Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / April 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Reduce your heart attack risk by eating whole-grain breakfast cereals

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Roman Bystrianyk - 05 Mar 2007 13:38 GMT
"Reduce your heart attack risk by eating whole-grain breakfast
cereals", news-medical.net, March 5, 2007,
Link: http://www.news-medical.net/?id=22373

The health benefits of whole-grain breakfast cereals have been lauded
yet again by the medical profession.

Researchers are now advocating that in order to lower the risk of
heart failure we need to eat whole-grain breakfast cereal seven or
more times each week.

The scientists Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School
are referring to breakfast cereals that contain at least 25 percent
oat or bran.

In the Physicians' Health study the majority of the doctors involved
ate whole-grain cereals rather than refined cereals which are rich in
vitamins, minerals, and anti-oxidants and have a high fiber content.

Of 10,469 doctors, 8,266 (79 percent) ate whole-grain cereals compared
to 2,203 (21 percent) who ate refined cereals, and the researchers
found that those who ate a whole-grain breakfast cereal seven or more
times per week were less likely (by 28 percent) to develop heart
failure over the course of the study than those who never ate such
cereal.

The risk of heart failure decreased by 22 percent in those who ate a
whole-grain breakfast cereal from two to six times per week and by 14
percent in those who ate a whole-grain breakfast cereal up to once per
week.

According to the researchers, if this data is confirmed by other
studies, a healthy diet including whole-grain breakfast cereals along
with other measures may help reduce the risk of heart failure.

Luc Djoussé, M.D., M.P.H., D.Sc., the lead author of the study who is
assistant professor of medicine, says the significant health benefits
of whole-grain cereal apply to adults as well as children.

Djoussé says a whole-grain, high-fiber breakfast may lower blood
pressure and bad cholesterol and prevent heart attacks and urges the
general public to consider eating a regular whole-grain, high fiber
breakfast for its overall health benefits.

The findings were based on yearly questionnaires concerning major
heart events from 1982 to 2006; the average age of physicians in the
study was 53.7 years.

Dr. Djoussé presented the findings of the study at the American Heart
Association's 47th Annual Conference on Cardiovascular Disease
Epidemiology and Prevention in Orlando, Florida.
TC - 05 Mar 2007 15:22 GMT
> "Reduce your heart attack risk by eating whole-grain breakfast
> cereals", news-medical.net, March 5, 2007,
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> Association's 47th Annual Conference on Cardiovascular Disease
> Epidemiology and Prevention in Orlando, Florida.

The title could also be:

"Increase your heart attack risk by eating refined grain breakfast
cereals "

I'd like to see these grain eaters compared to non-grain eaters insted
of just refined grain vs whole grain.

TC
Roman Bystrianyk - 05 Mar 2007 16:01 GMT
> > "Reduce your heart attack risk by eating whole-grain breakfast
> > cereals", news-medical.net, March 5, 2007,
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
>
> TC

Here is one that may be of interest ...

Roman Bystrianyk, "Diet high in animal protein and intestinal bacteria
key in colon cancer", Health Sentinel, February 5, 2007,

Colorectal cancer is the most common gastrointestinal cancer and the
second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. In fact,
the National Cancer Institute estimates that in 2007 there will be
approximately 150,000 new colorectal cancer cases with over 50,000
deaths.

African Americans have a high rate of colon cancer, occurring at a
rate of 65 per 100,000. However, native African's rate of colon cancer
is far lower, occurring at less than 1 case per 100,000. Because
African Americans have a rate 65 times higher of getting colon cancer
than native Africans strongly suggests that differences in environment
influence this disease.

Previous studies have shown that over 90% of gastrointestinal cancers
are due to environmental influences such as diet. Strong epidemiologic
and experimental evidence indicates that a diet high in red meat and
animal fat is associated with an increased colon cancer risk.

Over 88,000 women aged 34 to 59 from the Nurses Health Study were
examined to determine the link between diet and colon cancer. The
analysis showed that those who frequently ate beef, pork, and lamb
were 2.5 times more likely to develop the disease. Those who ate
processed meats and liver were also at an increased risk, while those
eating fish and skinless chicken were at a decreased risk.

In another study, the EPIC study, a database of over 470,000 men and
women from 10 European countries was examined. Colorectal cancer was
positively associated with a dietary high in red and processed meat,
but inversely associated with a diet high in fish.

A review of 13 published studies found a significant association with
a diet in meat and the risk of colon cancer. The study found that for
each 100 grams of meat eaten each day there was a 12-17% increase in
the risk of colon cancer.

A recent study published in The Journal of Nutrition attempts to
answer why African Americans get more colon cancer than native
Africans. They examined the diets of a number of African Americans as
compared to native Africans. They also examined the intestinal
bacteria of the study participants as there is evidence that a diet
high in meat inhibits beneficial bacteria and promotes detrimental
bacteria. Hydrogen-producing bacteria harm the digestive lining, or
mucosa, while methane-producing bacteria protect the mucosa by
detoxifying the hydrogen into methane.

They found that African Americans consume more protein, fat, animal
protein, and cholesterol that native Africans. They also found that
African Americans have a higher amount of the damaging hydrogen-
producing bacteria and a lower amount of the beneficial methane-
producing bacteria than their studied native African counterparts.
"Our results suggest that the significantly higher intakes of animal
protein and fat and the higher colonic colonization with hydrogen-
producing bacteria and lower activity of colonic mathanogenic (methane
producing) bacteria help explain the higher risk of colon cancer in
African Americans."

The researchers also examined the colons of native Africans versus
African Americans. They found that the colons of native Africans were
"far healthier" than those of matched Americans. Epithelial cell
proliferation is a marker for cancer risk and the researchers found
that rate to be more than 10 times greater in African Americans which
the researchers found "particularly striking".

The authors conclude that the risk of colon cancer is determined by an
overall lifetime of environmental factors some of which promote
intestinal health and some of which are detrimental for intestinal
health. "Our study confirms the USDA [United States Department of
Agriculture] figures that suggest Americans, and particularly African
Americans, consume excess quantities of animal protein and fat and
lead us to the conclusion that a healthier lifestyle that includes
less meat and more fruit, vegetables, grains, and exercise should be
beneficial not only for the colon but also for general health."

SOURCE: The Journal of Nutrition, January 2007
Tunderbar - 06 Mar 2007 15:53 GMT
> > > "Reduce your heart attack risk by eating whole-grain breakfast
> > > cereals", news-medical.net, March 5, 2007,
[quoted text clipped - 139 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/full/137/1/175S

They failed to address differences in carb intake. Both in terms of
quantity and quality.

They do mention what carbs NAs eat: "Cornmeal, in the form of refined
white maize meal, was eaten daily by all NAs either as the meal itself
or combined with vegetable and meat flavorings." but they fail to
address the fact that AAs would eat refined wheat flour bread, pastas,
RTE cereals, etc. And refined sugars, and hfcs are not addressed at
all either.

The only difference they identified, (to begin with, I may add, and
thus) to  infer causation is red meat vs chicken. Their design and
methodology seems to be based on their pre-presumptions and it all
seems to have guided their findings to their logical but narrow
conclusions.

Pretty bad science, if you ask me. The scientific method requires a
hypothesis, then a study is designed to prove or disprove it. In this
case a hypothesis was presented and a design was created to prove it.
It is missing one important aspect of the scientific method.

Like I said, I would like to see similar studies comparing a group
that ate real food compared to the Western SAD diet looking
specifically at carbs.

TC
MarilynMann - 15 Apr 2007 15:45 GMT
Colorectal cancer has also been linked to vitamin D deficiency, which
is common among African-Americans.  This is partly because people with
darker skin produce less vitamin D through exposure to sunlight,
partly because the main food in the U.S. fortified with vitamin D is
milk.  Many African-Americans do not drink a lot of milk because they
have lactose intolerance.

Marilyn
Jim Chinnis - 05 Mar 2007 16:10 GMT
"Roman Bystrianyk" <rbystrianyk@gmail.com> wrote in part:

>Of 10,469 doctors, 8,266 (79 percent) ate whole-grain cereals compared
>to 2,203 (21 percent) who ate refined cereals, and the researchers
>found that those who ate a whole-grain breakfast cereal seven or more
>times per week were less likely (by 28 percent) to develop heart
>failure over the course of the study than those who never ate such
>cereal.

So ALL doctors ate breakfast cereal? How odd. I would have thought that many
would never eat a breakfast cereal.

And the result you mention refers to heart failure, not heart attack as in
the subject line.
--
Jim Chinnis  Warrenton, Virginia, USA  jchinnis@alum.mit.edu
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.