Medical Forum / General / Alternative / January 2008
Re: WHY YOU SHOULD AVOID TAKING VACCINES
|
|
Thread rating:  |
rpautrey2 - 12 Jan 2008 02:04 GMT This article puts a somewhat different spin on the hazards of, and reasons to avoid, vaccinations. Paul
WHY YOU SHOULD AVOID TAKING VACCINES
By Dr. James Howenstine, MD. December 7, 2003 NewsWithViews.com
Dr. James R. Shannon, former director of the National institute of health declared, "the only safe vaccine is one that is never used." Cowpox vaccine was believed able to immunize people against smallpox. At the time this vaccine was introduced, there was already a decline in the number of cases of smallpox. Japan introduced compulsory vaccination in 1872. In 1892 there were 165,774 cases of smallpox with 29,979 deaths despite the vaccination program. A stringent compulsory smallpox vaccine program, which prosecuted those refusing the vaccine, was instituted in England in 1867. Within 4 years 97.5 % of persons between 2 and 50 had been vaccinated. The following year England experienced the worst smallpox epidemic[1] in its history with 44,840 deaths. Between 1871 and 1880 the incidence of smallpox escalated from 28 to 46 per 100,000. The smallpox vaccine does not work.
Much of the success attributed to vaccination programs may actually have been due to improvement in public health related to water quality and sanitation, less crowded living conditions, better nutrition, and higher standards of living. Typically the incidence of a disease was clearly declining before the vaccine for that disease was introduced. In England the incidence of polio had decreased by 82 % before the polio vaccine was introduced in 1956.
In the early 1900s an astute Indiana physician, Dr. W.B. Clarke, stated "Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated[2] person."
There is a widely held belief that vaccines should not be criticized because the public might refuse to take them. This is valid only if the benefits exceed the known risks of the vaccines.
Do Vaccines Actually Prevent Disease?
This important question does not appear to have ever been adequately studied. Vaccines are enormously profitable for drug companies and recent legislation in the U.S. has exempted lawsuits against pharmaceutical firms in the event of adverse reactions to vaccines which are very common. In 1975 Germany stopped requiring pertussis (whooping cough) vaccination. Today less than 10 % of German children are vaccinated against pertussis. The number of cases of pertussis has steadily decreased[3] even though far fewer children are receiving pertussis vaccine.
Measles outbreaks have occurred in schools with vaccination rates over 98 % in all parts of the U.S. including areas that had reported no cases of measles for years. As measles immunization rates rise to high levels measles becomes a disease seen only in vaccinated persons. An outbreak of measles occurred in a school where 100 % of the children had been vaccinated. Measles mortality rates had declined by 97 % in England before measles vaccination was instituted.
In 1986 there were 1300 cases of pertussis in Kansas and 90 % of these cases occurred in children who had been adequately vaccinated. Similar vaccine failures have been reported from Nova Scotia where pertussis continues to be occurring despite universal vaccination. Pertussis remains endemic[4] in the Netherlands where for more than 20 years 96 % of children have received 3 pertussis shots by age 12 months.
After institution of diptheria vaccination in England and Wales in 1894 the number of deaths from diptheria rose by 20 % in the subsequent 15 years. Germany had compulsory vaccination in 1939. The rate of diptheria spiraled to 150,000 cases that year whereas, Norway which did not have compulsory vaccination, had only 50 cases of diptheria the same year.
The continued presence of these infectious diseases in children who have received vaccines proves that life long immunity which follows natural infection does not occur in persons receiving vaccines. The injection process places the viral particles into the blood without providing any clear way to eliminate these foreign substances.
Why Do Vaccines Fail To Protect Against Diseases?
Walene James, author of Immunization: the Reality Behind The Myth, states that the full[5] inflammatory response is necessary to create real immunity. Prior to the introduction of measles and mumps vaccines children got measles and mumps and in the great majority of cases these diseases were benign. Vaccines "trick" the body so it does not mount a complete inflammatory response to the injected virus.
Vaccines and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome SIDS
The incidence of Sudden Infant Death syndrome SIDS has grown from .55 per 1000 live births in 1953 to 12.8 per 1000 in 1992 in Olmstead County, Minnesota. The peak incidence for SIDS is age 2 to 4 months the exact time most vaccines are being given to children. 85 % of cases of SIDS occur in the first 6 months of infancy. The increase in SIDS as a percentage of total infant deaths has risen from 2.5 per 1000 in 1953 to 17.9 per 1000 in 1992. This rise in SIDS deaths has occurred during a period when nearly every childhood disease was declining due to improved sanitation and medical progress except SIDS. These deaths from SIDS did increase during a period when the number of vaccines given a child was steadily rising to 36 per child.
Dr. W. Torch was able to document 12 deaths in infants which appeared within 3½ and 19 hours of a DPT immunization. He later reported 11 new cases of SIDS death and one near miss which had occurred within 24 hours of a DPT injection. When he studied 70 cases of SIDS two thirds of these victims[6] had been vaccinated from one half day to 3 weeks prior to their deaths. None of these deaths was attributed to vaccines. Vaccines are a sacred cow and nothing against them appears in the mass media because they are so profitable to pharmaceutical firms.
There is valid reason to think that not only are vaccines worthless in preventing disease they are counterproductive because they injure the immune system permitting cancer, auto-immune diseases and SIDS to cause much disability and death.
Are Vaccines Sterile?
Dr. Robert Strecker claimed that the department of defense DOD was given $10,000,000 in 1969 to create the AIDS virus to be used as a population-reducing[7] weapon against blacks. By use of the Freedom of Information Act Dr. Strecker was able to learn that the DOD secured funds from Congress to perform studies on immune destroying agents for germ warfare.
Once produced, the vaccine was given in two locations. Smallpox vaccine containing HIV was given to 100,000,000 Africans in 1977. Over 2000 young white homosexual males in New York City were given Hepatitis B vaccine that contained HIV virus in 1978. This vaccine was given at New York City Blood Center. The Hepatitis B vaccine containing the HIV virus was also administered to homosexual males in San Francisco, Los Angeles, St.Louis, Houston and Chicago in 1978 and 1979. U.S. Public Health epidemiology studies have disclosed that these same 6 cities had the highest incidence of AIDS, Aids related Complex (ARC) and deaths rates from HIV, when compared to other U.S. cities.
When a new virus is introduced into a community. It takes 20 years for the number of cases to double. If the fabricated story that green monkey bites of pygmies led to the HIV epidemic, the alleged monkey bites in the 1940s should have produced a peak in the incidence of HIV in the 1960s at which time HIV was non existent in Africa. The World Health Organization (WHO) began a African smallpox vaccination campaign in 1977 that targeted urban population centers and avoided pygmies. If the green monkey bites of pygmies truly caused the HIV epidemic the incidence of HIV in pygmies should have been higher than in urban citizens. However, the opposite was true.
In 1954 Dr. Bernice Eddy (bacteriologist) discovered live monkey viruses in supposedly sterile inactivated polio vaccine[8] developed by Dr. Jonas Salk. This discovery was not well received at the NIH and Dr. Eddy was demoted. Later Dr. Eddy, working with Sarah Stewart, discovered SE polyoma virus. This virus was quite important because it caused cancer in every animal receiving it. Yellow fever vaccine had previously been found to contain avian (bird) leukemia virus. Later Dr. Hilleman isolated SV 40 virus from both the Salk and Sabin polio vaccines. There were 40 different viruses[9] in these polio vaccines they were trying to eradicate. They were never able to get rid of these viruses ontaminating the polio vaccines. The SV 40 virus causes malignancies. It has now been identified in 43 % of cases of non- Hodgekin lymphoma[10] , 36 % of brain tumors[11] , 18 % of healthy blood samples, and 22 % of healthy semen samples, mesothiolomas and other malignancies. By the time of this discovery SV 40 had already been injected into 10,000,000 people in Salk vaccine. Gastric digestion inactivtes some of SV 40 in Sabin vaccine. However, the isolation of strains of Sabin polio vaccine from all 38 cases of Guillan Barre Syndrome[12] GBS in Brazil suggests that significant numbers of persons are able to be infected from this vaccine. All 38 of these patients had received Sabin polio vaccine months to years before the onset of GBS. The incidence of non-Hodgekin lymphoma has"mysteriouly" doubled since the 1970s.
Dr. John Martin, Professor of Pathology at the Univ. of Southern California, was employed by the Viral Oncology Branch of the Bureau of Biologics (FDA) from 1976 to 1980. While employed there he identified foreign DNA in the live polio vaccine Orimune Lederle that suggested serious vaccine contamination. He warned his supervisors about this problem and was told to discontinue his work as it was outside the scope of testing required for polio vaccine.
Later Dr. Martin learned that all eleven of the African green monkeys used to grow the Lederle polio virus Orimune had grown simian cytomegalovirus from kidney cell cultures. Lederle was aware of this viral contamination as their Cytomegaloviral Contamination Plan[13] clearly showed in 1972. The Bureau of Biologics decided not to pursue the matter so production of infected polio vaccine continued.
In 1955 Dr. Martin identified unique cell destroying viruses termed stealth viruses in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. These viruses lacked genes that would enable the immune system to recognize them. Thus they were protected by the body's failure to develop antiviral antibodies. In March of 1995, Dr. Martin learned that some of these stealth viruses had originated from African green monkey simian cytomegalovirus of a type known to infect man.
The Lederle vaccine experience suggests that the higher-ups are not concerned about sloppy and dangerous preparation of vaccines. Animal cross infection is a huge unsolved current problem for all vaccine manufacturing. If this vaccine production sounds like an unbelievable mess to you, you are right.
The influential Club of Rome has a position paper in which they state that the world population is too large and needs to be reduced by 90 %. This means that 6 billion people must be reduced to 500 to 600 million. Obviously, creating famines and genocidal wars such as wrecked havoc in Africa, and loosing new laboratory-created diseases (HIV, Ebola, Marburg[14] , and probably West Nile virus and SARS) can help reduce the population. Other elitist groups (Trilaterals, Bildenbergers) have expressed similar concerns about excess people on planet Earth.
The company that was projected to produce the new smallpox vaccine in the U.S. was in serious trouble in England because of unsatisfactory quality of operations before setting up their facility in the U.S. Why would their performance here be any better than it was in England?
If there are important powerful groups of people that are determined to reduce the world population, what could be a more diabolically clever way to eliminate people than to inject them with a cancer- causing vaccine? The person receiving the injection would never suspect that the vaccine taken 10 to 15 years earlier had caused the cancer to appear.
Other Dangers From Vaccines
In the March 4, 1977 issue of Science Jonas and Darrell Salk warn, "Live virus vaccines against influenza or poliomyelitis may in each instance produce the disease it intended to prevent. The live virus against measles and mumps may produce such side effects as encephalitis (brain damage).
The swine flu vaccine was administered to the American public even though there had never been a case of swine flu identified in a human. Farmers refused to use the vaccine because it killed too many animals. Within a few months of use in humans this vaccine caused many cases of serious nerve injury (Guillan Barre syndrome).
An article in the Washington Post on Jan. 26, 1988 mentioned that all cases of polio since 1979 had been caused by the polio vaccine with no known cases of polio from a wild strain since 1979. This might have created a perfect situation to discontinue the vaccine, but the vaccine is still given. Vaccines are a wonderful source of profits with no risks to the drug companies since vaccine injuries are now recompensed by the government.
The steady escalation in the number of vaccines administered has been followed by an identical rise in the incidence of auto-immune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, subacute lupus erythematosus, psoriasis, multiple sclerosis, asthma) seen in children. While there is a genetic transmission of some of these diseases many are probably due to the injury from foreign protein particles, mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde and other toxic agents injected in vaccines.
In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine was recommended by the Center for Disease Control for all infants. When this vaccine program was instituted several infants died and many had life endangering bowel obstructions. Prelicensure trials[15] of the rotavirus vaccine had demonstrated an increased incidence of intussusception 30 times greater than normal but the vaccine was released anyway without special warnings to practitioners to be on the lookout for bowel problems. Children's vaccines are often not studied for toxicity possibly because such study might eliminate them from being used.
A large study from Australia showed that the risk of developing encephalitis from the pertussis vaccine was 5 times greater than the risk of developing encephalitis by contacting pertussis by natural methods.
Naturally acquired immunity by illness evolves by spread of a virus from the respiratory tract to the liver, thymus, spleen, and bone marrow. When symptoms begin, the entire immune response has been mobilized to repel the invading virus. This complex immune system response creates antibodies that confer life long immunity against that invading virus and prepares the child to respond promptly to an infection by the same virus in the future.
Vaccination, in contrast, results in the persisting of live virus or other foreign antigens within the cells of the body, a situation that may provoke auto-immune reactions as the body attempts to destroy its own infected cells. There is no surprise that the incidence of auto- immune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, subacute lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, asthma, psoriasis) has risen sharply in this era of multiple vaccine immunization.
Vaccine Induced Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Dr. John Classen has published 29 articles on vaccine-induced[16] diabetes. At least 8 of 10 children with Type 1 (insulin needing) diabetes have this disease as a result of vaccination. These children may have avoided measles, mumps, and whooping cough but they have received something far worse: an illness that shortens life expectancy by 10 to 15 years and results in a life requiring constant medical care.
Dr. Classen has shown in Finland, the introduction of hemophilus type b vaccine caused three times as many cases of type 1 diabetes as the number of deaths and brain damage from hemophilus influenza type b it might have prevented.
In New Zealand, the incidence of Type 1 diabetes in children rose by 61 % after an aggressive vaccine program against hepatitis B.. This same program has been started in the U.S.A. so we can now look forward to many cases of Type 1 diabetes in children. Similar rises in Type 1 diabetes have been seen in England, Italy, Sweden, and Denmark after immunization programs against Hepatitis B.
Toxic Substances Are Needed To Make Vaccines.
Vaccines contain many toxic substances that are needed to prevent the vaccines from becoming infected or to improve the performance of the vaccine. Among these substances are mercury, formaldehyde and aluminum. [17]
In the past 10 years, the number of autistic children has risen from between 200 and 500 percent in every state in the U.S. This sharp rise in autism followed the introduction of measles, mumps and rubella vaccine in 1975.
Representative Dan Burton's healthy grandson was given injections for 9 diseases in one day. These injections were instantly followed by autism. These injections contain a preservative of mercury called thimerosal. The boy received 41 times the amount of mercury which is capable of harm to the body. Mercury is a neurotoxin that can injure the brain and nervous system. And tragically, it did.
In the United States the number of compulsory vaccine injections has increased from 10 to 36 in the last 25 years. During this period, there has been a simultaneous increase in the number of children suffering learning disabilities and attention deficit disorder. Some of these childhood disabilities are related to intrauterine cerebral damage from maternal cocaine use, but probably vaccines cause many of the others.
Many vaccines contain aluminum. A new disease called macrophagic myofasciitis causes pain in muscles, bones and joints. All persons with this disease have received aluminum containing vaccines. Deposits of aluminum are able to remain as an irritant in tissues and disturb the immune and nervous system for a lifetime.
Nearly all vaccines contain aluminum and mercury. These metals appear to play an important role in the etiology of Alzheimer's Disease. An expert at the 1997 International Vaccine Conference related that a person who takes 5 or more annual flu vaccine shots has increased the likelihood of developing Alzheimer's Disease by a factor of 10 over the person who has had 2 or fewer flu shots.
When we take vaccines we are playing a modern version of Russian Roulette. We not only get exposed to aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde and foreign cell proteins but we may get simian virus 40 and other dangerous viruses which can cause cancer, leukemia and other severe health problems because the vaccine pool is contaminated due to careless animal isolation techniques. Congress has protected the manufacturers from lawsuits, so dangerous vaccines simply increase profits at no risk to the drug companies.
U.S. children aged 2 months began receiving hepatitis B vaccine in December 2000.No peer-reviewed studies of the safety of hepatitis B in this age bracket had been done. Over 36,000 adverse reactions with 440 deaths were soon reported but the true incidence is much higher as reporting is voluntary so only approximately 10 % of adverse reactions get reported. This means that about 5000 infants are dying annually from the hepatitis B vaccine. The CDC's Chief of Epidemiology admits that the frequency of serious reactions to hepatitis B vaccine is 10 times higher than other vaccines. Hepatitis B is transmitted sexually and by contaminated blood, so the incidence of this disease must be near zero in this age bracket. A vaccine expert, Dr. Philip Incao, states that "the conclusion is obvious that the risks[18] of hepatitis B vaccination far outweigh the benefits. Once a vaccine is mandated the vaccine manufacturer is no longer liable for adverse reactions.
Dr. W.B. Clarke's important observation that cancer was not found in unvaccinated individuals demands an explanation and one now appears forthcoming. All vaccines given over a short period of time to an immature immune system deplete the thymus gland (the primary gland involved in immune reactions) of irreplaceable immature immune cells. Each of these cells could have multiplied and developed into an army of valuable cells to combat infection and growth of abnormal cells. When these immune cells have been used up, permanent immunity may not appear. The Arthur Research Foundation in Tucson, Arizona estimates that up to 60 % of our immune system may be exhausted[19] by multiple mass vaccines (36 are now required for children). Only 10 % of immune cells are permanently lost when a child is permitted to develop natural immunity from disease. There needs to be grave concern about these immune system injuring vaccinations! Could the persons who approve these mass vaccinations know that they are impairing the health of these children, many of whom are being doomed to requiring much medical care in the future?
Compelling evidence is available that the development of the immune system after contracting the usual childhood diseases matures and renders it capable to fight infection and malignant cells in the future.
The use of multiple vaccines, which prevents natural immunity, promotes the development of allergies and asthma. A New Zealand study disclosed that 23 % of vaccinated children develop asthma , as compared to zero in unvaccinated children.
Cancer was a very rare illness in the 1890's. This evidence about immune system injury from vaccinating affords a plausible explanation for Dr. Clarke's finding that only vaccinated individuals got cancer. Some radical adverse change in health occurred in the early 1900s to permit cancer to explode and vaccinating appears to be the reason.
Vaccines are an unnatural phenomena. My guess is that if enough persons said no to immunizations there would be a striking improvement in general health with nature back in the immunizing business instead of man. Having a child vaccinated should be a choice not a requirement. Medical and religious exemptions are permitted by most states.
When governmental policies require vaccinations before children enter schools coercion has overruled the lack of evidence of vaccine efficacy and safety. There is no proof that vaccines work and they are never studied for safety before release. My opinion is that there is overwhelming evidence that vaccines are dangerous and the only reason for their existence is to increase profits of pharmaceutical firms.
If you are forced to immunize your children so they can enter school, obtain a notarized statement from the director of the facility that they will accept full financial responsibility for any adverse reaction from the vaccine. Since there is at least a 2 percent risk of a serious adverse reaction they may be smart enough to permit your child to escape a dangerous procedure. Recent legislation passed by Congress gives the government the power to imprison persons refusing to take vaccines (smallpox, anthrax, etc). This would be troublesome to enforce if large numbers of citizens declined to be vaccinated at the same time.
Footnotes:
1 Null Gary Vaccination: An Analysis of the Health Risks- Part Townsend Letter for Doctors & Patients Dec. 2003 pg 78 2 Mullins Eustace Murder by Injection pg 132 The National Council for Medical Research, P. O. Box 1105, Staunton, Virginia 24401 3 Gary Null Interview with Dr. Dean Black April 7, 1995 4 de Melker HE, et al Pertussis in the Netherlands: an outbreak despite high levels of immunization with whole-cell vaccine Emerging Infectious Diseases 1997; 3(2): 175-8 Centers for Disease Control 5 Gary Null Interview with Walene James, April 6, 1995 6 Torch WS Diptheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) immunizations: a potential cause of the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) Neurology 1982; 32-4 A169 abstract. 7 Collin Jonathan The Townsend Letter for Doctors & Patients 1988 abstracted in Horowitz L. Emerging Viruses Aids & Ebola pg 1-5 8 Harris RJ et al Contaminant viruses in two live vaccines produced in chick cells.J Hyg (London) 1966 Mar:64(1) : 1-7 9 Horowitz Leonard G. Emerging Viruses AIDS & Ebola pg 484 10 Vilchez RA et al Association between simian virus 40 and non- Hodgekin lymphoma Lancet 2002 Mar 9;359(9309):817-823 11 Bu X A study of simian virus 40 infection and its origin in human brain tumors Zhonghu Liu Xing Bing Xue Zhi 2000 Feb;21 (1):19-21 12 Friedrich F. et al temporal association between the isolation of Sabin-related poliovirus vaccine strains and the Guillan-Barre syndrome Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 1996 Jan-Feb; 38(1):55-8 13 Horowitz Leonard Emerging Viruses: Aids and Ebola pg 492 14 Horowitz Leonard G Emerging Viruses: Aids & Ebola pg 378-88 Tetrahedron Inc. Suite 147, 206 North 4th Ave. Sandpoint, Idaho 83864 1-888-508-4787 tetra@tetrahedron.org 15 Null, Gary Vaccination: An Anatysis of the health risks-Part 3 Townsend letter for doctors & patients Dec. 2003 pg 78 16 Classen, JB et al. Association between type 1 diabetes and Hib vaccine BMJ 1999; 319:1133 17 Brain 9/01 18 Incao, philip M.D. Letter to representative Dale Van Vyven, Ohio House of Representatives March 1, 1999 provided to www.garynull.com by The Natural Immunity Information Network 19 Rowen Robert Your first consultation with Dr. Rowen pg 20
© 2003 Dr. James Howenstine - All Rights Reserved
Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts
Dr. James A. Howenstine is a board certified specialist in internal medicine who spent 34 years caring for office and hospital patients. Curiosity sparked a 4 year study of natural health products when 5 of his patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis were able to discontinue the use of methotrexate (chemotherapy agent) after trying an extract of New Zealand mussels for the therapy of severe rheumatoid arthritis.
Dr. Howenstine is convinced that natural products are safer, more effective and less expensive than pharmaceutical drugs. This research led to the publication of his book 'A Physicians Guide To Natural Health Products That Work'. This book and the recommended health products are available from www.naturalhealthteam.com and by calling 1-800-416-2806 U.S.A.
Dr Howenstine can be reached by E-Mail at jimhow@racsa.co.cr
"Dr. W. Torch was able to document 12 deaths in infants which appeared within 3½ and 19 hours of a DPT immunization. He later reported 11 new cases of SIDS death and one near miss which had occurred within 24 hours of a DPT injection."
The One True Zhen Jue - 12 Jan 2008 05:36 GMT > This article puts a somewhat different spin on the hazards of, and > reasons to avoid, vaccinations. > Paul > > WHY YOU SHOULD AVOID TAKING VACCINES 1. You hate children and want to see them suffer and or die. 2. You are an idiot who should not reproduce 3. You are a bigot who should not reproduce 4. You don't deserve to live
t - 12 Jan 2008 12:53 GMT On Jan 11, 9:04 pm, rpautrey2 <rpautr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This article puts a somewhat different spin on the hazards of, and > reasons to avoid, vaccinations. > Paul > > WHY YOU SHOULD AVOID TAKING VACCINES You are an idiot who should not reproduce like Andrew. You are a bigot who should not reproduce like Andrew. You don't deserve to live like Andrew
t - 12 Jan 2008 13:24 GMT On Jan 11, 9:04 pm, rpautrey2 <rpautr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This article puts a somewhat different spin on the hazards of, and > reasons to avoid, vaccinations. > Paul > > WHY YOU SHOULD AVOID TAKING VACCINES rpautrey2 - 14 Jan 2008 02:49 GMT TOTZJ: Your description/opinion of me isn't accurate or fair. Is your comment a threat? You paint a clear picture of yourself. Paul
On Jan 11, 11:36 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > This article puts a somewhat different spin on the hazards of, and > > reasons to avoid, vaccinations. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > 3. You are a bigot who should not reproduce > 4. You don't deserve to live Mark Probert - 14 Jan 2008 04:49 GMT > This article puts a somewhat different spin on the hazards of, and > reasons to avoid, vaccinations. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Dr. James R. Shannon, former director of the National institute of > health declared, "the only safe vaccine is one that is never used." Context? Of course not. Yuri pulled the same sh.t.
Peter Bowditch - 14 Jan 2008 06:37 GMT >> This article puts a somewhat different spin on the hazards of, and >> reasons to avoid, vaccinations. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > >Context? Of course not. Yuri pulled the same sh.t. It's like living at the end of a sewer outfall. The last time I saw this "quote" was less than two months ago. It was a lie then and it is a lie now. Here it is with some other standard lies:
http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/history/2007/11november.htm#24lies
 Signature Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
rpautrey2 - 14 Jan 2008 06:56 GMT PB: Thanks for the "distorted insight". PA
> It's like living at the end of a sewer outfall. The last time I saw > this "quote" was less than two months ago. It was a lie then and it is > a lie now.
> ratbag > Peter Bowditch rpautrey2 - 14 Jan 2008 08:31 GMT This is from the Dr. Mercola website. The 2nd video puts a similar spin on the subject post/article in this thread. PA
Link To The Film: http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/1/19/the-film...
The Film About Vaccines You Simply Must See
This stunning censored interview (top) was cut from the TV program The Health Century due to its huge liability -- the admission that the Merck drug company has been injecting cancer viruses into people worldwide.
If you find the content shocking, consider watching the second video, the entire movie, "In Lies We Trust: The CIA, Hollywood & Bioterrorism".
This film is produced and freely distributed by consumer protector and public health expert, Dr. Leonard Horowitz, and features the world's leading vaccine expert, Dr. Maurice Hilleman, explaining why Merck's vaccines have spread AIDS, leukemia, and other horrific plagues worldwide.
It may seem inconceivable to some of you, but disease is Big Business. And, if you're cynical - which seems to become easier with each passing day -- it's a way to achieve population control while making huge profits in the process.
Dr. Mercola Edited: rpautrey2
Mark Probert - 14 Jan 2008 12:55 GMT > This is from the Dr. Mercola website. That is all one needs to know it is bullshit.
> The 2nd video puts a similar spin on the subject post/article in this > thread. [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > Dr. Mercola > Edited: rpautrey2 Kevysmom - 17 Jan 2008 00:39 GMT > > This is from the Dr. Mercola website. > > That is all one needs to know it is bullshit. The number one health site in the world, and you call it bullshit? Whats wrong with you Mark? If it came directly from Pharmadoesntharm.com then you would believe it.
> > This is from the Dr. Mercola website. > [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > - Show quoted text - David Wright - 17 Jan 2008 02:34 GMT >> > This is from the Dr. Mercola website. >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >Pharmadoesntharm.com >then you would believe it. The Mercola web site claims that there are something like 5 radically different causes for autism. Including pasteurized milk. How does that grab you?
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher
>> > This is from the Dr. Mercola website. >> [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] >> >> - Show quoted text - Peter Bowditch - 17 Jan 2008 06:23 GMT >>> > This is from the Dr. Mercola website. >>> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >different causes for autism. Including pasteurized milk. How does >that grab you? I found 9 before I gave up looking. The milk is my favourite.
http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/history/2006/2006awards.htm
 Signature Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
rpautrey2 - 17 Jan 2008 06:34 GMT Hi PB! Thanks for your 2 cents worth. Bye PB!
Edited: PA
> >In article <50ceec3c-ed5f-4edc-b8fc-d38fa6818...@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, > >>> > This is from the Dr. Mercola website. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > ratbag > Peter Bowditch - ratbag Peter Bowditch - 17 Jan 2008 06:50 GMT >Hi PB! Thanks for your 2 cents worth. Bye PB! So which of Mercola's nine definite causes for autism do you find the most convincing? Do you think he might be mistaken about any of them?
Is it possible that someone who says that autism is caused by nine different things depending on what he is selling at the time might not believe any of them?
I see you accidentally snipped the list.
http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/history/2006/2006awards.htm
>Edited: >PA [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >> ratbag >> Peter Bowditch - ratbag
 Signature Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
rpautrey2 - 17 Jan 2008 07:00 GMT PB: The subject of the thread is "why you should avoid taking vaccines"("somewhat different spin"), not the various causes of autism. How many known causes of cancer can you find? How many causes of meningitis? How many causes of skin rashes? Etc. PA
Jan Drew - 18 Jan 2008 03:53 GMT >>Hi PB! Thanks for your 2 cents worth. Bye PB! > [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > > -- Jan Drew - 18 Jan 2008 03:42 GMT >>In article >><50ceec3c-ed5f-4edc-b8fc-d38fa681827c@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > http://www.ratbags.com/ The Anus Maximus Then there is the LIE about Max C.
FACT: The Anus Maxiums..Peter Bowditch wrote a peck of lies.
Peter got spanked.
1 - it's not your place to correct the term "Mr." You were not being addressed. If "Dr. Moran" wished me to call him as such, I'm sure he would have said so.
2 - You assume much in your statements. I did not claim that Dr. Warburg won the Nobel Prize for his findings on cancer. I simply asked if Peter Moran knew of him. However, I quote:
"For his discovery of the nature and mode of action of the respiratory enzyme, the Nobel Prize has been awarded to him in 1931. This discovery has opened up new ways in the fields of cellular metabolism and cellular respiration. He has shown, among other things, that cancerous cells can live and develop, even in the absence of oxygen." http://nobelprize.org/medicine/laureates/1931/warburg-bio.html ________________________ And also, in the "Presentation Speech by Professor E. Hammarsten, member of the Nobel Committee for Physiology or Medicine of the Royal Caroline Institute, on December 10, 1931:"
"The medical world expects great things from your experiments on cancer and other tumours, experiments which seem already to be sufficiently far advanced to be able to furnish an explanation for at least one cause of the destructive and unlimited growth of these tumours." http://nobelprize.org/medicine/laureates/1931/press.html ________________________ In a lecture to Nobel Laureates, Dr. Otto Warburg said the following:
"Many experts agree that one could prevent about 80% of all cancers in man, if one could keep away the known carcinogens from the normal body cells. But how can the remaining 20%, the so-called spontaneous cancers, be prevented? It is indisputable that all cancer could be prevented if the respiration of body cells were kept intact.
Nobody today can say that one does not know what the prime cause of cancer is. On the contrary, there is no disease whose prime cause is better known, so that today ignorance is no longer an excuse for avoiding measures for prevention. That the prevention of cancer will come there is no doubt. But how long prevention will be avoided depends on how long the prophets of agnosticism will succeed in inhibiting the application of scientific knowledge in the cancer field. In the meantime, millions of men and women must die of cancer unnecessarily." ________________________ In another speech, Dr. Warburg said the following:
"As emphasized, it is the first precondition of the proposed treatment that all growing body cells be saturated with oxygen. It is a second precondition that exogenous carcinogens be kept away, at least during the treatment. All carcinogens impair respiration directly or indirectly by deranging capillary circulation, a statement that is proved by the fact that no cancer cell exists, the respiration of which is not impaired. Of course, respiration cannot be repaired if it is impaired at the same time by carcinogens."
Of the cancer patients I've spoken to (obviously not nearly as many as any medical doctor who treats cancer) I have never spoken to one that was told by their doctor how to adjust their diets to exclude known carcinogens. Carcinogens are everywhere. Our most common foods are LOADED with them. Even foods most consider healthy such as "whole wheat" products contain rancid fats, a known carcinogen.
Granted that his speeches usually geared toward prevention, but if we know that cell respiration is KEY in keeping healthy cells in tact, and we know that a proper diet can play a huge role in cell respiration (and carcinogen elimination,) why is cell respiration (through the proper diet) generally not considered in cancer treatment regimens? Certainly chemo and radiation do nothing to help cell respiration.
Max.
Jan said:
> > There are however, MANY references to CANCER in the very subject > > relating > > to the Nobel Prize won by *DR* Warburg. Then Peter Bowditch said:
> There is ONE mention of cancer in the Presentation Speech by Professor > E. Hammarsten. Peter, either you have not read my replies to your comments or you have willfully chosen to ignore them. Your above statement, while *technically* true, is very misleading.
Mentions of cancer and Dr. Warburg in the Nobel literature:
1 - in his Nobel biography "This discovery has opened up new ways in the fields of cellular metabolism and cellular respiration. He has shown, among other things, that cancerous cells can live and develop, even in the absence of oxygen."
2 - again in his Nobel biography "In the last years he added to the problems of his Institute: chemotherapeutics of cancer, and the mechanism of X-ray's action."
3 - in the presentation speech (as you said) "The medical world expects great things from your experiments on cancer and other tumours, experiments which seem already to be sufficiently far advanced to be able to furnish an explanation for at least one cause of the destructive and unlimited growth of these tumours.
4 & 5 - in his two 1927 Nobel nominations "Work on anaerobic energy production in cancer cells, and the roll of iron in the oxidation mechanism of cells."
6, 7, 8, 9. 10 and 11 - in his six 1928 Nobel nominations "Studies of the metabolism of cancer cells and of oxidative processes in general."
Jeez this is getting redundant. MANY more mentions in his MANY nominations in 1930 and 1931. I think even the dimmest of people could figure out that Dr. Warburg's studies centered around caner just by reading his Nobel nominations alone. That doesn't even BEGIN to address the many speeches he gave on the subject of cancer over the decades, which I've already mentioned in a previous reply to you.
It would appear from the evidence that you are purposefully trying to be deceptive. That doesn't do much for your credibility, especially when the evidence to prove you wrong is so readily available.
Max.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/browse_thread/thread/9e02 5c10f0c3a5ff/42688881786e6d1c?lnk=st&q=The+Cancer+Challenge#42688881786e6d1c
[read Peter the deceiver, liar and filthy mouthed keep flip-floping back and forth with his *acceptance*..*presentation* *lecture* speech]
t - 17 Jan 2008 12:05 GMT > In article > <50ceec3c-ed5f-4edc-b8fc-d38fa681827c@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 57 lines] >>> >>> - Show quoted text - If Mr. Wrong says it is so, it is wrong.>
Mark Probert - 17 Jan 2008 12:58 GMT >>> This is from the Dr. Mercola website. >> That is all one needs to know it is bullshit. > > The number one health site in the world, and you call it bullshit? I read this just before I went to bed last night. I laid my head on the pillow laughing. I had vivid dreams of beautiful blue skies, verdant forests, etc.
> Whats wrong with you Mark? If it came directly from > Pharmadoesntharm.com > then you would believe it. Mercola is the only person who paid Barrett in a court case. In AltThink, that proves that he is a doofus.
If you had the slightest connection with reality, you would know that his site is pure sales pitch. One cannot even read most of it without signing up for his advertising, which he calls a newsletter.
His medical ideas are flaky, at best, and absurd for the most part. He has multiple contradictory causes of various diseases, and sells cures based on the contradictions.
The fact that you do not have a clue about him speaks volumes about your gullibility.
>>> This is from the Dr. Mercola website. >> That is all one needs to know it is bullshit. [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] >>> Edited: rpautrey2- Hide quoted text - >> - Show quoted text - Jan Drew - 18 Jan 2008 03:57 GMT > bullshit Groups View all web results » Results 1 - 10 of about 1,450 for markprobert@lumbercartel. com bullshit
rpautrey2 - 19 Jan 2008 01:35 GMT Dr. Mercola is also a salesman. His sight just happens to be where the post/link came from.
Paul
> >>> This is from the Dr. Mercola website. > >> That is all one needs to know it is bullshit. [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > The fact that you do not have a clue about him speaks volumes about your > gullibility. Peter Bowditch - 14 Jan 2008 11:36 GMT >PB: Thanks for the "distorted insight". >PA [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >> ratbag >> Peter Bowditch So I demonstrate that a collection of standard "quotes" are in fact lies and you call this "distorted insight"? What sort of insight sees lies as truth?
 Signature Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
Mark Probert - 14 Jan 2008 12:55 GMT > PB: Thanks for the "distorted insight". > PA [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >> ratbag >> Peter Bowditch When a "quote", like the one in what you posted, is only found on anti-vac liar websites, intelligent people can almost guarantee that it is distorted and/or taken out of context and/or was made up.
Yuri posted a quote which was shown to be so distorted by removing it from context, that even he acknowledged it was dishonest.
t - 14 Jan 2008 15:27 GMT "Peter Bowditch" <myfirstname@ratbags.com> Left some of his usual rat droppings.
Mark Probert - 15 Jan 2008 13:00 GMT > "Peter Bowditch" <myfirstname@ratbags.com> Left some of his usual rat > droppings. And you made a stew with them and ate them.
rpautrey2 - 17 Jan 2008 00:33 GMT "Different Spin"!
PA
> > "Peter Bowditch" <myfirstn...@ratbags.com> Left some of his usual rat > > droppings. > > And you made a stew with them and ate them. David Wright - 15 Jan 2008 03:00 GMT >This article puts a somewhat different spin on the hazards of, and >reasons to avoid, vaccinations. "Spin" is the word, all right -- in the modern political usage of "distort."
>Paul Paul, next time you're tempted to post more ancient crap like this, why don't you do us all a favor and find out whether someone else already has? And then you could maybe take the time to find out what kind of responses were made to it the first time. You might even find it enlightening.
So allow me to enlighten you by showing you what I wrote the first time this travesty by Howenstine was posted. (I wonder if he even really does have an MD -- if he does, they should take it away from him.)
>By Dr. James Howenstine, MD. >December 7, 2003 >NewsWithViews.com
>Dr. James R. Shannon, former director of the National institute of health >declared, "the only safe vaccine is one that is never used." True, if you mean "100% safe." Nothing in life is 100% safe.
>Cowpox vaccine was believed able to immunize people against smallpox. Quite rightly.
>At the time this vaccine was introduced, there was already a decline >in the number of cases of smallpox. Like any epidemic disease, smallpox waxes and wanes.
>Japan introduced compulsory vaccination in 1872. In 1892 there were >165,774 cases of smallpox with 29,979 deaths despite the vaccination >program. Nobody can be sure of the cause of that today. We don't have samples of the vaccine to test.
> Much of the success attributed to vaccination programs may actually > have been due to improvement in public health related to water > quality and sanitation, less crowded living conditions, better > nutrition, and igher standards of living. Except that you can't explain polio or measles or mumps or rubella with this.
>Typically the incidence of a disease was clearly declining before the >vaccine for that disease was introduced. No, the *death rates* were declining. Often, the disease was as prevalent as ever.
>In England the incidence of polio had decreased by 82% before the >polio vaccine was introduced in 1956. No it hadn't, unless you use a time horizon of a year or two.
>In the early 1900s an astute Indiana physician, Dr. W.B. Clarke, stated >"Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox >vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with two hundred cases >of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated[1] person." That's because they mostly died of infectious disease before getting old enough to develop cancer. Cancers have been known for a long, long time.
>Do Vaccines Actually Prevent Disease? Yes; the incidence of measles alone after the introduction of measles vaccine in the 1960s is proof enough.
>In 1975 Germany stopped requiring pertussis (whooping cough) vaccination. >Today less than 10% of German children are vaccinated against pertussis. >The number of cases of pertussis has steadily decreased[2] even though far >fewer children are receiving pertussis vaccine. It will increase again. It always does. Germany is also a place where measles vaccination has declined in certain areas. Measles has increased sharply in those areas.
>Measles outbreaks have occurred in schools with vaccination rates over 98% >in all parts of the U.S. including areas that had reported no cases of >measles for years. No vaccination is perfect. So even if everyone is vaccinated, some people will get the disease anyway. But with measles, the number of cases has gone from hundreds of thousands to hundreds in a very short time. The anti-vac loons always ignore that.
>Measles mortality rates had declined by 97 % in England before >measles vaccination was instituted. Another method of anti-vac lying -- implying that death is the only adverse consequence of a disease. It's not.
>In 1986 there were 1300 cases of pertussis in Kansas and 90% of these cases >occurred in children who had been adequately vaccinated. Similar vaccine >failures have been reported from Nova Scotia where pertussis continues to >be occurring despite universal vaccination. Pertussis remains endemic[3] in >the Netherlands where for more than 20 years 96% of children have received >3 pertussis shots by age 12 months. That's because the strain of pertussis in the Netherlands is resistant to the vaccine. Pertussis vaccine has always been one of the least effective vaccines anyway (it's not useless, it's just not as good as we need).
>The continued presence of these infectious diseases in children who have >received vaccines proves that life long immunity which follows natural >infection does not occur in persons receiving vaccines. The injection >process places the viral particles into the blood without providing any >clear way to eliminate these foreign substances. Injections are not done into the bloodstream. And while natural immunity may be lifelong, you have to get the disease to acquire it.
>Walene James, author of Immunization: the Reality Behind The Myth, states >that the full[4] inflammatory response is necessary to create real >immunity. Prior to the introduction of measles and mumps vaccines children >got measles and mumps and in the great majority of cases these diseases >were benign. And some were not, which is kind of an important distinction. The number of bad disease outcomes dwarfs the number of bad vaccine reactions.
>Vaccines and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome SIDS The usual garbage. I can't face it again. They always ignore things like the fact that New Zealand had a very high rate of SIDS and a low rate of vaccination; now they have more vaccination and less SIDS. The "back to sleep" campaign in the US has cut SIDS even though vaccination rates have not declined.
>There is valid reason to think that not only are vaccines worthless in >preventing disease they are counterproductive because they injure the >immune system permitting cancer, auto-immune diseases and SIDS to cause >much disability and death. No, there is no reason to think that.
>Dr. Robert Strecker claimed that the department of defense DOD was >given $10,000,000 in 1969 to create the AIDS virus to be used as a >population-reducing[6] weapon against blacks. Yes, and other people claim to have been kidnapped by UFOs. Yawn. Creating AIDS is far beyond the state of the art in 1969.
<usual conspiracy garbage deleted -- it's been debunked too many times>
>When a new virus is introduced into a community. It takes 20 years for the >number of cases to double. In the case of the flu, it takes less than 20 weeks. The statement is nonsense on the face of it.
>The influential Club of Rome has a position paper in which they state that >the world population is too large and needs to be reduced by 90 %. They also claimed we'd be out of natural resources by 2000 or so, if I recall correctly.
>Obviously, creating famines and genocidal wars such as wrecked havoc in >Africa, and loosing new laboratory-created diseases (HIV, Ebola, >Marburg[13] , and probably West Nile virus and SARS) can help reduce the >population. Other elitist groups (Trilaterals, Bildenbergers) have >expressed similar concerns about excess people on planet Earth. I'm leaving this in because I like people to see the really nutty stuff, so they can see who they're dealing with.
>In the March 4, 1977 issue of Science Jonas and Darrell Salk warn, "Live >virus vaccines against influenza or poliomyelitis may in each instance >produce the disease it intended to prevent. The live virus against measles >and mumps may produce such side effects as encephalitis (brain damage). "May." All this stuff is well known. Then they get on to swine flu, the usual anti-vac hobby horse.
>An article in the Washington Post on Jan. 26, 1988 mentioned that all cases >of polio since 1979 had been caused by the polio vaccine with no known >cases of polio from a wild strain since 1979. In the USA! There's lots of wild polio in Africa and Asia.
>This might have created a perfect situation to discontinue the >vaccine, If polio were extinct elsewhere, which it isn't.
>In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine was recommended by the Center for Disease >Control for all infants. When this vaccine program was instituted several [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >studied for toxicity possibly because such study might eliminate them from >being used. Wrong -- but the number of cases of intussception was so small that the tests didn't show it. So a vaccine was removed, and then we don't get the side-effects. But we'll probably have more children die from rotavirus. Another "victory" for the anti-vac army.
>A large study from Australia showed that the risk of developing >encephalitis from the pertussis vaccine was 5 times greater than the risk >of developing encephalitis by contacting pertussis by natural methods. Reference?
>Vaccine Induced Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
>Dr. John Classen has published 29 articles on vaccine-induced[14] diabetes. I thought it was Bart Classen. He has a vested interest in his results, if I recall correctly.
<typical autism junk removed -- why are all these people reading from the same garbage playbook?>
>Nearly all vaccines contain aluminum and mercury. False.
>These metals appear to play an important role in the etiology of >Alzheimer's Disease. Also false.
>An expert at the 1997 International Vaccine Conference related that a >person who takes 5 or more annual flu vaccine shots has increased the >likelihood of developing Alzheimer's Disease by a factor of 10 over >the person who has had 2 or fewer flu shots. He may have said this, but he never published anything. There is absolutely no evidence for it. This statement was made by a guy named Fudenberg, who used to be a serious researcher.
>Dr. W.B. Clarke's important observation that cancer was not found in >unvaccinated individuals demands an explanation and one now appears >forthcoming. Yeah -- he was full of it.
>Dr. James A. Howenstine is a board certified specialist in internal >medicine who spent 34 years caring for office and hospital patients. I'm glad he's not my doctor.
>Dr. Howenstine is convinced that natural products are safer, more effective >and less expensive than pharmaceutical drugs. This research led to the >publication of his book 'A Physicians Guide To Natural Health Products That >Work'. This book and the recommended health products are available from ><snip> and by calling <snip> Aha! Now we get down to real cases. Howenstine is in it for the money.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher
rpautrey2 - 17 Jan 2008 00:46 GMT DW: !Spin Off!
PA
> In article <52111650-0edc-4b9c-854d-501d700bd...@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > "Spin" is the word, all right -- in the modern political usage of > "distort." David Wright - 17 Jan 2008 02:34 GMT >DW: !Spin Off! Thank you so much for your tightly-reasoned and well-documented response. Just what I've come to expect from you, unfortunately.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher
>> In article ><52111650-0edc-4b9c-854d-501d700bd...@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >> "Spin" is the word, all right -- in the modern political usage of >> "distort." rpautrey2 - 17 Jan 2008 02:50 GMT DW: About that PhD of yours? Details? HA,HA,HA! PA
> In article <33876755-729a-4f77-84c8-78cd6682c...@k39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
> Thank you so much for your tightly-reasoned and well-documented > response. Just what I've come to expect from you, unfortunately. > > -- David Wright David Wright - 17 Jan 2008 03:39 GMT >DW: About that PhD of yours? Details? HA,HA,HA! PA A very poor attempt at diversion. I'm ashamed of you.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at copper.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "Without Bush, what will America's schoolchildren have to look down on?" -- Bill Maher
>> In article ><33876755-729a-4f77-84c8-78cd6682c...@k39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >> >> -- David Wright rpautrey2 - 17 Jan 2008 04:35 GMT DW: See "The Polio Vaccine And Cancer" article I posted about the same time I posted this one. Diversion? No. "Somewhat Different Spin"! Control Yourself!
Paul
> In article <3e32f143-7470-4be3-b609-542c24d01...@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > -- David Wright Jan Drew - 18 Jan 2008 04:02 GMT > In article > <33876755-729a-4f77-84c8-78cd6682c150@k39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > -- David Wright This article puts a somewhat different spin on the hazards of, and reasons to avoid, vaccinations. Paul
WHY YOU SHOULD AVOID TAKING VACCINES
By Dr. James Howenstine, MD. December 7, 2003 NewsWithViews.com
Dr. James R. Shannon, former director of the National institute of health declared, "the only safe vaccine is one that is never used." Cowpox vaccine was believed able to immunize people against smallpox. At the time this vaccine was introduced, there was already a decline in the number of cases of smallpox. Japan introduced compulsory vaccination in 1872. In 1892 there were 165,774 cases of smallpox with 29,979 deaths despite the vaccination program. A stringent compulsory smallpox vaccine program, which prosecuted those refusing the vaccine, was instituted in England in 1867. Within 4 years 97.5 % of persons between 2 and 50 had been vaccinated. The following year England experienced the worst smallpox epidemic[1] in its history with 44,840 deaths. Between 1871 and 1880 the incidence of smallpox escalated from 28 to 46 per 100,000. The smallpox vaccine does not work.
Much of the success attributed to vaccination programs may actually have been due to improvement in public health related to water quality and sanitation, less crowded living conditions, better nutrition, and higher standards of living. Typically the incidence of a disease was clearly declining before the vaccine for that disease was introduced. In England the incidence of polio had decreased by 82 % before the polio vaccine was introduced in 1956.
In the early 1900s an astute Indiana physician, Dr. W.B. Clarke, stated "Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated[2] person."
There is a widely held belief that vaccines should not be criticized because the public might refuse to take them. This is valid only if the benefits exceed the known risks of the vaccines.
Do Vaccines Actually Prevent Disease?
This important question does not appear to have ever been adequately studied. Vaccines are enormously profitable for drug companies and recent legislation in the U.S. has exempted lawsuits against pharmaceutical firms in the event of adverse reactions to vaccines which are very common. In 1975 Germany stopped requiring pertussis (whooping cough) vaccination. Today less than 10 % of German children are vaccinated against pertussis. The number of cases of pertussis has steadily decreased[3] even though far fewer children are receiving pertussis vaccine.
Measles outbreaks have occurred in schools with vaccination rates over 98 % in all parts of the U.S. including areas that had reported no cases of measles for years. As measles immunization rates rise to high levels measles becomes a disease seen only in vaccinated persons. An outbreak of measles occurred in a school where 100 % of the children had been vaccinated. Measles mortality rates had declined by 97 % in England before measles vaccination was instituted.
In 1986 there were 1300 cases of pertussis in Kansas and 90 % of these cases occurred in children who had been adequately vaccinated. Similar vaccine failures have been reported from Nova Scotia where pertussis continues to be occurring despite universal vaccination. Pertussis remains endemic[4] in the Netherlands where for more than 20 years 96 % of children have received 3 pertussis shots by age 12 months.
After institution of diptheria vaccination in England and Wales in 1894 the number of deaths from diptheria rose by 20 % in the subsequent 15 years. Germany had compulsory vaccination in 1939. The rate of diptheria spiraled to 150,000 cases that year whereas, Norway which did not have compulsory vaccination, had only 50 cases of diptheria the same year.
The continued presence of these infectious diseases in children who have received vaccines proves that life long immunity which follows natural infection does not occur in persons receiving vaccines. The injection process places the viral particles into the blood without providing any clear way to eliminate these foreign substances.
Why Do Vaccines Fail To Protect Against Diseases?
Walene James, author of Immunization: the Reality Behind The Myth, states that the full[5] inflammatory response is necessary to create real immunity. Prior to the introduction of measles and mumps vaccines children got measles and mumps and in the great majority of cases these diseases were benign. Vaccines "trick" the body so it does not mount a complete inflammatory response to the injected virus.
Vaccines and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome SIDS
The incidence of Sudden Infant Death syndrome SIDS has grown from .55 per 1000 live births in 1953 to 12.8 per 1000 in 1992 in Olmstead County, Minnesota. The peak incidence for SIDS is age 2 to 4 months the exact time most vaccines are being given to children. 85 % of cases of SIDS occur in the first 6 months of infancy. The increase in SIDS as a percentage of total infant deaths has risen from 2.5 per 1000 in 1953 to 17.9 per 1000 in 1992. This rise in SIDS deaths has occurred during a period when nearly every childhood disease was declining due to improved sanitation and medical progress except SIDS. These deaths from SIDS did increase during a period when the number of vaccines given a child was steadily rising to 36 per child.
Dr. W. Torch was able to document 12 deaths in infants which appeared within 3½ and 19 hours of a DPT immunization. He later reported 11 new cases of SIDS death and one near miss which had occurred within 24 hours of a DPT injection. When he studied 70 cases of SIDS two thirds of these victims[6] had been vaccinated from one half day to 3 weeks prior to their deaths. None of these deaths was attributed to vaccines. Vaccines are a sacred cow and nothing against them appears in the mass media because they are so profitable to pharmaceutical firms.
There is valid reason to think that not only are vaccines worthless in preventing disease they are counterproductive because they injure the immune system permitting cancer, auto-immune diseases and SIDS to cause much disability and death.
Are Vaccines Sterile?
Dr. Robert Strecker claimed that the department of defense DOD was given $10,000,000 in 1969 to create the AIDS virus to be used as a population-reducing[7] weapon against blacks. By use of the Freedom of Information Act Dr. Strecker was able to learn that the DOD secured funds from Congress to perform studies on immune destroying agents for germ warfare.
Once produced, the vaccine was given in two locations. Smallpox vaccine containing HIV was given to 100,000,000 Africans in 1977. Over 2000 young white homosexual males in New York City were given Hepatitis B vaccine that contained HIV virus in 1978. This vaccine was given at New York City Blood Center. The Hepatitis B vaccine containing the HIV virus was also administered to homosexual males in San Francisco, Los Angeles, St.Louis, Houston and Chicago in 1978 and 1979. U.S. Public Health epidemiology studies have disclosed that these same 6 cities had the highest incidence of AIDS, Aids related Complex (ARC) and deaths rates from HIV, when compared to other U.S. cities.
When a new virus is introduced into a community. It takes 20 years for the number of cases to double. If the fabricated story that green monkey bites of pygmies led to the HIV epidemic, the alleged monkey bites in the 1940s should have produced a peak in the incidence of HIV in the 1960s at which time HIV was non existent in Africa. The World Health Organization (WHO) began a African smallpox vaccination campaign in 1977 that targeted urban population centers and avoided pygmies. If the green monkey bites of pygmies truly caused the HIV epidemic the incidence of HIV in pygmies should have been higher than in urban citizens. However, the opposite was true.
In 1954 Dr. Bernice Eddy (bacteriologist) discovered live monkey viruses in supposedly sterile inactivated polio vaccine[8] developed by Dr. Jonas Salk. This discovery was not well received at the NIH and Dr. Eddy was demoted. Later Dr. Eddy, working with Sarah Stewart, discovered SE polyoma virus. This virus was quite important because it caused cancer in every animal receiving it. Yellow fever vaccine had previously been found to contain avian (bird) leukemia virus. Later Dr. Hilleman isolated SV 40 virus from both the Salk and Sabin polio vaccines. There were 40 different viruses[9] in these polio vaccines they were trying to eradicate. They were never able to get rid of these viruses ontaminating the polio vaccines. The SV 40 virus causes malignancies. It has now been identified in 43 % of cases of non- Hodgekin lymphoma[10] , 36 % of brain tumors[11] , 18 % of healthy blood samples, and 22 % of healthy semen samples, mesothiolomas and other malignancies. By the time of this discovery SV 40 had already been injected into 10,000,000 people in Salk vaccine. Gastric digestion inactivtes some of SV 40 in Sabin vaccine. However, the isolation of strains of Sabin polio vaccine from all 38 cases of Guillan Barre Syndrome[12] GBS in Brazil suggests that significant numbers of persons are able to be infected from this vaccine. All 38 of these patients had received Sabin polio vaccine months to years before the onset of GBS. The incidence of non-Hodgekin lymphoma has"mysteriouly" doubled since the 1970s.
Dr. John Martin, Professor of Pathology at the Univ. of Southern California, was employed by the Viral Oncology Branch of the Bureau of Biologics (FDA) from 1976 to 1980. While employed there he identified foreign DNA in the live polio vaccine Orimune Lederle that suggested serious vaccine contamination. He warned his supervisors about this problem and was told to discontinue his work as it was outside the scope of testing required for polio vaccine.
Later Dr. Martin learned that all eleven of the African green monkeys used to grow the Lederle polio virus Orimune had grown simian cytomegalovirus from kidney cell cultures. Lederle was aware of this viral contamination as their Cytomegaloviral Contamination Plan[13] clearly showed in 1972. The Bureau of Biologics decided not to pursue the matter so production of infected polio vaccine continued.
In 1955 Dr. Martin identified unique cell destroying viruses termed stealth viruses in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. These viruses lacked genes that would enable the immune system to recognize them. Thus they were protected by the body's failure to develop antiviral antibodies. In March of 1995, Dr. Martin learned that some of these stealth viruses had originated from African green monkey simian cytomegalovirus of a type known to infect man.
The Lederle vaccine experience suggests that the higher-ups are not concerned about sloppy and dangerous preparation of vaccines. Animal cross infection is a huge unsolved current problem for all vaccine manufacturing. If this vaccine production sounds like an unbelievable mess to you, you are right.
The influential Club of Rome has a position paper in which they state that the world population is too large and needs to be reduced by 90 %. This means that 6 billion people must be reduced to 500 to 600 million. Obviously, creating famines and genocidal wars such as wrecked havoc in Africa, and loosing new laboratory-created diseases (HIV, Ebola, Marburg[14] , and probably West Nile virus and SARS) can help reduce the population. Other elitist groups (Trilaterals, Bildenbergers) have expressed similar concerns about excess people on planet Earth.
The company that was projected to produce the new smallpox vaccine in the U.S. was in serious trouble in England because of unsatisfactory quality of operations before setting up their facility in the U.S. Why would their performance here be any better than it was in England?
If there are important powerful groups of people that are determined to reduce the world population, what could be a more diabolically clever way to eliminate people than to inject them with a cancer- causing vaccine? The person receiving the injection would never suspect that the vaccine taken 10 to 15 years earlier had caused the cancer to appear.
Other Dangers From Vaccines
In the March 4, 1977 issue of Science Jonas and Darrell Salk warn, "Live virus vaccines against influenza or poliomyelitis may in each instance produce the disease it intended to prevent. The live virus against measles and mumps may produce such side effects as encephalitis (brain damage).
The swine flu vaccine was administered to the American public even though there had never been a case of swine flu identified in a human. Farmers refused to use the vaccine because it killed too many animals. Within a few months of use in humans this vaccine caused many cases of serious nerve injury (Guillan Barre syndrome).
An article in the Washington Post on Jan. 26, 1988 mentioned that all cases of polio since 1979 had been caused by the polio vaccine with no known cases of polio from a wild strain since 1979. This might have created a perfect situation to discontinue the vaccine, but the vaccine is still given. Vaccines are a wonderful source of profits with no risks to the drug companies since vaccine injuries are now recompensed by the government.
The steady escalation in the number of vaccines administered has been followed by an identical rise in the incidence of auto-immune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, subacute lupus erythematosus, psoriasis, multiple sclerosis, asthma) seen in children. While there is a genetic transmission of some of these diseases many are probably due to the injury from foreign protein particles, mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde and other toxic agents injected in vaccines.
In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine was recommended by the Center for Disease Control for all infants. When this vaccine program was instituted several infants died and many had life endangering bowel obstructions. Prelicensure trials[15] of the rotavirus vaccine had demonstrated an increased incidence of intussusception 30 times greater than normal but the vaccine was released anyway without special warnings to practitioners to be on the lookout for bowel problems. Children's vaccines are often not studied for toxicity possibly because such study might eliminate them from being used.
A large study from Australia showed that the risk of developing encephalitis from the pertussis vaccine was 5 times greater than the risk of developing encephalitis by contacting pertussis by natural methods.
Naturally acquired immunity by illness evolves by spread of a virus from the respiratory tract to the liver, thymus, spleen, and bone marrow. When symptoms begin, the entire immune response has been mobilized to repel the invading virus. This complex immune system response creates antibodies that confer life long immunity against that invading virus and prepares the child to respond promptly to an infection by the same virus in the future.
Vaccination, in contrast, results in the persisting of live virus or other foreign antigens within the cells of the body, a situation that may provoke auto-immune reactions as the body attempts to destroy its own infected cells. There is no surprise that the incidence of auto- immune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, subacute lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, asthma, psoriasis) has risen sharply in this era of multiple vaccine immunization.
Vaccine Induced Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Dr. John Classen has published 29 articles on vaccine-induced[16] diabetes. At least 8 of 10 children with Type 1 (insulin needing) diabetes have this disease as a result of vaccination. These children may have avoided measles, mumps, and whooping cough but they have received something far worse: an illness that shortens life expectancy by 10 to 15 years and results in a life requiring constant medical care.
Dr. Classen has shown in Finland, the introduction of hemophilus type b vaccine caused three times as many cases of type 1 diabetes as the number of deaths and brain damage from hemophilus influenza type b it might have prevented.
In New Zealand, the incidence of Type 1 diabetes in children rose by 61 % after an aggressive vaccine program against hepatitis B.. This same program has been started in the U.S.A. so we can now look forward to many cases of Type 1 diabetes in children. Similar rises in Type 1 diabetes have been seen in England, Italy, Sweden, and Denmark after immunization programs against Hepatitis B.
Toxic Substances Are Needed To Make Vaccines.
Vaccines contain many toxic substances that are needed to prevent the vaccines from becoming infected or to improve the performance of the vaccine. Among these substances are mercury, formaldehyde and aluminum. [17]
In the past 10 years, the number of autistic children has risen from between 200 and 500 percent in every state in the U.S. This sharp rise in autism followed the introduction of measles, mumps and rubella vaccine in 1975.
Representative Dan Burton's healthy grandson was given injections for 9 diseases in one day. These injections were instantly followed by autism. These injections contain a preservative of mercury called thimerosal. The boy received 41 times the amount of mercury which is capable of harm to the body. Mercury is a neurotoxin that can injure the brain and nervous system. And tragically, it did.
In the United States the number of compulsory vaccine injections has increased from 10 to 36 in the last 25 years. During this period, there has been a simultaneous increase in the number of children suffering learning disabilities and attention deficit disorder. Some of these childhood disabilities are related to intrauterine cerebral damage from maternal cocaine use, but probably vaccines cause many of the others.
Many vaccines contain aluminum. A new disease called macrophagic myofasciitis causes pain in muscles, bones and joints. All persons with this disease have received aluminum containing vaccines. Deposits of aluminum are able to remain as an irritant in tissues and disturb the immune and nervous system for a lifetime.
Nearly all vaccines contain aluminum and mercury. These metals appear to play an important role in the etiology of Alzheimer's Disease. An expert at the 1997 International Vaccine Conference related that a person who takes 5 or more annual flu vaccine shots has increased the likelihood of developing Alzheimer's Disease by a factor of 10 over the person who has had 2 or fewer flu shots.
When we take vaccines we are playing a modern version of Russian Roulette. We not only get exposed to aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde and foreign cell proteins but we may get simian virus 40 and other dangerous viruses which can cause cancer, leukemia and other severe health problems because the vaccine pool is contaminated due to careless animal isolation techniques. Congress has protected the manufacturers from lawsuits, so dangerous vaccines simply increase profits at no risk to the drug companies.
U.S. children aged 2 months began receiving hepatitis B vaccine in December 2000.No peer-reviewed studies of the safety of hepatitis B in this age bracket had been done. Over 36,000 adverse reactions with 440 deaths were soon reported but the true incidence is much higher as reporting is voluntary so only approximately 10 % of adverse reactions get reported. This means that about 5000 infants are dying annually from the hepatitis B vaccine. The CDC's Chief of Epidemiology admits that the frequency of serious reactions to hepatitis B vaccine is 10 times higher than other vaccines. Hepatitis B is transmitted sexually and by contaminated blood, so the incidence of this disease must be near zero in this age bracket. A vaccine expert, Dr. Philip Incao, states that "the conclusion is obvious that the risks[18] of hepatitis B vaccination far outweigh the benefits. Once a vaccine is mandated the vaccine manufacturer is no longer liable for adverse reactions.
Dr. W.B. Clarke's important observation that cancer was not found in unvaccinated individuals demands an explanation and one now appears forthcoming. All vaccines given over a short period of time to an immature immune system deplete the thymus gland (the primary gland involved in immune reactions) of irreplaceable immature immune cells. Each of these cells could have multiplied and developed into an army of valuable cells to combat infection and growth of abnormal cells. When these immune cells have been used up, permanent immunity may not appear. The Arthur Research Foundation in Tucson, Arizona estimates that up to 60 % of our immune system may be exhausted[19] by multiple mass vaccines (36 are now required for children). Only 10 % of immune cells are permanently lost when a child is permitted to develop natural immunity from disease. There needs to be grave concern about these immune system injuring vaccinations! Could the persons who approve these mass vaccinations know that they are impairing the health of these children, many of whom are being doomed to requiring much medical care in the future?
Compelling evidence is available that the development of the immune system after contracting the usual childhood diseases matures and renders it capable to fight infection and malignant cells in the future.
The use of multiple vaccines, which prevents natural immunity, promotes the development of allergies and asthma. A New Zealand study disclosed that 23 % of vaccinated children develop asthma , as compared to zero in unvaccinated children.
Cancer was a very rare illness in the 1890's. This evidence about immune system injury from vaccinating affords a plausible explanation for Dr. Clarke's finding that only vaccinated individuals got cancer. Some radical adverse change in health occurred in the early 1900s to permit cancer to explode and vaccinating appears to be the reason.
Vaccines are an unnatural phenomena. My guess is that if enough persons said no to immunizations there would be a striking improvement in general health with nature back in the immunizing business instead of man. Having a child vaccinated should be a choice not a requirement. Medical and religious exemptions are permitted by most states.
When governmental policies require vaccinations before children enter schools coercion has overruled the lack of evidence of vaccine efficacy and safety. There is no proof that vaccines work and they are never studied for safety before release. My opinion is that there is overwhelming evidence that vaccines are dangerous and the only reason for their existence is to increase profits of pharmaceutical firms.
If you are forced to immunize your children so they can enter school, obtain a notarized statement from the director of the facility that they will accept full financial responsibility for any adverse reaction from the vaccine. Since there is at least a 2 percent risk of a serious adverse reaction they may be smart enough to permit your child to escape a dangerous procedure. Recent legislation passed by Congress gives the government the power to imprison persons refusing to take vaccines (smallpox, anthrax, etc). This would be troublesome to enforce if large numbers of citizens declined to be vaccinated at the same time.
Footnotes:
1 Null Gary Vaccination: An Analysis of the Health Risks- Part Townsend Letter for Doctors & Patients Dec. 2003 pg 78 2 Mullins Eustace Murder by Injection pg 132 The National Council for Medical Research, P. O. Box 1105, Staunton, Virginia 24401 3 Gary Null Interview with Dr. Dean Black April 7, 1995 4 de Melker HE, et al Pertussis in the Netherlands: an outbreak despite high levels of immunization with whole-cell vaccine Emerging Infectious Diseases 1997; 3(2): 175-8 Centers for Disease Control 5 Gary Null Interview with Walene James, April 6, 1995 6 Torch WS Diptheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) immunizations: a potential cause of the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) Neurology 1982; 32-4 A169 abstract. 7 Collin Jonathan The Townsend Letter for Doctors & Patients 1988 abstracted in Horowitz L. Emerging Viruses Aids & Ebola pg 1-5 8 Harris RJ et al Contaminant viruses in two live vaccines produced in chick cells.J Hyg (London) 1966 Mar:64(1) : 1-7 9 Horowitz Leonard G. Emerging Viruses AIDS & Ebola pg 484 10 Vilchez RA et al Association between simian virus 40 and non- Hodgekin lymphoma Lancet 2002 Mar 9;359(9309):817-823 11 Bu X A study of simian virus 40 infection and its origin in human brain tumors Zhonghu Liu Xing Bing Xue Zhi 2000 Feb;21 (1):19-21 12 Friedrich F. et al temporal association between the isolation of Sabin-related poliovirus vaccine strains and the Guillan-Barre syndrome Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 1996 Jan-Feb; 38(1):55-8 13 Horowitz Leonard Emerging Viruses: Aids and Ebola pg 492 14 Horowitz Leonard G Emerging Viruses: Aids & Ebola pg 378-88 Tetrahedron Inc. Suite 147, 206 North 4th Ave. Sandpoint, Idaho 83864 1-888-508-4787 te...@tetrahedron.org 15 Null, Gary Vaccination: An Anatysis of the health risks-Part 3 Townsend letter for doctors & patients Dec. 2003 pg 78 16 Classen, JB et al. Association between type 1 diabetes and Hib vaccine BMJ 1999; 319:1133 17 Brain 9/01 18 Incao, philip M.D. Letter to representative Dale Van Vyven, Ohio House of Representatives March 1, 1999 provided to www.garynull.com by The Natural Immunity Information Network 19 Rowen Robert Your first consultation with Dr. Rowen pg 20
© 2003 Dr. James Howenstine - All Rights Reserved
Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts
Dr. James A. Howenstine is a board certified specialist in internal medicine who spent 34 years caring for office and hospital patients. Curiosity sparked a 4 year study of natural health products when 5 of his patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis were able to discontinue the use of methotrexate (chemotherapy agent) after trying an extract of New Zealand mussels for the therapy of severe rheumatoid arthritis.
Dr. Howenstine is convinced that natural products are safer, more effective and less expensive than pharmaceutical drugs. This research led to the publication of his book 'A Physicians Guide To Natural Health Products That Work'. This book and the recommended health products are available from www.naturalhealthteam.com and by calling 1-800-416-2806 U.S.A.
Dr Howenstine can be reached by E-Mail at jim...@racsa.co.cr
"Dr. W. Torch was able to document 12 deaths in infants which appeared within 3½ and 19 hours of a DPT immunization. He later reported 11 new cases of SIDS death and one near miss which had occurred within 24 hours of a DPT injection."
|
|
|