On Jan 11, 8:44 pm, Mark Thorson <nos...@sonic.net> wrote:

Mark,

Why did you dislike Cell Tech so much???  .

http://www.cyclingforums.com/archive/index.php/t-100680.html

Hmm.  Yep, I remember.  I also remember the continous lies from Mark
Thorson.

http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/d49e7813a71e08d2

May 26 2002

Karuna wrote:

"Inviting" is your characterization, but I did post
the link to switchboard.com, which was a simple
search that yielded several names, any or none
of which could have been Jan, which came from
a public database.

And if Jan had said it that way, I would not have
disputed the accuracy of what she said, except
in the area of intent.  It was more of an impulse
decision, triggered by the previous posting in the
thread.  It was as though a finger-shaped hole
suddenly appeared in front of me.  I couldn't
resist sticking my finger in it. At the time, it didn't
seem like a big deal, because it was just like
calling up information on the phone.  But I see
now that it doesn't look any different than
encouraging harassment, so I agree that I
shouldn't have done it.

On this one point, Jan, I apologize.  I do not wish
any third party to harass you.

http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/ccf129c33bd581a9

Oct 9 2005

Jan the Accuser wrote:

HAR HAR HAR

No private information is in the database at switchboard.com.
You are once again making a false statement.

It says that every time a new search is done.  When you follow
the link, a new search is performed.  I did not post any search
results, only the link.  Your assertion that I posted search results
is false.

If your street address was never posted, then I never posted
your address, right?  If you disagree with that, then please
post a Google link to a posting from me which included
your street address.

You can't.  Your assertion that I posted your address is false.

For me to be a liar, I must have told a lie.

Why are you unable to back up your accusation
against me with EVEN ONE example of one of these
lies you claim I told.

No, it was not a link to results.  A new search is performed
each time the link is followed.  If a link to the results of a search
I had performed was posted, it would still be possible
to see those results by following the link.  But it isn't.
A new search is performed each time.

I did not post any results of a search I performed.
Every time a person follows the link, a new search is
performed.  If the database changes, new results are
generated.

Your claim that I posted search results is false,
one of many false accusations you have made.

No, you are the one who brings it up over and over.
I have NEVER brought up this subject, except in
response to you bringing it up.  When you make a
false accusation, I defend myself.  If you stopped
making false accusations, you wouldn't have to
endure being exposed as a liar each time.

I sometimes supplement that with proof of your
hatred and bigotry.  If you would stop making
false accusations, you wouldn't have to endure
those, either.

In the meantime, you'll just have to get used to it.

HAR HAR HAR

On Jan 11, 8:44 pm, Mark Thorson <nos...@sonic.net> wrote:

Mark,

Why did you dislike Cell Tech so much???  .

http://www.cyclingforums.com/archive/index.php/t-100680.html

Another thing I remember is:

http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/bc57d1919f05aaae

Nov 14 2004

In Mark Thorson's World

Quoting:

During the last several years, I have from time to time posted to this and

Yet he claims he didn't lie.

Therefore using this logic, I could plaster all over the net:

Mark Thorson *deliberately* molests children.

In *my* world, I would never so such a thing, *characterize* with no basis.
simply because having no basis is  : something on which something else is
established or based, which means I made it up. In *MY world* this is L Y I
N
G.

Cell Tech states:

One individual was responsible for a great deal of miscommunication
regarding
anatoxin-a, information which is still accessible on many Internet sites.
Cell
Tech sued Mark Thorson for posting defamatory statements about Cell Tech,
its
products and its personnel to various Internet or Usenet news groups. Cell
Tech's lawsuit against Mr. Thorson has now been settled. As part of the
settlement agreement, Mr. Thorson has posted the Retraction Statement that
appears below. Although he did retract the allegations that he had been
widely
circulating, we all know that one cannot, with a single correct statement,
undo
all the harm done by many mis-statements that continue to circulate.

Now, if I were to plaster all over the net, Mark Thorson *deliberately*
molests
children, and this no basis statement were believed, it would more than
likely
greatly damage Mark's reputation, most likely lose his job, and most likely
cause personal problems for his family.

AFTER that happened, I could whistle a tune, saying, I had no basis for my
*characterization*, I had no basis for my *suggestions*, I hereby retract in
full.

It would be a bit late, but what the hey, I didn't lie.

===========

Because I have pointed this out, Mark repeats the lying and makes all kinds
of
garbage posts about me. He has no basis for those either.

In short, Mark didn't learn from his mistakes and has a huge problem, and
still
repeats his mistakes, never learning it's past time to *shut up*.

Jan