:
a) there actually *is* an epidemic, and
b) most breast cancer patients have had implants.
Both are easy to test, assuming that you believe in testing
theories.
| Bogus as it might seem, people, this really is a deliverable |
| e-mail address. Of course, there isn't REALLY a lumber cartel. |
| There isn't really a Santa Claus, but try www.santaclaus.com. |
+--------------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> --------------+