Cancer and Mice

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

George Lagergren - 27 Jul 2003 22:09 GMT

Rich Andrews <n0-spam@yah0o.com> posted: 003 07-23-03 12:01
N0> PS. Pauling was a nut when it came to Vit. C. If his theory about
N0> VIt. C was correct, why did he die of cancer even though he took
N0> megadoses of Vit. C?

Maybe because of old age [94], his immune system was shot???
Maybe Pauling should be taken a good digestive enzyme product,
too??????

Because digestive enzymes "digest" away the material around
the cancer cell so the immune system can then destroy the
cancer cell????????

... End of message 23 Jul 03 11:59
___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30 [NR]

Reply to this Message

Anth - 27 Jul 2003 21:34 GMT

In the blood or in the gut?
I'm currently having discussions with some guy who cited that enzymes pass
through the gut wall intact.
I'm not sure I'm convinced they do.
Anth

> Rich Andrews <n0-spam@yah0o.com> posted: 003 07-23-03 12:01
> N0> PS. Pauling was a nut when it came to Vit. C. If his theory about
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> ... End of message 23 Jul 03 11:59
> ___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30 [NR]

Reply to this Message

D. C. Sessions - 27 Jul 2003 22:03 GMT

> In the blood or in the gut?
> I'm currently having discussions with some guy who cited that enzymes pass
> through the gut wall intact.
> I'm not sure I'm convinced they do.

Better hope not, because the gut is full of proteolytic enzymes.

| Microsoft: "A reputation for releasing inferior software will make |
| it more difficult for a software vendor to induce customers to pay |
| for new products or new versions of existing products." |

end

Reply to this Message

Anth - 28 Jul 2003 00:46 GMT

http://www.doctormurray.com/articles/pdfs/ProteolyticsInCancer.pdf
Interesting PDF - wish the guy would cite studies and proofs.
Anth

> > In the blood or in the gut?
> > I'm currently having discussions with some guy who cited that enzymes pass
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> | for new products or new versions of existing products." |
> end

Reply to this Message

Anth - 01 Aug 2003 00:34 GMT

Hi,

I believe the article was referenced. It is well accepted that
proteolytic enzymes are absorbed intact. Here are a few references to
get you started.

Sincerely,

Leipner J, Saller R: Systemic enzyme therapy in oncology: effect and
mode of action. Drugs. 2000;59:769-80.

Ambrus JL, et al.: Absorption of exogenous and endogenous proteolytic
enzymes. Clin Pharmacol Therap 1967;8:362-8.

Kleine MW, et al.: The intestinal absorption of orally administered
hydrolytic enzymes and their effects in the treatment of acute herpes
zoster as compared with those of oral acyclovir therapy. Phytomedicine
1995;2:7-15.

Majima Y, et al.: The effect of an orally administered proteolytic
enzyme on the elasticity and viscosity of nasal mucus. Arch
Otorhinolaryngol. 1988;244(6):355-9.

Castell JV, et al. Intestinal absorption of undegraded proteins in men:
presence of bromelain in plasma after oral intake. Am J Physiol. 1997
Jul;273(1 Pt 1):G139-46.

-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 3:06 PM
To:
Subject: Question for Dr.
On your site state that proteolytic enzymes are absorbed through the gut
wall and into the bloodstream.
Do you have any research papers/links that back your assertions up?
Thanks
Anthony

Reply to this Message