Medical Forum / General / Alternative / May 2007
Any relief for migraines?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
ellie.blunt - 21 May 2007 15:43 GMT Do any of you have any suggestions for alleviating migraines?
Ellie http://www.transparenthypnotist.blogspot.com
The One True Zhen Jue - 21 May 2007 19:57 GMT > Do any of you have any suggestions for alleviating migraines? > > Elliehttp://www.transparenthypnotist.blogspot.com Yes, Acupuncture & Chinese Herbs.
ellie.blunt - 22 May 2007 17:34 GMT On May 21, 2:57 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Do any of you have any suggestions for alleviating migraines? > > > Elliehttp://www.transparenthypnotist.blogspot.com > > Yes, Acupuncture & Chinese Herbs. thanks! knowing little about Chinese herbs, where would one start? Also, I've heard great things about Acupuncture, but have yet to try it. I've recently heard about Acupuncture using low electrical voltage. Any thoughts on this?
Ellie http://www.transparenthypnotist.blogspot.com
ellie.blunt - 22 May 2007 18:47 GMT On May 21, 2:57 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Do any of you have any suggestions for alleviating migraines? > > > Elliehttp://www.transparenthypnotist.blogspot.com > > Yes, Acupuncture & Chinese Herbs. Thanks. Not knowing much about Chinese Herbs, where would one start?
Nero - 22 May 2007 19:08 GMT On May 21, 11:57 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Do any of you have any suggestions for alleviating migraines? > > > Elliehttp://www.transparenthypnotist.blogspot.com > > Yes, Acupuncture & Chinese Herbs. Acupuncture does not work; it is based on the manipulation of a substance called "chi" that does not exist.
David - 22 May 2007 20:14 GMT > On May 21, 11:57 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > effective? > Please respond soon, thank you. Nero - 23 May 2007 06:19 GMT > Nero, please tell us about your experiences with Acupuncture. > Also please tell us about your extensive research on this. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > effective? > Please respond soon, thank you. Hi David. No one has experience with acupuncture, because there's no such thing. "Acupuncture" is defined as manipulation of "chi" for well- being. But since "chi" does not exist (it's not even well defined), it cannot be manipulated. Therefore, acupuncture cannot take place. Stimulation by needles, however, might have some effects on the nervous system, but that's a far cry from the amazing claims made by "acupuncturists." Hope I answered your question!
David - 23 May 2007 12:54 GMT >> Nero, please tell us about your experiences with Acupuncture. >> Also please tell us about your extensive research on this. [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > to the world like you have. > Oh! your screen name speaks for you............................. JohnDoe - 23 May 2007 13:44 GMT >>>Nero, please tell us about your experiences with Acupuncture. >>>Also please tell us about your extensive research on this. [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] >to the world like you have. >Oh! your screen name speaks for you............................. Tell us again david: 1) Is jumping of a cliff a good or a bad idea? 2) What is your experience with jumping of cliffs? (note: only *personal* experience counts) 3) What research have you done concerning jumping of cliffs? 4) Why haven't you still figured out how to properly quote a post? 5) And do tell us again why you drink your own urine? Please.
And I wonder what sickness drives you? No, actually, I don't. I know. But I still wonder *why* you hate people so much that you want all of them to use totally worthless alternative crap in stead of things that actually work.
David - 23 May 2007 15:29 GMT >>>>Nero, please tell us about your experiences with Acupuncture. >>>>Also please tell us about your extensive research on this. [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > later. > Thank you. Nero - 23 May 2007 17:53 GMT > Oh yes, you have answered very clearly. > You have NO experience, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > to the world like you have. > Oh! your screen name speaks for you............................. Strong words! But do try and figure out the quoting thing! Do you have a different definition of acupuncture than mine? If not, what then is "chi?" Thanks!
Nero - 23 May 2007 17:53 GMT > Oh yes, you have answered very clearly. > You have NO experience, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > to the world like you have. > Oh! your screen name speaks for you............................. Strong words! But do try and figure out the quoting thing! Do you have a different definition of acupuncture than mine? If not, what then is "chi?" Thanks!
Nero - 23 May 2007 17:59 GMT > Oh yes, you have answered very clearly. > You have NO experience, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > to the world like you have. > Oh! your screen name speaks for you............................. Strong words! But do try and figure out the quoting thing! Do you have a different definition of acupuncture than mine? If not, what then is "chi?" Thanks!
Nero - 23 May 2007 18:02 GMT > Oh yes, you have answered very clearly. > You have NO experience, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > to the world like you have. > Oh! your screen name speaks for you............................. Strong words! But do try and figure out the quoting thing! Do you have a different definition of acupuncture than mine? If not, what then is "chi?" Thanks!
Nero - 23 May 2007 19:33 GMT Sorry Sorry Sorry! Google Groups is wigging out.
Nero - 23 May 2007 19:47 GMT > Oh yes, you have answered very clearly. > You have NO experience, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > to the world like you have. > Oh! your screen name speaks for you............................. Strong words! But do try and figure out the quoting thing! Do you have a different definition of acupuncture than mine? If not, what then is "chi?" Thanks!
The One True Zhen Jue - 23 May 2007 17:46 GMT > > Nero, please tell us about your experiences with Acupuncture. > > Also please tell us about your extensive research on this. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > that's a far cry from the amazing claims made by "acupuncturists." > Hope I answered your question! Hi, Nero. Nothing any skeptic has said has had a greater chilling affect on Acupuncture than advocacy by David "Med(s)Tools" DeHart and his ilk. Sure, if I didn't know any better, I too would assume by association that it must be crap.
Qi is an abstraction. Don't let linguistics and semantics blind you to the results.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theories_regarding_acupuncture
Nero - 23 May 2007 22:08 GMT On May 23, 9:46 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Qi is an abstraction. Don't let linguistics and semantics blind you > to the results. Money is an abstraction. It's also well-defined, useful and real.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theories_regarding_acupuncture You do realize that anyone can put whatever they want in Wikipedia?
The One True Zhen Jue - 24 May 2007 00:01 GMT > On May 23, 9:46 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Money is an abstraction. It's also well-defined, useful and real. There was a time & place where clams were used as money. Have clams undergone a fundamental change that makes them not money? What about Conferedate money? Was it money that lost its money-ness when the south collapsed?
Has someone isolated "money" or monetary properties in gold? Is it the same physiological properties we find in other expensive commodities like caviar, cocaine, cadillacs, and champagne? Is there a physical property in currency that renders it acceptable or is it accepted on convention?
Qi is a very useful abstraction and it may well predate money!
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theories_regarding_acupuncture > > You do realize that anyone can put whatever they want in Wikipedia? Yes. I also realize that the article has a pretty good bibilography. Did you read anything at the link or did you dismiss it prejudicially? Acupuncture has many physiological effects and not just at the points themselves. Herbs have chemical properties which have clear effects.
Nero - 24 May 2007 17:09 GMT Thank you for your arguments in support of my statement that money is an abstraction.
On May 23, 4:01 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Qi is a very useful abstraction and it may well predate money! Next time you owe a Chinese doctor money, maybe you can pay him with chi!
> > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theories_regarding_acupuncture Science does not accept the existence of chi or meridiens.
The One True Zhen Jue - 24 May 2007 18:56 GMT > Thank you for your arguments in support of my statement that > money is an abstraction. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Science does not accept the existence of chi or meridiens. Science doesn't accept the existence of money, either and I'll bet you'll work for that abstraction (money). Like Qi, money is constantly being moved. It is transformed into commodities. It is tranformed into labor. It is transformed into Insurance. Money is a component in almost everything we have and yet it is an abstraction. Do you think money is unimportant, irrelevant, or part of a mass delusion?
Science doesn't accept the existence of the lines of longitude & latitude. For some reason, those non-existent lines to a good job. GPS wouldn't exist without those non-existent lines. Are you alleging a GPS can't work because the lines of longitude & latitude don't exist independently?
I'm sure you'll agree, GPS navigation works. Perhaps you should READ the link I posted. You'll learn something even if you don't accept the notion of acupuncture being useful.
All you need is to experience the effects of a treatment to know that it works.
Nero - 24 May 2007 19:33 GMT On May 24, 10:56 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Science doesn't accept the existence of money, ... That's a bizarre statement. Of course science accepts the existence of money.
> Do you think money is unimportant, irrelevant, > or part of a mass delusion? Why do you keep arguing? My exact words: "[Money is] also well-defined, useful and real."
> Science doesn't accept the existence of the lines of longitude & > latitude. Another bizarre and untrue statement.
> All you need is to experience the effects of a treatment to know that > it works. Apparently you are not familiar with the problems of anecdotal evidence. Science is for people who don't want to fool themselves.
The One True Zhen Jue - 24 May 2007 21:06 GMT > On May 24, 10:56 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > That's a bizarre statement. Of course science accepts the existence > of money. It accepts that people attribute monetary value to various and sundry things. It doesn't accept that money exists independently from humans. Money is an abstraction, remember?
> > Do you think money is unimportant, irrelevant, > > or part of a mass delusion? > > Why do you keep arguing? My exact words: > "[Money is] also well-defined, useful and real." Sorry. You did say that. What I'm trying to say is that just because something is an abstraction doesn't mean that it can't be useful. Money is real to you and me because we believe in it.
> > Science doesn't accept the existence of the lines of longitude & > > latitude. > > Another bizarre and untrue statement. No, its 100% true. You don't for a minute suggest that our planet actually has lines on it as pictured on a map or globe. You won't suggest that the lines were discovered, either. They were arbitrarily chosen because they are a useful abstraction. Humans & Machines can use these non-existent lines to calculate a position. This information can be used to locate, rescue, or target and yet the lines do NOT exist! They are merely a convention. Alternate systems could be created which would yield the same results. The meridians are to the body like longitude & latitude are to the globe.
> > All you need is to experience the effects of a treatment to know that > > it works. > > Apparently you are not familiar with the problems of anecdotal > evidence. No, I'm not. I realize that it is very difficult to test acupuncture via blinding. Its hard to blind the patient and harder to blind the practitioner! I appreciate the value of testing and like double blinding, its just not possible with acupuncture.
I KNOW that not all my patients who experience relief do so because of the acupuncture. I can easily believe that some were getting better and happened upon me while they were getting better. When people consistently call quit their pain meds, quit the pain clinic, and go back to work, you have something going on. These aren't people whose neck hurts SOME. These are people with rods in their neck, wired jaws, plates in their skulls, and severe burns. When you have a better success rate with pain patients than the pain clinics, MD's send patients to you. Whatever it is I'm doing gets a lot of people off meds, back to work, out of their MD's office, and yes, out of my office, too.
Now, if you're actually interested in scientific studies of the effects of acupuncture, you'll check out the link I posted. It shows results of imaging done on people recieving acupuncture. The neurological,
> Science is for people who don't want to fool themselves. Agreed. It may surprise you, but I'm quite pro-science. I'm pro mainstream medicine and vaccines. I don't fear aspartame or amalgams. I was a member of the Peter Bowditch's rag-tag posse, for cryin' out loud!
Somethings can be more easily explained by experience than in writing. Sex is one example. Sure, you can study it, but until you've done it, you can't know how it feels to YOU. Acupuncture is somewhat like that. You can't be sure it will OR won't work for your pain (etc) unless you try it. Its a pretty simple, safe procedure and it isn't very expensive. It is far less scary than many mainstream procedures medical or dental!
Now, since you like science why not check out this science?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theories_regarding_acupuncture
Nero - 25 May 2007 06:50 GMT On May 24, 1:06 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Sorry. You did say that. What I'm trying to say is that just because > something is an abstraction doesn't mean that it can't be useful. Goddammit! I said MONEY IS A USEFUL ABSTRACTION.
The One True Zhen Jue - 25 May 2007 13:37 GMT > On May 24, 1:06 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Goddammit! I said MONEY IS A USEFUL ABSTRACTION. Now YOU aren't paying attention. My point is that Qi, like money, is a useful abstraction, and you do know that now. You've also backed away from your statement about lines of longitude & latitude being scientifically proven to exist.
You're making some progress, but you do have a way to go. I guess you're reading the link I cited...
Nero - 25 May 2007 17:08 GMT On May 25, 5:37 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Now YOU aren't paying attention. My point is that Qi, like money, is > a useful abstraction, and you do know that now. Money is useful. Chi is not. Money is defined. Chi is not. The existence of money is accepted by science. The existence of chi is not. There are no physical phenomena that are best understood using Chi as a metaphor. Chi is a useless abstraction that does not contribute to our understanding of the Universe.
> You've also backed away from your statement about lines of longitude & > latitude being scientifically proven to exist. They are just like money, and just unlike Chi. They are defined, they are useful, they are used in science and they _exist_. They actually physically exist in ink on a map. When someone refers to 40?43 N, 74?00 W, I know exactly what they mean.
> You're making some progress, but you do have a way to go. I guess > you're reading the link I cited... Remember that I said needle stimulation has an effect, possibly beneficial, on the nervous system. That's not the same as acupuncture.
The One True Zhen Jue - 25 May 2007 18:37 GMT > On May 25, 5:37 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Money is useful. Chi is not. Money is defined. Chi is not. > The existence of money is accepted by science. Show me the scientific experiments which prove money exists. I'm looking forward to seeing them!
>The > existence of chi is not. There are no physical phenomena > that are best understood using Chi as a metaphor. How about disease? Many of them are well understood in that context.
> Chi is a useless abstraction that does not contribute > to our understanding of the Universe. How does money does contribute to our knowledge of the universe?
> > You've also backed away from your statement about lines of longitude & > > latitude being scientifically proven to exist. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > They actually physically exist in ink on a map. When someone > refers to 40?43 N, 74?00 W, I know exactly what they mean. LMAO! I'm laughing at you, not with you! Sure, those ink lines on the map PROVE that the lines are really there! When someone refers to Lung 3 or St 36, millions of people know EXACTLY what they mean. Notice that the lines of longitude are called....MERIDIANS!
> > You're making some progress, but you do have a way to go. I guess > > you're reading the link I cited... > > Remember that I said needle stimulation has an effect, possibly > beneficial, on the nervous system. That's not the same as acupuncture. Oh, and what is the difference? Does your hang-up on the semantics of Qi create an artificical distinction between the two?
Please post the scientific experiments proving the existence of Money. I want to know what scientist was credited with the discovery.
Nero - 26 May 2007 00:48 GMT On May 25, 10:37 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> How about disease? Many of them are well understood in that context. What is the definition of chi?
> How does money does contribute to our knowledge of the universe? How much money I have tells me how much I can buy, or how many hours I worked last week. That's knowing something about the state of the Universe. I don't know why this is so hard to understand.
> LMAO! I'm laughing at you, not with you! Sure, those ink lines on the > map PROVE that the lines are really there! Longitude lines are lines on a map. No one ever said they were lines on the Earth. If you still don't get it, read slow. Think hard.
> Oh, and what is the difference? Does your hang-up on the semantics of > Qi create an artificical distinction between the two? What is the definition of chi?
The One True Zhen Jue - 26 May 2007 15:24 GMT > On May 25, 10:37 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > That's knowing something about the state of the Universe. I don't > know why this is so hard to understand. The state of the universe has nothing to do with economics. Find a single cosmologist to support your contention, if you can. It seems like YOU never took physics.
> > LMAO! I'm laughing at you, not with you! Sure, those ink lines on the > > map PROVE that the lines are really there! [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > What is the definition of chi? It seems you snip every point you lose and dodge every question put to you. When you supply the scientific proof of the existence of the lines of longitude and latitude you write "They actually physically exist in ink on a map."
That's pretty lame, even for you, Nero. You've talked yourself into a box and want to pretend that you didn't say those things. You know that your comments make you look like a scientific illiterate or an intellectually dishonest blowhard.
Simply cite the scientific proofs of the existence of longitude & latitudes and money. That's all it takes to prove your point. Go ahead, search the Internet, call you local university's physics department or a bank. Somewhere, there MUST be a banker, physicist, or accountant that can find that for you.
Do that, and I'll cheerfully give you a proper definition of Qi.
(Nero: Insert cop-out here. Say that money is self-evident. Say that Longitude & Latitude actually physically exist in ink on a Globe)
Nero - 27 May 2007 11:57 GMT On May 26, 7:24 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Simply cite the scientific proofs of the existence of longitude & > latitudes and money. That's all it takes to prove your point. > ... > Do that, and I'll cheerfully give you a proper definition of Qi. Gladly! What would you accept as proof that money exists?
The One True Zhen Jue - 27 May 2007 14:40 GMT > On May 26, 7:24 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Gladly! What would you accept as proof that money exists? As I have said, I want the name of the person who discovered money, the experiemental design, and the results. Please post a link to that.
Nero - 27 May 2007 21:45 GMT On May 27, 6:40 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> As I have said, I want the name of the person who discovered money, > the experiemental design, and the results. > Please post a link to that. That would be like accepting the name "Isaac Newton" as proof that gravity exists.
In any case, money was invented, not discovered. We forgive you for not knowing this, because you seem to have been born yesterday. Can I claim that safety pins exist without knowing the name of their inventor?
What is the definition of chi?
The One True Zhen Jue - 28 May 2007 00:14 GMT > On May 27, 6:40 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > claim > that safety pins exist without knowing the name of their inventor? Of course, you can & do say all sorts of wacky things. Say again that part about lines of latitude and longitude exist because they exist in ink on the map. Go on, say it!
Now, a clear-headed individual like myself would say Walter Hunt invented the safety pin.
http://inventors.about.com/library/inventors/blhunt_pin.htm
You see, Nero, according to your logic, Harry Potter & the Easter Bunny exist. They too exist as lines of ink on pages.
> What is the definition of chi? I'll be glad to post it when you either prove or retract your claim about longitude and latitude.
Nero - 28 May 2007 05:55 GMT On May 27, 4:14 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I'll be glad to post it when you either prove or retract your claim > about longitude and latitude. We might have different definitions of lines of longitude and latitude. I already gave mine explicitly, as lines on a map. If we had your definition as well, perhaps we could settle the issue and move on. Please define lines of longitude and latitude.
The One True Zhen Jue - 28 May 2007 12:55 GMT > On May 27, 4:14 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > could settle the issue and move on. Please define lines of > longitude and latitude. This is interesting. You make a claim that Qi doesn't exist and therefore acupuncture doesn't either. That is something unique to you. You have the peculiar notion that money is recognized by science.
Troll elsewhere, Nero. Your drivel has become tiresome.
Nero - 28 May 2007 19:16 GMT Andrew_King wrote:
> This is interesting. You make a claim that Qi doesn't exist and > therefore acupuncture doesn't either. Do you agree with this statement from the Wikipedia article on acupuncture?
Chinese medical theory holds that acupuncture works by normalizing the free flow of qi (a difficult-to-translate concept that pervades Chinese philosophy and is commonly translated as "vital energy") throughout the body.
If so, what is qi?
Jan Drew - 25 May 2007 08:44 GMT >> On May 24, 10:56 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> >> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 81 lines] > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theories_regarding_acupuncture WIKIPEDIA MAKES NO GUARANTEE OF VALIDITY Wikipedia is an online open-content collaborative encyclopedia, that is, a voluntary association of individuals and groups working to develop a common resource of human knowledge. The structure of the project allows anyone with an Internet connection to alter its content. Please be advised that nothing found here has necessarily been reviewed by people with the expertise required to provide you with complete, accurate or reliable information.
That is not to say that you will not find valuable and accurate information in Wikipedia; much of the time you will. However, Wikipedia cannot guarantee the validity of the information found here. The content of any given article may recently have been changed, vandalized or altered by someone whose opinion does not correspond with the state of knowledge in the relevant fields.
No formal peer review We are working on ways to select and highlight reliable versions of articles. Our active community of editors uses tools such as the Special:Recentchanges and Special:Newpages feeds to monitor new and changing content. However, Wikipedia is not uniformly peer reviewed; while readers may correct errors or engage in casual peer review, they have no legal duty to do so and thus all information read here is without any implied warranty of fitness for any purpose or use whatsoever. Even articles that have been vetted by informal peer review or featured article processes may later have been edited inappropriately, just before you view them.
None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators, or anyone else connected with Wikipedia in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in or linked from these web pages.
No contract; limited license Please make sure that you understand that the information provided here is being provided freely, and that no kind of agreement or contract is created between you and the owners or users of this site, the owners of the servers upon which it is housed, the individual Wikipedia contributors, any project administrators, sysops or anyone else who is in any way connected with this project or sister projects subject to your claims against them directly. You are being granted a limited license to copy anything from this site; it does not create or imply any contractual or extracontractual liability on the part of Wikipedia or any of its agents, members, organizers or other users.
There is no agreement or understanding between you and Wikipedia regarding your use or modification of this information beyond the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL); neither is anyone at Wikipedia responsible should someone change, edit, modify or remove any information that you may post on Wikipedia or any of its associated projects.
Trademarks Any of the trademarks, service marks, collective marks, design rights, personality rights or similar rights that are mentioned, used or cited in the articles of the Wikipedia encyclopedia are the property of their respective owners. Their use here does not imply that you may use them for any other purpose other than for the same or a similar informational use as contemplated by the original authors of these Wikipedia articles under the GFDL licensing scheme. Unless otherwise stated Wikipedia and Wikimedia sites are neither endorsed nor affiliated with any of the holders of any such rights and as such Wikipedia cannot grant any rights to use any otherwise protected materials. Your use of any such or similar incorporeal property is at your own risk.
Jurisdiction and legality of content Publication of information found in Wikipedia may be in violation of the laws of the country or jurisdiction from where you are viewing this information. The Wikipedia database is stored on a server in the State of Florida in the United States of America, and is maintained in reference to the protections afforded under local and federal law. Laws in your country or jurisdiction may not protect or allow the same kinds of speech or distribution. Wikipedia does not encourage the violation of any laws; and cannot be responsible for any violations of such laws, should you link to this domain or use, reproduce, or republish the information contained herein.
Not professional advice
Richard Schultz - 24 May 2007 17:25 GMT : Qi is a very useful abstraction and it may well predate money! Useful for removing money from the pockets of suckers, yes. You do know that when Nixon went to China and was shown acupuncture being used during surgery as an example of the triumph of Chinese medicine, the patients were in fact anesthetized using good old fashioned chemicals, don't you?
----- Richard Schultz schultr@mail.biu.ac.il Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University ----- "an optimist is a guy/ that has never had/ much experience"
The One True Zhen Jue - 24 May 2007 19:09 GMT > In article <1179961275.054618.258...@q66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > ----- > "an optimist is a guy/ that has never had/ much experience" Yes, I know the PRC does a lot of stupid things in the name of public relations. I wouldn't be surprised if the people weren't anthestized and that the PRC told them to suffer in silence.
I do know that about 1/3 of my patients come from MD referal. If they have a patient or two tell them that they found relief from acupuncture, they don't think much of it. When they have several long- term pain patients who call them up and tell them that they are pain free and don't need their meds, they take notice. When those same people remain off of meds for years & go back to their full-time job, they really take notice. As a matter for fact, I have had patients send their MD to me!
Now, you can believe that all of these people are very suggestible and/ or that they didn't really have any pain to begin with. Sure, that's mighty plausible! They all decided that they wanted someone to stick needles into them, but they just had to come up with an excuse. So, they decided to have severe trauma, arthritis, & prolapsed disks so they could rationalize their need to be needled. Yeah, that IS the ticket!
Acupuncture works for pain, most any type and most of the time. That is the experience of myself, my patients, and perhaps half a billion other people. It has worked when opiates & anti-inflamatories have failed. It has worked on people who insisted that it would not.
How it works is not completely understood. Clearly, there is no separate form of energy called "Qi". Qi, like money, happiness, love, hate, & IQ cannot be found in nature; they are abstractions. So, why get all hung-up on the labels when you should be looking at the results?
Richard Schultz - 27 May 2007 05:52 GMT : Acupuncture works for pain, most any type and most of the time. That : is the experience of myself, my patients, and perhaps half a billion : other people. It has worked when opiates & anti-inflamatories have : failed. It has worked on people who insisted that it would not. Can you give me a reference to a properly controlled study in which acupuncture was shown to be a more effective analgesic than opiantes and anti-inflammatories?
----- Richard Schultz schultr@mail.biu.ac.il Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University ----- "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers which smell bad."
The One True Zhen Jue - 27 May 2007 14:54 GMT > In article <1180030163.557015.136...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > ----- > "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers which smell bad." Yes, I can. However, I hope you understand that double-blinding is out of the question. Its not that I have any objections to double-blinding, but it is not possible with acupuncture.
In this circumstance, what do you consider a properly controlled study?
Richard Schultz - 27 May 2007 15:55 GMT :> Can you give me a reference to a properly controlled study in which :> acupuncture was shown to be a more effective analgesic than opiantes :> and anti-inflammatories?
: Yes, I can. However, I hope you understand that double-blinding is : out of the question. : Its not that I have any objections to double-blinding, but it is not : possible with acupuncture. Why not?
: In this circumstance, what do you consider a properly controlled study? For starters, some consistent method of determining the amount of pain being experienced by the patients, and one in which the patients do not know whether or not they are receiving a placebo (e.g. the acupuncture needles are not inserted into the "correct" points).
----- Richard Schultz schultr@mail.biu.ac.il Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University ----- "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers which smell bad."
The One True Zhen Jue - 28 May 2007 00:06 GMT > In article <1180274094.134694.140...@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Why not? How do you blind both the acupuncturist and the patient? How would a practitioner not know if he were or weren't inserting a needle?
> : In this circumstance, what do you consider a properly controlled study? > > For starters, some consistent method of determining the amount of pain > being experienced by the patients, and one in which the patients do not > know whether or not they are receiving a placebo (e.g. the acupuncture > needles are not inserted into the "correct" points). Well, if you are seriously asking for double-blinded acupuncture, I'll have to tell you I don't know of any such experiements. I'm not sure that it is possible. Few single blinded studies exist, using a "placebo needle" in Germany (I think).
As for "some consistent method of determining the amount of pain being experienced by the patients" do you mean those used in medical trials for meds? If not, please elaborate.
> ----- > Richard Schultz schu...@mail.biu.ac.il > Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel > Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University > ----- > "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers which smell bad." Richard Schultz - 28 May 2007 06:59 GMT :> : Its not that I have any objections to double-blinding, but it is not :> : possible with acupuncture. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] : How do you blind both the acupuncturist and the patient? How would a : practitioner not know if he were or weren't inserting a needle? The practitioner does not know whether the patient is in the control group or in the experimental group; the patient does not know whether the needles are being inserted in the "correct" places or in random locations.
:> : In this circumstance, what do you consider a properly controlled study? :> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] : being experienced by the patients" do you mean those used in medical : trials for meds? If not, please elaborate. I would prefer some kind of objective measure (e.g. PET scans of the areas of the brain that are active when the patient is experiencing pain), but I would even accept self-reported pain levels if there was some consistent way of reporting them (e.g. rather than "does this make you feel better," "does X hurt more than Y").
----- Richard Schultz schultr@mail.biu.ac.il Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University ----- "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers which smell bad."
The One True Zhen Jue - 28 May 2007 13:05 GMT > In article <1180307189.500141.290...@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > group or in the experimental group; the patient does not know whether the > needles are being inserted in the "correct" places or in random locations. No. That does not consitute double-blinding. Many researchers have put forth ideas to "blind" acupuncture trials and none call this notion double blinding.
If someone simply tells the acupuncturist to do certain points, that requires the acupuncturist to palpate the region to locate the tender spots near or at the acupoints. Now, if you'd consider your parameters as double blinding, fine. I just don't know of any studies done in that fashion.
> :> : In this circumstance, what do you consider a properly controlled study? > :> [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > consistent way of reporting them (e.g. rather than "does this make you feel > better," "does X hurt more than Y"). Well, I don't know if the former is used in tests of meds. The latter IS used in most pain studies, regardless of the modality tested. Some very interesting things happen in the brain during acupuncture. I'm sure you read the link I posted earlier in the thread. Heck, its the imaging results that has convinced the NIH, WHO, BMA, and many others.
Yes, acupuncture has measurable effects on the nervous system. It works on animals and it works on people. It works even if the patient doesn't want to get acupuncture, doesn't like acupuncture, and even if they don't believe in it.
(BTW, do you know a Dr Micha Shamir?)
> ----- > Richard Schultz schu...@mail.biu.ac.il > Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel > Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University > ----- > "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers which smell bad." The One True Zhen Jue - 28 May 2007 13:26 GMT > In article <1180307189.500141.290...@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > consistent way of reporting them (e.g. rather than "does this make you feel > better," "does X hurt more than Y"). MD's find one particular objective measure very impressive. It can't be seen on imaging, but it can be seen on the patient's chart! Its when a patient, who has been taking Rx pain killers for more than 2 years, quits taking pain meds. When a person who has been declared 100% disabled tells his MD that he wants to have his disability revoked and go back to work, they pay attention.
The MD's (usually anesthesiologists) at the pain clinic evaluate my work on that scale. They don't pay much attention to anything short of that. That's because a lot of pain patients have good days and bad days. Sometimes, patients try something (herbs, exercise, meditation, chiro, acupuncture, etc) and they rave. Thats all well and good, if the relief lasts! When a person goes off meds, back to work, and quits complaining about their pain, they take that seriously. Anything less is usually written off as placebo.
I don't want to give the impression that every pain patient experiences such relief. Some don't report ANY relief. Almost all patients feel some relief, but for some it may not be enough to merit further treatment. When it does work that well (over 50%), I hear it from their family, spouse, and co-workers. When someone gets their life back, you know that something has changed. When that happens daily to over half your patients, you know you're doing something right. Perhaps that's why 46% of the GP's in the UK want to learn acupuncture so that they can perform it on their patients.
> ----- > Richard Schultz schu...@mail.biu.ac.il > Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel > Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University > ----- > "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers which smell bad." Nero - 28 May 2007 19:27 GMT On May 27, 6:54 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Yes, I can. However, I hope you understand that double-blinding is > out of the question. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > In this circumstance, what do you consider a properly controlled > study? The burden is on those who claim TCM's efficacy to devise a proper study that accounts for all confounding factors. Until they do, TCM cannot really be accepted.
The One True Zhen Jue - 28 May 2007 20:03 GMT > On May 27, 6:54 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > a proper study that accounts for all confounding factors. > Until they do, TCM cannot really be accepted. I agree that more high quality research needs to be done. Its a tough thing to research, but the use of PET & MRI helps. In time, science will have even better explanations of the physiological mechanisms. Technology has added to the case for acupuncture efficacy, not against it. After all, this isn't voodoo, it shows up on modern radiology.
Many good studies have been done. Many more poor ones have been done. The trend is quite positive for Acupuncture efficacy, despite the poor training of many non-Chinese acupuncturists (in my ever-so- humble opinion).
Sure, anecdotes don't prove anything. I say that all the time because I believe it. I wouldn't expect someone to come to me as a patient because someone simply said something positive. Its when they notice an irrefutable change in someone they've know for years that they take notice.
When someone wants me to prove that acupuncture works, I'm quite happy to demonstrate it. Its what I do 5 days a week, ~50 weeks a year. If my treatment fails on an individual, I wouldn't expect him to care if a study proved 90% efficacy. If my treatment succeeds on an individual, they wouldn't care if a study said the average efficacy was <= than taking aspirin.
Until someone comes up with an experiemental trial that suits you and Richard, I'll just have to prove it the old fashion way, by delivering the goods. I'm cool with that and so is the NIH, WHO, & BMA.
Nero - 29 May 2007 05:30 GMT On May 28, 12:03 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> .... I wouldn't expect someone to come to me as a patient > because someone simply said something positive. Its when they notice > an irrefutable change in someone they've know for years that they take > notice. The latter is as much an anecdote as the former.
The One True Zhen Jue - 29 May 2007 13:55 GMT > On May 28, 12:03 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > The latter is as much an anecdote as the former. No, Res ipsa loquitur - the affair speaks for itself. No words are needed when OBJECTIVE changes occur such as the person stops taking meds and goes back to work. That is something that can be measured and is more significant than a mere change in reported pain levels. Perhaps that's why 46% of UK GPs are interesting in learning acupuncture and performing it on their patients.
Nero - 29 May 2007 17:27 GMT On May 29, 5:55 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> No, Res ipsa loquitur - the affair speaks for itself. ... Is it still your position that qi exists and money does not? Define qi.
The One True Zhen Jue - 29 May 2007 21:05 GMT > On May 29, 5:55 am, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Is it still your position that qi exists and money does not? > Define qi. No, its my position that they both exist as abstractions. Neither exists independently of man.
linus17 - 25 May 2007 18:32 GMT what a suppressive you are Mr, pessimist
>: Qi is a very useful abstraction and it may well predate money! > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >----- > "an optimist is a guy/ that has never had/ much experience" ellie.blunt - 22 May 2007 19:31 GMT On May 21, 2:57 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Do any of you have any suggestions for alleviating migraines? > > > Elliehttp://www.transparenthypnotist.blogspot.com > > Yes, Acupuncture & Chinese Herbs. thanks! knowing little about Chinese herbs, where would one start? Also, I've heard great things about Acupuncture, but have yet to try it. I've recently heard about Acupuncture using low electrical voltage. Any thoughts on this?
Ellie http://www.transparenthypnotist.blogspot.com
ellie.blunt - 22 May 2007 19:48 GMT On May 21, 2:57 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Do any of you have any suggestions for alleviating migraines? > > > Elliehttp://www.transparenthypnotist.blogspot.com > > Yes, Acupuncture & Chinese Herbs. Thanks. Knowing little about chinese Herbs, where would one start? Also, do you have any thoughts on acupuncture that involves low jolts of electricity?
The One True Zhen Jue - 23 May 2007 17:38 GMT > On May 21, 2:57 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Also, do you have any thoughts on acupuncture that involves low jolts > of electricity? Diagnosis is the key to successful treatment in all medical systems. Try to find an experienced, licensed acupuncturist, preferably one that has training in Chinese herbs. Try your yellow pages or ask for a referal from your medical doctor. (For what its worth, about 1/3 of my patients come from MD referals).
Your acupuncturist will want to know: where do you feel the pain (behind the eyes, forehead, temples, occiput, etc), what the pain sensation feels like (sharp/stabbing, throbbing, pressure from the inside, etc) what makes the pain better or worse, what seems to trigger them, other sypmtoms (nausea, dizziness, sweating, etc) time of day, frequency, duration, etc.
I don't recommend electro-stim in most cases. I would doubt that would be helpful in your case.
Roman Bystrianyk - 21 May 2007 20:45 GMT > Do any of you have any suggestions for alleviating migraines? > > Elliehttp://www.transparenthypnotist.blogspot.com Here are 2 articles that may be of use to you. Enjoy your day!
Roman
Gentle yoga may aid migraine sufferers http://www.healthsentinel.com/news.php?event=news_print_list_item&id=1863
Herbal Extract Reduces Migraines http://www.healthsentinel.com/news.php?id=521&title=Herbal+Extract+Reduces+Migra ines&event=news_print_list_item
Roman Bystrianyk - 21 May 2007 20:46 GMT > Do any of you have any suggestions for alleviating migraines? > > Elliehttp://www.transparenthypnotist.blogspot.com Here are 2 articles that may be of use to you. Enjoy your day!
Roman
Gentle yoga may aid migraine sufferers http://www.healthsentinel.com/news.php?event=news_print_list_item&id=1863
Herbal Extract Reduces Migraines http://www.healthsentinel.com/news.php?id=521&title=Herbal+Extract+Reduces+Migra ines&event=news_print_list_item
ellie.blunt - 22 May 2007 19:44 GMT > > Do any of you have any suggestions for alleviating migraines? > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Herbal Extract Reduces Migraineshttp://www.healthsentinel.com/news.php?id=521&title=Herbal+Extract+Re... These are great. Many thanks!!!
cognite tute - 22 May 2007 18:54 GMT > Do any of you have any suggestions for alleviating migraines? > > Ellie > http://www.transparenthypnotist.blogspot.com how about big pharma?
try Plavix.
worked for me
j.
linus17 - 25 May 2007 18:29 GMT >Do any of you have any suggestions for alleviating migraines? > >Ellie >http://www.transparenthypnotist.blogspot.com Chiropractic care has worked very well for thousands of chronic and acute migraine sufferers
Nero - 26 May 2007 00:50 GMT > Chiropractic care has worked very well for thousands of chronic and acute > migraine sufferers Where are the controlled studies that support this claim?
David - 26 May 2007 01:48 GMT Dear, Slow, Nero, It may surprise you and cause you great dismay, BUT, millions of people all over the world have tried both Acupuncture AND Quiropractic with better results than they had with the things you call medicine. AND!!! They will continue to do so. AND!!!! AND!!!! GASP!!! They will tell their family and friends, who will listen and follow their advice! So while you entertain us with your two string fiddle concert, the world IS laughing at you, NOT with you.
Nero - 27 May 2007 12:09 GMT > millions of people all over the world have tried both Acupuncture AND > Quiropractic with better results than they had with the things you call > medicine. What things do I call medicine? Can you quote me on that?
Jan Drew - 26 May 2007 08:21 GMT >> Chiropractic care has worked very well for thousands of chronic and acute >> migraine sufferers > > Where are the controlled studies that support this claim? ZZzz. You don't need a study, all one need is *personal experience*.
Nero - 27 May 2007 12:11 GMT > ZZzz. You don't need a study, all one need is *personal experience*. (Sorry you are bored!) How do you account for confirmation bias, regression to the mean, the placebo effect, and other confounding factors when looking at personal experience?
Richard Schultz - 27 May 2007 15:56 GMT :> ZZzz. You don't need a study, all one need is *personal experience*.
: (Sorry you are bored!) : How do you account for confirmation bias, regression to the mean, : the placebo effect, and other confounding factors when looking at : personal experience? Better yet, ask her how she accounts for Steve McQueen when looking at "personal experience" of laetrile therapy.
----- Richard Schultz schultr@mail.biu.ac.il Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University ----- "an optimist is a guy/ that has never had/ much experience"
Peter Bowditch - 27 May 2007 21:46 GMT >:> ZZzz. You don't need a study, all one need is *personal experience*. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >Better yet, ask her how she accounts for Steve McQueen when looking at >"personal experience" of laetrile therapy. That one's easy!
Laetrile might be the most powerful cancer cure known to man (except for all the other ones) but it was unable to overcome the residual effects of the leaded gasoline fumes breathed by McQueen while filming Bullit and Le Mans. Even Stan Burzynski couldn't have saved him, or Hulda Clark, or Sam Chachoua, or ...
http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/comment/cancercurers.htm
 Signature Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
Peter Bowditch - 27 May 2007 21:38 GMT >> ZZzz. You don't need a study, all one need is *personal experience*. > >(Sorry you are bored!) >How do you account for confirmation bias, regression to the mean, >the placebo effect, and other confounding factors when looking at >personal experience? Jan doesn't account for those, because they are constructs of *organized medicine*. Out in quackland they don't need no steenkin' confounders (because knowledge of them detracts from the power of magic).
 Signature Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
Jerry - 27 May 2007 15:29 GMT > Do any of you have any suggestions for alleviating migraines? > > Elliehttp://www.transparenthypnotist.blogspot.com Your are probably dehydrated. Start replacing most of your liquid intake with water. Build up to eight to ten glasses a day over a couple of months and then keep it up. Add a little organic sea salt to your diet daily so that you get your trace minerals. Take an iodine, zing, magnesium, and some calcium supplements for a while. I'm no doctor this is just my opinion. I think that if you do this you won't only get rid of your migraines, but a whole lot of other problems as well. Good luck. Read a book called "Your not sick your thirsty". Jerry, the Canuck
Richard Schultz - 27 May 2007 15:57 GMT : Add a little organic sea salt to your diet daily This is more or less where I came in. How exactly can *sea salt* be "organic"?
----- Richard Schultz schultr@mail.biu.ac.il Department of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel Opinions expressed are mine alone, and not those of Bar-Ilan University ----- "Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers which smell bad."
Peter Bowditch - 27 May 2007 21:48 GMT >: Add a little organic sea salt to your diet daily > >This is more or less where I came in. How exactly can *sea salt* be "organic"? It's grown without pesticides or fertiliser, silly. Don't you know anything?
 Signature Peter Bowditch aa #2243 The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com
The One True Zhen Jue - 28 May 2007 00:28 GMT > Do any of you have any suggestions for alleviating migraines? > > Elliehttp://www.transparenthypnotist.blogspot.com Two things to note. The first is not surprising, the British Medical Associate finds acupuncture more effective on Migraines than other control interventions. The second, well, read it yourself! Yup, MD's readily dig acupuncture. Its quite nice to see someone get so much relief from such a simple, safe procedure. I guess thats not too surprising, especially when you've seen the results....over & over again.
1. The traditional "gold standard" of whether a treatment or procedure is effective is the randomized controlled trial (RCT). After examining several clinical trials of acupuncture for various medical conditions, the report concludes that acupuncture "is more effective than control interventions" for back pain, nausea and vomiting (most convincingly for post-operative symptoms in adults), migraine and dental pain.
2. GPs' overall knowledge of acupuncture was found to be low. Only 16% said they had "considerable knowledge" of acupuncture or "knew a lot" about the subject; 82% said they had "very little" or only "basic" knowledge of complementary and alternative medicine. However, nearly half (46%) said they would like to receive further training in acupuncture in order to treat their own patients in the future.
In one of the most surprising statistics, a full 79% of practitioners reported that they would like to see acupuncture provided in the National Health Service. For this to happen, however, the survey concluded - as did the full report - that more rigorous clinical trials would need to be conducted.
http://www.acupuncturetoday.com/archives2000/aug/08bma.html
BMA Acknowledges the Benefits of Acupuncture Report Recommends Treatment Be Integrated into National Health Service By Michael Devitt
In the past decade, several national and international organizations have issued reports concerning the safety and efficacy of acupuncture. The most well-known of these reports, the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Statement, concluded in 1997 that "there is sufficient evidence · of acupuncture's value to expand its use into conventional medicine and to encourage further studies of its physiology and value."1
Now, the British Medical Association has offered its opinion on the subject. At the BMA's annual conference in London this June, the association published a report, Acupuncture: Efficacy, Safety and Practice,2 which acknowledges the scientific benefits of acupuncture and recommends that the treatment be incorporated into the National Health Service, Britian's national health care program.
"(Acupuncture) is clearly something that people are turning to in large numbers," said Dr. Vivienne Nathanson, head of health policy at the BMA. "And it is clearly something that GPs (general practitioners) are turning to in increasing numbers."
The current report is the result of a resolution passed at the BMA's annual representative meeting in 1998, at which a resolution was passed to "investigate the scientific basis and efficacy of acupuncture and the quality of training and standards of competence in its practitioners." The paper also represents the third time in the last 15 years that the BMA has published a major report on complementary and alternative care.
Acupuncture: Efficacy, Safety and Practice contains sections that study the efficacy and safety of acupuncture; the ways in which acupuncturists are taught; and the future development of the profession. The report also summarizes a BMA survey of general practitioners and their feelings toward complementary and alternative care, and issues recommendations as to how the delivery of acupuncture can be improved.
Safety and Efficacy of Acupuncture
The traditional "gold standard" of whether a treatment or procedure is effective is the randomized controlled trial (RCT). After examining several clinical trials of acupuncture for various medical conditions, the report concludes that acupuncture "is more effective than control interventions" for back pain, nausea and vomiting (most convincingly for post-operative symptoms in adults), migraine and dental pain.
Less conclusive results, meanwhile, have been found for conditions such as neck pain and osteoarthritis, recovery from stroke, tension headaches, temporomandibular joint dysfunction, smoking cessation and weight loss.
Regarding the safety of acupuncture, the report states that most adverse reactions generally fall into three main areas: physical injuries (such as cardiovascular trauma); infections from blood-borne viruses; and other adverse reactions (such as drowsiness or fainting after treatment).
Although some adverse reactions may be difficult to control, the report stresses that most physical injuries can be avoided with proper training in anatomy and physiology, particularly in terms of the depth and location of major organs. Transmission of infectious agents, meanwhile, could be greatly reduced by improving sterilization techniques or using only pre-sterile disposable needles instead of reusable needles.
Education and Training of Acupuncturists
Acupuncture can - and has been - taught and practiced in a variety of ways. In fact, the report concludes that "within agreed parameters," a certain amount of diversity in acupuncture training can be considered "healthy" in meeting the individual needs of students and the different approaches and practices among acupuncture instructors.
With such diversity, the report recommends that "a core curriculum for practitioners" be put in place that includes instruction in anatomy and physiology, research methods, acupuncture techniques, fundamentals of diagnosis, and ethics. These courses should be "of a credible duration" to provide students with the ability to practice acupuncture with an acceptable level of competency.
The report also recommends greater undergraduate training and accredited postgraduate training in acupuncture at medical schools.
"Because patients and doctors are turning to acupuncture in increasing numbers," said Dr. Nathanson, "doctors need more information about its safety, and medical students need better training while at university to give patients advice."
Future Developments in Acupuncture
Although there are no comprehensive acupuncture guidelines for general practitioners or patients, and there are no national regulatory and safety standard in place for acupuncturists in Great Britain, the profession continues to flourish. For acupuncture to continue growing, however, the BMA feels that more collaborative studies should be conducted to study the costs and benefits of treatment.
"There is a need for greater consensus on the part of the government, Department of Health, NHS Executive, the medical profession, and acupuncture organizations to provide guidelines and agree how acupuncture and other complementary and alternative medicine services can be integrated into the UK healthcare system," the report stated.
"We need to see more high-quality research into the effectiveness of acupuncture," added Dr. Nathanson. "We welcome complementary medicines into medical practice, but only based on robust research and robust training."
Recommendations
The report lists several recommendations for the integration, regulation and funding of acupuncture. Among the most noteworthy:
Consideration should be given to the creation of policies and guidelines that would make acupuncture more widely available to patients under the National Health Service. A general list of all acupuncturists, medically and non-medically qualified, should be produced and maintained to facilitate the referral process for NHS doctors. Further research should be conducted into the cost-effectiveness of acupuncture treatment, particularly for those conditions in which acupuncture has been identified as an effective form of care. Research should also be conducted into other conditions that may be usefully treated by acupuncture. Acupuncture organizations should collaborate in creating a national system for the reporting of adverse events. Relationships between acupuncturists, general practitioners and patients must be strengthened. An atmosphere of mutual respect should be promoted between GPs and their patients regarding the use of acupuncture. Doctors should ask about their patients' use of acupuncture and other alternative forms of care; acupuncturists, in turn, should recommend that their patients inform their GPs of their treatment. Acupuncture should be included in any familiarization course on complementary and alternative medicine. Accredited postgraduate courses should be provided to inform doctors and other clinicians about acupuncture and its possible benefits. All acupuncturists should be fully trained in infection control procedures, and immunization against hepatitis B should be considered for the protection of acupuncturists and their patients. BMA Survey of Acupuncture in Primary Care
In addition to its review of acupuncture and recommendations, Acupuncture: Efficacy, Safety and Practice summarizes a survey of general practitioners in the United Kingdom to assess their use of (and attitudes toward) complementary and alternative medicine. A total of 365 GPs completed the survey, which was sent to every general practitioner in the country.
Of those who responded to the survey, more than half (58%) had arranged complementary or alternative therapies for their patients. Almost half of those surveyed reported arranging acupuncture treatment for their patients.
Acupuncture was also the most common form of alternative care used by general practitioners, and was used most commonly for pain relief and treating musculoskeletal disorders. It was most often performed in pain clinics or physiotherapy departments.
GPs' overall knowledge of acupuncture was found to be low. Only 16% said they had "considerable knowledge" of acupuncture or "knew a lot" about the subject; 82% said they had "very little" or only "basic" knowledge of complementary and alternative medicine. However, nearly half (46%) said they would like to receive further training in acupuncture in order to treat their own patients in the future.
In one of the most surprising statistics, a full 79% of practitioners reported that they would like to see acupuncture provided in the National Health Service. For this to happen, however, the survey concluded - as did the full report - that more rigorous clinical trials would need to be conducted.
Report Available Online
Acupuncture: Efficacy, Safety and Practice is available from the British Medical Association for £12.99 plus shipping and handling (note: at press time, £12.99 was roughly equal to $19.59 US). Practitioners interested in ordering a copy may visit the BMA's website (www.bma.org.uk), or they send an e-mail to the BMA's online bookstore (orders@bmjbookshop.com ).
Liz - 29 May 2007 15:12 GMT > Do any of you have any suggestions for alleviating migraines? > > Elliehttp://www.transparenthypnotist.blogspot.com Try an elimination diet. It's most likely something you're eating that's causing migraines. The usual culprits are wheat, eggs, nuts, soy, and dairy.
~Liz
Nero - 29 May 2007 17:39 GMT > ...It's most likely something you're eating > that's causing migraines. ... Jerry <jerry....@verizon.net> wrote:
> Your are probably dehydrated. ... The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Try to find an experienced, licensed acupuncturist, preferably one > that has training in Chinese herbs. I'm confused...whose brand of nonsense should we follow?
The One True Zhen Jue - 29 May 2007 21:07 GMT > > ...It's most likely something you're eating > > that's causing migraines. ... [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > I'm confused...whose brand of nonsense should we follow? Yes, you certainly are. That quip about lines of longitude existing as lines on the planet because they exist as ink on the map proves it.
You seem quite content with your own brand of nonsense and are probably too old & dim to learn anything new; nonsense or not.
Nero - 29 May 2007 21:38 GMT On May 29, 1:07 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Yes, you certainly are. That quip about lines of longitude existing > as lines on the planet because they exist as ink on the map proves it. I challenge you to quote me where I said lines of longitude exist as lines on the planet.
The One True Zhen Jue - 29 May 2007 22:20 GMT > On May 29, 1:07 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > I challenge you to quote me where I said lines oflongitudeexist > as lines on the planet. You said they were real & accepted by science. Doesn't that imply that they are really there?
At any rate, let me just go ahead an withdraw my statement. I've got a better one.
Remember when you said that money tells you about the state of the universe? I got a quantum chuckle out of that one! Find a physicist who'll validate that claim!
Nero - 29 May 2007 23:04 GMT On May 29, 2:20 pm, The One True Zhen Jue <Andrew_King...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> At any rate, let me just go ahead an withdraw my statement. I've got > a better one. I accept your retraction.
> Remember when you said that money tells you about the state of the > universe? I got a quantum chuckle out of that one! > Find a physicist who'll validate that claim! Believing "the Universe" only includes things like supernovae and quarks could be a symptom of scientific illiteracy. I'd have it checked out. In the meantime, here's some help from WordNet (http://wordnet.princeton.edu/per
|
|