Medical Forum / General / Alternative / April 2007
Reduce your heart attack risk by eating whole-grain breakfast cereals
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Roman Bystrianyk - 05 Mar 2007 13:38 GMT "Reduce your heart attack risk by eating whole-grain breakfast cereals", news-medical.net, March 5, 2007, Link: http://www.news-medical.net/?id=22373
The health benefits of whole-grain breakfast cereals have been lauded yet again by the medical profession.
Researchers are now advocating that in order to lower the risk of heart failure we need to eat whole-grain breakfast cereal seven or more times each week.
The scientists Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School are referring to breakfast cereals that contain at least 25 percent oat or bran.
In the Physicians' Health study the majority of the doctors involved ate whole-grain cereals rather than refined cereals which are rich in vitamins, minerals, and anti-oxidants and have a high fiber content.
Of 10,469 doctors, 8,266 (79 percent) ate whole-grain cereals compared to 2,203 (21 percent) who ate refined cereals, and the researchers found that those who ate a whole-grain breakfast cereal seven or more times per week were less likely (by 28 percent) to develop heart failure over the course of the study than those who never ate such cereal.
The risk of heart failure decreased by 22 percent in those who ate a whole-grain breakfast cereal from two to six times per week and by 14 percent in those who ate a whole-grain breakfast cereal up to once per week.
According to the researchers, if this data is confirmed by other studies, a healthy diet including whole-grain breakfast cereals along with other measures may help reduce the risk of heart failure.
Luc Djoussé, M.D., M.P.H., D.Sc., the lead author of the study who is assistant professor of medicine, says the significant health benefits of whole-grain cereal apply to adults as well as children.
Djoussé says a whole-grain, high-fiber breakfast may lower blood pressure and bad cholesterol and prevent heart attacks and urges the general public to consider eating a regular whole-grain, high fiber breakfast for its overall health benefits.
The findings were based on yearly questionnaires concerning major heart events from 1982 to 2006; the average age of physicians in the study was 53.7 years.
Dr. Djoussé presented the findings of the study at the American Heart Association's 47th Annual Conference on Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology and Prevention in Orlando, Florida.
TC - 05 Mar 2007 15:22 GMT > "Reduce your heart attack risk by eating whole-grain breakfast > cereals", news-medical.net, March 5, 2007, [quoted text clipped - 47 lines] > Association's 47th Annual Conference on Cardiovascular Disease > Epidemiology and Prevention in Orlando, Florida. The title could also be:
"Increase your heart attack risk by eating refined grain breakfast cereals "
I'd like to see these grain eaters compared to non-grain eaters insted of just refined grain vs whole grain.
TC
Roman Bystrianyk - 05 Mar 2007 16:01 GMT > > "Reduce your heart attack risk by eating whole-grain breakfast > > cereals", news-medical.net, March 5, 2007, [quoted text clipped - 57 lines] > > TC Here is one that may be of interest ...
Roman Bystrianyk, "Diet high in animal protein and intestinal bacteria key in colon cancer", Health Sentinel, February 5, 2007,
Colorectal cancer is the most common gastrointestinal cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. In fact, the National Cancer Institute estimates that in 2007 there will be approximately 150,000 new colorectal cancer cases with over 50,000 deaths.
African Americans have a high rate of colon cancer, occurring at a rate of 65 per 100,000. However, native African's rate of colon cancer is far lower, occurring at less than 1 case per 100,000. Because African Americans have a rate 65 times higher of getting colon cancer than native Africans strongly suggests that differences in environment influence this disease.
Previous studies have shown that over 90% of gastrointestinal cancers are due to environmental influences such as diet. Strong epidemiologic and experimental evidence indicates that a diet high in red meat and animal fat is associated with an increased colon cancer risk.
Over 88,000 women aged 34 to 59 from the Nurses Health Study were examined to determine the link between diet and colon cancer. The analysis showed that those who frequently ate beef, pork, and lamb were 2.5 times more likely to develop the disease. Those who ate processed meats and liver were also at an increased risk, while those eating fish and skinless chicken were at a decreased risk.
In another study, the EPIC study, a database of over 470,000 men and women from 10 European countries was examined. Colorectal cancer was positively associated with a dietary high in red and processed meat, but inversely associated with a diet high in fish.
A review of 13 published studies found a significant association with a diet in meat and the risk of colon cancer. The study found that for each 100 grams of meat eaten each day there was a 12-17% increase in the risk of colon cancer.
A recent study published in The Journal of Nutrition attempts to answer why African Americans get more colon cancer than native Africans. They examined the diets of a number of African Americans as compared to native Africans. They also examined the intestinal bacteria of the study participants as there is evidence that a diet high in meat inhibits beneficial bacteria and promotes detrimental bacteria. Hydrogen-producing bacteria harm the digestive lining, or mucosa, while methane-producing bacteria protect the mucosa by detoxifying the hydrogen into methane.
They found that African Americans consume more protein, fat, animal protein, and cholesterol that native Africans. They also found that African Americans have a higher amount of the damaging hydrogen- producing bacteria and a lower amount of the beneficial methane- producing bacteria than their studied native African counterparts. "Our results suggest that the significantly higher intakes of animal protein and fat and the higher colonic colonization with hydrogen- producing bacteria and lower activity of colonic mathanogenic (methane producing) bacteria help explain the higher risk of colon cancer in African Americans."
The researchers also examined the colons of native Africans versus African Americans. They found that the colons of native Africans were "far healthier" than those of matched Americans. Epithelial cell proliferation is a marker for cancer risk and the researchers found that rate to be more than 10 times greater in African Americans which the researchers found "particularly striking".
The authors conclude that the risk of colon cancer is determined by an overall lifetime of environmental factors some of which promote intestinal health and some of which are detrimental for intestinal health. "Our study confirms the USDA [United States Department of Agriculture] figures that suggest Americans, and particularly African Americans, consume excess quantities of animal protein and fat and lead us to the conclusion that a healthier lifestyle that includes less meat and more fruit, vegetables, grains, and exercise should be beneficial not only for the colon but also for general health."
SOURCE: The Journal of Nutrition, January 2007
Tunderbar - 06 Mar 2007 15:53 GMT > > > "Reduce your heart attack risk by eating whole-grain breakfast > > > cereals", news-medical.net, March 5, 2007, [quoted text clipped - 139 lines] > > - Show quoted text - http://jn.nutrition.org/cgi/content/full/137/1/175S
They failed to address differences in carb intake. Both in terms of quantity and quality.
They do mention what carbs NAs eat: "Cornmeal, in the form of refined white maize meal, was eaten daily by all NAs either as the meal itself or combined with vegetable and meat flavorings." but they fail to address the fact that AAs would eat refined wheat flour bread, pastas, RTE cereals, etc. And refined sugars, and hfcs are not addressed at all either.
The only difference they identified, (to begin with, I may add, and thus) to infer causation is red meat vs chicken. Their design and methodology seems to be based on their pre-presumptions and it all seems to have guided their findings to their logical but narrow conclusions.
Pretty bad science, if you ask me. The scientific method requires a hypothesis, then a study is designed to prove or disprove it. In this case a hypothesis was presented and a design was created to prove it. It is missing one important aspect of the scientific method.
Like I said, I would like to see similar studies comparing a group that ate real food compared to the Western SAD diet looking specifically at carbs.
TC
MarilynMann - 15 Apr 2007 15:45 GMT Colorectal cancer has also been linked to vitamin D deficiency, which is common among African-Americans. This is partly because people with darker skin produce less vitamin D through exposure to sunlight, partly because the main food in the U.S. fortified with vitamin D is milk. Many African-Americans do not drink a lot of milk because they have lactose intolerance.
Marilyn
Jim Chinnis - 05 Mar 2007 16:10 GMT "Roman Bystrianyk" <rbystrianyk@gmail.com> wrote in part:
>Of 10,469 doctors, 8,266 (79 percent) ate whole-grain cereals compared >to 2,203 (21 percent) who ate refined cereals, and the researchers >found that those who ate a whole-grain breakfast cereal seven or more >times per week were less likely (by 28 percent) to develop heart >failure over the course of the study than those who never ate such >cereal. So ALL doctors ate breakfast cereal? How odd. I would have thought that many would never eat a breakfast cereal.
And the result you mention refers to heart failure, not heart attack as in the subject line. -- Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA jchinnis@alum.mit.edu
|
|
|