Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / January 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

SFGATE:  Guess which drug is illegal?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ilena Rose - 18 Jan 2008 18:22 GMT
http://ilenarose.blogspot.com
Health Lover

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2008/01/18/notes011808.DTL

Guess which drug is illegal?
One deadens nerves, barely works, has foul side effects. The other
helps you feel God

By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist

Friday, January 18, 2008

Over here we have a new drug. It has one particularly unfortunate side
effect: It makes you fat. Or rather, fatter, given how most patients
who take it are already quite overweight to begin with.

But that's not all. Other nasty side effects include dizziness,
confusion, sleepiness, severe edema (swelling and oozing), among
others. What fun. But hey, at least it works, right?

Well, no, not really. It apparently works only about half the time, if
that, and even then it doesn't work very well and it certainly doesn't
actually cure anything or treat any of the potential causes of your
illness or address any of the deeper biological/psychological issues
at hand and, in fact, only "works" (they guess, but don't actually
know) by essentially numbing the central nervous system and therefore
merely blocking out what your body is trying to tell you. Sort of like
saying the light hurts your eyes and then taking a pill to make you go
blind. There now, all better.

This new drug is called Lyrica. It's from Pfizer, and it was just
approved by the FDA to treat an awful, inscrutable condition known as
fibromyalgia, an is-it-or-isn't-it illness distinguished by all-over
bodily pain the causes of which no one can figure and which few are
really sure is even a real disease, per se, given that there's no
biological test to diagnose it and no way to accurately validate its
existence and given that it has all sorts of seemingly unrelated,
scattershot symptoms, like irritable bowel (another suspect ailment)
and ringing in the ears and, well, just about everything else.

No matter. After years of doubt as to its effectiveness (and
fibromyalgia's existence), Lyrica has been approved, and fibromyalgia
has been more or less legitimized. Pfizer stands to make billions, as
do the other pharmco titans who are begging the FDA to let them make
expensive new drugs to treat this strange condition that no one seems
to understand — drugs which may actually exacerbate the condition —
but which clearly has enough patients who seem to be suffering from it
even though they might very well be suffering from something else
entirely.

Ah, the pharmaceutical industry. Tremendous amounts of good,
underscored by giant bolts of shameless, exploitive, predatory evil.
Isn't it fascinating?

Over here, another drug. This one's been around awhile. World famous,
beloved by millions, controversial for all the wrong reasons. It is
currently very, very illegal. Producing and selling it in any quantity
can result in severe punishment, years in prison.

It has been deemed highly dangerous, potentially toxic, even lethal,
and for years the government and the Centers for Disease Control and
your own mother have issued all sorts of lies and alarmist B.S. about
it, like how it drains spinal fluid, induces brain aneurisms, makes
you vote Libertarian. Which is not to say taking it doesn't have its
random dangers, but, you know, please.

This drug is famous for producing incredible feelings of euphoria,
openness, warmth and love and happiness in almost everyone who takes
it. It is staggeringly effective, non-addictive, and when taken
somewhat responsibly and with a slight hint of intelligence, has very
few, if any, notable or permanent side effects.

Its positives border on miraculous. It can effortlessly break down
long-held psychological barriers, remove obstacles to communication
and stifled emotion, make patients/users feel open and happy and much
better able to handle stress, anxiety, all manner of trauma.

It gets better. Some of the deeper emotional breakthroughs it produces
last for weeks, months, or forever. Truly, entire loving relationships
have been launched based on the deep bonding and raw emotional honesty
a couple discovers while on it, and in many cases, those feelings
become the foundation for long-term marriages (or, by way of the same
raw honesty, encourage the end of unhappy, dying ones).

Oh yes — this drug also frequently induces profound, life-changing
spiritual awakenings, can eradicate neurosis, increase feelings of
empathy and forgiveness and peace and overlay it all with an increased
love of music and sensual pleasure.

Thank God it's illegal.

This drug, as you've already guessed, is MDMA, or ecstasy. It has
finally, after years of governmental ignorance and lack of
balls/foresight/integrity in the psychiatric community, earned tacit
approval for a precious handful of clinical psychiatric trials.
Initial results? Turns out this scary illegal drug just might work
wonders for treating post-traumatic stress disorder. Gosh, really?

Yes. As reported by the Washington Post and the Guardian, as far as
PTSD alone is concerned, some docs already see MDMA as potentially
life-saving, a true wonder drug, which might even be administered to
all our traumatized U.S. soldiers. Which could be good news indeed,
given how an estimated 24 million Americans suffer from PTSD, whereas
only a fraction of that number claim to have fibromyalgia.

Oh, but there are problems. Major drawbacks. Terrible, unspeakable,
anti-American issues that seriously trouble our drug-addled nation.

Foremost: MDMA is not patented. Its formula is not owned by anyone.
Hence, no single company (or handful of companies) stands to make
billions from its potential legalization and the government cannot tax
it and organized religion cannot control the power it has to help you
totally reject its inane dogma, and they all really, really hate that.

What's more, millions of people already take MDMA recreationally, for
the sheer pleasure and joy of it, making it a huge threat to all
authority everywhere, because God knows we can't have lots of people
feeling peaceful and empathetic and nonviolent, as opposed to fearful
and victimized and angry and sick sick sick, all those things
governments and religions rely on to keep you meek and beaten down and
in check.

I know what you're thinking. That's a dangerous oversimplification,
Mark. Read the literature! Ecstasy is scary! People can overdose!
"Moderation" is not in America's DNA! With the possible exception of
extreme PTSD cases, we should probably keep MDMA illegal forever — you
know, just like that other toxic, wildly addictive drug that causes
thousands of deaths every year, along with liver disease and violence
and spousal abuse and trauma and impaired judgment and unwanted
pregnancy and frat boys and which you can order as much as you want
right now in any bar in the world. Oh wait.

Maybe it really is just that simple, just that odious. One drug, nasty
and of hugely questionable value, essentially designed to numb your
body and mock your spirit and shut you down like a land mine shuts
down a cat, is legal. Another drug, relatively safe, enormously
effective in how it opens you up like a flower and pours white hot
life straight down your throat and helps you feel God without forcing
you to kneel before, well, anything at all, is violently illegal. And
thus doth the brutal irony of the capitalist machine floweth over once
again.

It is, you could say, just another tale of the tense, vicious battle
ever raging between the government/corporations/church, all of whom
seek to control and profit by murdering any notion you may have that
you might be far more powerful, divinely connected, empathetic than
you imagine, and the humane, common-sensical universe of peaceful
reality. Do you know that fight? Do you ever sense that common sense
is losing? I have a suggestion for something you might want to try.

Mark Morford's Notes & Errata column appears every Wednesday and
Friday on SFGate and in the Datebook section of the San Francisco
Chronicle. To get on the e-mail list for this column, please click
here and remove one article of clothing.

Mark's column also has an RSS feed and an archive of past columns,
which includes another small photo of Mark potentially sufficient for
you to recognize him in the street and give him gifts. He also has a
raw Facebook page, but has little idea why.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2008/01/18/notes011808.DTL
Kevysmom - 19 Jan 2008 01:30 GMT
This sounds like something I would like to try!

> http://ilenarose.blogspot.com
> Health Lover
[quoted text clipped - 158 lines]
>
> http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2008/01/18/notes011808.DTL
Dan Clore - 19 Jan 2008 05:42 GMT
> http://ilenarose.blogspot.com Health Lover
>
> http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2008/01/18/notes011808.DTL

So, you don't have to know anything or write well to get published in
the SF Gate. Okay.

Signature

Dan Clore

My collected fiction, _The Unspeakable and Others_:
http://tinyurl.com/3akhhr
Lord Weÿrdgliffe & Necronomicon Page:
http://tinyurl.com/292yz9
News & Views for Anarchists & Activists:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smygo

Strange pleasures are known to him who flaunts the
immarcescible purple of poetry before the color-blind.
-- Clark Ashton Smith, "Epigrams and Apothegms"

Michael B - 21 Jan 2008 16:06 GMT
Ow, nasty things being said about Lyrica.
Too bad that it's the truth.

> http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2008/01/18/notes011808.DTL
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.