Medical Forum / General / Alternative / March 2007
Harold Foster's What really causes Multiple Sclerosis is out
|
|
Thread rating:  |
sarlatan00@gmail.com - 23 Mar 2007 19:13 GMT It can be downloaded from http://hdfoster.com/ or it can be bought from TRAFFORD Publishing: http://www.trafford.com/4dcgi/view-item?item=19403
WHAT REALLY CAUSES MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: AN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In young adults, in temperate Western climates, multiple sclerosis is the most common disease of the nervous system.1 Globally, some 2.5 million people suffer from this illness.2 Multiple sclerosis is a progressive disease for which there is no recognized conventional cure. It is associated with inflammation and ultimately the loss of myelin from the surface of nerves. This process of demyelination causes disruption to nerve transmission that can affect many body functions. It eventually leads to the patches of nerve scarring, known as 'sclerosis,' that give multiple sclerosis its name.3 Multiple sclerosis occurs more often in some families than chance alone would dictate. The average person living in the United States, for example, has roughly a 1 in 750 chance of developing multiple sclerosis.4 However, the children, brothers, sisters, or non-identical twins of somebody who already suffers from the disorder have a risk of getting it that ranges from about 1 in 100 to 1 in 40. In the case of identical twins, this risk increases to 1 in 3.5 Of course, if genetics were the only causal variable, the sibling of an identical twin with multiple sclerosis would always get the disorder. More specifically, in a large Canadian study of 5,463 multiple sclerosis patients, attending 10 different clinics, the disorder was found in 7 pairs of 27 monozygotic (identical) twins, that is in 25.9 percent of them, and in 1 of 43 dizygotic (fraternal) twins, or 2.3 percent.6 The risk of a first-degree relative of a multiple sclerosis patient developing the disorder was between 5 and 15 times higher than that of the general population.7 Indeed, in Vancouver, British Columbia,8 first-degree relatives of multiple sclerosis patients were found to have a risk of developing the disorder that was 30 to 50 times greater than that of the general population. viii What do these figures really mean? Well in schizophrenia, the lifetime risk of developing the disease for relatives of a victim of the illness are roughly as follows:9 grandchildren (5 percent); uncles and aunts (2 percent); half siblings (6 percent); siblings (8 percent); siblings with one schizophrenic parent (17 percent); children (13 percent); fraternal twins (18 percent); identical twins (48 percent), and the offspring of two schizophrenics (47 percent). Clearly, genetics play a much stronger role in deciding who becomes schizophrenic than they do in controlling who develops multiple sclerosis. Even so, there appear to be not one, but four or perhaps more genetic aberrations involved in schizophrenia.10 There can be no single genetic key to multiple sclerosis. Incidence and mortality for the disorder have highly non-random distribution patterns, typified by well developed global zones. The incidence and mortality rates for multiple sclerosis are not constant, but fluctuate markedly. They are probably falling, for example, in North America and Western Europe, but rising in many Mediterranean countries. Beyond that, migration is likely to increase or decrease the risk of developing multiple sclerosis. Every one of these characteristics is inconsistent with a dominant role for genetics in the etiology of this disease. Similarly, virologists, neurologists, and numerous other researchers have spent a century or more searching for a causal pathogen in multiple sclerosis.11 However, it is apparent that no such pathogen exists. If it did exist, it would have to infect women roughly twice as often as men, except where the disorder was rare. In these latter regions, it would cause illness in females at a rate of about six times that seen in males. It would also be much more infectious in certain families. This pathogen would pose more of a threat to adolescents than to young children, but it would almost never infect Lapps or Inuits. ix Nevertheless, it would cause multiple sclerosis in predictable global belts of infection in which prevalence declined both toward the equator and westward into Asia. In short, the genetic, epidemiological, and geographical evidence makes it very likely that virologists and neurologists will spend the next century looking for this elusive pathogen, with no more success than that accompanying their work in the last one hundred years. Taken as a whole, the available scientific and alternative evidence suggests that multiple sclerosis patients suffer from chronic inflammation caused by diets that contain inadequate antioxidants, omega-3 deficiencies, excess sugar, and foods that fail to significantly reduce oxidative stress. In addition, gluten, cow's milk, or some other allergen further promotes autoimmune disease. The coup de grâce, however, is a thyroid hormone deficiency that causes an abnormal need for dopamine.12 Dopamine is very susceptible to oxidative stress and can break down to form toxins such as dopachrome and other chrome indoles. These, in turn, kill oligodendrocytes,13 the cells needed to repair the damage to myelin caused by chronic inflammation. Beyond this, a shortage of triiodothyronine in multiple sclerosis patients appears to reduce their ability to produce new oligodendrocytes.14 Therefore, myelin deteriorates and the symptoms of multiple sclerosis worsen. Wilcoxon and Redei have shown that such associated thyroid malfunctions in adults may be triggered by environmental challenges early in life.15 This process is termed fetal programming. If the three step hypothesis presented in this book is correct, then it is possible to prevent and reverse multiple sclerosis. However, to achieve such goals requires societal and individual commitment. This volume concludes with an outline of the strategies that are needed. These include promoting antiinflammatory diets16 and methods for avoiding the allergens that trigger inflammatory cascades and associated chronic x autoimmune disease.17 Also discussed are orthomolecular techniques for mitigating the negative impacts of the neurotoxins associated with the oxidation of excess dopamine and for stimulating the body to produce higher levels of antioxidant enzymes, such as glutathione peroxidase.18 In summary, this book provides new evidence on the causes of multiple sclerosis and offers approaches for reversing its impacts.
Laura - 23 Mar 2007 19:29 GMT summarize it pal.. We have MS u know........
 Signature Laura
-Sautéed poo is still poo
It can be downloaded from http://hdfoster.com/ or it can be bought from TRAFFORD Publishing: http://www.trafford.com/4dcgi/view-item?item=19403
WHAT REALLY CAUSES MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: AN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In young adults, in temperate Western climates, multiple sclerosis is the most common disease of the nervous system.1 Globally, some 2.5 million people suffer from this illness.2 Multiple sclerosis is a progressive disease for which there is no recognized conventional cure. It is associated with inflammation and ultimately the loss of myelin from the surface of nerves. This process of demyelination causes disruption to nerve transmission that can affect many body functions. It eventually leads to the patches of nerve scarring, known as 'sclerosis,' that give multiple sclerosis its name.3 Multiple sclerosis occurs more often in some families than chance alone would dictate. The average person living in the United States, for example, has roughly a 1 in 750 chance of developing multiple sclerosis.4 However, the children, brothers, sisters, or non-identical twins of somebody who already suffers from the disorder have a risk of getting it that ranges from about 1 in 100 to 1 in 40. In the case of identical twins, this risk increases to 1 in 3.5 Of course, if genetics were the only causal variable, the sibling of an identical twin with multiple sclerosis would always get the disorder. More specifically, in a large Canadian study of 5,463 multiple sclerosis patients, attending 10 different clinics, the disorder was found in 7 pairs of 27 monozygotic (identical) twins, that is in 25.9 percent of them, and in 1 of 43 dizygotic (fraternal) twins, or 2.3 percent.6 The risk of a first-degree relative of a multiple sclerosis patient developing the disorder was between 5 and 15 times higher than that of the general population.7 Indeed, in Vancouver, British Columbia,8 first-degree relatives of multiple sclerosis patients were found to have a risk of developing the disorder that was 30 to 50 times greater than that of the general population. viii What do these figures really mean? Well in schizophrenia, the lifetime risk of developing the disease for relatives of a victim of the illness are roughly as follows:9 grandchildren (5 percent); uncles and aunts (2 percent); half siblings (6 percent); siblings (8 percent); siblings with one schizophrenic parent (17 percent); children (13 percent); fraternal twins (18 percent); identical twins (48 percent), and the offspring of two schizophrenics (47 percent). Clearly, genetics play a much stronger role in deciding who becomes schizophrenic than they do in controlling who develops multiple sclerosis. Even so, there appear to be not one, but four or perhaps more genetic aberrations involved in schizophrenia.10 There can be no single genetic key to multiple sclerosis. Incidence and mortality for the disorder have highly non-random distribution patterns, typified by well developed global zones. The incidence and mortality rates for multiple sclerosis are not constant, but fluctuate markedly. They are probably falling, for example, in North America and Western Europe, but rising in many Mediterranean countries. Beyond that, migration is likely to increase or decrease the risk of developing multiple sclerosis. Every one of these characteristics is inconsistent with a dominant role for genetics in the etiology of this disease. Similarly, virologists, neurologists, and numerous other researchers have spent a century or more searching for a causal pathogen in multiple sclerosis.11 However, it is apparent that no such pathogen exists. If it did exist, it would have to infect women roughly twice as often as men, except where the disorder was rare. In these latter regions, it would cause illness in females at a rate of about six times that seen in males. It would also be much more infectious in certain families. This pathogen would pose more of a threat to adolescents than to young children, but it would almost never infect Lapps or Inuits. ix Nevertheless, it would cause multiple sclerosis in predictable global belts of infection in which prevalence declined both toward the equator and westward into Asia. In short, the genetic, epidemiological, and geographical evidence makes it very likely that virologists and neurologists will spend the next century looking for this elusive pathogen, with no more success than that accompanying their work in the last one hundred years. Taken as a whole, the available scientific and alternative evidence suggests that multiple sclerosis patients suffer from chronic inflammation caused by diets that contain inadequate antioxidants, omega-3 deficiencies, excess sugar, and foods that fail to significantly reduce oxidative stress. In addition, gluten, cow's milk, or some other allergen further promotes autoimmune disease. The coup de grâce, however, is a thyroid hormone deficiency that causes an abnormal need for dopamine.12 Dopamine is very susceptible to oxidative stress and can break down to form toxins such as dopachrome and other chrome indoles. These, in turn, kill oligodendrocytes,13 the cells needed to repair the damage to myelin caused by chronic inflammation. Beyond this, a shortage of triiodothyronine in multiple sclerosis patients appears to reduce their ability to produce new oligodendrocytes.14 Therefore, myelin deteriorates and the symptoms of multiple sclerosis worsen. Wilcoxon and Redei have shown that such associated thyroid malfunctions in adults may be triggered by environmental challenges early in life.15 This process is termed fetal programming. If the three step hypothesis presented in this book is correct, then it is possible to prevent and reverse multiple sclerosis. However, to achieve such goals requires societal and individual commitment. This volume concludes with an outline of the strategies that are needed. These include promoting antiinflammatory diets16 and methods for avoiding the allergens that trigger inflammatory cascades and associated chronic x autoimmune disease.17 Also discussed are orthomolecular techniques for mitigating the negative impacts of the neurotoxins associated with the oxidation of excess dopamine and for stimulating the body to produce higher levels of antioxidant enzymes, such as glutathione peroxidase.18 In summary, this book provides new evidence on the causes of multiple sclerosis and offers approaches for reversing its impacts.
monty1945@lycos.com - 23 Mar 2007 21:42 GMT Good for Harold ! I wish him well in his attempt to make money.
Now, if you want to know the likely causation of such "inflammatory" disorders, you can go to my site, which is totally free:
http://groups.msn.com/TheScientificDebateForum-/
The molecular-level evidence is now clear, and so there is no need to concern oneself with the seemingly endless studies that talk of "correlations," "links," "associations," etc. You can easily, through diet, eliminate these "inflammatory" problems, which is caused by arachidonic acid in cells. There is a huge amount of scientific citation on my site, as well as my attempt to make it comprehensible to those without strong scientific backgrounds.
Sylv - 24 Mar 2007 21:33 GMT sarlata...@gmail.com wrote:
> WHAT REALLY CAUSES MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: > AN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <megasnip>
> Taken as a whole, the available scientific and alternative evidence > suggests that multiple sclerosis patients suffer from [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > book provides new evidence on the causes of multiple sclerosis > and offers approaches for reversing its impacts. Now, here's the million dollar question: why is this doctor the only one who knows?
I'd download this book, but I don't think I'd be able to put anything of this size on my wimpy computer.
Sylvia
Ron Peterson - 25 Mar 2007 04:26 GMT > sarlata...@gmail.com wrote: > > WHAT REALLY CAUSES MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: > > AN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
> Now, here's the million dollar question: why is this doctor the only > one who knows? He only knows one factor, vitamin D, and he isn't the only one that knows. There was data that showed that the incidence of MS in Ireland was much higher than among the Irish in Australia. The level of vitamin D was determined to be the main cause of the difference in MS.
-- Ron
never@million - 25 Mar 2007 05:42 GMT >> sarlata...@gmail.com wrote: >> > WHAT REALLY CAUSES MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >was much higher than among the Irish in Australia. The level of >vitamin D was determined to be the main cause of the difference in MS. Ron,
So tell us, high or low vitamin D.
Donn
Ron Peterson - 25 Mar 2007 17:28 GMT > >He only knows one factor, vitamin D, and he isn't the only one that > >knows. There was data that showed that the incidence of MS in Ireland > >was much higher than among the Irish in Australia. The level of > >vitamin D was determined to be the main cause of the difference in MS.
> So tell us, high or low vitamin D. The book says high vitamin D reduces the incidence of MS. He also claims selenium and omega-3 fatty acids help.
-- Ron
|
|
|