I will have to make a new webpage to respond to all the intentional
disinformation Coleah Penley Ayers posts about this classic SLAPP suit
of Industry Vs Activist, tirelessly working to change the facts to
nonsense on Barrett's losing cases.
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/BarrettVsRosenthal.htm
Being updated with New Ruling ...
It is a bit frustating, since David Gorski & Bowditch & Paul Lee &
Susan Chronnie Ummm Mom & the total coward who calls himself
QuackGuru and others from Barrett's team refuse to allow the verified
facts regarding this case and others Barrett keeps losing.
As recently as this morning, after a ruling yesterday requiring that
the losing defendants respond to interrogatives, followed by a stern
judicial warning because they have not complied with earlier rulings.
Plaintiffs are Stephen Barrett, Christopher Grell and Terry Polevoy,
aka "Vera Teasdale" etc. etc. Penley Ayers posted this lie:
"They do not have to post a bond."
Here's another lie she posted, when she found a sexual toy online and
fantasized that I was receiving payments for all puchases of the
"vibrating vagina" she posted about. How much is such an embarassing
lie worth????
www.BreastImplantAwareness.org/coleah-lies.htm
There are many facts about this case that Barrett uses huge mouths
like Penley Ayers and Disinformation Myrl Jeffcoat to cover up with
their garbage.
For example ... for years Barrett has misused the legal system to
attempt to silence activists and critics such as Darlene Sherrell,
myself, Dr. Tedd Koren, Dr. Mercola, to name just a few.
As NCAHF they have a unpaid judgement for a case they lost to a
botanicals company ... after this loss NCAHF was suspended by the
State of California, while NCAHF, to use their own self descriptive
terms, continued to beg for donations while having no legal state
entity. During this time, Penley Ayers and Jeffcoat regularly promoted
Barrett & NCAHF/Quackwatch (virtually indistinguishable).
Ruling from yesterday ... it appears the judges are getting exhausted
with all the non compliance from Barrett & Grelll & Polevoy.
"Plaintiffs are advised that failure to
comply with this court order and/or further discovery misuse may
result in the imposition of future sanctions."
http://apps.alameda.courts.ca.gov/fortecgi/fortecgi.exe?CaseNbr=C-833021&submitB
tn=Submit&ServiceName=DomainWebService&TemplateName=html%2Fcomplitcase.html&Curr
BatchNbr=1
Coleah Penley AyersSpeak:
"They do not have to post a bond."
The Judge have ruled that Barrett & Polevoy indeed were required to
post a bond in excess of $433,000and they have refused to do.
http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/order.pdf
The tentative ruling is affirmed as follows: The Motion of Defendant
and Judgment Creditor llena Rosenthal ("Defendant") for Order
Requiring Plaintiffs to File an Undertaking to Secure an Award of
Costs and Attorneys' Fees Which May Be Awarded is GRANTED IN PART.
As to Plaintiffs Terry Polevoy, M.D. and Stephen J. Barrett, M.D., the
motion is granted. Plaintiffs do not dispute that they reside out of
state. (See Code Civ.Proc., § 1030(b).) There is a "reasonable
possibility" that Defendant will obtain judgment for attorney's fees
and costs expended since October 5, 2001 in connection with
Defendant's special motion to strike under Code of Civil Procedure
section 425.16. (Id.)
The amount of the undertaking is $264,311.68 ($263,211.68 + $1,100) as
to PlaintiffPolevoy, and $169,404.25 ($168,304.25 + $1,100) as to
Plaintiffs Polevoy and Barrett. Defendant relies on Code of Civil
Procedure section 917.1 for the proposition that the undertaking shall
be increased, but that statute applies only to undertakings filed in
connection with appeals.
Coleah - 30 Aug 2007 22:17 GMT
http://www.ilena-rosenthal.com