Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Emergency Department Visits Involving ADHD Stimulant Medications

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jan Drew - 26 Sep 2006 22:49 GMT
https://dawninfo.samhsa.gov/files/TNDR09ADHDmeds.htm

Excerpts:

Emergency Department Visits Involving ADHD Stimulant Medications

       a.. An estimated 7,873 drug-related emergency department (ED) visits
involved methylphenidate or amphetamine-dextroamphetamine, two medications
used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
       b.. The most frequent reason for these visits was nonmedical use
(48%), followed by adverse reactions associated with medical use (34%),
accidental ingestion (10%), and suicide attempts (8%).
       c.. The rates of ED visits involving methylphenidate or
amphetamine-dextroamphetamine for patients aged 12 to 17 were higher than
the rates for patients aged 18 or older.
       d.. Over two thirds (68%) of the visits involving nonmedical use of
these two drugs also involved another substance, such as alcohol, an illicit
drug, or pharmaceutical.

Recent studies have indicated that as many as 7 percent of children and 4
percent of adults now meet the criteria for a diagnosis of
attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).1,2,3 As a result, more
prescriptions are being written for the stimulants used to treat ADHD. More
prescriptions will likely lead to increases in medical side effects
associated with the use of these medications and, potentially, greater use
of these drugs for nonmedical purposes as well.4 A recent Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) advisory panel recognized the danger of side effects
for ADHD stimulants and recommended that they carry a warning of an
increased potential for cardiac problems, such as hypertension, cardiac
arrests, and stroke.5 The possibility of medical problems may be exacerbated
by using ADHD stimulant medications improperly or in combination with other
drugs.

The potential for greater access of these medications to persons without a
prescription is supported by research, which has shown that peers are a
common source of ADHD medications.6 Although the potential for diversion has
increased, estimates from the 2003 National Survey on Drug Abuse and Health
(NSDUH) indicate that nonmedical use of ADHD stimulant medications is still
relatively low: 0.3 percent of the population aged 12 or older reported
using such stimulants nonmedically during the past year. However, those aged
18 to 25 had a higher rate of nonmedical use than those who were younger or
older.7 College students, who may use these drugs as study aids because of
their stimulant properties, fall primarily in this 18-to-25 age group.

The Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN), which collects data from a national
sample of short-term, general, non-Federal hospitals,8 provides estimates of
drug-related emergency department (ED) visits. The findings presented in
this issue of The DAWN Report are based on ED visits related to two of the
pharmaceuticals commonly used to treat ADHD-methylphenidate and
amphetamine-dextroamphetamine. DAWN includes both generic and branded drugs,
including methylphenidate marketed as Ritalin© and Concerta© and
amphetamine-dextroamphetamine marketed as Adderal©. Based on DAWN data, this
report examines the reasons for the ED visits and the relative frequency of
these ED visits for different age groups. Finally, for the ED visits
involving nonmedical use, DAWN provides the ability to examine the drugs
used along with the ADHD drugs. DAWN, which observes drug-related morbidity
in ED visits, offers a different view of drug use than the NSDUH, which
measures prevalence of nonmedical use in the population at large.

Overview

In 2004, about 106 million ED visits occurred in short-term, general,
non-Federal hospitals in the United States.9 DAWN estimates that about 2
million ED visits in 2004 were drug related, and the ADHD drugs examined in
this report were implicated in about 1 percent of those drug-related visits.
Methylphenidate was involved in an estimated 3,601 ED visits, and
amphetamine-dextroamphetamine was involved in an estimated 4,272 ED visits.

 Table 1. Estimated ED visits, by reason for ED visit and drug Reason for
visit Methylphenidate Amphetamine-
     dextroamphetamine Total
     ED visits % of visits ED visits % of visits ED visits % of visits
     Totala 3,601 100% 4,272 100% 7,873 100%
     Nonmedical use 1,541   43% 2,228   52% 3,769   48%
     Adverse reaction (medical use) 1,322   37% 1,320   31% 2,642   34%
     Accidental ingestion    390   11%    435   10%    825   10%
     Suicide attempt    348   10%    289     7%    637     8%

more at link
Rich - 26 Sep 2006 23:19 GMT
> There is nothing worse than aggressive stupidity. Johann Wolfgang von
> Goethe> Excerpts:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> visits involved methylphenidate or amphetamine-dextroamphetamine, two
> medications used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

Considering the number of people who are prescribed these medications, this
is a rather low rate. The ER visits for acetaminophen, narcotic analgesics,
and even iron supplements are all much higher.

>        b.. The most frequent reason for these visits was nonmedical use
> (48%), followed by adverse reactions associated with medical use (34%),
> accidental ingestion (10%), and suicide attempts (8%).

Bear in mind that the "adverse reactions" are almost all transient
tachycardia which carries very little threat of injury or death in the young
population that is likely to be taking prescribed amphetamines.

>        c.. The rates of ED visits involving methylphenidate or
> amphetamine-dextroamphetamine for patients aged 12 to 17 were higher than
> the rates for patients aged 18 or older.

Well, duh. First, there are more 12-17 year-olds prescribed the medications
than those 18+. Second, a 12-17yo feeling ill is likely to be taken to the
ER by parents. An 18+ having an adverse reaction, especially if he is using
diverted drugs, or abusing his own, is more likely to wait for the effects
to subside.

>        d.. Over two thirds (68%) of the visits involving nonmedical use of
> these two drugs also involved another substance, such as alcohol, an
> illicit drug, or pharmaceutical.

Yes, people who abuse drugs often abuse more than one drug.

> Recent studies have indicated that as many as 7 percent of children and 4
> percent of adults now meet the criteria for a diagnosis of
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> associated with the use of these medications and, potentially, greater use
> of these drugs for nonmedical purposes as well.

True, but for every new abuser there are likely to be many more who are
enabled to lead productive lives with the help of the medication. It's a
good trade-off.

> 4 A recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory panel recognized
> the danger of side effects for ADHD stimulants and recommended that they
> carry a warning of an increased potential for cardiac problems, such as
> hypertension, cardiac arrests, and stroke.

Yes, those things can happen, but they very seldom do in the younger
population.

> 5 The possibility of medical problems may be exacerbated by using ADHD
> stimulant medications improperly or in combination with other drugs.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> aids because of their stimulant properties, fall primarily in this
> 18-to-25 age group.

Amphetamines were a serious drug abuse problem in the '60's and '70's when
they were massively prescribed as "diet pills" and were available under the
counter at every truck stop. They are becoming a big problem again now, but
in the form of illegal methamphetamines ("ice" here in Hawaii), not Ritalin
or Adderal. The prescription-drug component of the amphetamine abuse problem
is a negligible fraction. And don't give me any bullshit about the ice-heads
"starting out" on prescription drugs unless you have some solid evidence
that the rate of occurance of that is significant.

> The Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN), which collects data from a national
> sample of short-term, general, non-Federal hospitals,8 provides estimates
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>      Accidental ingestion    390   11%    435   10%    825   10%
>      Suicide attempt    348   10%    289     7%    637     8%

All in all, this article is interesting, but is not so scary as it is
intended to be.
Signature


--Rich

Recommended websites:

http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
http://www.acahf.org.au
http://www.quackwatch.org/
http://www.skeptic.com/
http://www.csicop.org/

Jan Drew - 27 Sep 2006 04:58 GMT
>> There is nothing worse than aggressive stupidity. Johann Wolfgang von
>> Goethe>

Nothing is more dangerous than active ignorance. -- Goethe
Posted in 2002 by me.

Excerpts:

>> Emergency Department Visits Involving ADHD Stimulant Medications
>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> if he is using diverted drugs, or abusing his own, is more likely to wait
> for the effects to subside.

If there drugs were so not easy to get, 18 year olds couldn't get them.
This is the fault of doctors.

>>        d.. Over two thirds (68%) of the visits involving nonmedical use
>> of these two drugs also involved another substance, such as alcohol, an
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> enabled to lead productive lives with the help of the medication. It's a
> good trade-off.

In your opinion.  The fact is they are given to very young kids. Which is
insane.
I was called a liar by your buddy, Mark Probert and others--when I posted
that
years ago.  Now it is well proven
I was correct and not a liar.

>> 4 A recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory panel recognized
>> the danger of side effects for ADHD stimulants and recommended that they
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Yes, those things can happen, but they very seldom do in the younger
> population.

But, but,, but--Richey.  Face the facts.

>> 5 The possibility of medical problems may be exacerbated by using ADHD
>> stimulant medications improperly or in combination with other drugs.
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> now, but in the form of illegal methamphetamines ("ice" here in Hawaii),
> not Ritalin or Adderal.

Is that right?  Got any proof?

The prescription-drug component of the amphetamine abuse problem
> is a negligible fraction. And don't give me any bullshit about the
> ice-heads "starting out" on prescription drugs unless you have some solid
> evidence that the rate of occurance of that is significant.

I love it *solid*.  I that anything like--*Substantial* *real*  *convincing*
*hard* *clear-cut* *reasonable*
*significant* *credibile* *compelling* *copious* *direct*  *reliable*
*adequate*  Used by your gang group.

>> The Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN), which collects data from a
>> national sample of short-term, general, non-Federal hospitals,8 provides
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> All in all, this article is interesting, but is not so scary as it is
> intended to be.

Oh, dear--now you are in big trouble.  Some on a.s.a.d. think DAWN is very
reliable.
Peter Bowditch - 27 Sep 2006 06:34 GMT
>Nothing is more dangerous than active ignorance. -- Goethe

Start short-selling your irony meter futures. This didn't just blow
mine up but the one in the house next door as well.
Signature

Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

Peter Bowditch - 27 Sep 2006 06:57 GMT
>>Nothing is more dangerous than active ignorance. -- Goethe
>
>Start short-selling your irony meter futures. This didn't just blow
>mine up but the one in the house next door as well.

I just checked because I want to add it to the list of random
quotations on my site, and it seems that alternate words are: "Nothing
is worse than active ignorance", which doesn't have quite the same
meaning.

Then, of course, there is "There is nothing more frightful than
ignorance in action", which is very probably just another different
translation from German of the same quotation but means something else
again in English.
Signature

Peter Bowditch aa #2243
The Millenium Project http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au
Australian Skeptics http://www.skeptics.com.au
To email me use my first name only at ratbags.com

Jeff - 28 Sep 2006 02:02 GMT
>>> There is nothing worse than aggressive stupidity. Johann Wolfgang von
>>> Goethe>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> If there drugs were so not easy to get, 18 year olds couldn't get them.
> This is the fault of doctors.

It is not the fault of doctors that patients abuse drugs.

>>>        d.. Over two thirds (68%) of the visits involving nonmedical use
>>> of these two drugs also involved another substance, such as alcohol, an
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> In your opinion.  The fact is they are given to very young kids. Which is
> insane.

Really? It is insane to enable kids to pay attention and do well in school?

> I was called a liar by your buddy, Mark Probert and others--when I posted
> that
> years ago.  Now it is well proven
> I was correct and not a liar.

In your opinion.

>>> 4 A recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory panel recognized
>>> the danger of side effects for ADHD stimulants and recommended that they
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> But, but,, but--Richey.  Face the facts.

Provide us with evidence that they happen often.

Jeff

>>> 5 The possibility of medical problems may be exacerbated by using ADHD
>>> stimulant medications improperly or in combination with other drugs.
[quoted text clipped - 70 lines]
> Oh, dear--now you are in big trouble.  Some on a.s.a.d. think DAWN is very
> reliable.
Jan Drew - 28 Sep 2006 03:30 GMT
>>>> There is nothing worse than aggressive stupidity. Johann Wolfgang von
>>>> Goethe>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> It is not the fault of doctors that patients abuse drugs.

If there drugs were so not easy to get, 18 year olds couldn't get them.
This is the fault of doctors.

What part of that do you not understand?

>>>>        d.. Over two thirds (68%) of the visits involving nonmedical use
>>>> of these two drugs also involved another substance, such as alcohol, an
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Really?

Yes, really .

It is a fact that you knew already.

It is insane to enable kids to pay attention and do well in school?

That's debatabe,  It was shown that they actually did worst on tests.

>> I was called a liar by your buddy, Mark Probert and others--when I posted
>> that
>> years ago.  Now it is well proven
>> I was correct and not a liar.
>
> In your opinion.

Nope. A proven fact (and you knew that also).

>>>> 4 A recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory panel recognized
>>>> the danger of side effects for ADHD stimulants and recommended that
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Jeff

Rich needs to face facts.  Jeff--notkidsdoc--Jeffrey Peter, M.D--Jeff P.
Utz, MD.

>>>> 5 The possibility of medical problems may be exacerbated by using ADHD
>>>> stimulant medications improperly or in combination with other drugs.
[quoted text clipped - 70 lines]
>> Oh, dear--now you are in big trouble.  Some on a.s.a.d. think DAWN is
>> very reliable.
Jeff - 29 Sep 2006 03:48 GMT
>>>>> There is nothing worse than aggressive stupidity. Johann Wolfgang von
>>>>> Goethe>
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>
> What part of that do you not understand?

Doctors are not police. One alternative is to have a pharmacist in each
school and college, giving out pills one-by-one. For about $80k per year per
school.

Do you have a workable alternative?

People take other people's antibiotics. But that is not the fault of
doctors, either.

>>>>>        d.. Over two thirds (68%) of the visits involving nonmedical
>>>>> use of these two drugs also involved another substance, such as
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> It is a fact that you knew already.

It is your opinion. Not that I think it is a good idea to give these drugs
to young kids. But, they are not licensed for this either, by the FDA.

> It is insane to enable kids to pay attention and do well in school?
>
> That's debatabe,  It was shown that they actually did worst on tests.

References, please. Again, if you don't back your claims, you lose. Backing
your claims is your homework, not mine.

>>> I was called a liar by your buddy, Mark Probert and others--when I
>>> posted that
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Nope. A proven fact (and you knew that also).

No, I have not seen any evidence that makes me think Probert is a liar. If
you think I knew what you say, prove you can read minds. Of course, you may
believe it and may have said it a million times, but I usually ignore
garbage, so I ignore most of what you type.

>>>>> 4 A recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory panel
>>>>> recognized the danger of side effects for ADHD stimulants and
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Rich needs to face facts.  Jeff--notkidsdoc--Jeffrey Peter, M.D--Jeff P.
> Utz, MD.

In other words you are unable or unwilling to back your cliams.

You lose again.

When you are able to say something intelligent, I will respond. Until then,
I will not respond to anything else you write in this thread.

Jeff
<...>
Rich - 28 Sep 2006 03:36 GMT
>>> There is nothing worse than aggressive stupidity. Johann Wolfgang von
>>> Goethe>
>
> Nothing is more dangerous than active ignorance. -- Goethe
> Posted in 2002 by me.

Actually it's, "Es ist nichts schrecklicher als eine tätige Unwissenheit."
It loses something in translation.

YOUR active display of ignorance is legendary.

> Excerpts:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> If there drugs were so not easy to get, 18 year olds couldn't get them.
> This is the fault of doctors.

No, it's not the fault of doctors when prescription drugs are abused.

>>>        d.. Over two thirds (68%) of the visits involving nonmedical use
>>> of these two drugs also involved another substance, such as alcohol, an
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> years ago.  Now it is well proven
> I was correct and not a liar.

You are correct that the medications are prescribed for younger patients
than in the past. That this practice is "insane" is your opinion, and in my
opinion you are wrong.

>>> 4 A recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory panel recognized
>>> the danger of side effects for ADHD stimulants and recommended that they
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> But, but,, but--Richey.  Face the facts.

The fact is that healthy young hearts tolerate amphetamine induced
tachycardia very well. Those of any age with cardiac disease, particularly
tachyarrhythmias do not fare as well. Since ADHD medications are used
primarily by young people, and hardly at all by the elderly population in
which most of the cases of cardiac diseases occur, hypertension, cardiac
arrests, and stroke resulting from ADHD medications are rare events. In all
my years as an ER nurse, I've never seen one. (Actually I've only seen four
or five ER admissions related to ADHD meds, and with one exception all that
I can recall were simple panic attacks which resolved and the patients were
discharged home from the ER. The exception was a young lady (I can't recall
her age) who took her son's Ritalin because she thought it would help her
lose weight. Her tachycardia persisted, and she was admitted to the ICU. The
next day, the problem resolved and she was discharged. The cardiolgist told
us later that she had previously undiagnosed Wolf-Parkinson-White disease,
one of the above mentioned tachyarrhythmic disorders. Even with that, she
did not suffer hypertension, cardiac arrest, or stroke.

>>> 5 The possibility of medical problems may be exacerbated by using ADHD
>>> stimulant medications improperly or in combination with other drugs.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Is that right?  Got any proof?

http://www.narconon.org/druginfo/methamphetamine_hist.html
http://www.nida.nih.gov/Infofacts/methamphetamine.html
http://www.addictionsearch.com/featuredtopic.php
http://www.dea.gov/pubs/cngrtest/ct080204.html

Want more? There's lots.

> The prescription-drug component of the amphetamine abuse problem
>> is a negligible fraction. And don't give me any bullshit about the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> *significant* *credibile* *compelling* *copious* *direct*  *reliable*
> *adequate*  Used by your gang group.

These are all perfectly useful words. Your contempt for them implies you
prefer that evidence be insubstantial, imaginary, unconvincing, soft, vague,
unreasonable, insignificant, incredible, noncompelling, scant, indirect,
unreliable, and inadequate.

>>> The Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN), which collects data from a
>>> national sample of short-term, general, non-Federal hospitals,8 provides
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> Oh, dear--now you are in big trouble.  Some on a.s.a.d. think DAWN is very
> reliable.

I never said it wasn't. I'm just saying that this article is not something
to get your panties in a twist about.
Signature


--Rich

Recommended websites:

http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles
http://www.acahf.org.au
http://www.quackwatch.org/
http://www.skeptic.com/
http://www.csicop.org/

Jeff - 26 Sep 2006 23:57 GMT
> https://dawninfo.samhsa.gov/files/TNDR09ADHDmeds.htm
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> (48%), followed by adverse reactions associated with medical use (34%),
> accidental ingestion (10%), and suicide attempts (8%).

Nonmedical use? The problem is that the patient is not taking the medication
as prescribed, not the drug itself.

>        c.. The rates of ED visits involving methylphenidate or
> amphetamine-dextroamphetamine for patients aged 12 to 17 were higher than
> the rates for patients aged 18 or older.

Gee, more kids than adults take the drug. What a surprise.

>        d.. Over two thirds (68%) of the visits involving nonmedical use of
> these two drugs also involved another substance, such as alcohol, an
> illicit drug, or pharmaceutical.

I doubt many many doctors prescribing these two drugs recommend the use of
alcohol, illicit drugs or other pharmaceuticals with the drugs.

> Recent studies have indicated that as many as 7 percent of children and 4
> percent of adults now meet the criteria for a diagnosis of
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> is still relatively low: 0.3 percent of the population aged 12 or older
> reported using such stimulants nonmedically during the past year.

0.3%? That means that in an average middle school, two students out of the
whole school used such stimulants nonmedically. WHile that is two too many,
that is probably much smaller than the numbre of students using other
illegal drugs, like cigarettes, put, marihuana or alcohol.

> However, those aged 18 to 25 had a higher rate of nonmedical use than
> those who were younger or older.7 College students, who may use these
> drugs as study aids because of their stimulant properties, fall primarily
> in this 18-to-25 age group.

> The Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN), which collects data from a national
> sample of short-term, general, non-Federal hospitals,8 provides estimates
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
> more at link
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.