Medical Forum / General / Alternative / March 2008
New "Generation Rx" Documentary Exposes Mass Betrayal of Children by FDA, Big Pharma
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Jan Drew - 12 Jan 2008 23:08 GMT NewsTarget.com printable article Originally published January 8 2008 Kevin Miller's New "Generation Rx" Documentary Exposes Mass Betrayal of Children by FDA, Big Pharma by Mike Adams
(NewsTarget) A new documentary on the dangers of mind-altering drugs will be arriving this year, and the film's creator Kevin Miller was kind enough to send us an advance copy of the film for review. Not many films have the potential to radically reshape the understanding of an entire nation and create positive change for the health of future generations, but this is one that clearly qualifies. "Generation Rx" delivers a devastating blow to the psychiatric drug pushers, FDA puppets and Big Pharma marketing fraudsters who have sold an entire nation on an absurd idea that turns out to be a grand medical hoax: that millions of children have "chemical imbalances" in their brains requiring treatment with patented, profitable pharmaceutical drugs like Prozac and Ritalin.
The film features interviews with many notable doctors, authors and health experts, including Dr. Julian Whitaker, Dr. Fred Baughman, Robert Whitaker (author of Mad In America: Bad Science, Bad Medicine, and The Enduring Mistreatment of the Mentally Ill) and many others. Through the emotionally-charged personal testimonies of parents whose children have committed suicide on Prozac, along with secret memos from the drug companies' own top executives, Generation Rx weaves a terrifying tale of criminal conspiracy, the mass abandonment of medical ethics, and the routine betrayal of an entire generation by an industry that seems fixated on the idea of profits at any cost.
The evidence presented in Generation Rx is damning. By the time you finish chapter three of the film (which contains the most jaw-dropping revelations of FDA corruption and scientific fraud), you'll cry out for the criminal prosecutions of key FDA decision makers, Big Pharma executives and the authors of the DSM-IV, the "bible" of modern psychiatry. Fifty-six percent of the panel members who created the DSM-IV are on the take from drug companies, pocketing cash, bribes, royalty payments or other fees from the very same companies that profit from the mass marketing of "brain chemistry diseases." (Be sure to visit my interactive Disease Mongering Engine to invent your own fictitious brain chemistry diseases right now, just like the drug companies do!)
Evidence of criminal conspiracy Generation Rx reveals startling evidence detailing the criminal negligence of the FDA. The highly corrupt Food and Drug Administration didn't "accidentally" approve psychotropic drugs that just happened to kill children, you see: The administration knew that SSRI drugs (antidepressants) were killing children for well over ten years! The FDA then went out of its way to bury the evidence, colluding with prominent drug companies to hide key documents while hastening the approval of dangerous drugs and keeping the public ignorant of the true risks from consuming them.
Kevin Miller's Generation Rx covers all this (and more) in heart-wrenching detail. You'll see the remarkably lucid explanations and warnings by the scientifically-minded Robert Whitaker (who used to be a skeptic that Big Pharma money could possibly influence science), pleas for medical sanity by Dr. Julian Whitaker, and even home movie footage of young girls who later killed themselves while on Prozac. You'll walk away from this film shaking your head in disgust, asking "How did it come to this?"
Or, more precisely, how did modern psychiatric medicine come to the point where it's all just a grand marketing scam designed to generate obscene profits by exploiting the minds and bodies of an entire generation of children? How did Big Pharma manage to so completely hijack medical science, taking over the medical journals, FDA regulators, science researchers and medical schools? And why hasn't this been stopped? Why have these chemical crimes against children continued to be tolerated -- even encouraged! -- by the Food and Drug Administration and a Big Pharm-funded U.S. Congress? (Note of hope: There is one peer-reviewed medical journal that remains honest and publishes good medical science: PLoS Medicine, an open-source journal that accepts no advertising from drug companies...)
The simple truth, as the film reveals, is that money buys everything in this modern economy. It buys media coverage, it buys distorted science, it buys legislation, and it even buys the very definitions of disease. Big Pharma money has so completely infiltrated modern psychiatric medicine that any person claiming diseases like ADHD or "bipolar disorder" are based on solid science should be laughed off the world stage. Modern psychiatric medicine is an empty sham, a medical hoax, an uninspired contrivance of scientific-sounding babblydeegook designed to mesmerize gullible parents into putting their children on dangerous patented chemicals that may ultimately kill them.
Even the psychiatric scientists who voted these fictitious diseases (like "ADHD") into existence have no idea what they really are. At one point in Generation Rx, a psychiatrist is asked to offer a clear definition of ADHD. His answer? A 45-second fumbling of words, hesitations and stammering nonsense of such stupidity that it makes you wonder if the psychiatrist is, himself, on crack! Nowhere in his answer does he offer anything resembling rational thought.
Generation Rx is full of shocking little gems like this. Even if you already know the real story about the quackery of modern psychiatric medicine, this film delivers a jaw-dropping emotional ride through the corruption, deceit and downright psychotic behavior of an entire industry. A couple of CounterThink cartoons (by yours truly) also make the film, detailing FDA corruption, Big Pharma's junk science and the grand hoax of modern psychiatry.
(See my most recent CounterThink cartoon, just released today: Fidozac, the antidepressant drug for dogs!)
Only occasionally does the film retreat from its pressure-cooker drama. Chapter Three offers a series of personal testimonies on Prozac that goes on way too long, for example, but the timing of the film is likely to be tightened up before its final release.
We'll keep you posted on the film's release Generation Rx won't be available for public release until later this year. NewsTarget will be running exclusive clips from the film, and we'll be covering the film's launch and availability. We don't yet know the price of the DVD or where to purchase it, but as soon as this information is made available to us, we'll pass it along to you. (I'll also be asking if it's available in PAL format for our European readers.) We hope to get our hands on some clips that we'll post on YouTube.
Generation Rx is already on the top of my list of Best Films in 2008, and it's almost certain to stay there. (Other films to look forward to this year include All Jacked Up as well as one tentatively titled, "Junk Food, Inc.") Generation Rx is a must-see documentary that reveals the true depth of criminality and fraud in modern psychiatric medicine. It calls for an end to the mass drugging of our schoolchildren and wholesale reforms of the entire corrupt system of pharmaceutical development and marketing.
With this film, courageous filmmaker Kevin Miller has catapulted a giant boulder of truth into the scum-filled pond waters of modern psychiatry, sending out a shockwave of ripples that threaten to finally expose this malicious branch of medicine that depends for its very survival on the chemical poisoning of childrens' brains. I give this film my enthusiastic support, and I urge every parent, lawmaker and doctor to view it. Society owes Kevin Miller a great honor for creating this documentary -- an honor he is unlikely to ever receive, given the mass drugging of the population with the very same mind-altering drugs being exposed in this documentary.
Watch for updates and exclusive video clips of Generation Rx throughout 2008, right here on NewsTarget.com
Note to other filmmakers: I am available to both participate in and review other documentary films that contain important messages about health. There is no fee to have your film reviewed here. If I promote your film, I do not ask for any promotional fees or kickbacks of any kind. My articles, cartoons and other creations are readily available for use, without any fee, in your films or books (contact us for permission and release forms). I will be appearing prominently in the upcoming All Jacked Up film by Faerie Films, as well as other documentaries by non-profit groups, and I welcome the opportunity to participate in your documentary. If you are a filmmaker or producer, contact our offices by phone at (520) 232-9300 to obtain permissions, schedule interviews or send us films for review. We will sign NDAs and honor announcement embargoes. We can help make your film a tremendous success while educating millions about health freedom and natural health.
http://www.newstarget.com/z022474.html
Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. - 09 Feb 2008 07:12 GMT This has the potential of being a million times bigger than "Sicko!"
I predict that this film, which WILL win many awards including an Academy for Best Picture of the Decade, will finally put an end to the phoniest of the spin-dromes: ADD and ADHD.
Almost ever member here will rejoice that absolutely nothing was wrong with them, which we knew all along.
Thank you so much for this Jan, I am sure it lifted the spirits and hearts of the many readers who saw this, I know it did mine.
More and more parents are finally waking up and just saying NO to the force-feeding of strong zombie-like drugs that turn their children into brain-dead automatons.
Thank you again, this will be a real eye-opener for a lot of honest, decent people!
> NewsTarget.com printable article > Originally published January 8 2008 [quoted text clipped - 148 lines] > > http://www.newstarget.com/z022474.html Kevysmom - 09 Feb 2008 15:21 GMT > This has the potential of being a million times bigger than "Sicko!" It sure does!! One thing that really disappointed me in Mr Moores documentary is he didn't spend enough time exposing Pharma.
On Feb 9, 2:12 am, "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <scie...@zzz.com> wrote:
> This has the potential of being a million times bigger than "Sicko!" > [quoted text clipped - 169 lines] > > - Show quoted text - The One True Zhen Jue - 09 Feb 2008 15:31 GMT > > This has the potential of being a million times bigger than "Sicko!" > > It sure does!! One thing that really disappointed me in Mr Moores > documentary is he didn't > spend enough time exposing Pharma. He's far too busy lying & gorging himself to expose anything other than himself as a hypocrit. That makes him very popular to self-loathing, scientifically illiterate illiterates. (That's you and your ilk, Donna, in case you're sense of denial has keep you from that realization)
Kevysmom - 09 Feb 2008 15:34 GMT Wow, Andrew is in attack mode this morning! Isn't there some kind of DRUG you can take to control these hateful outburst? :o)
On Feb 9, 10:31 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > This has the potential of being a million times bigger than "Sicko!" > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > illiterate illiterates. (That's you and your ilk, Donna, in case > you're sense of denial has keep you from that realization) Mark Probert - 09 Feb 2008 16:35 GMT > Wow, Andrew is in attack mode this morning! Isn't there some kind of > DRUG you can take to control these hateful outburst? :o) That proves you are a jerk.
> On Feb 9, 10:31 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Jan Drew - 11 Feb 2008 03:25 GMT On Feb 9, 10:34 am, Kevysmom <bluebun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wow, Andrew is in attack mode this morning! Isn't there some kind of > DRUG you can take to control these hateful outburst? :o) That proves you are a jerk.
Says the dishonest disbarred jerk.
M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t 07-10...@lymbercartel.com
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/c1efd889a7678735
That _IS_ topical and worthy of discussion. Stick with the topic, that works for you & us.
The One True Zhen Jue - 09 Feb 2008 16:47 GMT > Wow, Andrew is in attack mode this morning! Isn't there some kind of > DRUG you can take to control these hateful outburst? :o) Projection ill becomes you, Donna. You've been told many times that your prejudices are not only morally reprehensible, their consequences are even worse. You'd have vaccination stopped and pediatricians punished for giving them. You've been told the facts, yet you'd still act-out on your prejudices when you know it would kill and injure millions of children annually.
Yes, your depraved attituded toward children is hateful and it does engender righteous outrage.
> On Feb 9, 10:31 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Jan Drew - 11 Feb 2008 03:27 GMT <Andrew_Kingoff@yahoo.com> wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/c1efd889a7678735 That _IS_ topical and worthy of discussion. Stick with the topic, that works for you & us.
On Feb 9, 10:34 am, Kevysmom <bluebun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wow, Andrew is in attack mode this morning! Isn't there some kind of > DRUG you can take to control these hateful outburst? :o) Mark Probert - 09 Feb 2008 16:35 GMT > > This has the potential of being a million times bigger than "Sicko!" > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > On Feb 9, 2:12 am, "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." Donna, do you know that you are agreeing with the biggest a.shole on usenet?
Jan Drew - 11 Feb 2008 03:32 GMT On Feb 9, 10:21 am, Kevysmom <bluebun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This has the potential of being a million times bigger than "Sicko!" > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > On Feb 9, 2:12 am, "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." Donna, do you know that you are agreeing with the biggest a.shole on usenet?
Groups View all web results » Results 1 - 10 of about 1,040 for Mark Probert a.shole
Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. - 10 Feb 2008 11:59 GMT > > This has the potential of being a million times bigger than "Sicko!" > > It sure does!! One thing that really disappointed me in Mr Moores > documentary is he didn't > spend enough time exposing Pharma. Great point, the Pfizer's and the Merck's of the world NEED to be exposed!
This film will quite the spsychiatrists and their friends in the Psychiatric-Medical-Industrial-Complex.
By he way, there are a few "nutcases" and "crack-pos" on these newsgroups that may attack my posts, because over the years they have been proven to be highly accurate, well documented from verifiable source material.
We humor these "useful idiots" because they are desperate in holding onto their delusions. We encourage the most obnoxious of those to commit themselves to a mental-health facility, for their own good. In fact, some of them have taken this advice and they are better for it!!
Thanks for the notice, let us support this film and expose the criminals in white lab coats!
Mark Probert - 10 Feb 2008 17:20 GMT On Feb 10, 6:59 am, "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <scie...@zzz.com> wrote:
> > > This has the potential of being a million times bigger than "Sicko!" > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Great point, the Pfizer's and the Merck's of the world NEED to be > exposed! Like you were exposed as portraying yourself as a phoney doctor on USenet? Boom! One ISP kicked you off for that activity.
Like you were exposed for plagiarizing and altering an article by the Washington Post? Boom! Another ISP kicked you off.
Like you were exposed for being a deadbeat who did not pay his ISP charges? Boom! A third ISP kicked you off!
Like you were exposed as not being representative of the humjan race? Boom! YOur alien friends returned you since you did not meet their standards.
> This film will quite the spsychiatrists and their friends in the > Psychiatric-Medical-Industrial-Complex. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > been proven to be highly accurate, well documented from verifiable > source material. None of your posts have ever been proven to be above the level of crap. You were the one who mocked a seriously ill woman who was threatening suicide. Fortunately, someone with ethics and morality located her in time for the police to save her.
> We "We"?? You mean YOU.
humor these "useful idiots" because they are desperate in holding
> onto their delusions. We encourage the most obnoxious of those to > commit themselves to a mental-health facility, for their own good. In > fact, some of them have taken this advice and they are better for > it!! No one has ever been better for taking your advice.
> Thanks for the notice, let us support this film and expose the > criminals in white lab coats! Jan Drew - 11 Feb 2008 03:37 GMT > you did not meet their standards. Like the so-called standards of Mark S Probert...
In the Matter of Mark Probert (Admitted as Mark S. Probert), a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.
92-02731
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT
183 A.D.2d 282; 590 N.Y.S.2d 747
November 9, 1992, Decided
PRIOR HISTORY: [***1]
Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District. Respondent was admitted to the Bar on February 15, 1978, at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, under the name Mark S. Probert.
DISPOSITION: Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline upon the respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is granted; and it is further,
HEADNOTES: Attorney and Client - Disciplinary Proceedings
Respondent attorney, who is charged with 22 counts of failing to cooperate with investigations of alleged misconduct by the Grievance Committee, and who has failed to answer or appear, is disbarred.
COUNSEL:
Frank A. Finnerty, Jr., Westbury (Muriel L. Gennosa of counsel), for petitioner.
JUDGES: Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline upon the respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is granted; and it is further,
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Mark Probert, is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondent shall continue to comply with this Court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,
Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary [***2] Law § 90, the respondent, Mark Probert, is commanded to continue to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.
OPINIONBY: Per Curiam.
OPINION: [*282]
[**747] By decision and order of this Court dated September 29, 1989, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law until the further order of this Court based upon his failure to cooperate with the Grievance Committee. By further order of this Court dated June 4, 1992, the Grievance Committee was authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding [*283] against the respondent and the Honorable Moses M. Weinstein was appointed as Special Referee.
[**748] A notice of petition and petition was personally served upon the respondent on July 2, 1992. No answer was forthcoming. The petitioner now moves to hold the [***3] respondent in default. The motion was personally served upon the respondent on August 14, 1992. The respondent has failed to submit any papers in response to the default motion.
The charges involve 22 counts of the respondent's failure to cooperate with the Grievance Committee in its investigations into complaints of professional misconduct.
The charges, if established, would require the imposition of a disciplinary sanction against the respondent. Since the respondent has chosen not to appear or answer in these proceedings, the charges must be deemed established. The petitioner's motion to hold the respondent in default and impose discipline is, therefore, granted. Accordingly, the respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately
Source:
NY UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, ATTORNEY REGIST. UNIT
Currency Status:
ARCHIVE RECORD
NAME & PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION
Name:
MARK PROBERT
Date Of Birth:
11/XX/1946
Gender:
MALE
Address:
1698 WEBSTER AVE
MERRICK, NY 11566
County:
NASSAU
Phone:
516-968-5572
EMPLOYER INFORMATION
Employer:
MARK S PROBERT ESQ
Organization:
PERSON
LICENSING INFORMATION
Licensing Agency:
NY STATE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION
License/Certification Type:
ATTORNEY
License Number:
1253889
Issue Date:
00/00/1978
License Status:
DISBARRED
License State:
NY
From: Mark Probert - view profile Date: Sun, Feb 11 2001 4:17 pm Email: Mark Probert <markpr...@my-deja.com> Groups: k12.chat.teacher
Noah has had one since 11/26/96 (my birthday).
Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. - 11 Feb 2008 06:36 GMT > On Feb 10, 6:59�am, "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." > <scie...@zzz.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > Boom! YOur alien friends returned you since you did not meet > their standards. Proby, even using the Hitlerian-Nixonian gambit of by repeating a lie often enough it becomes the truth, won't make make-believe into truth. But if you get a thrill in posting nonsense, since this is a "support" group, I support you if you feel it helps your delusions.
> > This film will quite the spsychiatrists and their friends in the > > Psychiatric-Medical-Industrial-Complex. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > threatening suicide. Fortunately, someone with ethics and morality > located her in time for the police to save her. Demonstrably wrong, but you are used to that, aren't you.
I stand by the FACTS, all my posts are well sourced, with footnotes and documentation. That is how I can prove everything that I have ever posted, and will post is 100% accurate. Your cult hates things like facts. In fact, Pres. Raygun once said facts are stupid things. I guess he would have known!!
> > We > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > No one has ever been better for taking your advice. Flat-out false. Here's some good advice for you, stay off these newsgroups and leave them to the experts, such as Jan and myself. We are cleaning up these groups and getting rid of the trolls, disruptors, dupes, agitators, menaces and lunatics.
Proby, best of the luck in the future. Rest assured that these medical groups will be in good hands with Jan and myself. I'd love to say it was nice having you, and maybe in the future we will, but not today.
> > Thanks for the notice, let us support this film and expose the > > criminals in white lab coats! Mark Probert - 11 Feb 2008 12:22 GMT On Feb 11, 1:36 am, "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <scie...@zzz.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 10, 6:59�am, "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." > > <scie...@zzz.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > often enough it becomes the truth, won't make make-believe into > truth. Listen, every point I made is, and YOU KNOW it, well documented in the Usenet archives.
But if you get a thrill in posting nonsense, since this is a
> "support" group, I support you if you feel it helps your delusions. Yes, your behavior is nonsense.
> > > This film will quite the spsychiatrists and their friends in the > > > Psychiatric-Medical-Industrial-Complex. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Demonstrably wrong, but you are used to that, aren't you. Like I said, wel documented.
> I stand by the FACTS, You can stand, sit, lay down, but you would not know a fact if it bit you on your a.s.
all my posts are well sourced, with footnotes
> and documentation. All? The ones in this thread are not, thus, you just proved you are a liar.
That is how I can prove everything that I have
> ever posted, and will post is 100% accurate. Your cult hates things > like facts. In fact, Pres. Raygun once said facts are stupid things. > I guess he would have known!! You have an aversion to facts and morality.
> > > We > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > > > Thanks for the notice, let us support this film and expose the > > > criminals in white lab coats! WWWSC #2 - 11 Feb 2008 13:12 GMT "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <science@zzz.com> expounded:
>I stand by the FACTS, all my posts are well sourced, with footnotes >and documentation. Huh? Not once, ever, have there been any sources, footnotes or documentation attached to any of your driveling rants, mainly because they're pulled right out of your sorry a.s.
 Signature Proud member WWWSC #2 Formerly known as Ann
Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. - 11 Feb 2008 16:57 GMT > "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <science@zzz.com> expounded: > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > documentation attached to any of your driveling rants, mainly because > they're pulled right out of your sorry a.s. Ann, Another one that has a thing about "behinds!" This newsgrope is really getting to be a bit kinky!
Ann, you can trust my posts to be totally accurate and precise in the gathering of the most relevant and timely data.
Just because you may disagree over one minor point here or there, does not mean you have to disregard the main message.
I know deep down that you welcome posts like mine and Jan, because we are right and can prove it!
Take care,
sir ArtiØ
--
> Proud member WWWSC #2 > Formerly known as Ann David Wright - 03 Mar 2008 04:07 GMT >> On Feb 10, 6:59�am, "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." >> <scie...@zzz.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] >truth. But if you get a thrill in posting nonsense, since this is a >"support" group, I support you if you feel it helps your delusions. No, that's your tactic -- you know, repeatedly claiming that you have a research institute, that you're some sort of authority on ADD, that kind of thing. All completely false, of course.
>> > This film will quite the spsychiatrists and their friends in the >> > Psychiatric-Medical-Industrial-Complex. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >and documentation. That is how I can prove everything that I have >ever posted, and will post is 100% accurate. None of your posts are sourced or have footnotes. Perhaps you should consult someone about these delusions of yours.
>Your cult hates things >like facts. In fact, Pres. Raygun once said facts are stupid things. >I guess he would have known!! Of course, Reagan just misspoke; he had intended to say "facts are stubborn things."
Not that I'm any fan of Reagan. But facts are stubborn things. Facts like "Sir Artie" is a complete fraud who's also posted under many other aliases, has pretended to be a doctor, etc.
>> > We >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >are cleaning up these groups and getting rid of the trolls, >disruptors, dupes, agitators, menaces and lunatics. You are not in a position to change the posters to newsgroups in any way and could not clean up a sink without screwing it up.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher
Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. - 03 Mar 2008 07:46 GMT Wright, As you well know, as a rule I do not respond to those posts that are totally 100% nonsense, like yours for instance. But some innocent newbies might mistake your scribbles as reasonable, which they aren't. Not only that, they are a very thin disguise for your utter lack of knowledge on this and other related subjects. I have studied, in great detail, the MYTH of ADD/ADHD for many a decade. Now that this phony SPIN-drome has been exposed, you and your brain- washed cult areepping up their assult on honest and scientific researchers, such as myself. This cannot stand in a democratic society. Not only are we winning the War for Proper Mental Health, we are have also and will continue to expose the greed-mongers who profit off of this phony diagnosis. Now move along and leave these groups to Jan and myself. And take those porno-writers, totalitarian control freaks, disbarred lawyers and fear-mongers with you, they have no business here.
Good day to you Wright!
Sir artiO
> In article <0cc80e65-0618-4530-8716-8500ee35c...@b2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>, > [quoted text clipped - 97 lines] > > - Show quoted text - WWWSC #2 - 03 Mar 2008 11:16 GMT "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <science@zzz.com> expounded:
>Wright, As you well know, as a rule I do not respond to those posts Bullshit, you respond to every single one.
> I have >studied, in great detail, the MYTH of ADD/ADHD for many a decade. You've studied the back of a Comet can.
 Signature Proud member WWWSC #2 Formerly known as Ann
Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. - 03 Mar 2008 15:29 GMT > "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <scie...@zzz.com> expounded: > > >Wright, As you well know, as a rule I do not respond to those posts > > Bullshit, Now that is something you are an expert at.
you respond to every single one.
> > I have > >studied, in great detail, the MYTH of ADD/ADHD for many a decade. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Proud member WWWSC #2 > Formerly known as Ann Mark Probert - 03 Mar 2008 12:10 GMT On Mar 3, 2:46 am, "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <scie...@zzz.com> wrote:
> Wright, As you well know, as a rule I do not respond to those posts > that are totally 100% nonsense, like yours for instance. But some [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > freaks, disbarred lawyers and fear-mongers with you, they have no > business here. Everything ever posted about you is well documented in the Google Archives.
Suffice it to say, your perfidy and evil ways are known.
Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. - 03 Mar 2008 15:29 GMT Proby, Your dodge and weave tactics have failed, the facts remain that this film, (remember the thread,) will once again discredit what is left of your rag-tag cult and it's desperate push to mislead people down the wrong path! Jan Drew has ripped you a new one so many times, there is no question what you spew is waste.
Sir ArtiO
> On Mar 3, 2:46 am, "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." > [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Frank - 04 Mar 2008 01:29 GMT Proby, Your dodge and weave tactics have failed, the facts remain that this film, (remember the thread,) will once again discredit what is left of your rag-tag cult and it's desperate push to mislead people down the wrong path! Jan Drew has ripped you a new one so many times, there is no question what you spew is waste.
Sir ArtiO ======================================= It's certain you never did, and also certain you're nothing but a lap dog who hides behind skirts.
Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. - 04 Mar 2008 02:30 GMT Demonstrably false, "Frank" - but you knew that!!
> Proby, Your dodge and weave tactics have failed, the facts remain > that this film, (remember the thread,) will once again discredit what [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > It's certain you never did, and also certain you're nothing but a lap > dog who hides behind skirts. Frank - 04 Mar 2008 02:36 GMT Demonstrably false, "Frank" - but you knew that!!
Wrong, queer boy, but we all knew that.
Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. - 04 Mar 2008 05:29 GMT There is no need to feel bad about your sexual orientation, that is your thing and does not apply to this newsgroup. And being gay does not cause ADD/ADHD, if they even existed. I don't know where you are going with that, but the Cult of KooKs sure have surfaced. First Stan than Frank -- hoo boy!
> Demonstrably false, "Frank" - but you knew that!! > > Wrong, queer boy, but we all knew that. Frank - 04 Mar 2008 06:11 GMT There is no need to feel bad about your sexual orientation, that is your thing and does not apply to this newsgroup. And being gay does not cause ADD/ADHD, if they even existed. I don't know where you are going with that, but the Cult of KooKs sure have surfaced. First Stan than Frank -- hoo boy! ====================================== Of course not queer boy, I'm never ashamed of being Hetro, it is just a fact of like that I feel comfortable. I never said your queerness had anything to do with ADD nor ADHD. I just enjoyed outing your sorry bum,
Play your silly gurlish games, no problem, you'll just be seen as a hypocrite for mucking up the group with your nonsense.
Also, if you are so concerned about the group then why are you and Jan always insisting upon spamming your happy HS across the Usenet to unrelated ng's?
Just goes to show your hypocrisy, and Jan's.
On Mar 3, 9:36 pm, "Frank" <dawgf...@ten.hut> wrote:
> "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <scie...@zzz.com> wrote in > messagenews:2cb96a0f-a252-496d-a068-eb0a7eef3e46@e31g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > Demonstrably false, "Frank" - but you knew that!! > > Wrong, queer boy, but we all knew that. markprobert@lumbercartel.com - 04 Mar 2008 13:30 GMT > Proby, Your dodge and weave tactics have failed, the facts remain > that this film, (remember the thread,) will once again discredit what [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > It's certain you never did, and also certain you're nothing but a lap > dog who hides behind skirts. Do not insult lap dogs.
David Wright - 05 Mar 2008 04:30 GMT >Wright, As you well know, as a rule I do not respond to those posts >that are totally 100% nonsense, like yours for instance. Fake expert, you respond to every single one of my posts, and you'll respond to this one, too. You can't help yourself. It's all part of your pathology, like pretending to be a doctor, or pretending you have a research institute, or pretending you know anything at all about ADD/ADHD.
>But some innocent newbies might mistake your scribbles as reasonable, >which they aren't. Not only that, they are a very thin disguise for >your utter lack of knowledge on this and other related subjects. I >have studied, in great detail, the MYTH of ADD/ADHD for many a >decade. You've never studied them at all and haven't even been involved in this whole area that long.
>Now that this phony SPIN-drome has been exposed, you and your brain- >washed cult areepping up their assult on honest and scientific [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >off of this phony diagnosis. Now move along and leave these groups >to Jan and myself. That would be ironic, if you and Jan were the only ones left. But I daresay that the readership who are in search of actual information have long since killfiled your fraudulent self (and if you haven't, readers, you really should).
>And take those porno-writers, totalitarian control >freaks, disbarred lawyers and fear-mongers with you, they have no >business here. No, frauds like you have no business here.
>Good day to you Wright! > >Sir artiO Your phoney name in addition to everything else.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher
>> In article <0cc80e65-0618-4530-8716-8500ee35c...@b2g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>, >> [quoted text clipped - 86 lines] >> You are not in a position to change the posters to newsgroups in any >> way and could not clean up a sink without screwing it up. Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. - 06 Mar 2008 05:10 GMT Wright, You are under some incredible illusion and delusion that you have any informative knowledge on these subjects, you are only kidding yourself and others who WANT to believe in this myth.
I don't have the time or inclination to answer any of your wrong- headed accusations, except to dismiss them as any concerned person would.
Now let's get down to the real business of mental-health, and leave that to the pros like myself, Ilena and Jan. We care.
Sir ArtiO
> In article <5f323f2f-b1ab-4093-8c3b-44ef90eac...@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, > [quoted text clipped - 138 lines] > > - Show quoted text - David Wright - 06 Mar 2008 05:27 GMT >Wright, You are under some incredible illusion and delusion that you >have any informative knowledge on these subjects, you are only kidding >yourself and others who WANT to believe in this myth. Like I said, FArtie, you can't resist responding to me and you'll do it every time.
>I don't have the time or inclination to answer any of your wrong- >headed accusations, except to dismiss them as any concerned person >would. No, you dismiss them because they're true and they show you for the hoaxer you are.
>Now let's get down to the real business of mental-health, and leave >that to the pros like myself, Ilena and Jan. You're not pros -- you're inmates. When it comes to mental health, you're exhibit A (as a bad example, that is).
>We care. You care about getting better? That's good. Now keep taking your meds and going to group and maybe someday you'll make it.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher
>Sir ArtiO > [quoted text clipped - 140 lines] >> >> - Show quoted text - Mark Probert - 06 Mar 2008 12:13 GMT On Mar 6, 12:10 am, "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <scie...@zzz.com> wrote:
> Wright, You are under some incredible illusion and delusion that you > have any informative knowledge on these subjects, you are only kidding > yourself and others who WANT to believe in this myth. > > I don't have the time or inclination or the intelligence
to answer any of your wrong-
> headed accusations, except to dismiss them as any concerned person > would. You have never answered any question. You just rant and rave.
> Now let's get down to the real business of mental-health, In that business, you are a stranger in a strange land.
and leave
> that to the pros like myself, xxxxx`and xxx. > We care. Like the time you ridiculed a suicidal woman who was only saved because someone who really cared was able to contact the police?
> Sir ArtiO fArtie, you di dnot spell your name correctly. You left off the Zero, which reflects your IQ
Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. - 08 Mar 2008 06:26 GMT Proby, Just because you can make up a myth and keep repeating it, still does not make it true. Furthermore, the fact remains in that the only time you have made any sense on this newsgroup was when you had just spent some "quality" time at a mental-health clinic. Some of us jokingly refer to it as the “insane asylum”, it your case, if the shoe fits!!!
Now Mr. Wright is a whole other matter. Most people already know you are a genuine 100% crack-pot and the way you let yourself be decimated by Jan still staggers the imagination of the readers here. But Wright actually takes himself seriously. Unlike you, he may actually BELIEVE his outright fabrications. But it takes no more than a quick read to see that Wright is on the same lamentable level that you are. I almost pity Wright, he is too far gone to understand that his corporate “agenda” is anti-people, anti mental-health and pro-med. This too will fail with the efforts of the Pro-Democracy Folks like Jan, Ilena and myself. That’s FYI!
Good luck Proby, perhaps we'll see you after your "treatment" !!
> On Mar 6, 12:10�am, "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." > <scie...@zzz.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > fArtie, you di dnot spell your name correctly. You left off the Zero, > which reflects your IQ WWWSC #2 - 08 Mar 2008 13:11 GMT "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <science@zzz.com> expounded:
>Just because you can make up a myth and keep repeating it, >still does not make it true. True for everyone, fArt, including you.
Then again, you're not repeating myths, you're repeating your own lies and total fabrications.
 Signature Proud member WWWSC #2 Formerly known as Ann
Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. - 08 Mar 2008 15:19 GMT Ann; I have tried to reason with you, but to no avail.
We sure have come afar from the original post, and that's a shame.
But our side, the side of honest research, will not be bullied, intimidated or demoralized by the actions of Ann or the other members of her cult. We will try to reason with them, but so far, that has been a very challenging proposition!
Dear Readers, notice how the kooky Cult never addresses the well- documented facts that Jan, Ilena and myself document. And their little game of accusing us of not stating the evidence. This is why they are on the rampage of trying to censor us. This is a direct attack on all people who cherish freedom, liberty, peace and truth. They must not prevail or else ALL MANKIND will perish!
> "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <science@zzz.com> expounded: > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Proud member WWWSC #2 > Formerly known as Ann Frank - 08 Mar 2008 16:11 GMT > They must not prevail or else ALL MANKIND will perish! Seek mental health via a psychiatrist.
Yes floridian queer boy, you are severely lacking in mental stability. It is no wonder your dad did not love you, we are all ashamed of you and your posting to the Usenet.
stanw - 08 Mar 2008 17:26 GMT On Mar 8, 10:19 am, "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <scie...@zzz.com> wrote:
> Ann; I have tried to reason with you, but to no avail. > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > attack on all people who cherish freedom, liberty, peace and truth. > They must not prevail or else ALL MANKIND will perish! Okay - a partial, point by point analysis of J/F/Wh/Fr's pseudo- manic style and veiled manipulation of readers' impression of him that he is some poor, rapid-cycling victim who thus mustn't be contradicted aggressively, lest the respondant be received as insensitive, bulllying, "cultish", mean, or desirous of silencing those who, albeit very carefully ineptly, would present views that differ from some imagined "big pharma" mainstream populace and their even more outlandishly alleged motives be they financial, or - and this is just too cleverly quasi-psychotic on Frag's part - **SINISTER**!! (ie "drugging of children", or perhaps the furthering of some (again, quasi-irrational) deteriorating social mores visavis "victim-, or prozac-, nation" et al):
Item 1A: "kooky Cult "
Deliberate use of the literary device known as alliteration. Fine for poetry. But a little nuts and a tad self- effacing in the context of a so-called argument.
Frag knows it has this effect. He wants to appear almost unhinged and inept. It is a ploy, a ruse. Yes - he is a nutjob, but for his pathetic pass-time of being a troll, not for what he wants folks to think are legitimately held beliefs that are out there, but authentic. They are not authentic. It is all flame-bait and self-amusement.
Item 2A: " But our side,"
Worded deliberately to give the impression of instability or weak thinking. Frag is saying one thing, but his intent is to give the ironic appearance. He know he sounds "out there" with this phaseology - and that is what he wants.
Item 2B: "will not be bullied"
Different phrase, same motive. The use of "(we) will not be" is delibererately strident and borderline grandiose. Again, it is deliberate - he wants folks to think he's off his nut - a "victim" who should just be left alone on a.s.a-d.
Item 2C: "the side of honest research"
More of the same. Deliberately simplistically "black versus white", "hero versus villian" mentality. The effect is one of a possible two: that readers see him as endearingly feeble-minded and worthy of pity, not confrontation, or that said readers get the impression of some schizo off of his own lithium who "cannot help himself" and thus shouldn't be "set off" or treated harshly.
DELIBERATE, folks.
Item 2D: "This is why they are on the rampage of trying to censor us. This is a direct attack on all people who cherish freedom, liberty, peace and truth. They must not prevail or else ALL MANKIND will perish!"
Okay - I think you get the point. This last example is one last flourish to finish off a deliberately unhinged presentation, all designed to continue the ruse of a poor pathetic whackjob who should just be left alone to rant on. The near classic (read: *cliche! *) use of "liberty, truth, justice" - and the American way!! - all presented to make him sound like a kook whose views are, although woefully weak in logic and reason, nonetheless authentic.
The views are not authentic, and neither is Frag. No "fringe of society" victim is he. Just some pathetic, probably unwillingly single, perhaps unemployed shmo in a garden level studio who cannot afford to go out and acquire the life experiences which might actually contribute to the attainment of the slightest bit of culture, wisdom or class.
-stan
Jan Drew - 10 Mar 2008 01:54 GMT "stanw" <stanwshura@yahoo.com> expounded:
[ ]
stanw - 10 Mar 2008 02:08 GMT > "stanw" <stanwsh...@yahoo.com> expounded: > > [ ] Your smartest and most eloquent post yet.
Jan Drew - 10 Mar 2008 02:55 GMT On Mar 9, 8:54 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> "stanw" <stanwsh...@yahoo.com> expounded: > > [ ] Your smartest and most eloquent post yet.
No, this one was:
> On Mar 5, 10:08 pm, terrym2442 <terrym2...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > From: M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 30, 2004 > (M.a.r.k_P.r.o.b.e.r.t_04-30...@limbercartel.com) What say about that stan??
stanw - 10 Mar 2008 03:30 GMT > On Mar 9, 8:54 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > > What say about that stan?? Well, since you asked:
(copy/paste coming up!)...
Not Found The requested message, O9_Aj.15136$0o7.607@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net, could not be found.
You can visit the main page.
Jan Drew - 11 Mar 2008 03:50 GMT On Mar 9, 9:55 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> "stanw" <stanwsh...@yahoo.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > What say about that stan?? Well, since you asked:
(copy/paste coming up!)...
Not Found The requested message, O9_Aj.15136$0o7.607@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net, could not be found.
You can visit the main page.
Poor Stan.
Maybe a 6 year old can show you how to copy paste the whole thing, Oh, that's right you did it on purpose
Scroll up to the correct one. It clicks on perfectly. Your leaving part of it off is noted. No wonder you and Mark are friends.
stanw - 12 Mar 2008 03:57 GMT > On Mar 9, 9:55 pm, "Jan Drew" <jdrew1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 58 lines] > > - Show quoted text - First, the 6 year old comment is supposed to be an insult? I will fully yield any claim of technical expertise to most 6 year olds today.
Second - left what off? When YOU quoted it, as a response to my indicating that silence was indeed your smartest and most eloquent post (looks like that still stands, by the way), I should merely have had to click on it.
Well ahhh shirrrly deeyad, Jayuhh Deeyuh, and that thar dang ol' error message did mos' impohlahhtleyah come upon me. Sherrrr azz shootin' I did so trah ti cleek eet agin, but, well sheeyooooot! Looks like YOU dun fu....oh, maah stars - ah mean SKREEEWED up thayer, hooneh!
Care to trah agin?? Post that thar link. Mehbeh yi maht dew it raaht theess tahme!!
Jan Drew - 12 Mar 2008 07:07 GMT stanw - 08 Mar 2008 17:52 GMT > But our side, the side of honest research, will not be bullied, > intimidated or demoralized by the actions of Ann or the other members [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > attack on all people who cherish freedom, liberty, peace and truth. > They must not prevail or else ALL MANKIND will perish! Okay - a partial, point by point analysis of J/F/Wh/Fr's pseudo- manic style and veiled manipulation of readers' impression of him that he is some poor, rapid-cycling victim who thus mustn't be contradicted aggressively, lest the respondant be received as insensitive, bulllying, "cultish", mean, or desirous of silencing those who, albeit very carefully ineptly, would present views that differ from some imagined "big pharma" mainstream populace and their even more outlandishly alleged motives be they financial, or - and this is just too cleverly quasi-psychotic on Frag's part - **SINISTER**!! (ie "drugging of children", or perhaps the furthering of some (again, quasi-irrational) deteriorating social mores visavis "victim-, or prozac-, nation" et al):
Item 1A: "kooky Cult "
Deliberate use of the literary device known as alliteration. Fine for poetry. But a little nuts and a tad self- effacing in the context of a so-called argument.
Frag knows it has this effect. He wants to appear almost unhinged and inept. It is a ploy, a ruse. Yes - he is a nutjob, but for his pathetic pass-time of being a troll, not for what he wants folks to think are legitimately held beliefs that are out there, but authentic. They are not authentic. It is all flame-bait and self-amusement.
Item 2A: " But our side,"
Worded deliberately to give the impression of instability or weak thinking. Frag is saying one thing, but his intent is to give the ironic appearance. He know he sounds "out there" with this phaseology - and that is what he wants.
Item 2B: "will not be bullied"
Different phrase, same motive. The use of "(we) will not be" is delibererately strident and borderline grandiose. Again, it is deliberate - he wants folks to think he's off his nut - a "victim" who should just be left alone on a.s.a-d.
Item 2C: "the side of honest research"
More of the same. Deliberately simplistically "black versus white", "hero versus villian" mentality. The effect is one of a possible two: that readers see him as endearingly feeble-minded and worthy of pity, not confrontation, or that said readers get the impression of some schizophrenic (or victim of some other psychotic break) off of his own lithium who "cannot help himself" and thus shouldn't be "set off" or treated harshly.
DELIBERATE, folks.
Item 2D: "This is why they are on the rampage of trying to censor us. This is a direct attack on all people who cherish freedom, liberty, peace and truth. They must not prevail or else ALL MANKIND will perish!"
Okay - I think you get the point. This last example is one last flourish to finish off a deliberately unhinged presentation, all designed to continue the ruse of some hapless victim or poor pathetic whackjob who should just be left alone to rant on - and to deny the reality of a lonely loser who cannot find another way to amuse himself. The near classic (read: *cliche! *) use of "liberty, truth, justice" - and the American way!! - all presented to make him sound like a kook whose views are, although woefully weak in logic and reason, nonetheless authentic.
The views are not authentic, and neither is Frag. No "fringe of society" victim is he. Just some pathetic, probably unwillingly single, perhaps unemployed shmo in a garden level studio who cannot afford to dig himself out from under the pizza boxes, ramen noodle wrappers, beer cans and slap mags and actually *go out* and acquire the life experiences which might actually contribute to the attainment of the slightest bit of culture, wisdom or class.
-stan
Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. - 09 Mar 2008 07:42 GMT Stan, I wish I had the time and inclination to cross-examine your hair-brain analysis, but that would feed into your delusional sickness, and that would be wrong!! But I will strongly urge you to use you diagnostic skills at something more fruitful, like the over- diagnosis of certain phony spin-dromes. You may find your work much more meaningful and fulfilling if you would chose that course of action.
I would love to say it is nice to have you back, but it isn’t. We need people who have a strong moral and ethical code that can help those who are being victimized by Big Pharma and Big Medicine. In fact, we have taken a principled stand to do just that. If we don’t help these victims today, we all may end up in the Gulag tomorrow.
These are words to ponder.
I do find your very amateurish psychoanalysis amusing to say the least. It is nice to see that at least one member of your Bloc has a sense of humour. Ha-ha!
> > But our side, the side of honest research, will not be bullied, > > intimidated or demoralized by the actions of Ann or the other members [quoted text clipped - 85 lines] > > -stan Mark Probert - 12 Mar 2008 03:42 GMT On Mar 9, 2:42 am, "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <scie...@zzz.com> wrote:
> Stan, I wish I had the time and inclination to cross-examine your > hair-brain analysis, but that would feed into your delusional [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > I would love to say it is nice to have you back, but it isn’t. True. Since Stan knows you as Frager, you are outed.
We
> need people who have a strong moral and ethical code that can help > those who are being victimized by Big Pharma and Big Medicine. In [quoted text clipped - 98 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Jan Drew - 12 Mar 2008 05:09 GMT NewsTarget.com printable article Originally published January 8 2008 Kevin Miller's New "Generation Rx" Documentary Exposes Mass Betrayal of Children by FDA, Big Pharma by Mike Adams
(NewsTarget) A new documentary on the dangers of mind-altering drugs will be arriving this year, and the film's creator Kevin Miller was kind enough to send us an advance copy of the film for review. Not many films have the potential to radically reshape the understanding of an entire nation and create positive change for the health of future generations, but this is one that clearly qualifies. "Generation Rx" delivers a devastating blow to the psychiatric drug pushers, FDA puppets and Big Pharma marketing fraudsters who have sold an entire nation on an absurd idea that turns out to be a grand medical hoax: that millions of children have "chemical imbalances" in their brains requiring treatment with patented, profitable pharmaceutical drugs like Prozac and Ritalin.
The film features interviews with many notable doctors, authors and health experts, including Dr. Julian Whitaker, Dr. Fred Baughman, Robert Whitaker (author of Mad In America: Bad Science, Bad Medicine, and The Enduring Mistreatment of the Mentally Ill) and many others. Through the emotionally-charged personal testimonies of parents whose children have committed suicide on Prozac, along with secret memos from the drug companies' own top executives, Generation Rx weaves a terrifying tale of criminal conspiracy, the mass abandonment of medical ethics, and the routine betrayal of an entire generation by an industry that seems fixated on the idea of profits at any cost.
The evidence presented in Generation Rx is damning. By the time you finish chapter three of the film (which contains the most jaw-dropping revelations of FDA corruption and scientific fraud), you'll cry out for the criminal prosecutions of key FDA decision makers, Big Pharma executives and the authors of the DSM-IV, the "bible" of modern psychiatry. Fifty-six percent of the panel members who created the DSM-IV are on the take from drug companies, pocketing cash, bribes, royalty payments or other fees from the very same companies that profit from the mass marketing of "brain chemistry diseases." (Be sure to visit my interactive Disease Mongering Engine to invent your own fictitious brain chemistry diseases right now, just like the drug companies do!)
Evidence of criminal conspiracy Generation Rx reveals startling evidence detailing the criminal negligence of the FDA. The highly corrupt Food and Drug Administration didn't "accidentally" approve psychotropic drugs that just happened to kill children, you see: The administration knew that SSRI drugs (antidepressants) were killing children for well over ten years! The FDA then went out of its way to bury the evidence, colluding with prominent drug companies to hide key documents while hastening the approval of dangerous drugs and keeping the public ignorant of the true risks from consuming them.
Kevin Miller's Generation Rx covers all this (and more) in heart-wrenching detail. You'll see the remarkably lucid explanations and warnings by the scientifically-minded Robert Whitaker (who used to be a skeptic that Big Pharma money could possibly influence science), pleas for medical sanity by Dr. Julian Whitaker, and even home movie footage of young girls who later killed themselves while on Prozac. You'll walk away from this film shaking your head in disgust, asking "How did it come to this?"
Or, more precisely, how did modern psychiatric medicine come to the point where it's all just a grand marketing scam designed to generate obscene profits by exploiting the minds and bodies of an entire generation of children? How did Big Pharma manage to so completely hijack medical science, taking over the medical journals, FDA regulators, science researchers and medical schools? And why hasn't this been stopped? Why have these chemical crimes against children continued to be tolerated -- even encouraged! -- by the Food and Drug Administration and a Big Pharm-funded U.S. Congress? (Note of hope: There is one peer-reviewed medical journal that remains honest and publishes good medical science: PLoS Medicine, an open-source journal that accepts no advertising from drug companies...)
The simple truth, as the film reveals, is that money buys everything in this modern economy. It buys media coverage, it buys distorted science, it buys legislation, and it even buys the very definitions of disease. Big Pharma money has so completely infiltrated modern psychiatric medicine that any person claiming diseases like ADHD or "bipolar disorder" are based on solid science should be laughed off the world stage. Modern psychiatric medicine is an empty sham, a medical hoax, an uninspired contrivance of scientific-sounding babblydeegook designed to mesmerize gullible parents into putting their children on dangerous patented chemicals that may ultimately kill them.
Even the psychiatric scientists who voted these fictitious diseases (like "ADHD") into existence have no idea what they really are. At one point in Generation Rx, a psychiatrist is asked to offer a clear definition of ADHD. His answer? A 45-second fumbling of words, hesitations and stammering nonsense of such stupidity that it makes you wonder if the psychiatrist is, himself, on crack! Nowhere in his answer does he offer anything resembling rational thought.
Generation Rx is full of shocking little gems like this. Even if you already know the real story about the quackery of modern psychiatric medicine, this film delivers a jaw-dropping emotional ride through the corruption, deceit and downright psychotic behavior of an entire industry. A couple of CounterThink cartoons (by yours truly) also make the film, detailing FDA corruption, Big Pharma's junk science and the grand hoax of modern psychiatry.
(See my most recent CounterThink cartoon, just released today: Fidozac, the antidepressant drug for dogs!)
Only occasionally does the film retreat from its pressure-cooker drama. Chapter Three offers a series of personal testimonies on Prozac that goes on way too long, for example, but the timing of the film is likely to be tightened up before its final release.
We'll keep you posted on the film's release Generation Rx won't be available for public release until later this year. NewsTarget will be running exclusive clips from the film, and we'll be covering the film's launch and availability. We don't yet know the price of the DVD or where to purchase it, but as soon as this information is made available to us, we'll pass it along to you. (I'll also be asking if it's available in PAL format for our European readers.) We hope to get our hands on some clips that we'll post on YouTube.
Generation Rx is already on the top of my list of Best Films in 2008, and it's almost certain to stay there. (Other films to look forward to this year include All Jacked Up as well as one tentatively titled, "Junk Food, Inc.") Generation Rx is a must-see documentary that reveals the true depth of criminality and fraud in modern psychiatric medicine. It calls for an end to the mass drugging of our schoolchildren and wholesale reforms of the entire corrupt system of pharmaceutical development and marketing.
With this film, courageous filmmaker Kevin Miller has catapulted a giant boulder of truth into the scum-filled pond waters of modern psychiatry, sending out a shockwave of ripples that threaten to finally expose this malicious branch of medicine that depends for its very survival on the chemical poisoning of childrens' brains. I give this film my enthusiastic support, and I urge every parent, lawmaker and doctor to view it. Society owes Kevin Miller a great honor for creating this documentary -- an honor he is unlikely to ever receive, given the mass drugging of the population with the very same mind-altering drugs being exposed in this documentary.
Watch for updates and exclusive video clips of Generation Rx throughout 2008, right here on NewsTarget.com
Note to other filmmakers: I am available to both participate in and review other documentary films that contain important messages about health. There is no fee to have your film reviewed here. If I promote your film, I do not ask for any promotional fees or kickbacks of any kind. My articles, cartoons and other creations are readily available for use, without any fee, in your films or books (contact us for permission and release forms). I will be appearing prominently in the upcoming All Jacked Up film by Faerie Films, as well as other documentaries by non-profit groups, and I welcome the opportunity to participate in your documentary. If you are a filmmaker or producer, contact our offices by phone at (520) 232-9300 to obtain permissions, schedule interviews or send us films for review. We will sign NDAs and honor announcement embargoes. We can help make your film a tremendous success while educating millions about health freedom and natural health.
http://www.newstarget.com/z022474.html
Jan Drew - 10 Mar 2008 01:57 GMT WWWSC #2 - 08 Mar 2008 22:04 GMT "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <science@zzz.com> expounded:
>Ann; I have tried to reason with you, but to no avail. You know no reason.
>But our side, the side of honest research, will not be bullied, There is no honest research on your side.
>intimidated or demoralized by the actions of Ann or the other members >of her cult. We will try to reason with them, but so far, that has >been a very challenging proposition! See above.
>Dear Readers, notice how the kooky Cult never addresses the well- >documented facts that Jan, Ilena and myself document. You have never, ever, once documented anything, never mind facts.
>And their >little game of accusing us of not stating the evidence. There's no game, because you don't state any evidence.
> This is why >they are on the rampage of trying to censor us. No rampage, just letting everyone who doesn't know already (there are still a few) that you're a known liar, deceiver, forger and plagarist.
> This is a direct >attack on all people who cherish freedom, liberty, peace and truth. >They must not prevail or else ALL MANKIND will perish! You are such an overblown buffoon it'd be funny if it wasn't so old.
 Signature Proud member WWWSC #2 Formerly known as Ann
Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. - 09 Mar 2008 07:48 GMT Ann; I feel your pain, but alas, you have been duped by a one Mr. Proby. He is very skilled at the Hitlerian-Nixonian tactic of the Big Lie. Your unruly Mob is coming apart at the seams, just as I predicted it would. But these are medical support and information groups, and I have always kept my postings on topics and only very rarely directly accuse anybody of misinformation. But your posts are nothing but that. I will kindly ask you once again to moderate yourself. We cannot afford to scare people off of these newsgroups because you go off half-crazy with phony accusations because your Controller tells you to!!
If you knew 1/1000 of what Jan knows or even 1/10000 of what Ilena knows, you would have something to say. But they do real research and they are to be commended for their excellent job and sacrifice to get information out to the public. I hope and pray that deep down you fell the same way.
Sir ARtiØ
> "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <science@zzz.com> expounded: > [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > Proud member WWWSC #2 > Formerly known as Ann Frank - 09 Mar 2008 08:20 GMT If you knew 1/1000 of what Jan knows or even 1/10000 of what Ilena knows, you would have something to say. But they do real research and they are to be commended for their excellent job and sacrifice to get information out to the public. I hope and pray that deep down you fell the same way.
Sir ARtiØ ========================================= Well Floridian Queer boy, your personal diseases are affecting your mind. It would be ridiculous for anyone to agree with the above statement, especially the one you are directing this too.
I wonder if Jan would accept the "facts" as you state them that Ilena is 10 times smarter than Jan?
I also wonder why you would worship them and believe the lies they post. Have you no mind of your own? Oh.......that's right, queer diseases that affect your brain.
Hope you had a nice time tonight, dancing with your bro's.
WWWSC #2 - 09 Mar 2008 12:59 GMT "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <science@zzz.com> expounded:
>Ann; I feel your pain, I am in no pain, fArty.
Hold your arms out straight from your body, fArty, it'll make it harder to get the net over you.
 Signature Proud member WWWSC #2 Formerly known as Ann
Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A. - 10 Mar 2008 08:26 GMT Ann, Please keep your kooky talk off of this group, there is enough of it with morons such as Frank and Proby.
Sir ArtiO
> "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <science@zzz.com> expounded: > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Proud member WWWSC #2 > Formerly known as Ann WWWSC #2 - 10 Mar 2008 11:25 GMT "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <science@zzz.com> expounded:
>Ann, Please keep your kooky talk off of this group, there is enough >of it with morons such as Frank and Proby. FOAD, Jerry.
 Signature Proud member WWWSC #2 Formerly known as Ann
Mark Probert - 10 Mar 2008 12:11 GMT On Mar 10, 3:26 am, "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <scie...@zzz.com> wrote:
> Ann, Please keep your kooky talk off of this group, there is enough > of it with morons such as Frank and Proby. > > Sir ArtiO You are a mistake of protoplasm.
> > "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <scie...@zzz.com> expounded: > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > - Show quoted text - stanw - 10 Mar 2008 23:56 GMT > On Mar 10, 3:26 am, "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > You are a mistake of protoplasm. ROTFLMFAO!!!! Oh, man. I gotta pee!
-stan
Mark Probert - 11 Mar 2008 02:12 GMT > > On Mar 10, 3:26 am, "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > ROTFLMFAO!!!! Oh, man. I gotta pee! Did I inadvertently insult protoplasm?
I hope not.
Mark Probert - 12 Mar 2008 03:44 GMT On Mar 9, 2:48 am, "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <scie...@zzz.com> wrote:
> Ann; I feel your pain, You have not felt enough pain. Please hit yourself in your head with a 2X4.
but alas, you have been duped by a one Mr.
> Proby. He is very skilled at the Hitlerian-Nixonian tactic of the Big > Lie. Yes, I am. I learned all about it from Y O U.
Your unruly Mob is coming apart at the seams, just as I
> predicted it would. But these are medical support and information > groups, and I have always kept my postings on topics and only very [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Jan Drew - 12 Mar 2008 07:03 GMT On Mar 9, 2:48 am, "Sir Arthur C.B.E. Wholeflaffers A.S.A." <scie...@zzz.com> wrote:
> Ann; I feel your pain, You have not felt enough pain. Please hit yourself in your head with a 2X4.
but alas, you have been duped by a one Mr.
> Proby. He is very skilled at the Hitlerian-Nixonian tactic of the Big > Lie. <Yes, I am. I learned all about it from Y O U.>
YOU and YOU along are responsible for your posts, your behavoir and YOUR LIES. Give it up Mark. Your UDP along with these posts show you have NO character.
Your unruly Mob is coming apart at the seams, just as I
> predicted it would. But these are medical support and information > groups, and I have always kept my postings on topics and only very [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > >Dear Readers, notice how the kooky Cult never addresses the well- > > >documented facts that Jan, Ilena and myself document. That's 2 funny as *I* posted this thread.
> > You have never, ever, once documented anything, never mind facts. Blatant lie.
These are the FACTS:
NewsTarget.com printable article Originally published January 8 2008 Kevin Miller's New "Generation Rx" Documentary Exposes Mass Betrayal of Children by FDA, Big Pharma by Mike Adams
(NewsTarget) A new documentary on the dangers of mind-altering drugs will be arriving this year, and the film's creator Kevin Miller was kind enough to send us an advance copy of the film for review. Not many films have the potential to radically reshape the understanding of an entire nation and create positive change for the health of future generations, but this is one that clearly qualifies. "Generation Rx" delivers a devastating blow to the psychiatric drug pushers, FDA puppets and Big Pharma marketing fraudsters who have sold an entire nation on an absurd idea that turns out to be a grand medical hoax: that millions of children have "chemical imbalances" in their brains requiring treatment with patented, profitable pharmaceutical drugs like Prozac and Ritalin.
The film features interviews with many notable doctors, authors and health experts, including Dr. Julian Whitaker, Dr. Fred Baughman, Robert Whitaker (author of Mad In America: Bad Science, Bad Medicine, and The Enduring Mistreatment of the Mentally Ill) and many others. Through the emotionally-charged personal testimonies of parents whose children have committed suicide on Prozac, along with secret memos from the drug companies' own top executives, Generation Rx weaves a terrifying tale of criminal conspiracy, the mass abandonment of medical ethics, and the routine betrayal of an entire generation by an industry that seems fixated on the idea of profits at any cost.
The evidence presented in Generation Rx is damning. By the time you finish chapter three of the film (which contains the most jaw-dropping revelations of FDA corruption and scientific fraud), you'll cry out for the criminal prosecutions of key FDA decision makers, Big Pharma executives and the authors of the DSM-IV, the "bible" of modern psychiatry. Fifty-six percent of the panel members who created the DSM-IV are on the take from drug companies, pocketing cash, bribes, royalty payments or other fees from the very same companies that profit from the mass marketing of "brain chemistry diseases." (Be sure to visit my interactive Disease Mongering Engine to invent your own fictitious brain chemistry diseases right now, just like the drug companies do!)
Evidence of criminal conspiracy Generation Rx reveals startling evidence detailing the criminal negligence of the FDA. The highly corrupt Food and Drug Administration didn't "accidentally" approve psychotropic drugs that just happened to kill children, you see: The administration knew that SSRI drugs (antidepressants) were killing children for well over ten years! The FDA then went out of its way to bury the evidence, col
|
|