> To make my other statement clearer.
> A higher percentage of people who take chemotherapy die of cancer than those
> who don't take chemo.
> The reason?
> Only people with cancer take chemo.
>> >> "PeterB" <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote in message
>>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> For cardio?
Yes, but mostly because I have found research shows the combo to be
productive in overall health, circulation, mental capacity.
>> To make my other statement clearer.
>> A higher percentage of people who take chemotherapy die of cancer than
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> You could do a study proving that vitamins are the primary cause of
> death thinking like that. ;o)
As a matter of statistics, a high probability.
People who take supplements are of a mix of higher probability to have
endemic problems.
PeterB - 27 Mar 2007 18:33 GMT
> >> "PeterB" <p...@mytrashmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> Yes, but mostly because I have found research shows the combo to be
> productive in overall health, circulation, mental capacity.
I personally go for the shotgun approach, but those are good uses.
> >> To make my other statement clearer.
> >> A higher percentage of people who take chemotherapy die of cancer than
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> People who take supplements are of a mix of higher probability to have
> endemic problems.
That would be interesting in light of naysayers who like to suggest
that people who take supplements are generally *more* healthy to begin
with, possibly explaining their overall better health in the process.
Even if it were true (and I don't think it is), it would not negate
the evidence that supplemental vitamin C (for one) has been associated
with reduced all-cause mortality even after adjusting for lifestyle
factors (see Passwater studies.) I suppose there could be a subset of
supplement takers who are indeed more prone to illness (just as those
who take more medication would be), but I haven't seen any evidence
that this is generally true.