Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / January 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Cholesterol combo not superior to solo drug

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Myrl - 15 Jan 2008 13:58 GMT
Cholesterol combo not superior to solo drug
Vytorin no better than high dose of generic form of Zocor, study says
The Associated Press
updated 3:11 p.m. PT, Mon., Jan. 14, 2008

NEWARK, N.J. - Drug developers Merck & Co. and Schering-Plough Corp.
on Monday said patients with a predisposition to high cholesterol
fared no better when taking their combination cholesterol drug Vytorin
than with a high dose of the generic form of Zocor.

Vytorin is a combination of Zetia and Merck's Zocor, which lost patent
protection in 2006. The study measured the amount of artery-clogging
plaque in three areas.

It focused on a group of 720 patients with a rare condition
predisposing them to high cholesterol. The patients were given either
Vytorin or a high dose of generic Zocor, known as simvastatin.

In December, a congressional committee requested more information on
the study. The results were delayed, the companies maintained, because
of the complexity of the data.

The patients in the two-year study had rare condition called
heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, which the companies said
affected about less than 1 percent of the population.

Earlier this month, Merck CEO Richard T. Clark said he expected
Vytorin to keep a secure position in the cholesterol drug market and
cited several other ongoing studies in addition to this one.

Merck and Schering-Plough are conducting three additional studies,
involving more than 20,000 high-risk patients.

URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22654205/
vernon O - 15 Jan 2008 16:30 GMT
> Cholesterol combo not superior to solo drug

The study stated clearly that neither had ANY positive effect whatever,
compared to ANYTHING.
Myrl - 15 Jan 2008 20:08 GMT
> The study stated clearly that neither had ANY positive effect whatever,
> compared to ANYTHING.

After watching news accountings this morning, I came away wondering
about the "real" benefits of the drug vs. side effects, vs benefits
that could possibly be found in diet and exercise!

It's always a balancing act, but guess if I had dangerously high
cholesterol readings I'd delve deeper.
vernon O - 16 Jan 2008 00:06 GMT
I went to their own site and they make no positive claims whatever.

On Jan 15, 8:30 am, "vernon O" <vernono@hereandthere> wrote:

> The study stated clearly that neither had ANY positive effect whatever,
> compared to ANYTHING.

After watching news accountings this morning, I came away wondering
about the "real" benefits of the drug vs. side effects, vs benefits
that could possibly be found in diet and exercise!

It's always a balancing act, but guess if I had dangerously high
cholesterol readings I'd delve deeper.
Myrl - 16 Jan 2008 00:12 GMT
> I went to their own site and they make no positive claims whatever.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> It's always a balancing act, but guess if I had dangerously high
> cholesterol readings I'd delve deeper.

I've always tried to reap the most health benefits through diet and
exercise.  I could do an infomercial on Jack LaLayne's juicer;-)

I think an over abundance of pharmaseudicals often cause more problems
than they cure.
vernon O - 17 Jan 2008 00:01 GMT
On Jan 15, 4:06 pm, "vernon O" <vernono@hereandthere> wrote:
> I went to their own site and they make no positive claims whatever.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> It's always a balancing act, but guess if I had dangerously high
> cholesterol readings I'd delve deeper.

Absolutely, but I don't think Jack has musch infuece.  :>)

I've always tried to reap the most health benefits through diet and
exercise.  I could do an infomercial on Jack LaLayne's juicer;-)

I think an over abundance of pharmaseudicals often cause more problems
than they cure.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.