Anti-alternative "Quackbusters" Have Giant Court Losses on Two Continents ~ Holland, Pennsylvania & California Courts Rule Against Them

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Ilena Rose - 08 Jan 2008 15:22 GMT

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/284400/antialternative_quackbusters_hav
e_giant.html?post=true&
By Ilena Rosenthal

Reply to this Message

Jan Drew - 09 Jan 2008 01:04 GMT

> http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/284400/antialternative_quackbusters_hav
e_giant.html?post=true&
> By Ilena Rosenthal

My, my the silence is deafening.

Great work, IIena. Keeps exposing the real quacks.

Reply to this Message

Peter Bowditch - 09 Jan 2008 02:20 GMT

>> http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/284400/antialternative_quackbusters_hav
e_giant.html?post=true&
>> By Ilena Rosenthal
>
>My, my the silence is deafening.

What is there to say? We have been subjected to Ilena shrieking about
these things for years (at least it seems like years).

>Great work, IIena. Keeps exposing the real quacks.

Are you telling her not to wear makeup? Oh, sorry, I thought you told
her to keep exposing the cracks.

(Notice how polite I was, and only alluded to facial cracks?)

Signature

Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

Reply to this Message

Citizen Jimserac - 09 Jan 2008 14:53 GMT

> >>http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/284400/antialternative_quack...
> >> By Ilena Rosenthal
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Are you telling her not to wear makeup? Oh, sorry, I thought you told

Actually, I think SHE was telling THEM not to "makeup" stuff.

Citizen Jimserac

Reply to this Message