 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Alternative / September 2007Mark Probert - What location is best for you?
Mark (or whomever you are): What location is the best, for you, for service of those legal papers? Claims Investigations Agency 5 Oakwood Avenue Merrick, NY 11566-3421 Phone: (516) 867-3200 Or Claims Investigations Agency 633 N. Krome Avenue, Homestead, FL 33030 - (305) 244-9680 Or the The Merrick, NY condo? I'm not in a hurry, since it didn't take as long as I thought it would to find you. So, whatever's convenient for you. You can respond personally, if you like, to jurimed2 at yahoo.com. Satisfied in California... Tim Bolen <snip> >You can respond >personally, if you like, to jurimed2 at yahoo.com. You don't have to worry about hiding your email address from spammers, Tim (even though you like to hide your home and work addresses from creditors and bailiffs). As you can see from the top of this reply, it gets included in full whenever anyone responds to your emetus.  SignaturePeter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com > jurim...@yahoo.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > Australian Skepticshttp://www.skeptics.com.au > To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com peter: I realize that you have limited knowledge of how the internet works (less, perhaps, than your knowlwdge of how the law, or healthcare, works), but surely even you can see that email addresses on google (usenet) get scrambled. So, if one wants to communicate off list it is a good idea to indicate an email address without the usual symbols. By the way, we will get around to you. You WILL get the attention you crave - for we figured out how to name you as a Defendant in the US Court system, and force your reponse. Maybe you can get James Randi to raise some money for you? (laugh here) Of course, I, personally, would prefer it if you DID NOT respond to a US Court summons in a timely manner, and we could take you to Default quickly. THAT would be fun... And, would continue to be fun for a very long process - like the one dirtbag Polevoy is beginning to learn to enjoy (well, perhaps"enjoy" is not the right word)... Amused in California... Tim Bolen On Sep 25, 8:59 am, jurim...@yahoo.com wrote: > > jurim...@yahoo.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Really starting to see a pattern here. As if not paying Federal Income Tax (winky, winky) since 1994 wasn't enough (http://www.ilena-rosenthal.com/bolen.jpg).....getting the Jurimed business license suspended in 2003 (for non-payment of State taxes???), and then just starting up again under a different business name. Slick, hip and cool, huh? Ilena's character and integrity mentor. Live a life of special 'free ride' entitlement....while normal, everyday working Americans pay their way. Amazing! I think I'm beginning to understand why Ilena was so paranoid in thinking that people desired to 'off her' or 'take her out'. Absolutely amazing.....the low life, irresponsible evil that exists in Alternative Medicine mouth pieces. Or is it only Hulda Clark behind it? >> jurim...@yahoo.com wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >> gets included in full whenever anyone responds to your emetus. >> -- >peter: > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >(usenet) get scrambled. So, if one wants to communicate off list it >is a good idea to indicate an email address without the usual symbols. Well, here's the thing, Tim - I don't use Google to read Usenet and the spammers don't use Google to collect email addresses. If I wanted to communicate with you offlist I would simple have to tell Agent that I wanted to reply to the poster by email. Alternatively, I could just click on the link. The same would apply if I was using Thunderbird, Outlook Express or any one of a countless number of other programs. I apologise if presenting you with a fact spoils your day. >By the way, we will get around to you. You WILL get the attention you >crave - for we figured out how to name you as a Defendant in the US >Court system, and force your reponse. You named me as a defendant once before, remember? Therefore you must have figured this out some time ago. Is your memory failing? Here's a reminder: http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/comment/clark05.htm And here's the running away: http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/comment/clark07.htm Note that this is YOU running away, not me. > Maybe you can get James Randi >to raise some money for you? (laugh here) > >Of course, I, personally, would prefer it if you DID NOT respond to a >US Court summons in a timely manner, and we could take you to Default >quickly. Default? Default? You would have to get a judgment for there to be a default, and there would have to be court proceedings to get a judgment. Try not to get too far ahead of the real world. Premature ejaculation is bad enough when done in private, but you want to do it in public. > THAT would be fun... And, would continue to be fun for a >very long process What would be fun would be the amount of ridicule that you would attract to yourself. > - like the one dirtbag Ooooh! Defamation!! Did it ever occur to you that defaming someone is not very useful if you are chasing them in court. You should ask a lawyer about this, but probably not Carlos Negrete Esq (lawyer to thieves and charlatans) who famously called me a "bottom feeding parasite" while simultaneously pretending to sue me. (In true quackery supporter fashion, he was accusing someone else of being me at the time.) > Polevoy is beginning to learn >to enjoy (well, perhaps"enjoy" is not the right word)... [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >Tim Bolen > SignaturePeter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com >Ooooh! Defamation!! Sure glad Pete never defames....................................... >>Ooooh! Defamation!! > >Sure glad Pete never defames....................................... Produce evidence that I have ever defamed anyone, Jan. And I notice that you snipped the context, which was Tim Bolen defaming someone while claiming the moral high ground. SignaturePeter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com >>>Ooooh! Defamation!! >> >>Sure glad Pete never defames....................................... > > Produce evidence that I have ever defamed anyone, Jan. How many thousand would you like? Groups View all web results » Results 1 - 79 of 79 for "idiot" author:myfirstname@ratbags.com Groups View all web results » Results 1 - 100 of 134 for "Hulda Clark" author:myfirstname@ratbags.com Groups View all web results » Results 1 - 8 of 8 for myfirstname@ratbags. com rusty rebar >>>>Ooooh! Defamation!! >>> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >Groups View all web results » Results 1 - 79 of 79 for "idiot" >author:myfirstname@ratbags.com Context, please. >Groups View all web results » Results 1 - 100 of 134 for "Hulda Clark" >author:myfirstname@ratbags.com I accept that calling someone Hulda Clark could be seen as offensive, because nobody would like to be associated with that disgusting crook, but please supply the names of the people I have defamed by calling them Hulda Clark. Unlike quackery lovers I have no need to call people by names other than their own. >Groups View all web results » Results 1 - 8 of 8 for >myfirstname@ratbags. com rusty rebar Advice to someone to embed rusty rebar in their orifices is not defamation. SignaturePeter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com > "JanDrew" <jdrew1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Context, please. Groups View all web results ? Results 1 - 79 of 79 for "idiot" > >author:myfirstn...@ratbags.com > >Groups View all web results Results 1 - 100 of 134 for "Hulda Clark" > >author:myfirstn...@ratbags.com [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > them Hulda Clark. Unlike quackery lovers I have no need to call people > by names other than their own. Oooooooooooooooh Defamation! > >Groups View all web results Results 1 - 8 of 8 for > >myfirstname@ratbags. com rusty rebar > > Advice to someone to embed rusty rebar in their orifices is not > defamation. In your world abd your *gang hypocrite members*. > -- > Peter Bowditch Defamation, lies and spam deleted. >>>Ooooh! Defamation!! >> >>Sure glad Pete never defames....................................... > > Produce evidence that I have ever defamed anyone, Jan. Groups View all web results » Results 1 - 79 of 79 for "idiot" author:myfirstname@ratbags.com Groups View all web results » Results 1 - 100 of 134 for "Hulda Clark" author:myfirstname@ratbags.com Groups View all web results » Results 1 - 8 of 8 for myfirstname@ratbags. com rusty rebar > And I notice that you snipped the context, which was Tim Bolen > defaming someone while claiming the moral high ground. You first have to have morals to know what they are. Tons of defaming snipped wrote: >> wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Groups View all web results » Results 1 - 8 of 8 for > myfirstname@ratbags. com rusty rebar If merely calling people names is defamation, then Bolen's post, and Ilena's repeating it, is defamatory. But wait! The court said it was not. Then it cannot be defamation. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.