Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / General / Alternative / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Digging into 19th Century Health Records

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
D. C. Sessions - 29 Jul 2006 22:39 GMT
Something in here for everyone.
NY Times, I've shortened the URL

http://tinyurl.com/g6dkm

Signature

begin signature.exe
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet?

David Wright - 30 Jul 2006 01:10 GMT
>Something in here for everyone.
>NY Times, I've shortened the URL
>
>http://tinyurl.com/g6dkm

Great stuff, dcs.  By the way, nice to have you back.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If you can't say something nice, then sit next to me."
                                -- Alice Roosevelt Longworth
Vernon - 30 Jul 2006 01:42 GMT
> Something in here for everyone.
> NY Times, I've shortened the URL
>
> http://tinyurl.com/g6dkm

Interesting.  It should already be known by just about everyone who give
opinions here.

Of course ANY news outlet pushes the edge of common reality.

Many people did live to 100 or more.

The interesting part would be to find out why.  From my family background,
both sides, in law level, grandparents, uncles aunts, great of both,
cousins, second and third of all.

The only consistency seemed to be that the ones in farming and limited
interaction with others, lived long.
Exercise?  Diet? limited exposure?  Mental attitude?
David Wright - 30 Jul 2006 20:58 GMT
>> Something in here for everyone.
>> NY Times, I've shortened the URL
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Interesting.  It should already be known by just about everyone who give
>opinions here.

And why is that?  Some of the results weren't even known to the people
who did the study.

>Of course ANY news outlet pushes the edge of common reality.
>
>Many people did live to 100 or more.

No, "many" people did not.  A few did.  And not as many, in
proportion, as today, when the over-85 age group is the fastest-
growing demographic.

>The interesting part would be to find out why.  From my family
>background, both sides, in law level, grandparents, uncles aunts,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>interaction with others, lived long.
>Exercise?  Diet? limited exposure?  Mental attitude?

Exercise and diet and limited exposure to industrial dusts would all
be relevant.

Sure, "why" is important, but first you have to find out the facts,
so you know what it is you're trying to explain.

 -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If you can't say something nice, then sit next to me."
                                -- Alice Roosevelt Longworth
D. C. Sessions - 30 Jul 2006 22:19 GMT
> Many people did live to 100 or more.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> interaction with others, lived long.
> Exercise?  Diet? limited exposure?  Mental attitude?

This much after the fact it's pretty near impossible to find out
how it was that someone a long time ago beat the odds.

There are, after all, plentiful counterexamples of people who
violated just about every one of your suggestions and ended up
living very long lives.  Alcohol?  Cigarettes?  Some of the worst
air pollution on the planet?  Constant exposure to scores of
total strangers?  Rich food?

Try the Queen of England's mother.

About all she *didn't* violate on your list was attitude -- and
the books are full of people living past the century mark with
dispositions that would make Scrooge look sunny.

Signature

begin signature.exe
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet?

Vernon - 31 Jul 2006 01:33 GMT
>> Many people did live to 100 or more.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> air pollution on the planet?  Constant exposure to scores of
> total strangers?  Rich food?

It's always easy to find exceptions.
Common DNA results help.
I forgot to mention that EVERY one that lived a long life had a drink of
some alcohol EVERY day, like clockwork.
I'm speaking of statistics here, with comon results, not exceptions.

20 or 30 out of a couple hundred where that 20 or 30 had similar living
habits.    Get it?

> Try the Queen of England's mother.
>
> About all she *didn't* violate on your list was attitude -- and
> the books are full of people living past the century mark with
> dispositions that would make Scrooge look sunny.
Vernon - 31 Jul 2006 01:35 GMT
> Try the Queen of England's mother.
>
> About all she *didn't* violate on your list was attitude -- and
> the books are full of people living past the century mark with
> dispositions that would make Scrooge look sunny.

You really should read up on the obsessions of her.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.