"JohnDoe" <dont@spam.me> wrote > More idiot crap
JohnDoe - 27 Feb 2007 16:00 GMT
> "JohnDoe" <dont@spam.me> wrote > More idiot crap
Hey tools, I read a post today that there is now a google group about
urophagia! Sounds right up your ureter, err, alley.
t - 27 Feb 2007 16:20 GMT
>> "JohnDoe" <dont@spam.me> wrote > More idiot crap
>> http://www.newstarget.com/z021560.html
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> 2) idiots are not getting away with bringing other people's health in
> danger.
So -- you think it is good to force poeple who have the right to decide. We
are going backwards to mandatory. Nice that you call people who disagree
with you *idiots*.
> Thanks for the good news Jan.
A matter of opinion. Actually, any time peoples rights are taken away is
not good. This is a free country.
>> By law, all students through ninth grade were required to be vaccinated
>> against hepatitis B and chickenpox by January 2. According to Bill
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Yep, when you break the law, there are consequences.
As in stupid laws by those in control that choose to overlook. We have a
caccination compsation act. Injuuries are why.
>> However, Washington County Assistant Superintendent for Secondary
>> Instruction Donna Hanlin said that before taking such aggressive
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>> that many vaccines contain toxic substances and are actually highly
>> dangerous.
Read that again. Many parents do not want toxic substances that are highly
dangerous put in to their childs body. NO one has the right to make any laws
to punish those who make free choices.
>> "Forced mass vaccination of schoolchildren is medical tyranny at its
>> worst," charged Mike Adams, author of "Natural Health Solutions and the
>> Conspiracy to Keep You From Knowing About Them."
>
> "The Conspiracy...." Apparently, he hasn't found a cure for paranoia yet.
Actually, he tells it like it is.
>> "What school and state officials are essentially saying now is that they
>> will use the threat of violence to force parents into injecting their
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> It is a sign that society will not accept that people let their kids
> spread vaccine preventable diseases to other (innocent) children.
No, it is a sign those in control have a huge problem.
JohnDoe - 28 Feb 2007 08:14 GMT
>>>http://www.newstarget.com/z021560.html
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> are going backwards to mandatory. Nice that you call people who disagree
> with you *idiots*.
I think it's good that the law is being enforced. That's the idea behind
laws Jan. Get a clue.
>>Thanks for the good news Jan.
>
> A matter of opinion. Actually, any time peoples rights are taken away is
> not good. This is a free country.
It's not a right to murder your child Jan. People's right end where the
rights of others are endangered.
>>>By law, all students through ninth grade were required to be vaccinated
>>>against hepatitis B and chickenpox by January 2. According to Bill
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> As in stupid laws by those in control that choose to overlook. We have a
> caccination compsation act. Injuuries are why.
In English please Jan.
>>>However, Washington County Assistant Superintendent for Secondary
>>>Instruction Donna Hanlin said that before taking such aggressive
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> dangerous put in to their childs body. NO one has the right to make any laws
> to punish those who make free choices.
Again, people's free choice ends where the rights of others are
endangered. The right to a healthy life of a child was endangered here.
Now we all know you don't think much of children's right to live, but
*I* do.
>>>"Forced mass vaccination of schoolchildren is medical tyranny at its
>>>worst," charged Mike Adams, author of "Natural Health Solutions and the
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> No, it is a sign those in control have a huge problem.
David - 28 Feb 2007 12:19 GMT
mainframetech - 01 Mar 2007 21:01 GMT
> >>>http://www.newstarget.com/z021560.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 93 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
What the story really sounds like is that the drug companies are
pushing to get more money out of prior deals on vaccinations. They
are not getting what was planned for the HPV thing, and so they push
the politicians to get the income anywhere they can. If vaccines were
perfect, I might go along with a few of the forced vaccinations, but
not while they're at the level that they're at.
Chris
JohnDoe - 02 Mar 2007 07:57 GMT
>>>>>http://www.newstarget.com/z021560.html
>>
[quoted text clipped - 102 lines]
>
> Chris
Tell me Chris, what would be more profitable for drug companies:
A) one shot of a vaccine, preventing disease, or
B) let people get sick and have them buy your expensive drugs for months
to cure them. Even better, withold a cure and only market drugs that
make the disease manageble, ensuring that they have to buy it for the
rest of their life.
I don't know about you, but 'pushing' vaccines hardly sounds profitable
to me. Worse, if you get enough people vaccinated, you can totally
eradicate a disease, which means you can't even sell the vaccine
anymore! Talk about a bad business strategy!
> It's good to see that
> 1) the law is enforced
[quoted text clipped - 41 lines]
> It is a sign that society will not accept that people let their kids
> spread vaccine preventable diseases to other (innocent) children.
My daughter in law just had to have a procedure and wished that the vaccine
was available for her, it's not. After seeing what she went through, along
with my son, I think it's a good thing. UM MOM Susan