From this week's update to The Millenium Project
http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/
Fifteen good ones (28/7/2007)
The British Medical Journal was first published in 1840. Recently, the
magazine conducted a reader poll to find the fifteen most important
advances, discoveries or breakthroughs in medicine since then. I don't
know if it's happening anywhere else, but the medical school at the
University of Sydney is holding series of public lectures based on the
list. You can see the timetable here
(http://dev.health.usyd.edu.au/news/events/bmjlectures/), and I would
encourage anyone who can attend to do so. If you aren't in Sydney you
could contact the BMJ to see if there is something similar in your
area. Here is the list:
Anaesthesia
Antibiotics
Chlorpromazine
Computers
Discovery of DNA structure
Evidence Based Medicine
Germ Theory
Imaging
Immunology
Oral Rehydration Therapy
The Pill
Risks of Smoking
Sanitation
Tissue Culture
Vaccines
Alternative medicine supporters will be especially horrified at the
list, because not only does it contradict much of quackery by
including germ theory and antibiotics, admit to the reality of mental
illness by including the first anti-psychotic drug, highlight the
value of evidence and recognise the value of vaccines, but one of
altmed's most demonised villains (Louis Pasteur) was associated with
two of the things in the list.
I therefore invite representative of alternative medicine to provide
their own list of the fifteen greatest discoveries in Supplementary,
Complementary and Alternative Medicine (or SCAM, for short). Here are
my suggestions, in no particular order:
The freedom to "cure" cancer in Tijuana, out of the reach of US health
authorities.
EDTA chelation, as a method of extracting money from the parents of
autistic children.
Expert witness fees.
The opportunity to be paid to find what you want to find when doing
research. (cf Dr Andrew Wakefield)
The power of the word "natural" to imply "safe" and "healthy".
The axiom of organic chemistry that the dangers of an "ethyl-"
compound can be assumed to be the same as for a "methyl-" compound,
because the names rhyme. (cf Dr Boyd Haley)
The profitability of selling water and calling it "homeopathic
remedy".
The power of religion to deflect criticism, engender fear and provide
credibility.
The gullibility of the general public, coming from ignorance of
science.
The variability of conditions like MS, where natural fluctuations in
symptoms and regression to the mean can look like "cures".
The use of trade practices and intellectual property laws to stifle
criticism.
The fact that the causes of SIDS and autism are as yet unknown,
allowing vaccines to be blamed.
The public's fear of being labelled as mentally ill, thus providing a
fertile field for the treatment of psychosomatic illnesses such as
Multiple Chemical Sensitivity.
The public's fear of mental illness itself, allowing its existence to
be denied and its signs to be blamed on inadequate nutrition, poor
parenting or some other external cause.
The reluctance of politicians, health bureaucrats, insurance
executives and doctors to stand up and loudly declare "That's
bullshit!".

Signature
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
Mark Thorson - 29 Jul 2007 23:05 GMT
> I therefore invite representative of alternative medicine to provide
> their own list of the fifteen greatest discoveries in Supplementary,
> Complementary and Alternative Medicine (or SCAM, for short). Here are
> my suggestions, in no particular order:
What? No colon cleansing? No e-meter auditing?
No biomagnets? No detoxifying foot baths?
No aura reading? No blood-type diet?
No removal of amalgam fillings? No touch
therapy? No vitamin megadoses?
Dr. Dre - 30 Jul 2007 05:30 GMT
> What? No colon cleansing? No e-meter auditing?
> No biomagnets? No detoxifying foot baths?
> No aura reading? No blood-type diet?
> No removal of amalgam fillings? No touch
> therapy? No vitamin megadoses?
Have the therapies you mock not all been targets of the bizarre Stephen
Barrett, M.D., and his Quackwatch collaborators? Has the Dutch version
of Quackwatch not recently been recognized by the Netherlands Appeals Court
as attempting to shut down emerging science? Has the bizarre Stephen
Barrett, M.D., not suffered multiple legal defeats recently? So is it
really any surprise that a reader poll of the British Medical Journal
would overlook the therapies you mention? Are you really so daft?

Signature
http://www.domain357.info/DrDre.html
David Wright - 31 Jul 2007 05:13 GMT
>> What? No colon cleansing? No e-meter auditing?
>> No biomagnets? No detoxifying foot baths?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Have the therapies you mock not all been targets of the bizarre Stephen
>Barrett, M.D., and his Quackwatch collaborators?
They may have been. That doesn't automatically turn them into valid
concepts.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"Only George Bush could start a war for oil and not get any."
-- Bill Maher
Dr. Dre - 31 Jul 2007 06:33 GMT
>>> What? No colon cleansing? No e-meter auditing?
>>> No biomagnets? No detoxifying foot baths?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> "Only George Bush could start a war for oil and not get any."
> -- Bill Maher
'k

Signature
http://www.domain357.info/DrDre.html
Peter Bowditch - 30 Jul 2007 06:58 GMT
>> I therefore invite representative of alternative medicine to provide
>> their own list of the fifteen greatest discoveries in Supplementary,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>No removal of amalgam fillings? No touch
>therapy? No vitamin megadoses?
I stopped at fifteen, and I concentrated on the ones which could be
seen as general discoveries leading the way to specific
implementations. This is similar to the BMJ list. Most of the above
can be derived from the discovery of gullibility as a customer trait.

Signature
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
Dr. Dre - 30 Jul 2007 05:49 GMT
> From this week's update to The Millenium Project
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> by including the first anti-psychotic drug, highlight the value of
> evidence....
How does your mind derail from "including the first anti-psychotic drug" to
"admit to the reality of mental illness"?
Would you likewise infer that antibiotics effective against H. Pylori
imply "the reality of mental illness", in light of the medical-racket's
brilliant (not) history of expressing the Delusion that
peptic-ulcer-disease is due to "stress" / "worry"?
Here is a link about anti-psychotic drugs:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=128375
20&dopt=Abstract
The exact mechanisms of action of some antipsychotics and mood stabilizers
have not been elucidated. What's known is that drugs used in the treatment
of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder inhibit the replication of
parasites.
The APA pervertedly advises M.D.'s failing to find an underlying medical
condition to project, psychotically, their failure onto patients (see my
sig-line for more information about the APA's perversions and the
medical-racket's psychoses).
Only a quack would infer "the reality of mental illness" from "the first
anti-psychotic drug"; and evidently, only a quack is what you are.

Signature
http://www.domain357.info/DrDre.html
David Wright - 31 Jul 2007 03:26 GMT
>Here is a link about anti-psychotic drugs:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder inhibit the replication of
>parasites.
Some of them, not all of them. Which you keep forgetting.
The etiology of schizophrenia is not known, but it does seem to have
a genetic component.
Actually, this part is kind of interesting. As a rule of thumb, if a
disease is seen in more than about 1% of the population, it becomes
less likely that it's genetic, or at least that it's entirely genetic.
However, schizophrenia, according to one recent study, affects less
than 1% of the population.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"Only George Bush could start a war for oil and not get any."
-- Bill Maher
Dr. Dre - 31 Jul 2007 06:43 GMT
>>Here is a link about anti-psychotic drugs:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> However, schizophrenia, according to one recent study, affects less
> than 1% of the population.
I find that hard to believe, considering that virtually the entire
medical-establishment exhibited Delusions lasting way more than 6 months
that peptic-ulcer-disease was due to "stress" / "worry".
Not to mention the medical-establishment's Psychotic implementation of the
APA's perverted guidelines.

Signature
http://www.domain357.info/DrDre.html
Dr. Dre - 30 Jul 2007 08:58 GMT
> From this week's update to The Millenium Project
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Chlorpromazine
> Computers
oh so the medical establishment believes it invented computers now does
it...
> Discovery of DNA structure
> Evidence Based Medicine
more like Delusional-based medicine:
The U.S. Health Department admits that peptic-ulcers are caused by an
infectious-disease (H. Pylori). However, prior to 1994, the U.S. Health
Department expressed Delusions that peptic-ulcers were caused by 'stress'
/ 'worry'. The Health Department's misinformation campaign had been so
effective, that in 1995, “nearly 90 percent of those with ulcers [still]
blame[d] their ulcers on stress or worry....”
http://www.cdc.gov/ulcer/history.htm
If the medical-establishment was practicing evidence-based science, and if
their motivation was skepticism, then how in the first place did they ever
get the Delusional idea that peptic-ulcers were due to 'stress' or
'worry', rather than infectious disease? How in the first place did that
false theory ever earn its way into the establishment's acceptance?
----
From http://www.nytimes.com/library/national/061597chem-weapons.html:
The Pentagon and... the Presidential Advisory Committee on Gulf War
Veterans' Illnesses, had both concluded that Iraqi chemical and biological
weapons were probably not responsible for the veterans' health
problems.... Both the Pentagon and the White House panel suggested that
the physical aftereffects of wartime stress were a more likely cause of
the ailments.
A new government report has harshly criticized the Pentagon and a special
White House panel over their investigation of the illnesses reported by
veterans of the 1991 Persian Gulf war and has found that there is
“substantial evidence” linking nerve gas and other chemical weapons to the
sorts of health problems seen among the veterans.
It also criticized the Pentagon for trying to discount another potential
risk, a tropical disease spread by parasites that produces symptoms that
might not surface for years, and questioned whether pesticides had
contributed to the health problems.
The U.S. medical-establishment, encouraged by the American Psychiatric
Association, tends to misdiagnose organic-illnesses as mental. The medical
establishment behaves as if it believes it's omniscient, exhibiting
Grandiose Delusions (a sign of serious mental illness).
> Germ Theory
> Imaging
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
> The reluctance of politicians, health bureaucrats, insurance executives
> and doctors to stand up and loudly declare "That's bullshit!".

Signature
http://www.domain357.info/DrDre.html
David Wright - 31 Jul 2007 03:30 GMT
>> From this week's update to The Millenium Project
>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>oh so the medical establishment believes it invented computers now does
>it...
Let me help you through your reading difficulties, here, Dre: they
aren't claiming to have invented computers, they are saying that
computers are one of the great assets they now are able to use. Tons
of computers exist inside medical equipment.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"Only George Bush could start a war for oil and not get any."
-- Bill Maher
priorityman@gmail.com - 30 Jul 2007 13:27 GMT
> From this week's update to The Millenium Project
>
[quoted text clipped - 94 lines]
> Australian Skepticshttp://www.skeptics.com.au
> To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
Wait. A medical journal that publishes articles about conventional
medicine came up with a list of important medical advances and they
were all conventional medical drugs or procedures. Wow. That proves
so much.
There are many alternative practitioners and clients who believe in
the germ theory. Many in fact predicted the problems seen today by
the overuse of antibiotics (in individuals and on societal levels) and
manage to get well without the use of antibiotics in many situations
where conventional doctors would prescribe them. Would many AM
believers use antibiotics in some circumstances? Sure. But knee-jerk
authoritarian types like you think that deviations from what you
consider normal is false and must be defended.
I wish you had the guts to admit what you are afraid of, rather than
thinking belligerence makes you more right or somehow means you've
dealt with your fear.
Peter Bowditch - 30 Jul 2007 22:40 GMT
>> From this week's update to The Millenium Project
>>
[quoted text clipped - 112 lines]
>thinking belligerence makes you more right or somehow means you've
>dealt with your fear.
So, where's your list? I'm waiting.

Signature
Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com