 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / General / Alternative / April 2007Vaccination graphs
http://www.whale.to/a/graphs.html They show that the health of people were improving, but that the vaccines prevented deaths. Nothing new here. Of course, they are highly selected to make it seem like the vaccines didn't have any effect. Nothing new here, either. Jeff > They show that the health of people were improving, but that the vaccines > prevented deaths. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Of course, they are highly selected to make it seem like the vaccines > didn't have any effect. Nothing new here, either. You liars should know. You start your graphs just before vaccination started. >> They show that the health of people were improving, but that the vaccines >> prevented deaths. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > You liars should know. You start your graphs just before vaccination > started. Why don't you show us where, John? And why don't you show us graphs that show the incidence of disease, not just the deaths? Vaccines not only prevent deaths, but they prevent the incidence of disease and the problems resulting from the illnesses, like meningitis and deafness. Jeff > Why don't you show us where, John? here is one of your graphs on incidence http://www.quackwatch.com/03HealthPromotion/immu/immu01.html incidence is one you can fiddle as allopaths keep the stats on that, if anyone death stats are compulsory, and kept by gov, so you can't fiddle them so easy > And why don't you show us graphs that show the incidence of disease, not > just the deaths? Vaccines not only prevent deaths, but they prevent the > incidence of disease and the problems resulting from the illnesses, like > meningitis and deafness. > > Jeff incidence is meaningless, as you liars know which is why you go on about it, hoping we ignore death stats morbidity is tied to mortality >> Why don't you show us where, John? > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > incidence is one you can fiddle as allopaths keep the stats on that, if > anyone You confuse me, John. What difference does it make? You use the graph on the stats on death made by allopaths? Are you suggesting that the stats that allopaths keep on incidence are bad, but the ones they keep on deaths are good? > death stats are compulsory, and kept by gov, so you can't fiddle them so > easy Gee, John, get a clue, if you can. Who fills of the death certificates? Mostly allopaths. >> And why don't you show us graphs that show the incidence of disease, not >> just the deaths? Vaccines not only prevent deaths, but they prevent the [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > incidence is meaningless, as you liars know which is why you go on about > it, hoping we ignore death stats Tell that to the parent who has to miss work for a week, and the income from work, so that she can take care of her sick kid. Tell that to the parents of kids who are left brain-injured or deaf from measles. Tell that to parents who have to take their kid to the hospital because he won't drink because of the chicken-pox lesions in his throat. Like it or not, allopaths not only want to prevent death, but allopaths want to prevent all disease as well as the problems that result from having disease, like brain damage and deafness. > morbidity is tied to mortality Yeah, and with better treatments, as well as better general health thanks to better sanitation and better quality food available, there is far less mortality. But, without vaccines, thousands of kids would still die from vaccine-preventable illnesses each year, like measles, rubella (from congenital rubella), and chicken pox. How many people died from smallpox last year? Zero, thanks to vaccines. And please don't suggest that this is because of better nutrition and health and sanitation. There are many areas of the world where there is poor sanitation (i.e., they poop in the streem or on the ground), poor nutrition and poor health. Yet, there is no smallpox, thanks to vaccines. Jeff > Like it or not, allopaths not only want to prevent death, but allopaths > want to prevent all disease as well as the problems that result from > having disease, like brain damage and deafness. reality check: allopaths are the leading cause of death http://www.whale.to/a/dean.html >> Like it or not, allopaths not only want to prevent death, but allopaths >> want to prevent all disease as well as the problems that result from >> having disease, like brain damage and deafness. > > reality check: allopaths are the leading cause of death > http://www.whale.to/a/dean.html Incorrect. People die for the most part because they have diseases. They don't die because they are treated by allopaths, which, by your definition, I am not one. Jeff >> Like it or not, allopaths not only want to prevent death, but allopaths >> want to prevent all disease as well as the problems that result from >> having disease, like brain damage and deafness. > >reality check: allopaths are the leading cause of death >http://www.whale.to/a/dean.html Better reality check -- the numbers in that so-called report are mostly either irrelevant, obsolete, or speculative. -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "HPV shots don't cause promiscuity. Tequila shots do." -- Bill Maher |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.