Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Red Yeast Rice question

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
George Jetson - 27 Jan 2007 03:41 GMT
I did a little research on Red Yeast Rice, and I'm getting conflicting
info. Some places say that RYR lowers cholosterol, and some places say it
did, but the FDA banned it. So exactly how did I just buy a bottle of RYR
from Vitamin World?
David Wright - 27 Jan 2007 04:02 GMT
>I did a little research on Red Yeast Rice, and I'm getting conflicting
>info. Some places say that RYR lowers cholosterol, and some places say it
>did, but the FDA banned it. So exactly how did I just buy a bottle of RYR
>from Vitamin World?

Just lucky, I guess.  Also, I can't recall whether the ban was
overturned.  Basically, RYR is what you get if you obtain the
prescription drug Mevacor, though you're less sure of how much
you're getting.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
     "If George Bush were my dad, I'd be drunk in public so often that
      James Baker would have me killed." -- Bill Maher on the Bush twins
vernon - 27 Jan 2007 04:26 GMT
>I did a little research on Red Yeast Rice, and I'm getting conflicting
> info. Some places say that RYR lowers cholosterol, and some places say it
> did, but the FDA banned it. So exactly how did I just buy a bottle of RYR
> from Vitamin World?

1. It's safer than ANY other statin.
2. Statins (including Red Yeast Rice) lower CoQ10, thus requiring the taking
of CoQ10
3. Red Yeast Rice is a natural statin and not a pharm created DRUG
"approved" by FDA.
4. I DOES lower Cholesterol as well if not BETTER than prescription statins
(prescription SPECIFICALLY means dangerous)
5. There are other treatments to try before a statin such as  Policosinol,
Niacin, Lecithin and B complex.
6. 1200 mg daily does the job.
George Jetson - 27 Jan 2007 05:03 GMT
> 1. It's safer than ANY other statin.
> 2. Statins (including Red Yeast Rice) lower CoQ10, thus requiring the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Policosinol, Niacin, Lecithin and B complex.
> 6. 1200 mg daily does the job.

Thanks for the info. Do you know if it's baned by the FDA? I read that it
was, but I bought some in a store.
jazon48@yahoo.com - 27 Jan 2007 13:58 GMT
> > 1. It's safer than ANY other statin.
> > 2. Statins (including Red Yeast Rice) lower CoQ10, thus requiring the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> > Policosinol, Niacin, Lecithin and B complex.
> > 6. 1200 mg daily does the job.

>Thanks for the info. Do you know if it's baned by the FDA? I read that it  was, but I bought some in a store.

 To repeat and expand on Dave's post:

1.  Red Yeast Rice contains the same active ingredient as a
prescription statin drug.   It can produce the same life-extending
effects of a prescription statin drug.   It can produce the same death-
causing deleterious side effects of a prescription statin drug.   Odds
are that it will produce life-extending benefits but a minor fraction
of the users will suffer from the same death-causing effects.

2.  The FDA banned it because,  obviously,  unrestricted use of a drug
with death-causing potential by naive consumers could easily result in
death.   (Some key words in that sentence are "unrestricted" and
"naive").

3.   The issue has been in and out of the courts since at least
1998.    It disappeared from the market for a while,  then reappeared
so I assume the pro advocates  are currently ahead of the con
advocates.

4.  As with any prescription drug with possible death-causing
effects,  if you choose to use Red Yeast Rice,  you must be aware of
the symptoms leading to possible death.   Since there's no doctor in
the loop as with a prescription statin,   you are the one who must do
the watching.    Find a list of symptoms and keep it handy.   I had a
friend who tried to take a statin despite the symptoms and it wasn't a
nice experience.

5.  One big problem in this whole issue;  OTC red yeast rice is not
regulated so there is no control of the amount of active statin in any
commercial product.  You don't know if you are getting a very low
dose,  a very useful dose,  or a very dangerous dose.

6.  In any case,  folks taking a prescription statin or Red Yeast Rice
should also take about 200 mg of CoQ10

7.  Don't forget Niacin,  ground flax seed,  oatmeal, walnuts and fish
oil.   They should be tried before testing Red Yeast Rice.   They
worked so well for me that I decided not to  try the Red Yeast Rice.

Policosanol has been discredited.    The original research was
performed by folks in Cuba who had a compelling interest in selling
the product.    When a German health food supplier tried to duplicate
the original research (before deciding to offer the product),  it
could not produce any benefits.

7.  BTW;  I would check IHerb's price before buying my second
bottle.    I learned to do this after noticing that my local health
food store owner was wearing a diamond ring worth more than my first
house.

Jason
vernon - 27 Jan 2007 14:52 GMT
>> > 1. It's safer than ANY other statin.
>> > 2. Statins (including Red Yeast Rice) lower CoQ10, thus requiring the
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
>
> Jason

The Statins in RYR are different that the artificial ones and it is
difficult to get too much as in the case of artificial statins, not a big
difference in "concept" from natural fats and hydrogenated fats.

German health food suppliers are more "industry and politics" controlled
than even American.  They are second only to Canada, disasterville.
There have been MANY studies of policosanol that show positive results
including slicker blood.

Yes, I Herb is a great place for price and quality, save "about" 15 -30%
over the typical outlet which has to rent space, pay distribution and pay
clerks.  The health food store owners don't get rich easily.
George Jetson - 28 Jan 2007 15:47 GMT
> 2.  The FDA banned it because,  obviously,  unrestricted use of a drug
> with death-causing potential by naive consumers could easily result in
> death.   (Some key words in that sentence are "unrestricted" and
> "naive").

Thanks for the info. I was curious about this sentence, though. Why hasn't
the FDA banned cigarettes? I would think that smoking cigarettes by naive
consumers could easily result in death also.
vernon - 28 Jan 2007 17:22 GMT
>> 2.  The FDA banned it because,  obviously,  unrestricted use of a drug
>> with death-causing potential by naive consumers could easily result in
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the FDA banned cigarettes? I would think that smoking cigarettes by naive
> consumers could easily result in death also.

The statement was a GROSS overstatement of the FDA position.  (A polite way
of identifying a lie)
AND

1. The FDA has required a statement on tobacco products indicating the
dangers.
2. It is NOT as dangerous as a "prescription" drug.
3. No such statement is required on RYR other than the generic (lactating,
pregnant, have liver problems, taking medications)
4. A huge statement is REQUIRED on prescription statins as with all
"prescription" drugs.
mainframetech - 29 Jan 2007 15:43 GMT
George,
   As to how low you should even bother to lower your LDL
cholesterol, there is some difference of opinion.  A number of doctors
are finally coming out with opposing views that we actually need
cholesterol at our normal levels for helping with things like
alzheimers disease and others.  Read "The Cholesterol Myhts" by Uffe
Ravnskov.  Also, if anyone tries to get you to take statins, you might
want to go to a doctor's website that had his own experience with
those little gems:
   www.spacedoc.net   (30 years as a NASA doctor)

   No doubt the folks that support the giant drug companies wouldn't
want you to read those things, but it's worth the time in my opinion.

Chris

> jazo...@yahoo.com wrote innews:1169906295.441146.215020@a34g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the FDA banned cigarettes? I would think that smoking cigarettes by naive
> consumers could easily result in death also.
jazon48@yahoo.com - 29 Jan 2007 15:44 GMT
> jazo...@yahoo.com wrote innews:1169906295.441146.215020@a34g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the FDA banned cigarettes? I would think that smoking cigarettes by naive
> consumers could easily result in death also.

On banning cigarettes. . .a fine idea but remember what happened when
the government tried to ban alcoholic beverages.

A bit more on statins and Red Yeast Rice:

  1.  All folks taking statins  (prescription or Red Yeast Rice)
should monitor and restrict their grapefuit consumption.   Grapefruit
juice interferes with the destruction mechanism which removes statins
and some other drugs from the body.   That allows the drugs to build
up,  possibly to dangerous levels.

 2.  More on Red Yeast Rice and its statin content:

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/red-yeast-rice/NS_patient-redyeast

". . . .Red yeast rice. . . contains several compounds collectively
known as Monacolins, substances known to inhibit cholesterol
synthesis. One of these, "Monacolin K" is a potent inhibitor of HMG-
CoA reductase, and is also known as Mevinolin or Lovastatin (Mevacor®,
a drug produced by Merck & Co., Inc). . . ."

 -Jason
vernon - 29 Jan 2007 17:31 GMT
On Jan 28, 10:47 am, George Jetson <gjets...@gmail.com> wrote:
> jazo...@yahoo.com wrote
> innews:1169906295.441146.215020@a34g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> the FDA banned cigarettes? I would think that smoking cigarettes by naive
> consumers could easily result in death also.

On banning cigarettes. . .a fine idea but remember what happened when
the government tried to ban alcoholic beverages.

A bit more on statins and Red Yeast Rice:

  1.  All folks taking statins  (prescription or Red Yeast Rice)
should monitor and restrict their grapefuit consumption.   Grapefruit
juice interferes with the destruction mechanism which removes statins
and some other drugs from the body.   That allows the drugs to build
up,  possibly to dangerous levels.

 2.  More on Red Yeast Rice and its statin content:

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/red-yeast-rice/NS_patient-redyeast

". . . .Red yeast rice. . . contains several compounds collectively
known as Monacolins, substances known to inhibit cholesterol
synthesis. One of these, "Monacolin K" is a potent inhibitor of HMG-
CoA reductase, and is also known as Mevinolin or Lovastatin (Mevacor®,
a drug produced by Merck & Co., Inc). . . ."

 -Jason

AND, no matter how it comes out RYR is NOT a controlled substance while
prescription statins ARE.

EVERY drug company tried their best to get RYR controlled.  The only thing
that happened was RYR is SAFE (as safe as any pill) while prescription
statins are NOT safe.

To give an idea of how controlling FTC and FDA are, Stevia is not even
allowed to be called a sweetener on the label.

Do I think RYR is totally safe?  No.  Is it magnitudes safer than
prescription statins?  Yes.  Is it as effective as prescription statins?
EXACTLY.

Mayo Clinic is as far from an unbiased source as one can POSSIBLY get.
vernon - 27 Jan 2007 14:31 GMT
>> 1. It's safer than ANY other statin.
>> 2. Statins (including Red Yeast Rice) lower CoQ10, thus requiring the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Thanks for the info. Do you know if it's baned by the FDA? I read that it
> was, but I bought some in a store.

About 6 years ago there was a very temporary hold by the FDA.
PeterB - 29 Jan 2007 18:19 GMT
> I did a little research on Red Yeast Rice, and I'm getting conflicting
> info. Some places say that RYR lowers cholosterol, and some places say it
> did, but the FDA banned it. So exactly how did I just buy a bottle of RYR
> from Vitamin World?

A better question would be to ask whether the notion that "high
cholesterol" is a disease has scientific merit.  What is the evidence
that one can modify his disease risk simply by modifying a marker
associated with disease?  One half of all heart attacks occur in those
with "normal" cholesterol.  A fairly substantial number of people
having heart attacks have below-normal cholesterol.  Read the article
at http://www.shareguide.com/cholesterol.html.  The best discussion of
systemic heart disease, in my opinion, is the book by Mathias Rath,
"Why Animals Don't Get Heart Attacks But People Do."
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.