Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / January 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Earlier Barrett Operations :  He Lies to anti-fluoride group to find out their strategies & bring them down

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ilena Rose - 17 Jan 2008 00:46 GMT
So Bowditch ... are you now denying that the coward behind the fake
"Skeptic" alias is other than Bobby Baratz????

www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/snake-oil.htm#Baratz
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/snake-oil.htm#Bowditch
Attempted to censor and hide evidence of their conspiracy by ordering
webarchive to nuke the page
Skeptic - 17 Jan 2008 01:15 GMT
> So Bowditch ... are you now denying that the coward behind the fake
> "Skeptic" alias is other than Bobby Baratz????

Ilena -
I've been posting here intermittently for over a dozen years.  The regulars
here, those that agree with my points and those that don't, know that.
You're confused.  I forgive you.
Jan Drew - 17 Jan 2008 10:53 GMT
>> So Bowditch ... are you now denying that the coward behind the fake
>> "Skeptic" alias is other than Bobby Baratz????
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> regulars here, those that agree with my points and those that don't, know
> that. You're confused.  I forgive you.
Uh  huh.

email on the sites below

www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/snake-oil.htm#Baratz
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/snake-oil.htm#Bowditch

theposse@ratbags.com <theposse@ratbags.com>
Mark Probert - 17 Jan 2008 05:15 GMT
> So Bowditch ... are you now denying that the coward behind the fake
> "Skeptic" alias is other than Bobby Baratz????

Check out the header yourself.

YOU know where Baratz is.
Jan Drew - 18 Jan 2008 04:23 GMT
>> So Bowditch ... are you now denying that the coward behind the fake
>> "Skeptic" alias is other than Bobby Baratz????
>
> Check out the header yourself.
>
> YOU know where Baratz is.

Check your own, not lumbercartel.com...but
Verizon............................
Ilena Rose - 19 Jan 2008 02:34 GMT
The very and utterly cowardly "skeptic"  who thinks he is hiding
behind his aliases, we  believe for many, many, many, many, many
reasons, is none other than Barrett's left shoe, NCAHF.org's head
operator, Robert S. Baratz.

He firmly has denied it ... which will make it more interesting when
his masquerade is removed.

Team member Probert is correct, he resides in Boston area ... and all
who wish to look can see his addiction to sports teams from Boston.

http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=lPrWGhEAAACGqFpdkr7E1lIqeWxqS0X
fkdEasx1kiYTQavV7mdW13Q


http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?show=more&enc_user=lPrWGhEAAACGqFpdkr7E1
lIqeWxqS0XfkdEasx1kiYTQavV7mdW13Q&group=alt.sports.football.pro.ne-patriots

Boston Patriots
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.basketball.nba.boston-celtics/browse_f
rm/thread/7ac424240c916077/3669deac190e7b3e#3669deac190e7b3e

Boston Celtics

I also believe he hides behind the alias of QuackGuru on Wikipedia ...
working flak-to-flack with others on this Snake-Oil Team ... including
Peter Bowditch and Paul Lee, aka Fyslee (their Healthfraud Assistant
List Master for several years), David Gorski etc.

www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Snake-oil.htm

I've been reviewing and making copies of his postings, and have come
up with some dooozies! If in fact, amalgams are an issue that his
NCAHF has commented on ... will soon be revealed. His rants on breast
implants and implanted women have been duly recorded for posterity.

>You know how I know I never posted about "mercury amalgams"?  Because it's not a topic I give a rat's a.s about.

I've found threads of his that I doubt he, with an ego similar to
Barrett (who calls himself ever so humbly) "The Media" ... will want
to take responsibility for writing.

Other than sparring with his idiocy here on Usenet and Wikipedia ...
(watching him edit out with Paul Lee and Bowditch, all in disguises,
all true and unflattering evidence about their various operations ...
and fill Wiki with their own links, denying that they have any
relationship whatsoever to NCAHF & Barrett) ... I'd not put much
attention on this particular Snake-oil team member of Barrett's.

However, a few weeks ago, he, in pure Quackwatch / Healthfraud format,
email bombed  a (to use their own words) "begging for donations" for
Barrett letter, with Baratz lying that Barrett's loss to me was on a
"technicality."

www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/QuackWatchWatch.htm
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/BarrettVsRosenthal.htm

This is a blatant lie ... a typical Quackwatch / Health Fraud
Operations attempt to rewrite history to their own liking ... aided by
several masked members of the Rag-tag Posse of Snake-oil Vigilantes
(complete list below from 2004.  In 2006, Bowditch, without my
permission nor amalgam activist, Ms Jan Drew's, put our names on the
list.)

www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Snake-oil.htm#Peter-Bowditch
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Snake-oil.htm#Stephen-Barrett
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Snake-oil.htm#Terry-Polevoy
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Snake-oil.htm#Mark-Probert
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Snake-oil.htm#Paul-Lee
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Snake-oil.htm#Robert-Baratz
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Snake-oil.htm#David-Wright
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Snake-oil.htm#Andrew-Kingoff  
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Snake-oil.htm#Willa-Nidiffer
etc.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

More on Bobby Baratz to come ...

Peter Bowditch
Woofie Pearson
Robert Baratz
Mattias Haglund
Bernard Morey
Mark Lowry
Christopher Brown
Andrew Langer
Mark Thorson
Willa Nidiffer
David Wright
Rich Andrews          Rosalind Dalefield
David Green
TD Laing
Cindy Province
Paul Lee
John Stone
Janice Lyons
James Laidler
Mark Probert
Rich Shewmaker
David Gorski
Andrew Kingoff
Honorary Members
These are people who aren't in the list above but who have been named
in Nuremberg 2001, the court case against members of "one of the most
evil, and vicious, organizations ever to stalk Planet Earth's
Families"
Stephen Barrett
Judith Barrett
Terry Polevoy
Christopher Grell
Rebecca Long
Rebekah Johnson
Aron Primack
Peter W. Pappas
Joseph Pizzorno
William T. Jarvis          Tim Gorski
Bill Ross
Monica Pignotti
Michael McNeil
Paul Hilling
Paul Smith
Esther Figueroa
Jose Figueroa
Skeptic - 19 Jan 2008 05:30 GMT
> The very and utterly cowardly "skeptic"  who thinks he is hiding
> behind his aliases, we  believe for many, many, many, many, many
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Team member Probert is correct, he resides in Boston area ... and all
> who wish to look can see his addiction to sports teams from Boston.

It is truly a great year for Boston sports.  Alas, while I am originally
from Boston it's been quite a few years since I've lived there.  I don't
know Barrett or Baratz.... nor do I even know if these are real people or
just silly names you made up.  My identity is of no significance here.  I
freely expose my identity on professional discussion boards that are for
health professionals only.  A forum like this draws too many whackos.  Case
in point.
Debbee - 19 Jan 2008 06:14 GMT
.

>I freely expose my identity on professional discussion boards that are for
> health professionals only.

Good for you---why waste your time here?

 A forum like this draws too many whackos.  Case
> in point.

I see you identified yourself by looking in the mirror.
Jan Drew - 19 Jan 2008 06:14 GMT
> The very and utterly cowardly "skeptic"  who thinks he is hiding
> behind his aliases, we  believe for many, many, many, many, many
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.basketball.nba.boston-celtics/browse_f
rm/thread/7ac424240c916077/3669deac190e7b3e#3669deac190e7b3e

> Boston Celtics

Well, now, just lookie lookie...

CustName:   Mediacom Communications Corp.
Address:    100 Cristal Run Road
City:       Middletown
StateProv:  NY
PostalCode: 10941
Country:    US
RegDate:    2007-06-22
Updated:    2007-06-22

OrgName:    AT&T WorldNet Services
OrgID:      ATTW
Address:    200 S. Laurel AVE.
City:       MIDDLETOWN
StateProv:  NJ
PostalCode: 07748
Country:    US

> I also believe he hides behind the alias of QuackGuru on Wikipedia ...
> working flak-to-flack with others on this Snake-Oil Team ... including
[quoted text clipped - 97 lines]
> Esther Figueroa
> Jose Figueroa
Mark Probert - 20 Jan 2008 03:31 GMT
> Team member Probert is correct, he resides in Boston area ... and all
> who wish to look can see his addiction to sports teams from Boston.

Chuckle...I have a dream...that the Giants wipe out the team from Boston....

OK, we have an unimpeachable source confirming that Baratz is from Boston.

Now, take a look at Skeptic's header. It reflects that his ISP is
www.mchsi.com, whose website lists all the states where they do business.

Massachusetts is not one of them.

The coffin nail comes when I used GeoIPTool which reflect that his NNTP
posting host is in Illinois.

Now, back to mchsi, which does business in Illinois.

The inescapable conclusion is that Skeptic is not Baratz.

Let's end this bullshit.
Debbee - 20 Jan 2008 10:50 GMT
> The inescapable conclusion is that Skeptic is not Baratz.
>
> Let's end this bullshit.

Why would you want to end the cow manure--the flies are just getting
started.
This is Usenet-and I know you do not want to curtail anyone's free
speech!
Let them rock on!!
Ilena Rose - 19 Jan 2008 23:46 GMT
The very and utterly cowardly "skeptic"  who thinks he is hiding
behind his aliases,  has surfaced as Brandon C Stahl ... may God
protect his patients.

To think that such a closed minded bully who hides behind aliases is
allowed to 'practice' on innocent humans is unconscionable.

I do thank him for his new rounds of attacks ... I had almost
forgotten this page which I will soon update when I catch a minute.

http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/disinfoagentsfaq.htm#Brandon-Stahl
Debbee - 20 Jan 2008 00:51 GMT
> The very and utterly cowardly "skeptic"  who thinks he is hiding
> behind his aliases,  has surfaced as Brandon C Stahl ... may God
> protect his patients.

Ilena:

Just ignore who ever it is.  He/she/it is simply not worth any of your
valuable time.
Ilena Rose - 20 Jan 2008 03:34 GMT
So ... you are still the coward, Brandon C Stahl lurking behind this
moniker, fake "skeptic".
http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/disinfoagentsfaq.htm

I had almost forgotten your earlier attacks against me ... you went
underground for quite a while.

It appears that he dropped his Brandon Stahl address and took up the
fake 'skeptic address in 2003 ... and like Martin Rady (avb on Wiki
and "martin" here on Usenet) let the PR teams know his 'opinion' was
for sale.

It is very frightening to believe that the medical schools are
foisting onto the innocent public closeminded fake sceptics like him
... when patients need open minded and clear heads.

No reputable medical person ... only cancer industry shills have such
closed minds.

http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.medicine/browse_frm/thread/c7a2e1c5
e42aeaf0/86af7d536f493f88?lnk=st&q=ilena#86af7d536f493f88

"Good gawd, you are right on the money.  Who funded this???  I need a
few thousand to, ummm, I want to see if there's a correlation between
smoking and, oh, say lung cancer.  I'll even write it up! "

Cancer: Why We're Still Dying to Know the Truth by Phillip Day.
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.medicine/browse_frm/thread/ab04965c
5d0c12c4/0c5d8f0097b9fd4b?lnk=st&q=ilena#0c5d8f0097b9fd4b


~~~~~~~~~~~~

So, I correct myself ... the coward behind the attacks from the alias
of "skeptic" is not Bobby Baratz (although I doubt like Stahl claims,
he knows nothing about him) ... but Brandon "God Help His Patients"
Stahl.

As far as Bob Baratz ... his lies surrounding his right shoe Steve
Barrrett's enormous lost to me are absurd and pure propaganda and
disinformation.

Barrett did not lose to me on a 'technicality' as his email bombing
letter begging for donations for Barrett (to use their term) falsely
claimed.

Stephen Barrett lost to me in 3 courts ... including the Supreme Court
of California, because he was not defamed. Now Baratz and Paul Lee and
others from the Snake Oil Team are trying to change history for Sue
Happy Barrett.

www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/QuackWatchWatch.htm
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Snake-oil.htm#Baratz
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Snake-oil.htm#Barrett

The very and utterly cowardly "skeptic"  who thinks he is hiding
behind his aliases,  has surfaced as Brandon C Stahl ... may God
protect his patients.

To think that such a closed minded bully who hides behind aliases is
allowed to 'practice' on innocent humans is unconscionable.

I do thank him for his new rounds of attacks ... I had almost
forgotten this page which I will soon update when I catch a minute.

http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/disinfoagentsfaq.htm#Brandon-Stahl
Skeptic - 20 Jan 2008 14:09 GMT
> I had almost forgotten your earlier attacks against me ... you went
> underground for quite a while.

No, Ilena, not gone underground.  Been active in other groups.  Simply
stopped posting on TPM because of this very reason - an inability of the
most active posters on this NG to actually discuss issues of substance.  I
have moved on to moderated, professionals only, discussion groups where we
can actually talk about - and civilly disagree - on issues.

In the years and years that I've been reading your posts, I've seen nothing
more than one of two things - copying and pasting news articles and personal
attacks on all sorts of people here.  I have tried, numerous times, to
engage you in a discussion on a topic, but you don't seem to want to do
that.

I'm sure you will reply to this as you do everything else - with some lame
insult on the name line, a quick blurb you and maybe 3 other people in the
world will think to be witty, followed a long repost of irrelevant data with
numerous self-serving links to your web site...

You're Ann Coulter with less class.
Ilena Rose - 20 Jan 2008 15:39 GMT
My God Brandon Stahl ... you are the aggressor and an idiot.

YOU came after me ... not vice versa.

YOU posted your imbecilic non skeptical rants about women and suicide.

I will start a new thread to show your ignorance and prejudices ...
perhaps the medical directors of your hospital should be warned about
your inability to understand emerging science and your attacks on
women harmed by breast implants.

www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/
Skeptic - 20 Jan 2008 15:46 GMT
> My God Brandon Stahl ... you are the aggressor and an idiot.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/

The debate was this:  There is data to suggest the suicide rate is higher
among with breast implants vs. those without.

Let's say it's true.  That then begs the question:  Is the rate higher
because of some effect of having a breast implant, or because of an
underlying condition that predisposes people who seek implants to suicidal
ideation?

That's a scientific question, not a rant.  I can easily argue both sides,
but since I know which side you'll take, I'll take the other.  Now, why
would you think that implants cause suicide?

If you can discuss this, we can have an actual discussion.  If you're going
to sling mud and post links to your website then this can't go further.  You
don't need to worry about trying to "drive me away".  I won't be here long
since no one here seems to want to discuss the issues save a few people,
like Conklin (who I have almost never agreed with), Rubin, and a few others.

So, Ilena, what say you?  Care to discuss it?  Is it an issue important to
you or not?  If so, let's have an honest discussion.

Anyone else with thoughts on this issue?
Ilena Rose - 20 Jan 2008 16:08 GMT
I will absolutely discuss what I believe about suicide and breast
implants.

My comments were published in the British Medical Journal and I repost
them here.

YOUR comments show ignorance and lack of skeptical thinking. You are
the kind of ignorant doctor that women in my support group tell me
about all the time ... they are told they are crazy when in fact they
are extremely ill. Dealing with ignorant physicians like yourself
(please any new readers can see his absurd comments on this thread)
can lead a woman to feel more isolated and without options. You,
Brandon C Stahl, are no medical deity. You are a frightening man and I
will see to it that your Medical School knows about your hobby here on
Usenet. (Don't bother nuking your articles ... will only make you look
worse.)

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/browse_frm/thread/5976
483674ec289a/5a28c8f51dbf0202?lnk=gst&q=skeptic+sandra#5a28c8f51dbf0202


~~~~

http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/326/7388/527

Authors miss most important clue 14 March 2003

Ilena Rosenthal,
Director, Non Profit foundation
San Diego, CA 92109
Send response to journal:
Re: Authors miss most important clue

This study's authors miss the most important clue to the reasons a
disproportionately large number of women with breast implants choose
suicide.

Most breast implants fail over time, even though for decades they were
sold as a "lifetime" device.

With this extremely high rupture rate comes additional surgeries,
infections, and frequently the ultimate loss of the implant along with
breast tissue. Commonly, women suffer from the very painful
fibromyalgia and other often undefined diseases.

The denial of the medical profession as to their illnesses as well as
families experiencing their once healthy and vibrant mother, wife,
sister, or daughter now in chronic pain with no medical solution in
sight, leaves the women feeling more isolated and desperate.

She often then loses her job, her insurance, and the downward spiral
continues.

To ignore the enormous physical harm from ruptured implants and
drawing the fuzzy psychological conclusions the authors have, makes me
wonder about their open minded scientific approach to this growing
medical tragedy.

Ilena Rosenthal

Director, Humantics Foundation for Women
http://www.BreastImplantAwareness.org

FDA Rupture Studies

http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/breastimplants/extracapstudy.html
http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/breastimplants/studies/biinterview.html

Competing interests:   Author: Breast Implants: The Myths, The Facts,
The Women Founder of Support group: Breast Implants: Recovery &
Discovery
Skeptic - 20 Jan 2008 17:26 GMT
Yeah, I read through that and didn't see anything where you explain what I
asked.

Very simply, Ilena - women who have breast implants:  How do we know if they
have pre-existing reasons for a tendency toward suicide or if getting
implants createse this tendency?

That is the question.  Can you answer it?

>I will absolutely discuss what I believe about suicide and breast
> implants.
[quoted text clipped - 65 lines]
> The Women Founder of Support group: Breast Implants: Recovery &
> Discovery
Ilena Rose - 20 Jan 2008 17:49 GMT
Brandon C Stahl, fake 'skeptic' writes:

"Yeah, I read through that and didn't see anything where you explain
what I asked.

Very simply, Ilena - women who have breast implants:  How do we know
if they have pre-existing reasons for a tendency toward suicide or if
getting implants createse this tendency?

That is the question.  Can you answer it?"

Ilena Rosenthal's answer.

First, this issue is far wider than your one question. I am very
familiar with your slick-as-silicone technique out of speaking in
opposites and being deaf, dumb and blind to facts you don't want to
deal with.

Second, women who want breast implants should be screened for many
things first, in my opinion.

a. allergies / reactions to any of the many toxic ingredients.

b. any pre-disposition or current autoimmune diseases or other
immunological / neurological sensitivities.

c. financial ability to be able to afford not just the original
surgery, but all subsequent surgeries and MRI's in the future.

d. if they fully understand the downside that hundreds of thousands of
women have faced after the buy the "annuity" breast implant and all
the real long term ramifications.

Further, Brandon Stahl, you don't seem to understand what I have
written on this topic (as is your pattern) ... so I will repeat it
here.

My comments were published in the British Medical Journal and I repost
them here.

YOUR comments show ignorance and lack of skeptical thinking. You are
the kind of ignorant doctor that women in my support group tell me
about all the time ... they are told they are crazy when in fact they
are extremely ill. Dealing with ignorant physicians like yourself
(please any new readers can see his absurd comments on this thread)
can lead a woman to feel more isolated and without options. You,
Brandon C Stahl, are no medical deity. You are a frightening man and I
will see to it that your Medical School knows about your hobby here on
Usenet. (Don't bother nuking your articles ... will only make you look
worse.)

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/browse_frm/thread/5976
483674ec289a/5a28c8f51dbf0202?lnk=gst&q=skeptic+sandra#5a28c8f51dbf0202


~~~~

http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/326/7388/527

Authors miss most important clue 14 March 2003

Ilena Rosenthal,
Director, Non Profit foundation
San Diego, CA 92109
Send response to journal:
Re: Authors miss most important clue

This study's authors miss the most important clue to the reasons a
disproportionately large number of women with breast implants choose
suicide.

Most breast implants fail over time, even though for decades they were
sold as a "lifetime" device.

With this extremely high rupture rate comes additional surgeries,
infections, and frequently the ultimate loss of the implant along with
breast tissue. Commonly, women suffer from the very painful
fibromyalgia and other often undefined diseases.

The denial of the medical profession as to their illnesses as well as
families experiencing their once healthy and vibrant mother, wife,
sister, or daughter now in chronic pain with no medical solution in
sight, leaves the women feeling more isolated and desperate.

She often then loses her job, her insurance, and the downward spiral
continues.

To ignore the enormous physical harm from ruptured implants and
drawing the fuzzy psychological conclusions the authors have, makes me
wonder about their open minded scientific approach to this growing
medical tragedy.

Ilena Rosenthal

Director, Humantics Foundation for Women
http://www.BreastImplantAwareness.org

FDA Rupture Studies

http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/breastimplants/extracapstudy.html
http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/breastimplants/studies/biinterview.html

Competing interests:   Author: Breast Implants: The Myths, The Facts,
The Women Founder of Support group: Breast Implants: Recovery &
Discovery
Skeptic - 20 Jan 2008 19:04 GMT
>Skeptic writes:
> "Yeah, I read through that and didn't see anything where you explain
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> women have faced after the buy the "annuity" breast implant and all
> the real long term ramifications.

I don't work for the silicone industry.  I don't do plastic surgery.  I
speak from a desire to understand and discuss an issue.

On point a, above - agree, so long as there are claims that silicone causes
autoimmune type reactions, we should examine the issue.
Point b - agree
Point c - I wouldn't object
Point d - "real long term ramifications" is a phrase that differs from
person to person.  As a genera concept, I'd agree.

What I don't see is your response to the question.  I ask again, do you
think the increase rate of suicide somehow caused by having an implant
placed OR do you think the women who seek out implants are a group with a
higher risk of suicide?

I would like to know your opinion.

As for determining that - it can be done.  One could design a study looking
at all women evaluated for possible breast implants.  Not all will get them
for a variety of reasons (financial, psychological, fear of surgery, etc.).
One could them compare the long term outcomes of those that got them to
those that did not.  A similar suicide rate would of course imply there is
no direct effect of the implant but is instead something that predisposes
that group of patients, and the converse would be true.

Actually, that study design would also be good to look at those other
conditions you always rant about, like auto-immune disorders.

Retrospective data would be incomplete and open to selection bias so it
would have to be large prospective study.
Ilena Rose - 20 Jan 2008 20:01 GMT
http://ilena-rosenthal.blogspot.com

Whether or not anyone is 'predisposed' to suicide is not as simple as
your proposed { horrifically  flawed] fantasy study is,  Brandon C.
Stahl.

It reminds me of the classic "if you get them asking the wrong
questions, you don't have to worry about the answers.

You continue to show your ignorance as to the processes that occur in
women with implants after their frequent failure.

It isnt' the implant itself, in my 13 years of experience with women
harmed by breast implants, that creates the desperation that drives a
woman to take her own life.

I said it succinctly and clearly in the British Medical Journal ...
too bad you are so unskeptical and close minded like the Snake-oil
Members, blind, deaf and dumb to anything but the viewpoint of the
sponsors of ACSH.org.

www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Quackwatchwatch.htm
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Snake-oil.htm

My comments were published in the British Medical Journal and I repost
them here.

YOUR comments show ignorance and lack of skeptical thinking. You are
the kind of ignorant doctor that women in my support group tell me
about all the time ... they are told they are crazy when in fact they
are extremely ill. Dealing with ignorant physicians like yourself
(please any new readers can see his absurd comments on this thread)
can lead a woman to feel more isolated and without options. You,
Brandon C Stahl, are no medical deity. You are a frightening man and I
will see to it that your Medical School knows about your hobby here on
Usenet. (Don't bother nuking your articles ... will only make you look
worse.)

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/browse_frm/thread/5976
483674ec289a/5a28c8f51dbf0202?lnk=gst&q=skeptic+sandra#5a28c8f51dbf0202


~~~~

http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/326/7388/527

Authors miss most important clue 14 March 2003

Ilena Rosenthal,
Director, Non Profit foundation
San Diego, CA 92109
Send response to journal:
Re: Authors miss most important clue

This study's authors miss the most important clue to the reasons a
disproportionately large number of women with breast implants choose
suicide.

Most breast implants fail over time, even though for decades they were
sold as a "lifetime" device.

With this extremely high rupture rate comes additional surgeries,
infections, and frequently the ultimate loss of the implant along with
breast tissue. Commonly, women suffer from the very painful
fibromyalgia and other often undefined diseases.

The denial of the medical profession as to their illnesses as well as
families experiencing their once healthy and vibrant mother, wife,
sister, or daughter now in chronic pain with no medical solution in
sight, leaves the women feeling more isolated and desperate.

She often then loses her job, her insurance, and the downward spiral
continues.

To ignore the enormous physical harm from ruptured implants and
drawing the fuzzy psychological conclusions the authors have, makes me
wonder about their open minded scientific approach to this growing
medical tragedy.

Ilena Rosenthal

Director, Humantics Foundation for Women
http://www.BreastImplantAwareness.org

FDA Rupture Studies

http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/breastimplants/extracapstudy.html
http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/breastimplants/studies/biinterview.html

Competing interests:   Author: Breast Implants: The Myths, The Facts,
The Women Founder of Support group: Breast Implants: Recovery &
Discovery
Skeptic - 20 Jan 2008 23:24 GMT
> http://ilena-rosenthal.blogspot.com
> It isnt' the implant itself, in my 13 years of experience with women
> harmed by breast implants, that creates the desperation that drives a
> woman to take her own life.

OK, that's all you had to say.  You think it a result of the implant.

> YOUR comments show ignorance and lack of skeptical thinking.

You don't know what skepticism is.  I'm skeptical that the effects of breast
implants drive people to suicide.  That is neither ignorant nor lacking in
skepticism.
Jan Drew - 21 Jan 2008 03:14 GMT
>> http://ilena-rosenthal.blogspot.com
>> It isnt' the implant itself, in my 13 years of experience with women
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> breast implants drive people to suicide.  That is neither ignorant nor
> lacking in skepticism.

http://www.breastimplantinfo.org/news/mentor-pma.html

http://www.breastimplantinfo.org/pdfs/breast_implant_report.pdf

http://www.breastimplantinfo.org/what_know/before_you_get.html
Ilena Rose - 21 Jan 2008 00:16 GMT
Brandon C Stahl ... I am very, very educated in what a true sceptic is
... someone who questions the 'status quo' such as 'vaccinations are
safe; or 'breast implants are safe' etc.

YOU are no skeptic .

http://ilena-rosenthal.blogspot.com

Whether or not anyone is 'predisposed' to suicide is not as simple as
your proposed { horrifically  flawed] fantasy study is,  Brandon C.
Stahl.

It reminds me of the classic "if you get them asking the wrong
questions, you don't have to worry about the answers.

You continue to show your ignorance as to the processes that occur in
women with implants after their frequent failure.

It isnt' the implant itself, in my 13 years of experience with women
harmed by breast implants, that creates the desperation that drives a
woman to take her own life.

I said it succinctly and clearly in the British Medical Journal ...
too bad you are so unskeptical and close minded like the Snake-oil
Members, blind, deaf and dumb to anything but the viewpoint of the
sponsors of ACSH.org.

www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Quackwatchwatch.htm
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/Snake-oil.htm

My comments were published in the British Medical Journal and I repost
them here.

YOUR comments show ignorance and lack of skeptical thinking. You are
the kind of ignorant doctor that women in my support group tell me
about all the time ... they are told they are crazy when in fact they
are extremely ill. Dealing with ignorant physicians like yourself
(please any new readers can see his absurd comments on this thread)
can lead a woman to feel more isolated and without options. You,
Brandon C Stahl, are no medical deity. You are a frightening man and I
will see to it that your Medical School knows about your hobby here on
Usenet. (Don't bother nuking your articles ... will only make you look
worse.)

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.breast-implant/browse_frm/thread/5976
483674ec289a/5a28c8f51dbf0202?lnk=gst&q=skeptic+sandra#5a28c8f51dbf0202


~~~~

http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/326/7388/527

Authors miss most important clue 14 March 2003

Ilena Rosenthal,
Director, Non Profit foundation
San Diego, CA 92109
Send response to journal:
Re: Authors miss most important clue

This study's authors miss the most important clue to the reasons a
disproportionately large number of women with breast implants choose
suicide.

Most breast implants fail over time, even though for decades they were
sold as a "lifetime" device.

With this extremely high rupture rate comes additional surgeries,
infections, and frequently the ultimate loss of the implant along with
breast tissue. Commonly, women suffer from the very painful
fibromyalgia and other often undefined diseases.

The denial of the medical profession as to their illnesses as well as
families experiencing their once healthy and vibrant mother, wife,
sister, or daughter now in chronic pain with no medical solution in
sight, leaves the women feeling more isolated and desperate.

She often then loses her job, her insurance, and the downward spiral
continues.

To ignore the enormous physical harm from ruptured implants and
drawing the fuzzy psychological conclusions the authors have, makes me
wonder about their open minded scientific approach to this growing
medical tragedy.

Ilena Rosenthal

Director, Humantics Foundation for Women
http://www.BreastImplantAwareness.org

FDA Rupture Studies

http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/breastimplants/extracapstudy.html
http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/breastimplants/studies/biinterview.html

Competing interests:   Author: Breast Implants: The Myths, The Facts,
The Women Founder of Support group: Breast Implants: Recovery &
Discovery
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.