Medical Forum / General / Alternative / April 2007
Chiropractic KILLS Children !!!
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Mark Thorson - 07 Apr 2007 23:10 GMT Read about it here:
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/reprint/119/1/e275.pdf
David - 08 Apr 2007 02:19 GMT "Mark Thorson" <nospam@sonic.net> wrote in Ding Ding Ding
msmith2911@yahoo.com - 08 Apr 2007 06:58 GMT > Read about it here: > > http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/reprint/119/1/e275.pdf And how about this study, Thorson?
"Study Finds US Paediatric Medical Errors Kill 4500 Children a Year"
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/328/7454/1458-b
Mark Thorson - 08 Apr 2007 18:36 GMT > > Read about it here: > > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/328/7454/1458-b Oh? In what way does that justify deaths caused by applying chiropractic to children?
Even with the deaths due to errors, pediatric medicine on balance still saves many lives. You can't say that about chiropractic.
Chiropractic has never saved even one life because it is based on a wrong theory, the notion of "subluxations". Therefore even one death should be considered unacceptable.
If chiropractic saved many lives, a few deaths might be acceptable. But it saves no lives at all, and so a different standard must be applied to chiropractic than to medicine.
That's why your attempt to justify the chiropractic deaths by comparing them against the larger number of medical deaths is bogus. Medicine saves lives; chiropractic only takes them.
David - 08 Apr 2007 21:28 GMT I think I heard a bit of flatulence, musta been Mr. Mark.
JohnDoe - 10 Apr 2007 09:36 GMT >>Read about it here: >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/328/7454/1458-b Even if that were true, please explain how that would somehow make killing children by chiropractic ok.
David - 10 Apr 2007 14:51 GMT "JohnDoe" <dont@spam.me> wrote in message
JohnDoe - 10 Apr 2007 15:37 GMT > "JohnDoe" <dont@spam.me> wrote in message Are you infected with the same bug as Jan Drew, the bug that makes you think that if you delete a person's post in your reply, the original post will go away and people won't see what an idiot you are? Or is that all the reply your intellectual powers can muster?
David - 10 Apr 2007 17:04 GMT "JohnDoe" <dont@spam.me> wrote in message ? Nothing worth reading, again. Think about it, why would anyone trust a person who signs in as John Doe? And a fake address too! Even motels would question such. But then Mr. Doe is a little short of a full deck.
David Wright - 11 Apr 2007 04:17 GMT >"JohnDoe" <dont@spam.me> wrote in message ? Nothing worth reading, again. >Think about it, why would anyone trust a person who signs in as John Doe? >And a fake address too! Even motels would question such. But then Mr. Doe is >a little short of a full deck. I don't think they're going to be too bowled over by someone like you, either -- you know, someone who is too stupid to even master the quoting functions of his newsreader.
I don't think you're posting empty posts to try to make the original go away; I think you're doing it because you're too dumb to figure out how to post a complete article.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "HPV shots don't cause promiscuity. Tequila shots do." -- Bill Maher
David - 11 Apr 2007 13:05 GMT Dear Mr. Wrong, ............ Ah that says it all.
>>"JohnDoe" <dont@spam.me> wrote in message ? Nothing worth reading, again. >>Think about it, why would anyone trust a person who signs in as John Doe? [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. > "HPV shots don't cause promiscuity. Tequila shots do." -- Bill Maher David Wright - 11 Apr 2007 13:57 GMT >Dear Mr. Wrong, ............ Ah that says it all. Yes, but says it about you, you top-posting idiot.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "HPV shots don't cause promiscuity. Tequila shots do." -- Bill Maher
>>>"JohnDoe" <dont@spam.me> wrote in message ? Nothing worth reading, again. >>>Think about it, why would anyone trust a person who signs in as John Doe? [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >> go away; I think you're doing it because you're too dumb to figure out >> how to post a complete article. David - 11 Apr 2007 14:32 GMT Mr. Wrong, I top posted just for you sweetheart.
>>Dear Mr. Wrong, ............ Ah that says it all. > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] >>> go away; I think you're doing it because you're too dumb to figure out >>> how to post a complete article. JOHN - 11 Apr 2007 14:36 GMT "David Wright"
pharma troll, went in my killfile years ago
David - 11 Apr 2007 17:43 GMT I would not killfile Rr. Wrong. He is like that kid who truly is an brat, but is so cute that you put up with him for the entertainment. Be sure to read his next comment and you will see what I mean.
David Wright - 12 Apr 2007 04:18 GMT >"David Wright" > >pharma troll, went in my killfile years Sure I did -- that's why you respond to me.
Lots of people go into John's killfile -- they have a nasty habit of pointing out the idiocy of what he posts, and he just can't handle it.
-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "HPV shots don't cause promiscuity. Tequila shots do." -- Bill Maher
David - 12 Apr 2007 13:14 GMT Not to worry sweetie, you are far too funny to ever go in my killfile.
>>"David Wright" >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. > "HPV shots don't cause promiscuity. Tequila shots do." -- Bill Maher msmith2911@yahoo.com - 13 Apr 2007 05:38 GMT > Lots of people go into John's killfile -- they have a nasty habit of > pointing out the idiocy of what he posts, and he just can't handle it.<<<< > > I am trying to ascertain what is is Mr. Wright that you are fond of when it comes to speaking for alternative health therapies. Mr. Wright, I've been reading your posts and I'm unable to understand from where you are going to much less from where you have been. I would appreciate being enlightened on your viewpoints within the alternative healthcare therapies for which you support no doubt.
JOHN - 13 Apr 2007 10:48 GMT >> Lots of people go into John's killfile -- they have a nasty habit of >> pointing out the idiocy of what he posts, and he just can't handle [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > within the alternative healthcare therapies for which you support no > doubt. I guess we all have to waste time arguing with this pharma troll, but it doesn't take long to see he has no argument, like Putz and the rest of them, Bowditch, Probert, NCN, John Doe, Sessions http://www.whale.to/a/posse.html
nasty bunch of reptile wanabees
you have to wonder at the mindset of someone dedicating his life to Allopathy, ie 90% lies, that is the leading cause of death http://www.whale.to/a/allopathy_h.html
msmith2911@yahoo.com - 14 Apr 2007 03:16 GMT > I guess we all have to waste time arguing with this pharma troll, but it > doesn't take long to see he has no argument, like Putz and the rest of them, > Bowditch, Probert, NCN, John Doe, Sessionshttp://www.whale.to/a/posse.html > > nasty bunch of reptile wanabees Why is there such a push to beat up on alternative health practices? I'm taking part in this project with my conventional doctor and colonics, and although I've only gone through treatment #2, I almost hate to admit to this but I actually think I feel better, and so doesn't he. It would make perfectly good sense to realize that much of alternative health practices are the "hands on approach", and manipulation is a good way in which to touch people; because the human touch is an important factor in healing.
I wonder if anyone has done a study on those individuals who dislike alternative health care to see they were not touched as a child by their parents very often when they were young? I've met some people in my life that could not stand to be hugged, massaged or touched. I wonder if these kinds of people are the ones that post against chiropractic?
JOHN - 11 Apr 2007 12:39 GMT > "JohnDoe" <dont@spam.me> wrote in message ? Nothing worth reading, again. > Think about it, why would anyone trust a person who signs in as John Doe? > And a fake address too! Even motels would question such. But then Mr. Doe > is a little short of a full deck. "JohnDoe" ---pharma troll for the killfile
JOHN - 08 Apr 2007 11:11 GMT > Read about it here: > > http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/reprint/119/1/e275.pdf oh really, Allopaths are the real baby killers http://www.whale.to/vaccines/deaths.html
|
|
|