http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/edu
cation/6071216.stm
The ADHD dilemma for parents
By Cordelia Rayner
All Out Productions
With a recent survey suggesting almost 50% of children with Attention
Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder have been excluded at some point, parents
face difficult choices.
Up to one in 20 children have ADHD, which affects concentration and can
cause them to be disruptive.
Many are being put on medication but unions warn that some schools cannot
meet their medical needs.
And American scientists have raised concerns about the widespread use of
ADHD medications.
A recent survey by the National Attention Deficit Disorder information and
support service found the exclusion rate for children with ADHD was 10 times
higher than that of those without.
Some parents have told the BBC they were told to give their children
medication or keep them at home, and that they often felt they were being
denied a proper education.
The only way parents can get their children an education is through the
courtroom
Linda Sheppard
The National Association of Head Teachers spokesperson, Jan Myles, said:
"It's the system that fails the child but all too often the blame is laid at
the door of the school.
"A lot of heads I'm talking to on a daily basis are exhausted with trying to
implement different strategies that are not working."
One mother, Linda Sheppard, is taking her local authority to the European
Court of Human Rights to gain her son the educational support she claims he
needs.
Ms Sheppard removed her son from his school because she says they were
unable to offer him adequate support in the classroom.
Continual exclusions from school trips and other activities caused his
well-being to plummet and by the time he was seven he threatened suicide,
she says.
For 18 months Ms Sheppard struggled to find a school she felt could cope
with her son's education needs.
"It's ridiculous - the only way parents can get their children an education
is through the courtroom," says Ms Sheppard, who claims that many exclusions
are not recorded in official statistics and are classified as authorised
absences by schools.
Other parents say they are coming under pressure to have their children on
prescription drugs.
The BBC's Five Live Report spoke to one parent who said they were asked by
their school to either put their child on medication or they would be
excluded.
In the past 10 years the prescription rates for ADHD medications, which are
based on the chemical methylphenidate, have risen sharply.
These are powerful medications that have serious risks
Dr Steven Nissen
In 1994 there were just 4,000 prescriptions for methylphenidate, 10 years
later that figure had gone up to 359,000 - a 90-fold increase.
However, the news comes at a time when leading American doctors have called
for greater warnings on the labels of the ADHD medications.
The risks outlined by Dr Steven Nissen include tics, strokes, and in severe
cases, sudden death.
"These drugs are not candy," says Dr Nissen, President of the American
College of Cardiologists who was one of the key experts that moved to
increase the warnings. "These are powerful medications that have serious
risks."
In Britain though the drug advisory board, the MRHA, is not yet planning to
release any new guidelines.
Manufacturers said the risks identified were small and only applied to
people with pre-existing heart conditions.
One drugs company, Novartis, said it had "conducted a review of our global
safety database in early 2005 which did not show any increased events of
sudden deaths or strokes among methylphenidate users compared to the general
population".
Five Live Report can be heard on Sunday 22 October at 1100 BST and 1930BST
and will also be available at the Five Live Report website .
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/uk_news/education/6071216.stm
Published: 2006/10/22 08:36:17 GMT
© BBC MMVI
~~~~~~~
Prediction. Mark Probert will reply to this post, doing his dance,
therefore, blowing his UDP AGAIN.
Raving - 30 Oct 2006 05:42 GMT
> http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/edu
cation/6071216.stm
>
[quoted text clipped - 103 lines]
> Prediction. Mark Probert will reply to this post, doing his dance,
> therefore, blowing his UDP AGAIN.
Amazing.
An important piece of news "ignored" because Jan Drew posted it?
The English class system isn't dead; it has shifted onto other
criteria.
If the person cannot make the cut then they are OUT of THERE.
... Hard luck, old cock. Better chance next life.
If the parent doesn't control their unruly brat at school by chemical
or other means; it's no cheese off the foreskin of the headmaster.
NIMBY reigns supreme.
"Ours is not to understand why. Ours is but to do and die."
Nothing personal, Lamb Chop, you are substandard.
Raving Beauty - 30 Oct 2006 18:29 GMT
> > http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/edu
cation/6071216.stm
> >
[quoted text clipped - 106 lines]
>
> An important piece of news "ignored" because Jan Drew posted it?
A researcher researched the posting histories of all the targets of
organized criminal vigilante stalking on usenet.
The only thing ALL the targets of organized criminal vigilante stalking
have in common is they are all people who post on topic articles to
initiate on topic discussion.
Raving - 30 Oct 2006 20:38 GMT
> > > http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/edu
cation/6071216.stm
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> have in common is they are all people who post on topic articles to
> initiate on topic discussion.
Um, don't you post a lot of 'on topic' articles to initiate on topic
discussion?
Isn't that ALSO what "setting one's self up as a target" means?
Like, if ya' decide to go down into the 'bear pit' and fight it out,
what do you expect ...
No bears?
Why bother.
Raving - 30 Oct 2006 21:14 GMT
> > http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/edu
cation/6071216.stm
> >
[quoted text clipped - 122 lines]
>
> Nothing personal, Lamb Chop, you are substandard.
It's nice to know that people are happy with the
perform-or-get-out-of-the-classroom attitude referred to in the OP
article.
The child cannot concentrate, eh?
... must be an "Attention deficit" problem.
Such as ...
* The teacher is totally boring.
* The child ALREADY knows and understands the gist of what is being
taught. ... Only, a quarter of an ear is kept open. Eventually, ...
zzZzz
* The child does NOT KNOW how to concentrate. ... Never learned how to
do such as thing!. Either, the understanding came immediately, mostly
... or it was too difficult and was not understandable. Most of the
time, the understanding came immediately. No reason to concentrate.
Never needed to concentrate before. What does it mean; this
'concentration' ... How do I figure out how to comprehend something
that I am unable to pick up immediately?
* The child has already found six interesting things in the 1st 5
minutes of the teachers presentation and is overwhelmed with the new
material.
* Or perhaps the child "is" paying attention but merely scanning the
material for some specific and individually meaningful aspect?
A person doesn't concentrate.
It can mean many different things.
But to refer to it as a lack of attention; to call it a handicap and
leave it at that is inexcusable ignorance and total bullshit.
The educators and psychologists should know better than that. What
have they contributed to education and cognition in the last 2,000
years ...
jack squat?
Raving - 31 Oct 2006 16:09 GMT
> > > http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/edu
cation/6071216.stm
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 165 lines]
>
> jack squat?
Seems as if it is pointless to post any material which has meaningful
content.
Usenet is useless.
Raving - 01 Nov 2006 00:28 GMT
> > > > http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/edu
cation/6071216.stm
> > > >
[quoted text clipped - 169 lines]
>
> Usenet is useless.
Yep.
I am too useless for Usenet.
OK.