Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Is natural healing effective?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mr. Aje - 30 Jan 2007 14:56 GMT
These days natural forms of healing and medicine have evolved into
being so much more popular and more of a choice for the health seeker
looking for ways to treat maladies.

Perhaps this may be due to the many side-effects associated with most
modern day drugs; however it does leave room for the question on
whether natural healing is really effective in the first place?

Well, from a guy who previously suffered from marring acne, asthma,
lethargy and poor health, I will say natural healing does work, on the
condition that it is applied correctly.

Take a look at what I culled up online folks:

An article on the web indicates that in 1997 Americans made 627
million visits to practitioners of alternative medicine and spent $27
billion of their own money to pay for alternative therapies. In
contrast, Americans made only 386 million visits to their family
doctor.

Admittedly, even though conventional treatment by the medical
fraternity does work well in the case of trauma and emergency, surveys
are indicating that it is much less effective when it comes to
prevention, chronic disease, and in addressing the mental, emotional,
and spiritual needs of an individual.

Moreover, the irony about alternative healing may be that it's not so
'alternative' after all, but rather the actual basis of the health
care system.

Here's an analogy to consider; Ayurvedic medicine uses diet, exercise,
yoga, meditation, massage, herbs, and medication and, despite its long
lineage, is as applicable today as it was 5000 years ago.

For example, the seeds of the Mucuna pruriens plant have long been
used to treat Parkinson's disease in India; it is now receiving
attention in conventional circles as it is more effective than l-dopa
(the common Parkinson's disease drug) and has fewer side effects

I will say natural healing can be all the more useful when one looks
into detoxifying the body and adhering to a proper diet and lifestyle
for health as perhaps nothing could be as responsible for disease and
maladies as eating unhealthy food substances.

So logic would depict that the cessation of such a practice and a
replacement with a healthier and more productive choice is definitely
the route to go.

Well, as mentioned earlier, natural healing is gaining grounds in
popularity and who knows in a few decades, not using this choice might
be seen as the UNCONVENTIONAL approach.

For now, here's to health.

Foras Aje is an independent researcher and co-founder of
BodyHealthSoul LLC.
He invites you to visit his blog on General Health Articles and News
today at http://www.bodyhealthsoul.com/wp/index.php
PeterB - 30 Jan 2007 16:33 GMT
Since there is no such thing as un-natural healing, I suspect your
question answers itself.  As you also noted, we see a substantial
number of natural medicines used in the ER, including insulin,
magnesium sulfate, thiamine, adenosine, N-acetylcysteine, and others,
all effective at saving lives.  For the most part, though, the drug
makers rely on commoditization of disease through prescription drugs,
which have nothing to do with healing, to derive their profits.  Good
luck with your blog.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.