>> > Quoting from this ORIGINAL POSTING from Jan Drew:
>> > http://www.google.com/groups?&selm=20040924222415.01015.00001086%40mb-m15.aol.com
[quoted text clipped - 80 lines]
> Granted. However, Jan is saying that their practices are satanic,
> which goes quite a long way beyond disagreeing with them.
Saying something comes from Satan, IMHO, is not the same as saying that the
practice is satanic, i.e., worship of Satan.
For example, if the act of praying to saints comes from Satan, then the
people who pray to saints instead of directly to God are not worshipping
Satan, even if the act of praying to saints instead of to God comes from
Satan. Personally, I think our knowledge and understand of God is so
limited, that we can't really have an informed opinion of whether praying to
saints is right or wrong.
It is kind of like eating liberty fries during the start of the Iraq War.
The fries may have first been made in France, but eating them doesn't mean
that you support the French (although, I did agree with the French position
even back then). No more than eating sour kraut during WWI means that you
supported the Germans.
Jeff
cathyb - 31 Oct 2006 10:42 GMT
> >> > Quoting from this ORIGINAL POSTING from Jan Drew:
> >> > http://www.google.com/groups?&selm=20040924222415.01015.00001086%40mb-m15.aol.com
[quoted text clipped - 83 lines]
> Saying something comes from Satan, IMHO, is not the same as saying that the
> practice is satanic, i.e., worship of Satan.
I must disagree with your premise that disagreeing with the Catholic
Church is the same as calling their practices "from Satan". i.e.,
satanic (in much the same way that something coming from America is
American). Particularly to a christian, that is indeed bigotry and
prejudice.
Cathy
> For example, if the act of praying to saints comes from Satan, then the
> people who pray to saints instead of directly to God are not worshipping
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> even back then). No more than eating sour kraut during WWI means that you
> supported the Germans.
Actually, it's really not like that at all. Think about it.
> Jeff
>> > Quoting from this ORIGINAL POSTING from Jan Drew:
>> > http://www.google.com/groups?&selm=20040924222415.01015.00001086%40mb-m15.aol.com
[quoted text clipped - 80 lines]
> Granted. However, Jan is saying that their practices are satanic,
> which goes quite a long way beyond disagreeing with them.
Rosalind is lying again.
Jeff - 30 Oct 2006 02:26 GMT
>>> > Quoting from this ORIGINAL POSTING from Jan Drew:
>>> > http://www.google.com/groups?&selm=20040924222415.01015.00001086%40mb-m15.aol.com
[quoted text clipped - 88 lines]
>>
> Rosalind is lying again.
I don't think Rosalind is lying. Obviously, I don't agree with her
conclusions. But I don't need to insult her to let my view be known, either.
Jeff
cathyb - 30 Oct 2006 02:59 GMT
> >>> > Quoting from this ORIGINAL POSTING from Jan Drew:
> >>> > http://www.google.com/groups?&selm=20040924222415.01015.00001086%40mb-m15.aol.com
[quoted text clipped - 93 lines]
>
> Jeff
Who the f.ck is Rosalind?
Jeff - 31 Oct 2006 00:31 GMT
>> >>> > Quoting from this ORIGINAL POSTING from Jan Drew:
>> >>> > http://www.google.com/groups?&selm=20040924222415.01015.00001086%40mb-m15.aol.com
[quoted text clipped - 99 lines]
>
> Who the f.ck is Rosalind?
You don't need to use vulgar lanquage.
jeff
Jan Drew - 31 Oct 2006 03:54 GMT
>>> >>> > Quoting from this ORIGINAL POSTING from Jan Drew:
>>> >>> > http://www.google.com/groups?&selm=20040924222415.01015.00001086%40mb-m15.aol.com
[quoted text clipped - 105 lines]
>
> jeff
Imagine her four kids listening to just that. Vulgar language..
http://web.archive.org/web/20050205050827/http://www.ratbags.com/posse/whoarewe.htm
http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/willanidiffer.htm
http://www.dalefield.com/toxicology/
http://www.gatago.com/misc/health/alternative/27487889.html
http://autismdiva.blogspot.com/2005/06/most-toxic-substance.html
http://groups.google.com/groups?lnk=hpsg&q=you+Rosalind+Dalefield+hiding+behind+
the+alias+of+%22Cathy+B.%22%3F+
cathyb - 31 Oct 2006 10:37 GMT
> >> >>> > Quoting from this ORIGINAL POSTING from Jan Drew:
> >> >>> > http://www.google.com/groups?&selm=20040924222415.01015.00001086%40mb-m15.aol.com
[quoted text clipped - 101 lines]
>
> You don't need to use vulgar lanquage.
That's entirely subjective; obviously I did feel the need.
Who the f.ck is Rosalind?
> jeff
Jan Drew - 30 Oct 2006 03:43 GMT
>>>> > Quoting from this ORIGINAL POSTING from Jan Drew:
>>>> > http://www.google.com/groups?&selm=20040924222415.01015.00001086%40mb-m15.aol.com
[quoted text clipped - 94 lines]
>
> Jeff
Fine. It is a FACT she is lying.
nosugarintea@yahoo.com - 30 Oct 2006 03:59 GMT
You have never taken a science course in your life, right? You are
retarded .
> >>>> > Quoting from this ORIGINAL POSTING from Jan Drew:
> >>>> > http://www.google.com/groups?&selm=20040924222415.01015.00001086%40mb-m15.aol.com
[quoted text clipped - 95 lines]
> > Jeff
> Fine. It is a FACT she is lying.